March 2018 - CSC-Review - lists.icann.org

[Retitled] Slide Set
by Martin Boyle March 13, 2018

March 13, 2018

Hi Bart and thanks for doing this. I’m very happy with the slide set, but just a few minor suggestions: * Slide 2: “Does the Charter enable the CSC to fulfil…?” * Slide 6: I had not realised that we’d agreed to something as stark as requiring “at least 2 meetings per year between CSC and PTI Board.” This seems to me to be over-prescriptive. * Slide 6: “Frequency of CSC meetings determined by need over time”: is it worth adding that this is an operational decision for the CSC? Do we need to specify any safety-valve (how members might be able to request a call, for example)? * Slide 7: missing bracket in “agreed procedures ( Remedial Action Procedures” * Slide 8: might it be worth adding some explanation to “Create synergies” like coordinating the scope of the reviews? * Slide 9: [not for the slides, but to try and position the schedule] does this timescale end after Panama? That’s it from me Thanks Martin From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org> On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis Sent: 11 March 2018 10:21 To: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Cc: CSC-review(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6 Thanks Bart Remedial Actin Procedures title should be Remedial Action Procedures Elaine On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org <mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org> > wrote: Donna, all, Please find included draft deck Please note you are also invited today at CSC meeting from 17.00-18.30. Most likely that will be short meeting Kind regards, BArt From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of "Austin, Donna via CSC-Review" <CSC-review(a)icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> > Reply-To: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar <mailto:Donna.Austin@team.neustar> > Date: Friday 9 March 2018 at 19:33 To: "CSC-review(a)icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> " <CSC-review(a)icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> > Subject: [CSC-Review] FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6 Bart Is it possible for you to develop a deck of the key points contained in the attached so that this can be used for meetings with the RySG and ccNSO? Thanks Donna From: Martin Boyle [mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com <mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 5:07 PM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar <mailto:Donna.Austin@team.neustar> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Thanks Donna, This all looks quite satisfactory to me. I had a couple of additional comments and minor suggestions, which I have inserted in the clean copy, attached. For the table in section 6, I note that we still have item 5 as well as item 6, which cover the same ground. Under 14 right at the end of the proposed wording section I would suggest, “… at the request of either one or more members of the PTI Board or the CSC.” The reasons are that I think in this case it is the PTI (but transferable to a new operator) and I think we are probably particularly interested in the views of the independent directors. Number 20, “… by the members constituency (ie the RySG or the ccNSO).” Although I’m not really convinced we need to specify, so the wording in red (and the text it replaces) could be dropped! I note that my comments on numbers 7 and 12 about needing to provide text (and in 18, 23 & 24 also need some response to comments. Thanks Martin From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org> > On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via CSC-Review Sent: 07 March 2018 01:01 To: CSC-review(a)icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Hi All Sorry this is taking so long. I’m not quite there yet, but if I could ask if folks could review the document up to Section 6. Proposed Changes to the CSC Charter that would be greatly appreciated. I’ve attached a redline and a clean version (the clean version stops after the section on travel support). Thanks Donna Donna Austin Neustar, Inc. / Senior Policy Manager, Registry Solutions Mobile: +1 310 890 9655 <mailto:donna.austin@team.neustar> donna.austin(a)team.neustar / Website: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.home.neustar_&d=DwM…> home.neustar Follow Neustar: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_compan…> LinkedIn / <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.twitter.com_neustar…> Twitter Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. _______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review(a)icann.org <mailto:CSC-Review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review

6 17

Re: [CSC-Review] [Ext] RE: FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6
by Bart Boswinkel March 11, 2018

March 11, 2018

Donna, I have raised it with Byron. Bart From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar> Date: Sunday 11 March 2018 at 14:53 To: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, "CSC-review(a)icann.org" <CSC-review(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [CSC-Review] FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6 Thanks Bart, this looks good to me. With regards the CSC meeting today, is it possible to arrive at 5pm and provide a 10 minute update basically to explain that we were not able to post our report for public comment and will now do so in a week or so, but there are no changes to what we’ve reported previously. From: Bart Boswinkel [mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org] Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 9:41 AM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar>; CSC-review(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6 Donna, all, Please find included draft deck Please note you are also invited today at CSC meeting from 17.00-18.30. Most likely that will be short meeting Kind regards, BArt From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "Austin, Donna via CSC-Review" <CSC-review(a)icann.org> Reply-To: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar> Date: Friday 9 March 2018 at 19:33 To: "CSC-review(a)icann.org" <CSC-review(a)icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6 Bart Is it possible for you to develop a deck of the key points contained in the attached so that this can be used for meetings with the RySG and ccNSO? Thanks Donna From: Martin Boyle [mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 5:07 PM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Thanks Donna, This all looks quite satisfactory to me. I had a couple of additional comments and minor suggestions, which I have inserted in the clean copy, attached. For the table in section 6, I note that we still have item 5 as well as item 6, which cover the same ground. Under 14 right at the end of the proposed wording section I would suggest, “… at the request of either one or more members of the PTI Board or the CSC.” The reasons are that I think in this case it is the PTI (but transferable to a new operator) and I think we are probably particularly interested in the views of the independent directors. Number 20, “… by the members constituency (ie the RySG or the ccNSO).” Although I’m not really convinced we need to specify, so the wording in red (and the text it replaces) could be dropped! I note that my comments on numbers 7 and 12 about needing to provide text (and in 18, 23 & 24 also need some response to comments. Thanks Martin From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org> On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via CSC-Review Sent: 07 March 2018 01:01 To: CSC-review(a)icann.org Subject: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Hi All Sorry this is taking so long. I’m not quite there yet, but if I could ask if folks could review the document up to Section 6. Proposed Changes to the CSC Charter that would be greatly appreciated. I’ve attached a redline and a clean version (the clean version stops after the section on travel support). Thanks Donna Donna Austin Neustar, Inc. / Senior Policy Manager, Registry Solutions Mobile: +1 310 890 9655 donna.austin(a)team.neustar / Website: home.neustar Follow Neustar: LinkedIn / Twitter Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

1 0

FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6
by Austin, Donna March 11, 2018

March 11, 2018

Bart Is it possible for you to develop a deck of the key points contained in the attached so that this can be used for meetings with the RySG and ccNSO? Thanks Donna From: Martin Boyle [mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 5:07 PM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Thanks Donna, This all looks quite satisfactory to me. I had a couple of additional comments and minor suggestions, which I have inserted in the clean copy, attached. For the table in section 6, I note that we still have item 5 as well as item 6, which cover the same ground. Under 14 right at the end of the proposed wording section I would suggest, "... at the request of either one or more members of the PTI Board or the CSC." The reasons are that I think in this case it is the PTI (but transferable to a new operator) and I think we are probably particularly interested in the views of the independent directors. Number 20, "... by the members constituency (ie the RySG or the ccNSO)." Although I'm not really convinced we need to specify, so the wording in red (and the text it replaces) could be dropped! I note that my comments on numbers 7 and 12 about needing to provide text (and in 18, 23 & 24 also need some response to comments. Thanks Martin From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via CSC-Review Sent: 07 March 2018 01:01 To: CSC-review(a)icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Hi All Sorry this is taking so long. I'm not quite there yet, but if I could ask if folks could review the document up to Section 6. Proposed Changes to the CSC Charter that would be greatly appreciated. I've attached a redline and a clean version (the clean version stops after the section on travel support). Thanks Donna Donna Austin Neustar, Inc. / Senior Policy Manager, Registry Solutions Mobile: +1 310 890 9655 donna.austin(a)team.neustar<mailto:donna.austin@team.neustar> / Website: home.neustar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.home.neustar_&d=DwM…> Follow Neustar: LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_compan…> / Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.twitter.com_neustar…> Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

3 8

Status of the Remedial Action Plan
by Austin, Donna March 8, 2018

March 8, 2018

Hi Elaine, all Can you confirm the status of the RAP please? Has it been agreed by both PTI and the CSC? If not, what is the anticipated timing—it’s important to understand for the Charter review. Also, can you confirm that the intention is to have the RAP as a standalone document to be referenced in the Charter, but not to form part of the Charter> Thanks Donna From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 6:51 PM To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes(a)icann.org> Cc: CSC-review(a)icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC HI, Please find attached the most recent draft of the RAPs. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes(a)icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>> wrote: Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes(a)icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> | Cell +1 202 679 5185<tel:(202)%20679-5185> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 [/Users/maria.otanes/Library/Containers/com.microsoft.Outlook/Data/Library/Caches/Signatures/signature_1187332237] _______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review(a)icann.org<mailto:CSC-Review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_l…>

2 1

CSC Wrap Up Session
by Maria Otanes March 8, 2018

March 8, 2018

https://61.schedule.icann.org/meetings/647598 https://participate.icann.org/sju61-209a

1 0

CSC Public Session
by Maria Otanes March 8, 2018

March 8, 2018

https://61.schedule.icann.org/meetings/647598 https://participate.icann.org/sju61-209a

1 0

CSC Meeting Agenda, ICANN61 Public Session
by Maria Otanes March 8, 2018

March 8, 2018

Dear CSC and CSC Review Team, Please find the agenda for Sunday’s CSC Public Session attached. As noted in the agenda, the CSC Review Team will provide an update/presentation towards the end of the public session. Immediately following the public session is the CSC Wrap Up Session (same room – 209A). You may find the CSC related sessions on this Wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/aCW8B Also attached: RAP; CSC Chair and Vice Chair Election Procedure I will send calendar invites for the CSC Public Session and CSC Wrap Up Session. Safe travels and see you in Puerto Rico! All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes(a)icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5

1 0

Re: [CSC-Review] [EXTERNAL] RE: PLS READ: Version 6
by Austin, Donna March 7, 2018

March 7, 2018

Thanks Martin, I'll work from your version and will look to address the other concerns you've raised. All, I think it is unrealistic (well near impossible) at this point to try to get an Initial Report posted before San Juan. I don't think there's any harm in delaying this until after San Juan, we can still move forward with consultations regardless. I'd also prefer to have the SLA changes and the RAP out of the way before we post as well. Donna From: Martin Boyle [mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 1:07 PM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin(a)team.neustar> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Thanks Donna, This all looks quite satisfactory to me. I had a couple of additional comments and minor suggestions, which I have inserted in the clean copy, attached. For the table in section 6, I note that we still have item 5 as well as item 6, which cover the same ground. Under 14 right at the end of the proposed wording section I would suggest, "... at the request of either one or more members of the PTI Board or the CSC." The reasons are that I think in this case it is the PTI (but transferable to a new operator) and I think we are probably particularly interested in the views of the independent directors. Number 20, "... by the members constituency (ie the RySG or the ccNSO)." Although I'm not really convinced we need to specify, so the wording in red (and the text it replaces) could be dropped! I note that my comments on numbers 7 and 12 about needing to provide text (and in 18, 23 & 24 also need some response to comments. Thanks Martin From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via CSC-Review Sent: 07 March 2018 01:01 To: CSC-review(a)icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] PLS READ: Version 6 Hi All Sorry this is taking so long. I'm not quite there yet, but if I could ask if folks could review the document up to Section 6. Proposed Changes to the CSC Charter that would be greatly appreciated. I've attached a redline and a clean version (the clean version stops after the section on travel support). Thanks Donna Donna Austin Neustar, Inc. / Senior Policy Manager, Registry Solutions Mobile: +1 310 890 9655 donna.austin(a)team.neustar<mailto:donna.austin@team.neustar> / Website: home.neustar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.home.neustar_&d=DwM…> Follow Neustar: LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_compan…> / Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.twitter.com_neustar…> Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

1 0

PLS READ: Version 6
by Austin, Donna March 7, 2018

March 7, 2018

Hi All Sorry this is taking so long. I'm not quite there yet, but if I could ask if folks could review the document up to Section 6. Proposed Changes to the CSC Charter that would be greatly appreciated. I've attached a redline and a clean version (the clean version stops after the section on travel support). Thanks Donna Donna Austin Neustar, Inc. / Senior Policy Manager, Registry Solutions Mobile: +1 310 890 9655 donna.austin(a)team.neustar<mailto:donna.austin@team.neustar> / Website: home.neustar<http://www.home.neustar/> Follow Neustar: LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> / Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar> Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

1 0

Re: [CSC-Review] [ICANN-CSC] Remedial Action Procedures - For Review and Approval
by Naela Sarras March 6, 2018

March 6, 2018

Dear Colleagues, Thank you for sharing the final draft proposed Remedial Action Procedures. We look forward to the meeting on Sunday when the entire CSC will consider the RAPs and address any questions. We wanted to outline what we see as the next steps in approving the document. Our next step is to share the final draft RAP document with both the PTI and ICANN Boards today for their information. In our message to the boards we’ll add the caveat that the CSC as a whole will be reviewing it on Sunday and that there could be additional changes made to the draft. On Sunday if the CSC deems that it is ready to approve the document, we’ll use that as a trigger to formally share the CSC approved RAPs with the PTI and ICANN Boards as a final notice. Kim Davies will later approve the RAPs on behalf of PTI, once both the PTI Board and the ICANN Board have been given the opportunity to review the proposed procedures and provide any feedback, if needed. Let me take this opportunity to thank the RAP WG on their work to see the RAPs through. Safe travels and see you in Puerto Rico. Best regards, Naela On 3/5/18, 10:11 AM, "ICANN-CSC on behalf of Allan MacGillivray" <icann-csc-bounces(a)icann.org on behalf of allan.macgillivray(a)cira.ca> wrote: CSC members and liaisons – please find attached a copy of the proposed Remedial Action Procedures as approved by the RAPs Working Group. As noted during the last CSC meeting, it is proposed that these be approved at the CSC’s meeting in San Juan this Sunday, March 11. I will present a summary of the RAPs at the meeting, but should you have any specific questions, I would be pleased to address these on the list this week. Regards Allan

1 0