- Koreangp - lists.icann.org

agenda of CJK LGR coordination meeting
by HiroHOTTA Sept. 28, 2016

Sept. 28, 2016

Dear all, Please find below the agenda we've confirmed so far. Dear TWNIC folks, I'd appreciate it if you could print out the agenda and distributed on Thursday. Hiro ================ agenda =================== LGR CJK Coordination Committee ==== <date/time> Day1 Thursday, 29 September, 2016 Day2 Friday, 30 September, 2016 <venue> TWNIC Office 4F-2, No. 9, Roosevelt Rd., Sec. 2, Taipei 100, Taiwan (in Chinese) 臺北市羅斯福路二段9號4樓之2 nearest station Guting (metro Green line and Yellow line intersection) (in Chinese) 古亭 <main topics> Topic1 (variant definition coordination) Topic2 (letter to ICANN requesting labels with any combination of characters to be allocatable) <participants> CGP(CN) ? ? CGP(TW) Kenny Huang Neiwen Shu Ai Chin Lu Prof. Shianshiong Tseng engineer A engineer B JGP(JP) Hiro Hotta Yoshiro Yoneya Yuri Takamatsu KGP(KR) KIM, K. SHIN S. CHO S. LEE D. JEON E. PARK M; ICANN Sarmad Hussain (remote) <agenda> Day1[29-Sept] {chaired by Hiro} 09:00-09:05 ( 5m) roll call 09:05-09:10 ( 5m) confirmation of meeting facilitator and note taker 09:10-09:20 (10m) confirmation of meeting agenda 09:20-09:50 (30m) general update by each GP CGP update (10m) JGP update (10m) KGP update (10m) 09:50-10:10 (20m) Q&A on general updates 10:10-10:30 (20m) break 10:30-12:00 (90m) discussion on Topic1 CGP detailed update (20m) KGP deta-ked update (20m) discussion (40m) goal setting of this meeting for Topic1 (10m) 12:00-13:30 (90m) lunch break {chaired by Kenny} 13:30-15:00 (90m) discussions on Topic1 (continued) 15:00-15:20 (20m) break 15:20-16:50 (90m) discussions on Topic1 (continued) 16:50-17:15 (25m) Day 1 wrap up Day1 summary Day2 schedule confirmation Day2[30-Sept] {chaired by Hiro} 09:00-09:05 ( 5m) roll call 09:05-09:30 (25m) review of Day1 & goal (re)setting of Topic1 {chaired by Kenny} 09:30-10:50 (80m) discussions on Topic1 (continued) 10:50-11:10 (20m) Topic1 summary and future planning 11:10-11:30 (20m) break {chaired by Hiro} 11:30-12:00 (30m) introduction to Topic2 goal setting of this meeting for Topic2 (10m) 12:00-13:30 (90m) lunch break 13:30-15:00 (90m) Topic2 discussion (90m) 15:00-15:20 (20m) break 15:20-16:40 (80m) discussion on Topic2 (continued) 16:40-16:50 (10m) Topic1 summary and future planning 16:50-17:10 (20m) wrap up for confirmation of Day1&2 Topic1 summary and future plan Topic2 summary and future plan whole plan of LGR proposal to ICANN Hyderabad meeting preparation 17:10-17:30 (20m) AOB ============================== <how to participate remotely> Adobe Connect ? IDN Meeting room: How to connect: Link to Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/idn/ *Upon logging into Adobe Connect, a pop up window will provide you the option to Dial Out to your Phone. Enter your Phone Number* (Remember to change the Country Code if needed). After joining the call, as a courtesy to others and the presenters, please MUTE your phone. This can be done by selecting *6 on your keypad. To UNMUTE select *6 again. If you are Unable to log into Adobe Connect and can only join via phone: https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=1064158692&num=1-719-4 57-1414 Participant Passcode: 1064158692 ====

1 1

KR_Hg_Hj_rep_vg_list_v0.5_20160928.xlsx
by KIM Kyongsok Sept. 27, 2016

Sept. 27, 2016

Dear all: Enclosed you will find K-LGR v0.5 (2016.09.28.) Details: KR's Hanja repertoire and list of variant groups (v0.5, 2016.09.28.) - A repertoire of 4,819 Hanja characters. - The repertoire includes 101 variant characters (50 variant groups). - file name: klgp200_51d_KR_Hg_Hj_rep_vg_list_v0.5_20160928.xlsx Thanks. Rgds, -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

1 0

CJK Coordination Meeting in Taipei
by Kenny Huang, Ph.D. Sept. 20, 2016

Sept. 20, 2016

Dear All, CJK Coordination Meeting will be held in Taipei from 29 to 30 September. Please find below the remote participation information if you plan to participate online via Adobe Connect. Best Regards Kenny Huang Co-Chair, CGP *Adobe Connect – IDN Meeting room:* How to connect: *Link to Adobe Connect**:* *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/idn/* <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/idn/> *Upon logging into Adobe Connect, a pop up window will provide you the option to *Dial Out* to your Phone. Enter your Phone Number* (Remember to change the Country Code if needed). After joining the call, as a courtesy to others and the presenters, please MUTE your phone. This can be done by selecting *6 on your keypad. To UNMUTE select *6 again. *If you are Unable to log into Adobe Connect and can only join via phone:* *https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=1064158692&num=1-719-457-1414* <https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=1064158692&num=1-719-…> Participant Passcode: *1064158692*

1 0

agenda of CJK LGR coordination meeting
by HiroHOTTA Sept. 19, 2016

Sept. 19, 2016

Dear all, On behalf of CGP/JGP/KGP chairs, let me circulate an agenda of coming CJK LGR coordination meeting held in Taipei on Sept.29-30. Remote participation is planned to be available. Please wait for further announcement. Hiro ===== Day1[29-Sept] <chaired by Hiro> 09:00-09:05 ( 5m) roll call 09:05-09:10 ( 5m) confirmation of meeting facilitator and note taker 09:10-09:20 (10m) confirmation of meeting agenda 09:20-09:50 (30m) general update by each GP CGP update (10m) JGP update (10m) KGP update (10m) 09:50-10:10 (20m) Q&A on general updates 10:10-10:30 (20m) break 10:30-12:00 (90m) discussion on Topic1 CGP detailed update (20m) KGP deta-ked update (20m) discussion (40m) goal setting of this meeting for Topic1 (10m) 12:00-13:30 (90m) lunch break <chaired by Kenny> 13:30-15:00 (90m) discussions on Topic1 (continued) 15:00-15:20 (20m) break 15:20-16:50 (90m) discussions on Topic1 (continued) 16:50-17:15 (25m) Day 1 wrap up Day1 summary Day2 schedule confirmation Day2[30-Sept] <chaired by Hiro> 09:00-09:05 ( 5m) roll call 09:05-09:30 (25m) review of Day1 & goal (re)setting of Topic1 <chaired by Kenny> 09:30-10:50 (80m) discussions on Topic1 (continued) 10:50-11:10 (20m) Topic1 summary and future planning 11:10-11:30 (20m) break <chaired by Hiro> 11:30-12:00 (30m) introduction to Topic2 goal setting of this meeting for Topic2 (10m) 12:00-13:30 (90m) lunch break 13:30-15:00 (90m) Topic2 discussion (90m) 15:00-15:20 (20m) break 15:20-16:40 (80m) discussion on Topic2 (continued) 16:40-16:50 (10m) Topic1 summary and future planning 16:50-17:10 (20m) wrap up for confirmation of Day1&2 Topic1 summary and future plan Topic2 summary and future plan whole plan of LGR proposal to ICANN 17:10-17:30 (20m) AOB ==============================

1 0

KGP's draft LGR (klgp220_22c_K_LGR_v0.4_20160820.xml)
by KIM Kyongsok Sept. 16, 2016

Sept. 16, 2016

Dear Mr. Sarmad and CJK GPs members: Enclosed you will find KGP's draft LGR in XML. Some relevant information is summarized below: ---- <version comment="based on K-LGR v0.4, 2016-03-18, klgp200_4c"> 0.4 </version> <date>2016-08-20</date> <description>This XML file was prepared on 2016-08-20 by KIM, Kyongsok based on K-LGR v0.4 (2016-03-18, klgp200_4c). ---- Any comments will be welcome. Thanks in advance. KIM, K. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain(a)icann.org> wrote: > Dear Prof. Kim, > > > > Thank you for your response. We will schedule this in our work plan. > > > > Kindly note that we had also requested the KGP for an initial draft of the > LGR Proposal document. Interim drafts, even if incomplete, can be shared > with the integration panel for feedback. > > > > Based on experience with other generation panels, we believe that such > iterative and collaborative exercise helps the LGR proposal development. > Such drafts do not need to present the final solution. > > > > Would it be possible for KGP to share a first draft of their LGR proposal > for such informal review and feedback by the Integration Panel earlier than > the end of this year? > > > > Further, would it be useful to organize another coordination meeting between > KGP and CGP in July? > > > > Regards, > Sarmad -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 1

[lgr] Georgian script GP finalizes root zone LGR proposal
by Sarmad Hussain Sept. 16, 2016

Sept. 16, 2016

Dear All, We are pleased to share that Georgian script GP has finalized their root zone LGR proposal. The proposal is now available for public comment <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/georgian-lgr-2016-09-15-en> (see news below). Please visit https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/lgr-proposals-2015-12-01-en for the list of all the completed LGR proposals. Regards, Sarmad Daily Digest of ICANN.org News & Announcements _____ Proposal for Georgian Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) <http://icann.org/news/announcement-2016-09-15-en> Open Date: 15 September 2016 Close Date: 28 October 2016 Originating Organization: Global Domains Division Categories/Tags: Top-Level Domains Brief Overview: The Georgian script community has formed the Georgian script Generation Panel (GP), which in turn has developed a Proposal for the Georgian Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (Proposal and Proposal Documentation). As per the LGR Procedure, this proposal... Read more <http://icann.org/news/announcement-2016-09-15-en> _____ BROWSE ALL NEWS <http://icann.org/news> _______________________________________________ lgr mailing list lgr(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lgr

2 1

[lgr] FW: [Lager] RFC 7940 on Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML
by Sarmad Hussain Aug. 10, 2016

Aug. 10, 2016

Dear All, Kindly note that the LGR specification "Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML" is now available as a standards track RFC 7940. Regards, Sarmad -----Original Message----- From: Lager [mailto:lager-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:06 PM To: ietf-announce(a)ietf.org; rfc-dist(a)rfc-editor.org Cc: drafts-update-ref(a)iana.org; lager(a)ietf.org; rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org Subject: [Lager] RFC 7940 on Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7940 Title: Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML Author: K. Davies, A. Freytag Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: August 2016 Mailbox: kim.davies(a)icann.org, asmus(a)unicode.org Pages: 82 Characters: 170416 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lager-specification-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7940 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7940 This document describes a method of representing rules for validating identifier labels and alternate representations of those labels using Extensible Markup Language (XML). These policies, known as "Label Generation Rulesets" (LGRs), are used for the implementation of Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), for example. The rulesets are used to implement and share that aspect of policy defining which labels and Unicode code points are permitted for registrations, which alternative code points are considered variants, and what actions may be performed on labels containing those variants. This document is a product of the Label Generation Rules Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ Lager mailing list Lager(a)ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager _______________________________________________ lgr mailing list lgr(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lgr

1 0

56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3
by KIM Kyongsok Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Dear everybody: Enclosed you will find 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3. Thanks. -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 7

comments (4) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.20.), Q7
by KIM Kyongsok July 20, 2016

July 20, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang Wei: Thanks for your quick response. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:07 AM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: > Dear Prof. Kim > > Thanks for your review which help find out some editorial errors. > > I noticed that you compared the current table with 2015.04.30, > which was already replaced by CGP LGR 20160612 > before the ICANN Helsinki meeting. > The rational of the repertoire extension was explained > in the attached WORD document. I fully understand your repertoire extension. I checked each of CGP LGR 20160612, CGP LGR 20160718, and CGP LGR 20160720 against LGR 20150430. > To your question Q1, the sequencing of "朦(6726)䑃(4443)" > has been changed to "䑃(4443)朦(6726)" > To your question Q3, MSS --> CCC, yes, > it is an editorial mistake that replace the "CCC" by "MSS" automatically. > To your question Q4, yes, the parentheses has been changed into ASCII format in the attached new version. RE: Q1, Q3, and Q4: Great. Thanks. > To your question Q2, your number is correct. Great. Thanks. I hope that correct numbers of characters and variant groups will be incorporated into the "revised" CGP Proposal Draft 20160613.docx later. > To your question Q5, those characters went through > review process last year and were set as independent chars. I see. I wll summarize my understanding below: 1) The two var. groups dropped. 1a) formerly vg (5CAB 岫, 5CC0 峀) --> Now, 2 independent chars. 諝 8ADD 1b) formerly vg of size 3: (O 5999 妙, X 7385 玅, O 7AD7 竗) --> Now, split into ONE indep. char. 竗(7AD7) and ONE var. group of size 2 composed of (妙 5999, 玅 7385). 2) Three new var. groups created (added) in C-LGR 2016.06.12.) 2a) (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫): a new vg of size 2 2b) (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆): a new vg. of size 2 2c) formerly, ONE independent char 㥠(3960) and one var. group of size 2 composed of ( 諝 8ADD, 谞 8C1E) --> Now, a new vg of size 3 (3960 㥠, 8ADD 諝, X 8C1E 谞). Plz correct me if I am wrong. > After Helsinki meeting, the IP reminds that㩜(3A5C) and墵(58B5) are out of MSR scope, so I also take them away for the time being. I see. Thanks. I will label it Q6 (although it is not my question..) Q7. TWO minor typos on page 5 of file <CGP Proposal Draft 20160613.docx>. 1) "한자 Hanjia" --> "한자 Hanja" (without "i") 2) and Hanjia are both therefore covered by CGP. --> and Hanja are both therefore covered by CGP. (without "i") Thanks again. Rgds, KIM, K. > > Please refer the attached new version of repertoire and variants. > > > Regards > WANG Wei > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2016年7月19日 15:47 > 收件人: 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> > 抄送: chinesegp(a)icann.org; JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> > 主题: Re: comments (3) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.18.), Q4 and Q5. > > Dear Mr. Wang Wei: > > I am making progress ^-^ and noticed some more errors/changes. > > > ================================================================ > Q3 (My previous message RE: MSS --> CCC) > > ================================================================= > > Q4. This seems minor too. I notices that CJK compatibility paren was used instead of regular ASCII paren. There were 2 occurrences in one line. > > I would like to suggest that > "）" (CJK compatibility paren) --> ")" (ASCII paren). > [ 2 occurrences in one line] > > 83B5 莵菟(83DF）菟(83DF）莵(83B5)菟(83DF) > --> > 83B5 莵菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF) > > > ================================================================= > Q5: I compared variant groups in C-LGR (2015.04.30.) and vg in C-LGR > (2016.07.18.) and > noticed some two variant groups (vg) were removed and three new vg are added. > > I would like to know whether these removals are mistakes or not and > whether additions are really intended. > > 1) [removal] existed in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now missing in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) > > 1a) > < 2 2 (O 5CAB 岫) (O 5CC0 峀): vg > > ===> > >> 5CAB 岫岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB): indep. char. >> 5CC0 峀峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0): indep. char. > > 1b) > < 3 2 (O 5999 妙) (X 7385 玅) (O 7AD7 竗): vg of size 3 (3 variants) > > ===> > >> 5999 妙妙(5999) 妙(5999) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 >> 7385 玅妙(5999) 玅(7385) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 >> 7AD7 竗竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) : indep. char. > > 2) [addition] did NOT exist in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now added to C-LGR > (2016.07.18.) > > 2a) > > < 7200 爀爀(7200) 爀(7200) : indep. char. > < 8D6B 赫赫(8D6B) 赫(8D6B) : indep. char. > > ===> > >> 2 2 (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫) : a new vg of size 2 > > 2b) > > < 757A 畺畺(757A) 畺(757A) : indep. char. > < 7586 疆疆(7586) 疆(7586) : indep. charf. > > ===> > >> 2 2 (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆) : a new vg. of size 2 > > 2C) > < 3960 㥠㥠(3960) 㥠(3960) : indep. char. > < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 > < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 > > ===> > >> 3 2 (O 3960 㥠) (O 8ADD 諝) (X 8C1E 谞) : a new vg of size 3 > > * * * > > Thanks in advance. > > KIM, K. > > ------------------------------- > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Mr. Wang Wei: >> >> I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.) >> >> In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC. >> One sample line is shown below: >> >> 5MSS 峌峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) >> --> >> 5CCC 峌峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> KIM, K. >> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: >>> Dear Prof. Kim >>> >>> I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL >>> I have re-edited them in the attached document. >>> >>> Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR. >>> >>> So please refer the latest version as attached. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> WANG Wei >>> >>> >>> -----邮件原件----- >>> 发件人: chinesegp-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] >>> 代表 KIM Kyongsok >>> 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 >>> 收件人: chinesegp(a)icann.org >>> 抄送: JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok >>> <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> >>> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.) >>> >>> Dear Mr. Wang: >>> >>> I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12. >>> >>> I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below. >>> >>> ==================================================== >>> Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors: >>> >>> --- 1 >>> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >>> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >>> >>> --- 2 >>> cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >>> cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >>> >>> --- 3 >>> cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) >>> cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor) >>> >>> --- 4 >>> cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) >>> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >>> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >>> >>> --- 5 >>> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >>> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >>> >>> --- 6 >>> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) >>> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043) >>> >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it. >>> >>>> Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant >>>> character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, >>>> 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, >>>> 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants. >>> >>> - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). >>> >>> - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant >>> Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers >>> (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): >>> >>> a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 >>> b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 >>> >>> Plz correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Rgds, >>> >>> -- >>> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ChineseGP mailing list >>> ChineseGP(a)icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp >> >> >> >> -- >> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok > > > > -- > 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

1 0

Re: [Koreangp] comments (3) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.18.), Q4 and Q5.
by KIM Kyongsok July 19, 2016

July 19, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang Wei: I am making progress ^-^ and noticed some more errors/changes. ================================================================ Q3 (My previous message RE: MSS --> CCC) ================================================================= Q4. This seems minor too. I notices that CJK compatibility paren was used instead of regular ASCII paren. There were 2 occurrences in one line. I would like to suggest that "）" (CJK compatibility paren) --> ")" (ASCII paren). [ 2 occurrences in one line] 83B5 莵菟(83DF）菟(83DF）莵(83B5)菟(83DF) --> 83B5 莵菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF) ================================================================= Q5: I compared variant groups in C-LGR (2015.04.30.) and vg in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) and noticed some two variant groups (vg) were removed and three new vg are added. I would like to know whether these removals are mistakes or not and whether additions are really intended. 1) [removal] existed in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now missing in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) 1a) < 2 2 (O 5CAB 岫) (O 5CC0 峀): vg ===> > 5CAB 岫岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB): indep. char. > 5CC0 峀峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0): indep. char. 1b) < 3 2 (O 5999 妙) (X 7385 玅) (O 7AD7 竗): vg of size 3 (3 variants) ===> > 5999 妙妙(5999) 妙(5999) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 > 7385 玅妙(5999) 玅(7385) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 > 7AD7 竗竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) : indep. char. 2) [addition] did NOT exist in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now added to C-LGR (2016.07.18.) 2a) < 7200 爀爀(7200) 爀(7200) : indep. char. < 8D6B 赫赫(8D6B) 赫(8D6B) : indep. char. ===> > 2 2 (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫) : a new vg of size 2 2b) < 757A 畺畺(757A) 畺(757A) : indep. char. < 7586 疆疆(7586) 疆(7586) : indep. charf. ===> > 2 2 (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆) : a new vg. of size 2 2C) < 3960 㥠㥠(3960) 㥠(3960) : indep. char. < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 ===> > 3 2 (O 3960 㥠) (O 8ADD 諝) (X 8C1E 谞) : a new vg of size 3 * * * Thanks in advance. KIM, K. ------------------------------- On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Wang Wei: > > I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.) > > In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC. > One sample line is shown below: > > 5MSS 峌峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) > --> > 5CCC 峌峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) > > Thanks in advance. > > KIM, K. > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: >> Dear Prof. Kim >> >> I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL >> I have re-edited them in the attached document. >> >> Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR. >> >> So please refer the latest version as attached. >> >> >> >> Regards >> WANG Wei >> >> >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: chinesegp-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok >> 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 >> 收件人: chinesegp(a)icann.org >> 抄送: JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> >> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.) >> >> Dear Mr. Wang: >> >> I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12. >> >> I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below. >> >> ==================================================== >> Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors: >> >> --- 1 >> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >> >> --- 2 >> cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >> cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >> >> --- 3 >> cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) >> cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor) >> >> --- 4 >> cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) >> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >> >> --- 5 >> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >> >> --- 6 >> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) >> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043) >> >> >> ====================================================== >> Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it. >> >>> Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant >>> character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, >>> 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, >>> 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants. >> >> - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). >> >> - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant >> Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers >> (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): >> >> a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 >> b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 >> >> Plz correct me if I am wrong. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Rgds, >> >> -- >> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok >> _______________________________________________ >> ChineseGP mailing list >> ChineseGP(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp > > > > -- > 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 1