March 2011 - Rt4-whois - lists.icann.org

WHOIS Policy Review Team - public comment
by Emily Taylor March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Dear David In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I would like to inform you on behalf of the WHOIS policy Review Team that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. In addition to the public comment process, the WHOIS Policy Review Team will also hold an interaction with the community session on Wednesday, 16 March at 11:00 AM in the Elizabethan A-C room. The WHOIS Policy Review Team hopes your constituency will actively submit comments and thoughts to this process as their feedback will be most helpful in the completion of their exercise. I hope you are well, and am looking forward to seeing you again next week, during our scheduled meeting with the Registries constituency at 14:30 on Tuesday March 15. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

2 1

WHOIS Review Team, announcement of call for public comment
by Emily Taylor March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Dear Mason In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I would like to inform you on behalf of the WHOIS policy Review Team that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. In addition to the public comment process, the WHOIS Policy Review Team will also hold an interaction with the community session on Wednesday, 16 March at 11:00 AM in the Elizabethan A-C room. The WHOIS Policy Review Team hopes that the Registrar constituency will actively submit comments and thoughts to this process as their feedback will be most helpful in the completion of our exercise. I hope you are well, and am looking forward to seeing you again next week, during our scheduled meeting with the Registrars constituency at 10:00 on Tuesday March 15. Kind regards Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

1 0

draft ppt for your consideration
by Alice Jansen March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Hi Emily, Hi Kathy, I have drafted the attached powerpoint for your consideration. Please provide your editing requirements. As the wording and structure of definitions are crucial to fully comprehend the RT's reasoning, I have chosen not to "trim" the statements so as avoid potential misinterpretations. Looking forward to your feedback, Thanks, Best regards Alice

2 1

San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker?
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

3 7

WHOIS Review Team, call for public comment
by Emily Taylor March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Hi Patrik The WHOIS review team is looking forward to our session with SSAC on Tuesday 15 March at 9.30 am in Tower Salon A. I wanted to make members of the SSAC aware that we have launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm, which will be open for 45 days, and will be holding a public meeting on 16 March at 11am in Elizabethan A-C. I hope that the call for public comment will give members of the SSAC a feel for how we are approaching our task, and provide a structure for our conversation with you on 15 March. I hope that you will encourage your members to contribute to the call for public comments, as the process will benefit from a range of perspectives from stakeholders. We are looking forward to our interaction with SSAC at ICANN San Francisco and over the coming months. Kind regards Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

2 1

Announcement of Public comment
by Emily Taylor March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Hi Alice As you will see, I have written to the GAC, SSAC and ccNSO to inform them of our public comment. Heather had asked me to keep her informed (although I don't think we've been able to set up a session with the GAC this time, correct?), and we're meeting with SSAC and ccNSO. Please would you let me know who I should write to for the Registrars and Registries. Please would you also, on the team's behalf, write to the chairs of other ICANN constituencies, to draw their attention to the public comment and our public meeting, and encourage their members to contribute. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

2 1

Re: [Rt4-whois] Formal request for agenda space, SF
by Emily Taylor March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Dear Gabi Thank you for this message. You now have the copy of the public comment. A summary of our presentation would be: The WHOIS Review Team has been set up under the Affirmation of Commitments to "assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust". The Review Team has drafted a scope of work, roadmap, outreach plan, action plan and has done some early work on defining key terms. A call for public comment was launched on 4 March and a public session has been scheduled for Wednesday 16 March 2011 at 11am-12 noon in the Elizabethan A-C meeting room. The presentation will give an overview of the Team's work to date, issues arising from the public comment, and explore ways in which the ccNSO may be able to contribute to the Review Team's work, for example through the sharing of experiences and good practices relating to ccTLD WHOIS services. Thanks, Emily >> On 4 Mar 2011, at 12:39, Gabriella Schittek wrote: >> >>> Hi Emily, >>> >>> Just to remind you that I need a short summary of your presentation. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Gabi >>> >>> ------ Forwarded Message >>> From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/gabriella.schittek@icann.org> > >>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:00:29 -0800 >>> To: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > >>> Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF >>> >>> Emily, >>> >>> I would need a short summary of your presentation (2-3 lines would do!) – we are posting summaries of all presentations prior to the meeting, so that people can prepare (see http://www.ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/presentations.htm) >>> >>> Also, is there any document that we could post on our agenda page which is relevant for the subject? >>> >>> It would be great if I could have this as soon as possible. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Gabi >>> >>> >>> On 2/22/11 3:42 PM, "Alice Jansen" <alice.jansen(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/alice.jansen@icann.org> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Gabi, >>>> >>>> Thanks a million – I have added you to our schedule https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting. >>>> >>>> Emily, Kathy, - my assumption is that this works for you. If not, please let me know. >>>> >>>> Very best regards >>>> >>>> Alice >>>> >>>> From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/gabriella.schittek@icann.org> > >>>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:21:19 -0800 >>>> To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/alice.jansen@icann.org> >, Emily Taylor <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > >>>> Cc: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman(a)pir.org <x-msg://141/kKleiman@pir.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF >>>> >>>> Hello Emily & Alice, >>>> >>>> The only possibility to change the session was to schedule it at 12.40 – 13.00. I hope this is more suitable. The only risk is that the prior session might overrun! >>>> >>>> Gabi >>>> >>>> On 2/22/11 11:22 AM, "Alice Jansen" <alice.jansen(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/alice.jansen@icann.org> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Gabi, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for trying to squeeze us in your schedule – hopefully it will work out :-). >>>>> Emily is on vacation this week, which means very limited access to emails. Please do not hesitate to contact me, ccing Kathy – our Vice-Chair –, if you have questions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks so much! >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards >>>>> >>>>> Alice >>>>> >>>>> From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/gabriella.schittek@icann.org> > >>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:39:12 -0800 >>>>> To: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > >>>>> Cc: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman(a)pir.org <x-msg://141/kKleiman@pir.org> >, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen(a)icann.org <x-msg://141/alice.jansen@icann.org> > >>>>> Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF >>>>> >>>>> Hello Emily, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for pointing this out - I’ll see what I can do about this! I’ll let you know! >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gabi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/19/11 11:52 AM, "Emily Taylor" <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Gabi >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much for squeezing us in. Is there a possibility that we could have our 20 minute slot at any other time? Because as luck would have it, that slot exactly coincides with our "Community Interaction". >>>>>> >>>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Emily >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18 Feb 2011, at 08:01, Gabriella Schittek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Emily, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The ccNSO draft agenda has now been published http://ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/agenda.htm. I could squeeze you in, but only for 20 minutes, Wednesday 16 March, 11.00 – 11.20. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hope this is OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gabi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/9/11 7:02 PM, "Emily Taylor" <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Chris, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Much appreciated. Isn't it 5 am your time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> E >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9 Feb 2011, at 17:56, Chris Disspain wrote: >>>>>>>> > Thanks Emily. > > We are working on fitting you into the agenda. > > Cheers, > > Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer > .au Domain Administration Ltd > T: 1300 732 929 <tel:1300%20732%20929> | F: 03 8341 4112 <tel:03%208341%204112> > E: ceo(a)auda.org.au <x-msg://141/ceo@auda.org.au> <x-msg://47/ceo@auda.org.au <x-msg://47/ceo@auda.org.au> > <mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> | W:www.auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au> <http://www.auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> > <http://www.auda.org.au/> > > auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator > > > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2011 04:50 > To: Chris Disspain > Cc: Gabriella Schittek > Subject: Formal request for agenda space, SF > > Dear Chris and Gabi, > > I have pleasure in sending a formal request on behalf of the WHOIS Review Team, as Chair and ccNSO representative, for some time on the ccNSO meeting agenda. I understand that your agenda planning process is already far advanced, but would be most grateful if you could find us a few minutes. > > As you may know, the WHOIS Policy Review Team mandated by the Affirmation of Commitments began its enterprise in October 2010. The scope of work and roadmap of the WHOIS RT as well as its activities may be found on the community wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/WHOIS+Policy+Review+Team. > The Team partially composed of SO/AC representatives will hold a second public face-to-face meeting in San Francisco on Sunday, 13 March and invite the ICANN community to interact with them on Wednesday, 16 March starting at 11:00 AM ending at noon. > In addition to this schedule, the RT Members unanimously expressed the wish to meet with ICANN's respective SO/ACs not only to discuss the task they have entrusted with but also to collect input from constituents. As your feedback and comments are essential in this exercise, it would be a great honor if the WHOIS Policy Review Team could please join your session in San Francisco to exchange views. Please advise whether you would be willing to dedicate an agenda item to the WHOIS Policy RT. > > Many thanks in advance for your guidance, > > Best regards, > > > Emily Taylor > Chair, > WHOIS Review Team > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > <mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> > <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5857 (20110208) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com <http://www.eset.com/> <http://www.eset.com/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >>>>>>>> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >>>>>>>> emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> > <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >>>>>> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >>>>>> emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk <x-msg://141/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------ End of Forwarded Message >> >> >> >> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >> emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> >> >> >> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

2 1

WHOIS Review Team - call for public comment
by Emily Taylor March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Hi Heather I hope you are well. In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I wanted to inform GAC members that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days, and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. I hope that GAC members will actively contribute their comments and thoughts to this process. Kind regards Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] Call for public comment
by Alice Jansen March 6, 2011

March 6, 2011

Many thanks Emily. I am unsure what happened there and apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. I will send the attached document to web admin right away and request a prompt update. Thanks for your patience, Best Alice Alice Jansen - ICANN Sent via Blackberry ________________________________ From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk> To: Alice Jansen Cc: RT4 WHOIS <rt4-whois(a)icann.org> Sent: Sat Mar 05 01:36:30 2011 Subject: Call for public comment Hi Alice Sarmad spotted an anomaly between the published version and the one that we asked to be published. Please can you investigate and ensure that the correct version is published. Thanks. It doesn't have the lines wrt WHOIS data.... etc or the Feedback request from the community which asks about whether the definition is too broad or narrow.

6 5

Re: [Rt4-whois] Call for public comment
by James M. Bladel March 5, 2011

March 5, 2011

1 0