July 2011 - Rt4-whois - lists.icann.org

Where do I need to be today? TUESDAY
by Alice Jansen Oct. 24, 2011

Oct. 24, 2011

11:00-12:00 Security & Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Moor 12:00-12:30 Non Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) Bras Basah 14:00-15:00 Business Constituency (BC)/Commercial Stakeholder Group (CSG): Moor 15:00-15:30 Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) Morrison 15:30-16:30 At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Padang Please refer to outlook invitations for remote participation details.

2 4

Suggested questions for Article 29 speaker
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

4 5

Letter from Article 29 Chair, 2007
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

Here is the letter from Mr. Peter Schaar, then chair of Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, to Mr. Vint Cerf. http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/schaar-to-cerf-12mar07.pdf Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org <http://www.pir.org> | Find us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.

2 1

Follow up to the call
by Emily Taylor Aug. 2, 2011

Aug. 2, 2011

Hi Olof Many thanks for taking on the follow up work while Alice is on holiday. These are the tasks I think we just agreed: 1. Please would you do a first pass on "bundling" the recommendations into related issues. Kathy and I can then review 2. Please would you liaise with Lynn who has the RT's authority to sign off the RFP once the deadline for comments has expired. I noticed a couple of typos, so would be grateful if you could also do a final proofread (I think you became Olaf again ;-)) 3. Alice has kindly forwarded links to documents on Applicable Laws and Producers/Maintainers to Sharon. Please would you follow up with Sharon if she has any further requests or would like to set up calls with those involved in the subteams covering those issues. 4. We would like to have a note of people's availability over the coming holiday period (Northern Hemisphere). This would be on the private wiki. Please would you organise this. Kind regards Emily PLEASE NOTE: from 30 June 2011 my contact details have changed (see below). [image: Emily Taylor Consultancy - Internet Governance] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily(a)emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.

4 4

Short update on clash between civil and penal law, hack attacks in Brazil
by Omar Kaminski July 29, 2011

July 29, 2011

http://culturadigital.br/marcocivil/2010/04/20/draft-bill-propostion-on-civ… This pre-bill is gaining enthusiasts over the time, but the time is against it since a bill takes around 5 years to be approved. At least could have some educative purposes. In the same situation we have a data protection bill, unfortunatelly no english version avaliable. Proposing a central autority to manage the general identities among other details. And finally our main cibercrime bill, 12 years old, in a dead end to be approved (or not) with lots of people against it (mostly for political reasons), even with a massive attack against gov.br sites some weeks ago showing there aren't criminal laws to deal with this issue: http://itdecs.com/2011/07/brazilian-government-remains-under-hacker-siege/ http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90852/7426007.html http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/group/cybercrime/forum/topics/laws-f… Regards, Omar

2 2

Draft report & recommendations on private wiki
by Alice Jansen July 28, 2011

July 28, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, The draft report and draft recommendations have been added to your private wiki for your convenience. Draft report:https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report Draft recommendations:https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draf… Kindly note that your login details will be needed to access the pages. Thank you, Kind regards Alice

1 0

wiki links
by Alice Jansen July 28, 2011

July 28, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, Your wikis were recently migrated to a new tab "AoC reviews". Please make sure to bookmark the new URLs: Public wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/WHOIS+Policy+Review+Team Private wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/WHOIS+Review+-+Priva… Note: your login details have not changed. Thank you, Very best regards Alice

2 1

Note Pod Content from Wed, 27 July discussion
by Alice Jansen July 27, 2011

July 27, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, Please find below draft discussion notes of the conference call held on Wednesday, 27 July. Kindly note that these are draft notes for your convenience and that a preliminary report will be circulated. Thanks, Very best regards Alice AGENDA 1) Highlights of Singapore - quick update for Lutz, Kathy and others not attending some/all the sessions (Team) 2) Update on Chapters - submitted and extensions requested (Olof) 3) Chapters for final report: thoughts, questions, comments, deadlines (Team) 4) Implementation Subteam visit to ICANN Compliance Team (Susan) 5) Update on Data Protection laws in Russia (and other countries, if Team members have information) (Michael) 6) RFP Update (Lynn) 7) Marina Del Rey visit - Update on arrangements (Olof, Alice) 8) Additional business, comments or questions. PARTICIPANTS: Lynn, Kathy, James, Olof, Michael, Peter, Susan, Kim, Omar, Alice APOLOGIES : Emily, Sharon Highlights of Singapore: (PN) asked GAC to submit input - received 5 - RT wants summary - (PN) to touch base with (SL) and coordinate with her regarding format of summary. Public or private? TBD - full responses as appendix Summary of Public comments: full version + more compact (reduced to a third) - curent status of summary: divided by question & contributors - readable format - KK proposal to take a deeper dive into comments received. Deeper dive team: (SK), (KVA), (MY) Will analyze Olof's division and decide what to do Updates on chapters In the draft sections: set stage what issue is, what is important, perspectives and concerns so that readers with different backgrounds can understand. Members responsible for sections report progress. Cross-community (KK) Consumer Trust Note that GNSO working on consumer trust - ICANN staff made sure that no duplication - complement each other. Rosemary Sinclair - Implementation Team - ICANN (SK) & (JB) reports meeting with ICANN compliance team (SK), (JB), (BS) to write a summary/report that may be published as part of meeting notes Update on Status of Data protection Laws in Russia (MY) reports current developments - heavy discussion on privacy, identification of users and overall ability of search engines - hot topic for Russian politicians Update on Status of Data protection Laws in Brazil Clash between civil laws and penal laws - turning point (MY) + (OK) to send a written update to the group RfP update 1 proposal to be distributed to individual emails +1 phone call (LG) to send acknowledgment, thank for bid and ask for references MdR Meeting Staff provided the Review Team with an overview of MdR preparations

2 1

Collated public comments - WHOIS-DP v1
by Olof Nordling July 27, 2011

July 27, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, As agreed at the call earlier today, please find attached the public comments received, collated per question. These are the full comments, verbatim, with two exceptions: 1) a reference from (MM) to an article, which is linked from the text and 2) detailed lists of WHOIS records from (MN) for which reference is made to the full submission. I hope you will find it useful (albeit dense). Very best regards Olof

2 1

Possible legal reclassification of IP address "ownership"
by Lutz Donnerhacke July 27, 2011

July 27, 2011

Yesterday I had a workshop (on IPv6) with our Federal and Regional Commissioners for Data Protection. We stumbled upon a interesting problem: Legal classification of statically assignd IP addresses is going to change. Currently all IP assignments are classified as call detail records. There is a strong movement to reclassify those as master data. As an implementor of access technology we choosed to distinguish clearly between those data models. Resellers are able to set the master data record to "static", but which IP is really assigned, is not available to them. Of course they can research IP adress assignments on LEA requests, but that's different issue. The implications to Whois should be clear.

1 0