September 2011 - Rt4-whois - lists.icann.org

DAKAR MEETING - please confirm
by Alice Jansen Dec. 11, 2011

Dec. 11, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, The next ICANN meeting will be held in Dakar - 23–28 October 2011. Information on this event (venue, hotel, health, visa etc) may be found on the ICANN website at: http://dakar42.icann.org/ With a view to preparing for this meeting, please let us know by Friday, 12 August whether: * you are attending the meeting (Yes/No) * you need travel support (Yes/No) If you do require travel support, please provide us with your desired arrival & departure dates. Once this information submitted, ICANN Constituency Travel will contact you directly to book your trip. * FLIGHTS: Please book your flights through ICANN Constituency Travel. Should you wish to book business or economy premium tickets, please know that an allowance will be granted to you according to your geographic region. * ACCOMMODATION: ICANN Constituency Travel will book your hotel room – please do not book via the website. This is the safe way to have ICANN cover your lodging needs. We look forward to receiving your details. In the meantime, do feel free to contact us should you have questions or concerns. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Olof & Alice

7 7

Where do I need to be today? TUESDAY
by Alice Jansen Oct. 24, 2011

Oct. 24, 2011

11:00-12:00 Security & Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Moor 12:00-12:30 Non Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) Bras Basah 14:00-15:00 Business Constituency (BC)/Commercial Stakeholder Group (CSG): Moor 15:00-15:30 Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) Morrison 15:30-16:30 At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Padang Please refer to outlook invitations for remote participation details.

2 4

SSAC recommendations regarding terminology
by Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Oct. 11, 2011

Oct. 11, 2011

Dear Tema Members, whiole waiting for my flight back home to Europe on Friday, I had the opportunity to consciously read the various documents, already having the considerations of the F2F meeting in my (almost empty :-) ) head. After doing so, I am wondering what the position of the team is wer the recommendations of the SSAC, specifically to think about adopting their proposals for terminology. I think adopting the basic suggestions to clearly specify registration data, protocol stuff and directory service/display for the end-user does make a lot of sense. I am less convinced that the more detailed and specific terminology suggestions and acronyms would really benefit the readers of our final report. Does anyone have a particular pov or guidance? Cheers, Wilfried.

4 7

List of Action Items - PLEASE REVIEW
by Alice Jansen Oct. 3, 2011

Oct. 3, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached a list of the action items the Team agreed upon in Marina del Rey. Please review the list and feel free to add any additional item Kathy and I could have inadvertently forgotten. Note that this document (along with date + name information) is available on the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Action+Items. As you will notice the wiki post is a more interactive version, e.g. features such as green tick when a task has been completed. Thanks, Kindest regards Alice

2 1

FW: group-facebook.com -- Whois Data Problem Report
by Susan Kawaguchi Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

Hello All, Thought you would be interested in seeing a follow up email I received on a domain name I reported as inaccurate. It appears that the compliance team has implemented a new process. Susan -----Original Message----- From: no-reply(a)icann.org [mailto:no-reply@icann.org] Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 12:01 PM To: Susan Kawaguchi Subject: group-facebook.com -- Whois Data Problem Report This message is in follow-up to the Whois Data Problem Report you confirmed on Wed Aug 10 18:00:29 2011 regarding group-facebook.com. As indicated to you at the time of submission, a copy of your report was forwarded to the sponsoring registrar for investigation. We would appreciate it if you could assist us in monitoring registrar compliance with Whois data accuracy obligations by selecting one of the options below: 1. The data inaccuracy was corrected. Please go to the following URL: <http://wdprs.internic.net/cgi/feedback.cgi?s=fdbf081a93676785ba5595abda829e…> 2. The domain has been deleted or re-registered. Please go to: <http://wdprs.internic.net/cgi/feedback.cgi?s=fdbf081a93676785ba5595abda829e…> 3. The whois data is still inaccurate. Please go to: <http://wdprs.internic.net/cgi/feedback.cgi?s=fdbf081a93676785ba5595abda829e…> 4. None of the above. Please go to: <http://wdprs.internic.net/cgi/feedback.cgi?s=fdbf081a93676785ba5595abda829e…> For your reference, the current whois data for the domain is appended below and your report ID is: fdbf081a93676785ba5595abda829e040a1d8fda Thanks again for your assistance. Best regards, InterNIC Whois Data Problem Reports System ================================================================ WHOIS DATA AS OF 2011/9/25 REGISTRAR WHOIS: Domain Name: GROUP-FACEBOOK.COM Registrant: Facebook, Inc. Domain Administrator (FACEBOOK(a)FB.COM) Palo Alto CA 94304 US California California,94304 US Tel. +1.6505434800 Fax. +1.6505434800 Creation Date: 11-Mar-2011 Expiration Date: 11-Mar-2012 Domain servers in listed order: ns1.youhosting.ir ns2.youhosting.ir Administrative Contact: Facebook, Inc. Domain Administrator (FACEBOOK(a)FB.COM) Palo Alto CA 94304 US California California,94304 US Tel. +1.6505434800 Fax. +1.6505434800 Technical Contact: Facebook, Inc. Domain Administrator (FACEBOOK(a)FB.COM) Palo Alto CA 94304 US California California,94304 US Tel. +1.6505434800 Fax. +1.6505434800 Billing Contact: Facebook, Inc. Domain Administrator (FACEBOOK(a)FB.COM) Palo Alto CA 94304 US California California,94304 US Tel. +1.6505434800 Fax. +1.6505434800 Status:SUSPENDED Note: This Domain Name is Suspended. In this status the domain name is InActive and will not function. The data in this whois database is provided to you for information purposes only, that is, to assist you in obtaining information about or related to a domain name registration record. We make this information available "as is", and do not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a whois query, you agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that stress or load this whois database system providing you this information; or (2) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic mail, or by telephone. The compilation, repackaging, dissemination or other use of this data is expressly prohibited without prior written consent from us. The Registrar of record is Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. We reserve the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by these terms. REGISTRY WHOIS: Whois Server Version 2.0 Domain Name: GROUP-FACEBOOK.COM Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM Whois Server: whois.PublicDomainRegistry.com Referral URL: http://www.PublicDomainRegistry.com Name Server: NS1.YOUHOSTING.IR Name Server: NS2.YOUHOSTING.IR Status: clientDeleteProhibited Status: clientHold Status: clientTransferProhibited Status: clientUpdateProhibited Updated Date: 12-aug-2011 Creation Date: 11-mar-2011 Expiration Date: 11-mar-2012 ================================================================

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] Filings of Article 29 Working Party and Data Protection Commissioners
by Denise Michel Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

Dear Kathy, ICANN's records have been reviewed and Staff has found no additional Article 29 correspondence beyond the ones that you and Bill have already shared with the Team. "Data protection commissioner" is not a title all governments confer so Staff has included correspondence on Whois from other government officials that the Team may find useful. Please let me know if the Team needs anything further on this. Regards, Denise Letter from Hansjürgen Garstka to Stuart Lynn<http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/garstka-to-lynn-15jan03.htm>International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications15 January 2003Whois policy Letter From Jonathan Leibowitz to Paul Twomey<http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/leibowitz-to-twomey-09feb05.pdf> [PDF, 858 KB]Federal Trade Commission9 February 2005Whois Database Letter from John Fingleton to Vint Cerf<http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/fingleton-to-cerf-20jun06.pdf> [PDF, 51 KB]Office of Fair Trading20 June 2006Proposed change to narrow purpose definition of publicly available Whois databases Letter from Michel Parisse to ICANN <http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/parisse-to-icann-22jun06.pdf>[PDF, 55 KB]Commission de la Protection de la Privee22 June 2006WHOIS Is Privacy Issues Letter from Jennifer Stoddart to Vinton Cerf<http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/stoddart-to-cerf-12jul06.pdf> [PDF, 72 KB]Privacy Commissioner of Canada12 July 2006Whois Issues Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel(a)icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy(a)kathykleiman.com>wrote: > Dear Liz and Denise, > On behalf of the Whois Review Team, I would like to request the past > filings, submissions, letters and comments of data protection commissioners > speaking/writing to ICANN on Whois issues. > > We are looking for any material submitted over the duration of this > discussion with ICANN. This could be material of individual data protection > commissioners who may have written, as well as DP associations, e.g., The > Article 29 Working Party (and/or its chair) writing to ICANN. (As you know > the Article 29 Working Party is a group established under the EU Privacy > Directive and comprised of all national data protection commissioners of the > EU). > > There may be other associations of data protection commissioners that have > written to us as well, e.g., the International *Data Protection* and > Privacy *Commissioners* Conference. > > I do not think there are many filings, but I do recall they span a long > period of time, and probably date back to the original Whois Task Forces. > (4-5 pieces, maybe) > > Timeframe: As soon as possible, and by our Marina del Ray meeting next > week, if possible. > > Thank you, > > Kathy Kleiman > Vice-Chair, Whois Review Team > > -- > > > >

1 0

Updated Statement of Interest
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com Sept. 29, 2011

Sept. 29, 2011

1 0

Updated Questionnaire for Consumer Trust Survey - Final Review
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com Sept. 27, 2011

Sept. 27, 2011

5 4

Re: [Rt4-whois] Additional requests for informaiton?
by Denise Michel Sept. 27, 2011

Sept. 27, 2011

Dear Wilfried, ICANN Staff is working on these questions. For the sake of completeness, here are the additional questions that were not included in the Action List for Staff: 1. How is the new gTLD program addressing Whois policy for IDNs? 2. What agreements are in place that address Whois policy and IDNs (including for registrars and registries)? 3. What plans do ICANN Compliance Staff have to ensure Whois policy compliance for IDNs? 4. What technical standards are there to support Whois policy compliance for IDNs (ie. data model, services). 5. How is the application community working to make Whois available to end users for IDNs (ie. display/web based access, etc.) Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel(a)icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet < Woeber(a)cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > Hi Denise, > > just a short reminder regarding the IDN stuff mail I sent to you during > the meeting, Subj: Fwd: Re: WHOIS RT: IDN thread > > Thanks, > Wilfried. > > Denise Michel wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > Is there any additional information arising out of last week's meeting > > that the Team needs from ICANN Staff (beyond what I sent during the > > meeting)? > > > > Regards, > > Denise > >

2 1

[OT] Civil Rights Framework for Internet in Brazil
by Omar Kaminski Sept. 27, 2011

Sept. 27, 2011

http://direitorio.fgv.br/node/1850 At last an english version, important to understand the core discussion about cyberlaw in Brazil in the next years. Regards, Omar PS: I've just heard on an online event streaming right now (Brazilian Ecommerce Day) about an "Brazilian Dream" before the "American Dream" :)

1 0