February 2011 - Rt4-whois - lists.icann.org

Suggested questions for Article 29 speaker
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

4 5

Letter from Article 29 Chair, 2007
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

Here is the letter from Mr. Peter Schaar, then chair of Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, to Mr. Vint Cerf. http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/schaar-to-cerf-12mar07.pdf Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org <http://www.pir.org> | Find us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.

2 1

San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker?
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

3 7

Adobe Room
by Alice Jansen March 2, 2011

March 2, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, Please be kindly reminded to join the Adobe Connect room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/whois-review/ No password required – please enter as "guest". Thanks, Best regards Alice

2 3

Next conference call - PROPOSAL
by Alice Jansen Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice

8 8

Agenda for our next call
by Emily Taylor Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

Hi all I'm sending this from my phone so apologies for brevity / typos. Here's a suggested agenda for Wednesdays call. Please let me have any comments or additional items as soon as possible. Kind regards Emily > Objective: to finalise the public comment documents > > Update on public comment elements:- > 1.Notice - Emily Kathy > 2.Scope and roadmap - ready > 3. Law enforcement definitions and questions - subteam > 4. Applicable laws - subteam > 5. Consumers - subteam > 6. Producers - subteam > Comments and discussion > Sign off for publication > > 7. Update on schedule for SF (Alice) > > 8. Update on questions for staff (Denise) > > 9. Discussion re budget (Sarmad's recent question)

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call -
by Lemon, Sharon Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

Classification: [ NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED ] I won't make it at either time~sorry. Please excuse brevity of message, sent from BB. Sharon ________________________________ From: rt4-whois-bounces(a)icann.org To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois(a)icann.org WHOIS Sent: Mon Feb 28 17:43:21 2011 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call - Dear all Please can we move the call to 0500 UTC so that I can join to chair it? Emily Sent from my iPhone On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:41, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen(a)icann.org> wrote: Dear Review Team Members, As you know, the time of your last conference call changed as Peter was unable to join. Pursuant to our rotation system and in line with resolutions adopted during your last call, the next session will be scheduled within working hours of Peter's timezone. Since 4:00 UTC was the time initially allotted to the 16 Feb session, our proposal is to adopt this slot for the next call - scheduled for Wednesday, 2 March. This is put forward for your consideration – please feel free to share your views. Should no objection be raised by today, end of your business day, we will proceed with this proposal. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice From: Alice Jansen < <mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org> alice.jansen(a)icann.org> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:48:06 -0800 To: " <mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> rt4-whois(a)icann.org" < <mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> rt4-whois(a)icann.org> Cc: "Kathage, Tristan" < <mailto:Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au> Tristan.Kathage(a)dbcde.gov.au> Subject: Next conference call - PROPOSAL Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - <https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences> https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries(a)soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call -
by James M. Bladel Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

1 0

Next week -availability and public comment materials
by Emily Taylor Feb. 25, 2011

Feb. 25, 2011

Dear all Just to let you know, I will be off line from Monday afternoon UTC for the rest of the week on holiday and business, and will not have access to e-mails. I wanted to contribute to the cause of getting our materials out to public comment next week. As I see it, our situation is: Scope and roadmap - agreed Action plan and outreach plan - agreed Definitions and questions: Law enforcement - agreed Producers and maintainers - agreed (I think) Applicable laws - nearly there. We are waiting on additional questions to highlight concerns raised on the call by Bill. Bill is going to put his thoughts to the sub-Team, who will do the drafting. Consumers and consumer trust - This needs the most work, in my view. We have a definition of "consumer" which can go out. Again, Kathy raised some concerns on the call - and we agreed that Kathy will put her concerns in writing, and the sub-team will formulate some questions for public comment on that basis. We also need to think about how to capture the ideas on consumer trust. I have a suggestion, which I'd be glad to work on this weekend. That is, we develop a qualitative-type question set based on section two of the paper. The aim would be to capture views on what is important in promoting consumer trust. The other area that we have not addressed is the introduction to the public comment. Kathy and I would be glad to pull something together on this. I will let Kathy have a first draft this weekend. Let me know if I missed anything. Best, Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

2 1

Preliminary Report - 16 Feb - for your consideration
by Alice Jansen Feb. 23, 2011

Feb. 23, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached the preliminary report of your last conference call for your consideration. Kindly note that Kathy has reviewed this document. Thanks, Very best regards Alice

3 3