March 2011 - Rt4-whois - lists.icann.org

Suggested questions for Article 29 speaker
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

4 5

Letter from Article 29 Chair, 2007
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

Here is the letter from Mr. Peter Schaar, then chair of Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, to Mr. Vint Cerf. http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/schaar-to-cerf-12mar07.pdf Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org <http://www.pir.org> | Find us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.

2 1

GAC Principles [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
by Nettlefold, Peter April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

Hi all GAC Principles attached. Cheers Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

Next steps - some ideas
by Emily Taylor April 1, 2011

April 1, 2011

Hi everyone Thank you very much for making our time at ICANN San Francisco effective and rewarding. I think our teamwork is improving constantly, and I was impressed (and grateful) that so many team members attended so many of our outreach meetings, and contributed actively. I know that you all had multiple other things to do at the meeting, and believe that this investment will help us to develop a shared understanding of the way that different sections of the ICANN community think about the issues. I'm sure we'd also all like to recognise and thank the ICANN staff team for an excellent job in supporting our meetings, setting up meetings with multiple communities, and coping with ever changing powerpoint presentations. Thank you very much. To take the work on, and try to comply with our published work programme, I've put together a straw man for a report outline. Basically, I have been trying to make sense of the work we have done to date, and provide a context for all the activity we have undertaken so far. I'd like to discuss this on our next call. You will see that I believe we need professional help (don't we all?) in developing a "consumer trust" questionnaire and undertaking the research. We don't have the specialist skills or resources within the team to undertake this sort of research. I would welcome views on this. Kathy and I spent some time with Denise during the ICANN meeting, to discuss logistics going forward. Denise pointed out that if we plan to have external research (1) we need to get approval for a budget increase, and (2) we need to go through a tendering process of some kind - this will add time and require input/effort from us on the Review Team. I'm sure James can attest to that given his time on the ATRT. Another point is that, while we were in San Francisco, Bill, and I and others started to think about our work as the implementation subteam. After a useful informal conversation with members of the ICANN compliance team, and an informal chat with James (as a registrar), Bill offered to go and spend some time work shadowing the compliance team some time in May. I understand that James has also kindly offered to attend. Susan - your name as a west-coaster was also mentioned as someone who might be prepared to join this expedition. Thank you Bill, James (and maybe Susan) for offering to do this. I think it will give an invaluable insight into the work of the compliance team. So, please can you: 1. All - take a look at the attached 2 page report outline, and give feedback on this list 2. Law Enforcement subteam - please start to develop questions for law enforcement to identify the legitimate needs. I understand that you have started some thinking along these lines. 3. Consumer trust subteam - continue your work on a questionnaire for discussion with the full team at our next call. 4. Policy subteam - if you agree with the proposed outline, you could start a write up on the policy inventory. 5. Bill, James (?Susan) - agree a date for work shadow with the compliance team. Look forward to our heated discussions. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

3 3

YOUR INPUT IS NEEDED: Singapore Meeting
by Alice Jansen March 31, 2011

March 31, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, ICANN Constituency travel needs us to hand in a list of RT Members attending the Singapore meeting (19-24 June 2011) as soon as possible so that they may book tickets and accommodation in a timely fashion. With a view to completing this task, we would be very grateful if you could please provide us with your details as soon as you can. How? Please log in to the private wiki – direct hyperlink: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/ICANN+Meeting+Singap… – and fill out the the table. Note that the face-to-face meeting is scheduled for Sunday, 19 June and that dates for the interactions with SO/ACs, constituencies and the ICANN community are to be determined. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thanks, Very best regards Alice

2 1

Re: [Rt4-whois] Public Comment Period - reminder - deadline
by James M. Bladel March 29, 2011

March 29, 2011

1 0

Public Comment Period - reminder - deadline
by Alice Jansen March 29, 2011

March 29, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, Please be kindly reminded that your public comment period will close on Sunday, 17 April. To date, 3 comments have been submitted in response to your definitions and questions: http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-rt/ Note that we have taken the liberty to request the reposting of your announcement in order to increase its visibility on the ICANN website and catch the reader's eye. This should be up on the ICANN homepage in the upcoming hours. Also, we would be very grateful if SO/AC representatives could please circulate an email to their membership to invite and encourage them to provide feedback and comments. Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and time, Very best regards Alice Alice Jansen --------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational Review alice.jansen(a)icann.org Phone: +32.2.234.78.64 --------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium

3 3

Implementation team call and our next call
by Emily Taylor March 28, 2011

March 28, 2011

Hi Alice Bill and I managed to meet briefly with James during ICANN to try and get some understanding of a registrar's experience of compliance. Understandably, Peter was only able to pop down for a very short time, and we agreed that the best way of taking this forward would be for you to set up a doodle for the Implementation Subteam and James, and for us to do the conversation by phone instead. Also, I should let you know that I will be unable to join our next call, scheduled for 2300 local time next Wednesday. Would it be possible for us to push this call off for a week, and do it the following Wednesday? Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

2 2

Re: [Rt4-whois] Next steps - some ideas
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com March 22, 2011

March 22, 2011

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: [bc-gnso] Knujon Internet Security Report]
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com March 22, 2011

March 22, 2011

1 0