July 2011 - Rt4-whois - lists.icann.org

Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] Looking for replacement At-Large members for WHOIS Review Team
by Omar Kaminski July 23, 2011

July 23, 2011

Lutz? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> Date: 2011/7/11 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] Looking for replacement At-Large members for WHOIS Review Team To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: ICANN AtLarge Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Dear all, due to an At-Large representative having sent his resignation from the WHOIS Review Team because of increased work pressures, there is an opening for an At-Large member in this very important group which was created under the wider Affirmation of Commitments Reviews. The original call for applicants was made in June 2010 and can be found under: http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/call-for-applicants-01jun10-en.… So far, about half of the Team's work has been completed. It is therefore very important for At-Large to propose a replacement candidate. The difference between the original call and the one we are making now, is procedural - in that we are trying to fill an empty slot as soon as possible. To familiarise yourself with the Team's work, please consult its current discussion paper, available for public comment from: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09jun11-en.htm The WHOIS-RT plan is to have a face-to-face meeting in Marina del Rey (Los Angeles) in September and to have a draft final report ready around the Dakar meeting. This means that any candidate should be prepared to travel - and work hard in the next few months. How to Apply: Send a copy of your CV (maximum 3 pages) in English, a one-page motivation letter and an SOI (Statement of Interest), to: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org The SOI should answer the following questions: 1. Current vocation, employer and position 2. Type of work performed in #1 above 3. Identify any financial ownership or senior management/leadership interest in registries, registrars or other firms that are interested parties in ICANN policy or any entity with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement. 4. Identify any type of commercial or non-commercial interest in ICANN GNSO policy development processes and outcomes. Are you representing other parties? Describe any arrangements/agreements between you and any other group, constituency or person(s) regarding your nomination/selection as a work team member. Describe any tangible or intangible benefit that you receive from participation in such processes. For example, if you are an academic or NGO and use your position to advance your ability to participate, this should be a part of the statement of interest, just as should employment by a contracted party, or a business relationship with a non- contracted party who has an interest in policy outcomes. 5. Are you a member of a GNSO Constituency / Stakeholder Group, and if yes, which one(s)? ICANN At-Large staff will compile the details and after the deadline for applications which we're setting at Friday 22 July 2011, will forward those for consideration by the GAC Chair and ICANN President/CEO who will make the selection. Ideally, we'd like this position to be applied for by someone who is not in the "usual suspects" list. Best regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] Move 7/20 meeting to 7/27
by James M. Bladel July 19, 2011

July 19, 2011

1 0

Next meeting - Wed (Tues for some of us)
by Kathy Kleiman July 19, 2011

July 19, 2011

Hi All, As Emily is on vacation, I will be chairing the next meeting. A quick note and a quick question. The quick note is that the time of the meeting is Wed 2:00 UTC, which is Tues 10pm for Washington DC, and 7pm in San Fran (sorry Michael, it's 6am in Moscow!) Here's the quick question: should we meet? The main purpose would be to compare notes on our sections, ask questions, and discuss anything that would make preparing and writing your sections easier. So --- does anyone have questions? Do you have issues to discuss about your section or others in this writing stage? Should we meet? Please feel free to send questions/comments/issues to the group, or to me, and I will prepare an agenda. Best and tx, Kathy

8 11

Re: [Rt4-whois] Privacy Riskiness Classification
by James M. Bladel July 13, 2011

July 13, 2011

1 0

Draft section 7 - Identification and inventory of ICANN's implementation
by Emily Taylor July 13, 2011

July 13, 2011

Dear all I am going on holiday tomorrow morning, and as promised, here is my rough draft of section 7. I have tried to summarise fairly the inputs that we have received. I have left placeholders where the notes of sessions are still in production. I look forward to receiving your comments, and suggested edits. I hope this will be useful to those members of the team who are planning to visit Marina del Rey later this month. Kind regards Emily -- PLEASE NOTE: from 30 June 2011 my contact details have changed (see below). * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily(a)emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.

1 0

Privacy Riskiness Classification
by Lutz Donnerhacke July 13, 2011

July 13, 2011

FYI ----- Forwarded message from Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> ----- From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> To: whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Grist for the WHOIS mill.....maybe we can put it to the WHOIS Review Team? http://webmedia.company.ja.net/edlabblogs/regulatory-developments/2011/07/1… Carlton ----- End forwarded message ----- The proposal tries to find names for different classes of privacy of some data types. The German legislation already uses a similar system: - personal data (direct pointing to a real person) - personable data (asking a third party to get a pointer to a real person) - non-personal data (no possibility to select a real person) Of course the distinction is not always easy: How about statistical evidence?

1 0

Re: [Rt4-whois] RFP posted
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com July 11, 2011

July 11, 2011

1 0

RFP posted
by Olof Nordling July 10, 2011

July 10, 2011

Dear Review Team Members, FYI, the RFP is now posted, see http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-10jul11-en.htm All the best Olof

1 0

RFP ready to issue
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com July 9, 2011

July 9, 2011

2 1

Final Draft RFP
by lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com July 8, 2011

July 8, 2011

2 1