April 2016 - ChineseGP - lists.icann.org

JGP members who can send e-mails directly to each GP@icann.org mailing list
by HiroHOTTA April 28, 2016

April 28, 2016

Dear CJK folks, For your information : Following the discussion in Beijing and past, JGP decided that 4 JGP members can send e-mails to ChineseGP(a)icann.org, KoreanGP(a)icann.org, and IP. Such JGP members are HiroHOTTA <hotta(a)jprs.co.jp Chair MAEMURA Akinori <maem(a)nic.ad.jp> Vice Chair Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya(a)jprs.co.jp> Tech Leader Yuri TAKAMATSU <takamatsu(a)jprs.co.jp Secretariat With the kind arrangement by ICANN, now each of the above will send e-mails to your mailing list directly without moderation. Regards, Hiro

1 0

FW: CJK action item list (as of 25/APR/2016)
by Sarmad Hussain April 25, 2016

April 25, 2016

Forwarding mail from Yuri on behalf of JGP... -----Original Message----- From: Yuri TAKAMATSU [mailto:takamatsu@jprs.co.jp] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 12:03 PM To: ChineseGP(a)icann.org; JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; KoreanGP(a)icann.org Cc: takamatsu(a)jprs.co.jp Subject: CJK action item list (as of 25/APR/2016) Dear CGP, JGP, KGP members This is the new ation item list as of 25 April. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ @@ action Item List as of 25/APR/2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ those items that C+J+K have already confirmed the completion were already removed from the list the status of the action item is shown on the line beginning with ==> B1. Yoneya will re-write the name of the title from "Algorithm" to "Procedure" and add some explanation (especially regarding 'review') to the "Algorithm" (now "Procedure") document before Beijing Meeting. [JGP] Step1: Yoneya re-write the name of title of "Procedure" document before CJK coordination meeting@Beijing. ==>(done) Step2: GP's formal response to the draft on the mailinglist ==>(not yet) B2. CJK will check and confirm the template of Root LGR proposal and ask for IP's advice if necessary [CGP, JGP] step1: Yoneya will send the edited template to CJK mailing lists which includes differentiation mark <common> for CJK and <individual> for each GP step2: CJK will check the drafted template and confirm step3: ask for IP's advice if necessary ==> pending (before next ICANN Helsinki meeting) Step4: Write the draft proposal in format. [CGP, JGP, KGP] B3. CGP and JGP will devise a joint statement and then KGP will consider whether to make a joint statement with C and J in KGP LGR proposal Step1: Hotta and Wang Wei prepare the first draft. (Edmon will help to review) Step2: send the letter to K for comments before sending it to ICANN formally Step3: K will consider whether or not to join in (Before Helsinki ICANN meeting) * Note: The statement includes two independent letters to IP and ICANN which were proposed by Hotta and Wang Wei. B4. Yoneya will draft a temporary schedule for each step of CJK integration procedure and send it to Kenny for his check. After that. Yoneya and Kenny will share it with CJK mailing lists to solicit their opinions about the schedule [JGP] ==> This step will start after Beijing Meeting ? ==> pending B5. Decide who to have the authorization to post IP ML and send it to Sarmad. [CJK] ==> each of CJK decides who can post and tells it to Sarmad B6: research on 260 unacceptable Chinese variant groups. [CGP, KGP] step1. K will review on temporal analyze result for 10 variant groups by C during Beijing meeting and provide further suggestion to C on the analyze by end of April. step2. C will analyze the registration ratio of characters in above variant groups, as well as ratio of WHOIS queries, also, C will investigate the meaning of labels contains these characters. step3. C will generate a formal report including feedback to the unacceptance of variant groups. step4. C will coordinate with CDNC, then send it to K and J. * Note: All work should be done by the end of May. B7: C send the changes on variant group caused by 172 new added characters to K, including code points, variant code, group. B8: Wang Wei will request Sarmad to arrange a CJK meeting in ICANN Helsinki ==> done ------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

CJK Joint meeting record and homework
by 王伟 April 24, 2016

April 24, 2016

Dear All Please find the attached documents of meeting agenda & record, and the action item (homework) Thanks everyone who join the meeting in the two days. We will keep working on it. Regards WANG Wei -----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 HiroHOTTA 发送时间: 2016年3月21日 8:53 收件人: ChineseGP(a)icann.org; JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; KoreanGP(a)icann.org 主题: [ChineseGP] how 'blocked' can help us (During 4 hours struggle with the letters without significant output ...) A question has come to my mind and won't disappear... What are the future of "allocatable labels"? Let's assume the case where registrant-X applied for label-A, and label-B is marked as 'allocatable' by LGR, then, label-A is delegated to registrant-X. As far as I understand, the above means "only registrant-X has the right to apply for label-B in the future." If registrant-X wants label-B to be delegated, he/she needs to make a separate application to ICANN. And ICANN will evaluate the label-B by a human panel (maybe supported by some automatic mechanism). Then, what's the difference between (1) all variants are allocatable (2) some variants are allocatable and the others are blocked (or invalid) I understand (2) can make the applicant know that the application for some strings (that are blocked/invalid) will definitely be rejected in any case. However, this does not reduce the number of TLD delegations significantly because the applicant does want only a few variant TLDs in reality, for money-wise reason or usage-wise reason. then,,,,, why is (1) so evil? Hiro _______________________________________________ ChineseGP mailing list ChineseGP(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp

3 6

[lgr] Proposal for Khmer Script Root Zone‬ Label Generation Rules (LGR)
by Sarmad Hussain April 19, 2016

April 19, 2016

Dear All, We are pleased to announce that Khmer Generation Panel has completed their proposal for the Root Zone LGR. The proposal has been released for public comment, and is available at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/khmer-lgr-2016-04-15-en for review and feedback. Regards, Sarmad _______________________________________________ lgr mailing list lgr(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lgr

1 0