February 2018 - ChineseGP - lists.icann.org

Call for remote conference
by 王伟 March 2, 2018

March 2, 2018

Dear All I am writing to propose a meeting to study the latest feedback document from IP before ICANN 61. According to the feedback document, some part of the current CGP proposal draft need further work, a new characters an variant mappings review expert team might need to be re-built. We need your valuable suggests on the next step work of CGP. Anyone who intends to attend to meeting , please reply the email directly. Personally, I would like to have the meeting on this Friday 2nd March, please also indicate if you have other preferred time. Regards, Wei WANG

8 11

CGP - IP feedback discussion
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana Feb. 27, 2018

Feb. 27, 2018

Dear CGP members, This is the place holder for the CGP Call on Friday 2 March 2018 at 10AM - 5PM (Beijing/Taiwan/Hong Kong Time, UTC+8) Regards, Pitinan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How to connect: Link to Adobe Connect: https://participate.icann.org/idn/ *Upon logging into Adobe Connect, a pop up window will provide you the option to Dial Out to your Phone. Enter your Phone Number* (Remember to change the Country Code if needed). After joining the call, as a courtesy to others and the presenters, please MUTE your phone. This can be done by selecting *6 on your keypad. To UNMUTE select *6 again. If you are Unable to log into Adobe Connect and can only join via phone: https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=1064158692&num=1-719-… Participant Passcode: 1064158692

1 0

CGP work updates
by 王伟 Feb. 12, 2018

Feb. 12, 2018

Dear All CGP generated a new version of CGP LGR Proposal according to the discussion with IP in ICANN60 Abu Dhabi As explained in the attached “CGP-LGR-Proposal-1.1-201712”, Kenny, Ning KONG and I designed an engineering method to eliminate the over production of allocatable labels caused by multiple allocatable variant mappings. This compromise solution could help limit the number of allocatable labels under 4. CGP sent out the proposal to IP in Dec, 2017 and got the feedback document from IP last week (please refer the attached "CGP-LGR20171212-report_20180130_Clean"). According the feedback document, IP accepted most part of the CGP LGR Proposal. But there is a new issue raised up, that about 50 variant groups and their variant mappings were challenged by IP. IP compared the variant mappings of these groups in CDNC, dotAsia and Unihan, questioned that whether these variant mappings need further investigation and reconsideration. In previous work, CGP focused on CDNC and dotAsia, seldom referred Unihan table. When CDNC and dotAsia faced with conflicts on some specific variant mappings, CGP took CDNC rules first. However, IP studied these conflicts as well as Unihan, gave out a different opinion and their suggestions. As suggested, CGP might need another round of variant mapping review work on those 50 variant groups. I will discuss with Kenny to see how we proceed with the next step work. As always, opinions and comments of all CGP members are important to the work. Please feel free to express your suggestions in the mailing list. Best Regards, Wei WNAG

3 2

[lgr] Call for Experts to Study the Application of Root Zone Label Generation Rules
by Sarmad Hussain Feb. 8, 2018

Feb. 8, 2018

Dear GP members, Kindly see the call for nomination of technical experts from the SOs/ACs and IAB to form a study group on application for Root Zone LGR at https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-02-08-en. Regards, Sarmad _______________________________________________ lgr mailing list lgr(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lgr

1 0