ChineseGP

Download

chinesegp@icann.org

January 2017

1 participants
2 discussions

答复: CGP Proposal Update
by 王伟 Jan. 17, 2017

Jan. 17, 2017

Thanks QI Chao for generating XML file and correcting errors in appendix H. That attached proposal, repertoire and variant mapping files will be sent to IP for further coordination. 发件人: 王伟 [mailto:wangwei@cnic.cn] 发送时间: 2017年1月16日 22:28 收件人: ChineseGP(a)icann.org; hotta(a)jprs.co.jp; 김경석 (gimgs0(a)gmail.com) <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> 抄送: Sarmad Hussain (sarmad.hussain(a)icann.org) <sarmad.hussain(a)icann.org> 主题: CGP Proposal Update Dear All CGP noticed that in the latest feedback document, IP urged CGP to take the following actions: 1. Reduce the size of repertoire based on modern usage analysis of each code point 2. Reduce the number of allocatable labels 3. Explain the inconsistency between CGP and dotAsia IDN Table Correspondingly, CGP made the following updates to the proposal draft: 1. Section 3.3 explains the attempt that CGP made to reduce the repertoire, and the reason why CGP suggested to keep the current size. 2. Section 4.7 introduces the coordination result between C and K, 146 variant mappings in last version are decoupled, reducing the number of allocable labels mildly. CGP acknowledges that it is far from the goal that IP expected, further work still needs to be done. 3. Section 4.5 illustrates the inconsistency between CGP and dotAsia. According to the discussion with Edmon CHUNG, dotAsia would adjust its SLD repertoire and variant mappings to comply with CGP LGR rules once it was finalized. 4. Proofread the translation of通用规范汉字表, from “Normalized Hanzi List for Common Use (NHCU)” to “Table of General Standard Chinese Characters (TGSCC)” For the next step, CGP would carry out the following work: 1. Hold a vote on the issue of repertoire size reduction. CGP members might take different positions on this issue, the members represent IDN registries who already applied CDNC IDN tables and rules might be more inclined to keep the consistency between CDNC table and CGP repertoire. 2. Work together with JGP on the issue of allocatable labels overproduction CGP and JGP have the similar concern on this issue, and proposed a similar conception named “multiple LGR execution” or “complement process of root LGR”. We will keep working closely to find a way which keep <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=keep&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> allocatable labels at <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=at&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> a <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=a&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> reasonable <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=reasonable&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> number <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=amount&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> , <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=.&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> and could be accepted by IP as well. @QI Chao, could you please help transfer the attached appendix H into XML format, thank you. Regards WANG Wei

1 0

CGP Proposal Update
by 王伟 Jan. 16, 2017

Jan. 16, 2017

Dear All CGP noticed that in the latest feedback document, IP urged CGP to take the following actions: 1. Reduce the size of repertoire based on modern usage analysis of each code point 2. Reduce the number of allocatable labels 3. Explain the inconsistency between CGP and dotAsia IDN Table Correspondingly, CGP made the following updates to the proposal draft: 1. Section 3.3 explains the attempt that CGP made to reduce the repertoire, and the reason why CGP suggested to keep the current size. 2. Section 4.7 introduces the coordination result between C and K, 146 variant mappings in last version are decoupled, reducing the number of allocable labels mildly. CGP acknowledges that it is far from the goal that IP expected, further work still needs to be done. 3. Section 4.5 illustrates the inconsistency between CGP and dotAsia. According to the discussion with Edmon CHUNG, dotAsia would adjust its SLD repertoire and variant mappings to comply with CGP LGR rules once it was finalized. 4. Proofread the translation of通用规范汉字表, from “Normalized Hanzi List for Common Use (NHCU)” to “Table of General Standard Chinese Characters (TGSCC)” For the next step, CGP would carry out the following work: 1. Hold a vote on the issue of repertoire size reduction. CGP members might take different positions on this issue, the members represent IDN registries who already applied CDNC IDN tables and rules might be more inclined to keep the consistency between CDNC table and CGP repertoire. 2. Work together with JGP on the issue of allocatable labels overproduction CGP and JGP have the similar concern on this issue, and proposed a similar conception named “multiple LGR execution” or “complement process of root LGR”. We will keep working closely to find a way which keep <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=keep&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> allocatable labels at <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=at&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> a <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=a&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> reasonable <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=reasonable&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> number <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=amount&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> , <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=.&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> and could be accepted by IP as well. @QI Chao, could you please help transfer the attached appendix H into XML format, thank you. Regards WANG Wei

1 0

Results per page: