- ChineseGP - lists.icann.org

56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3
by KIM Kyongsok Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Dear everybody: Enclosed you will find 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3. Thanks. -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 7

CJK joint meeting in Taipei
by 王伟 July 29, 2016

July 29, 2016

Dear All In ICANN Helsinki meeting, three GP chairs gathered and agreed to hold a joint meeting in Taipei, 29 Sept to 30 Sept. The meeting will be focused on the coordination of 260 unacceptable variant groups proposed by KGP. Please feel free to contact me if you want to attend to meeting. I will see if ICANN's sponsorship could cover the cost. Best Regards ＷANG Wei

1 0

comments (4) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.20.), Q7
by KIM Kyongsok July 20, 2016

July 20, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang Wei: Thanks for your quick response. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:07 AM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: > Dear Prof. Kim > > Thanks for your review which help find out some editorial errors. > > I noticed that you compared the current table with 2015.04.30, > which was already replaced by CGP LGR 20160612 > before the ICANN Helsinki meeting. > The rational of the repertoire extension was explained > in the attached WORD document. I fully understand your repertoire extension. I checked each of CGP LGR 20160612, CGP LGR 20160718, and CGP LGR 20160720 against LGR 20150430. > To your question Q1, the sequencing of "朦(6726)䑃(4443)" > has been changed to "䑃(4443)朦(6726)" > To your question Q3, MSS --> CCC, yes, > it is an editorial mistake that replace the "CCC" by "MSS" automatically. > To your question Q4, yes, the parentheses has been changed into ASCII format in the attached new version. RE: Q1, Q3, and Q4: Great. Thanks. > To your question Q2, your number is correct. Great. Thanks. I hope that correct numbers of characters and variant groups will be incorporated into the "revised" CGP Proposal Draft 20160613.docx later. > To your question Q5, those characters went through > review process last year and were set as independent chars. I see. I wll summarize my understanding below: 1) The two var. groups dropped. 1a) formerly vg (5CAB 岫, 5CC0 峀) --> Now, 2 independent chars. 諝 8ADD 1b) formerly vg of size 3: (O 5999 妙, X 7385 玅, O 7AD7 竗) --> Now, split into ONE indep. char. 竗(7AD7) and ONE var. group of size 2 composed of (妙 5999, 玅 7385). 2) Three new var. groups created (added) in C-LGR 2016.06.12.) 2a) (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫): a new vg of size 2 2b) (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆): a new vg. of size 2 2c) formerly, ONE independent char 㥠(3960) and one var. group of size 2 composed of ( 諝 8ADD, 谞 8C1E) --> Now, a new vg of size 3 (3960 㥠, 8ADD 諝, X 8C1E 谞). Plz correct me if I am wrong. > After Helsinki meeting, the IP reminds that㩜(3A5C) and墵(58B5) are out of MSR scope, so I also take them away for the time being. I see. Thanks. I will label it Q6 (although it is not my question..) Q7. TWO minor typos on page 5 of file <CGP Proposal Draft 20160613.docx>. 1) "한자 Hanjia" --> "한자 Hanja" (without "i") 2) and Hanjia are both therefore covered by CGP. --> and Hanja are both therefore covered by CGP. (without "i") Thanks again. Rgds, KIM, K. > > Please refer the attached new version of repertoire and variants. > > > Regards > WANG Wei > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2016年7月19日 15:47 > 收件人: 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> > 抄送: chinesegp(a)icann.org; JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> > 主题: Re: comments (3) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.18.), Q4 and Q5. > > Dear Mr. Wang Wei: > > I am making progress ^-^ and noticed some more errors/changes. > > > ================================================================ > Q3 (My previous message RE: MSS --> CCC) > > ================================================================= > > Q4. This seems minor too. I notices that CJK compatibility paren was used instead of regular ASCII paren. There were 2 occurrences in one line. > > I would like to suggest that > "）" (CJK compatibility paren) --> ")" (ASCII paren). > [ 2 occurrences in one line] > > 83B5 莵菟(83DF）菟(83DF）莵(83B5)菟(83DF) > --> > 83B5 莵菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF) > > > ================================================================= > Q5: I compared variant groups in C-LGR (2015.04.30.) and vg in C-LGR > (2016.07.18.) and > noticed some two variant groups (vg) were removed and three new vg are added. > > I would like to know whether these removals are mistakes or not and > whether additions are really intended. > > 1) [removal] existed in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now missing in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) > > 1a) > < 2 2 (O 5CAB 岫) (O 5CC0 峀): vg > > ===> > >> 5CAB 岫岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB): indep. char. >> 5CC0 峀峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0): indep. char. > > 1b) > < 3 2 (O 5999 妙) (X 7385 玅) (O 7AD7 竗): vg of size 3 (3 variants) > > ===> > >> 5999 妙妙(5999) 妙(5999) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 >> 7385 玅妙(5999) 玅(7385) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 >> 7AD7 竗竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) : indep. char. > > 2) [addition] did NOT exist in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now added to C-LGR > (2016.07.18.) > > 2a) > > < 7200 爀爀(7200) 爀(7200) : indep. char. > < 8D6B 赫赫(8D6B) 赫(8D6B) : indep. char. > > ===> > >> 2 2 (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫) : a new vg of size 2 > > 2b) > > < 757A 畺畺(757A) 畺(757A) : indep. char. > < 7586 疆疆(7586) 疆(7586) : indep. charf. > > ===> > >> 2 2 (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆) : a new vg. of size 2 > > 2C) > < 3960 㥠㥠(3960) 㥠(3960) : indep. char. > < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 > < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 > > ===> > >> 3 2 (O 3960 㥠) (O 8ADD 諝) (X 8C1E 谞) : a new vg of size 3 > > * * * > > Thanks in advance. > > KIM, K. > > ------------------------------- > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Mr. Wang Wei: >> >> I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.) >> >> In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC. >> One sample line is shown below: >> >> 5MSS 峌峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) >> --> >> 5CCC 峌峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> KIM, K. >> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: >>> Dear Prof. Kim >>> >>> I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL >>> I have re-edited them in the attached document. >>> >>> Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR. >>> >>> So please refer the latest version as attached. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> WANG Wei >>> >>> >>> -----邮件原件----- >>> 发件人: chinesegp-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] >>> 代表 KIM Kyongsok >>> 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 >>> 收件人: chinesegp(a)icann.org >>> 抄送: JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok >>> <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> >>> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.) >>> >>> Dear Mr. Wang: >>> >>> I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12. >>> >>> I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below. >>> >>> ==================================================== >>> Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors: >>> >>> --- 1 >>> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >>> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >>> >>> --- 2 >>> cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >>> cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >>> >>> --- 3 >>> cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) >>> cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor) >>> >>> --- 4 >>> cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) >>> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >>> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >>> >>> --- 5 >>> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >>> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >>> >>> --- 6 >>> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) >>> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043) >>> >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it. >>> >>>> Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant >>>> character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, >>>> 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, >>>> 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants. >>> >>> - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). >>> >>> - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant >>> Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers >>> (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): >>> >>> a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 >>> b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 >>> >>> Plz correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Rgds, >>> >>> -- >>> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ChineseGP mailing list >>> ChineseGP(a)icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp >> >> >> >> -- >> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok > > > > -- > 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

1 0

Re: [ChineseGP] comments (3) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.18.), Q4 and Q5.
by KIM Kyongsok July 19, 2016

July 19, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang Wei: I am making progress ^-^ and noticed some more errors/changes. ================================================================ Q3 (My previous message RE: MSS --> CCC) ================================================================= Q4. This seems minor too. I notices that CJK compatibility paren was used instead of regular ASCII paren. There were 2 occurrences in one line. I would like to suggest that "）" (CJK compatibility paren) --> ")" (ASCII paren). [ 2 occurrences in one line] 83B5 莵菟(83DF）菟(83DF）莵(83B5)菟(83DF) --> 83B5 莵菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF) ================================================================= Q5: I compared variant groups in C-LGR (2015.04.30.) and vg in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) and noticed some two variant groups (vg) were removed and three new vg are added. I would like to know whether these removals are mistakes or not and whether additions are really intended. 1) [removal] existed in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now missing in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) 1a) < 2 2 (O 5CAB 岫) (O 5CC0 峀): vg ===> > 5CAB 岫岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB): indep. char. > 5CC0 峀峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0): indep. char. 1b) < 3 2 (O 5999 妙) (X 7385 玅) (O 7AD7 竗): vg of size 3 (3 variants) ===> > 5999 妙妙(5999) 妙(5999) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 > 7385 玅妙(5999) 玅(7385) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 > 7AD7 竗竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) : indep. char. 2) [addition] did NOT exist in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now added to C-LGR (2016.07.18.) 2a) < 7200 爀爀(7200) 爀(7200) : indep. char. < 8D6B 赫赫(8D6B) 赫(8D6B) : indep. char. ===> > 2 2 (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫) : a new vg of size 2 2b) < 757A 畺畺(757A) 畺(757A) : indep. char. < 7586 疆疆(7586) 疆(7586) : indep. charf. ===> > 2 2 (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆) : a new vg. of size 2 2C) < 3960 㥠㥠(3960) 㥠(3960) : indep. char. < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 < 8ADD 諝谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 ===> > 3 2 (O 3960 㥠) (O 8ADD 諝) (X 8C1E 谞) : a new vg of size 3 * * * Thanks in advance. KIM, K. ------------------------------- On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Wang Wei: > > I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.) > > In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC. > One sample line is shown below: > > 5MSS 峌峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) > --> > 5CCC 峌峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) > > Thanks in advance. > > KIM, K. > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: >> Dear Prof. Kim >> >> I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL >> I have re-edited them in the attached document. >> >> Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR. >> >> So please refer the latest version as attached. >> >> >> >> Regards >> WANG Wei >> >> >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: chinesegp-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok >> 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 >> 收件人: chinesegp(a)icann.org >> 抄送: JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> >> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.) >> >> Dear Mr. Wang: >> >> I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12. >> >> I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below. >> >> ==================================================== >> Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors: >> >> --- 1 >> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >> >> --- 2 >> cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >> cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) >> >> --- 3 >> cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) >> cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor) >> >> --- 4 >> cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) >> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) >> >> --- 5 >> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) >> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) >> >> --- 6 >> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) >> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043) >> >> >> ====================================================== >> Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it. >> >>> Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant >>> character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, >>> 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, >>> 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants. >> >> - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). >> >> - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant >> Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers >> (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): >> >> a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 >> b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 >> >> Plz correct me if I am wrong. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Rgds, >> >> -- >> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok >> _______________________________________________ >> ChineseGP mailing list >> ChineseGP(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp > > > > -- > 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 1

comments (2) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.18.)
by KIM Kyongsok July 19, 2016

July 19, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang Wei: I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.) In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC. One sample line is shown below: 5MSS 峌峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) --> 5CCC 峌峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) Thanks in advance. KIM, K. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei(a)cnic.cn> wrote: > Dear Prof. Kim > > I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL > I have re-edited them in the attached document. > > Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR. > > So please refer the latest version as attached. > > > > Regards > WANG Wei > > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: chinesegp-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok > 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 > 收件人: chinesegp(a)icann.org > 抄送: JapaneseGP(a)icann.org; koreanGP(a)icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com> > 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.) > > Dear Mr. Wang: > > I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12. > > I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below. > > ==================================================== > Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors: > > --- 1 > cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) > cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) > > --- 2 > cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) > cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) > > --- 3 > cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) > cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor) > > --- 4 > cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) > cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) > cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) > > --- 5 > cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) > cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) > > --- 6 > cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) > cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043) > > > ====================================================== > Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it. > >> Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant >> character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, >> 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, >> 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants. > > - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). > > - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant > Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers > (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): > > a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 > b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 > > Plz correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks in advance. > > Rgds, > > -- > 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok > _______________________________________________ > ChineseGP mailing list > ChineseGP(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

1 0

comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.)
by KIM Kyongsok July 18, 2016

July 18, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang: I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12. I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below. ==================================================== Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors: --- 1 cvg_0:��(5378) 缷(7F37) cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) --- 2 cvg_0:��(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) --- 3 cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor) --- 4 cvg_0:击(51FB) ��(6483) 擊(64CA) cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) --- 5 cvg_0:��(5378) 缷(7F37) cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37) --- 6 cvg_0:沣(6CA3) ��(7043) cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043) ====================================================== Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it. > Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant > character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, > 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, > 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants. - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 Plz correct me if I am wrong. Thanks in advance. Rgds, -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 3

[klgp215_1b] 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in K-LGR v0.3
by KIM Kyongsok June 29, 2016

June 29, 2016

Dear everybody: I improved a little bit my previous document klgp215_1. The new document is klgp215_1b_56_simplitional_charsj.docx dated on 2016.06.29. I added some more useful information to answer Mr. Wang's questions. Thanks in advance. KIM, K. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:03 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0(a)gmail.com>s wrote: > Dear everybody: > > Enclosed you will find 56 simplitional chars based on 4819 chars in > K-LGR v0.3. > > Thanks. > > -- > 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

1 0

result of informal CJK meeting in Helsinki
by HiroHOTTA June 27, 2016

June 27, 2016

CGP, JGP, and KGP informally met in Helsinki today. I'm reporting of the meeting on behalf of participants. == Date&Time : 27 June, 2016 1600-1700 (Helsinki time) Chairs present : Kenny(C), Hiro(J), Prof. Kim(K) We talked about how we proceed to finalization of the variants issues. The main outcome was : (1) CGP and KGP will independently try to reduce the contentious variants intensively (2) CGP/JGP/KGP will have a f2f meeting to coordinate the variants definition utilizing the outcome of CGP and KGP from (1) - tentative meeting dates are from 30 Sept to 1 Oct, - venue TBD (either of Beijing, Seoul, Tokyo) (3) We will ask ICANN for travel support for f2f meeting of (2) Hiro

1 0

Draft of CGP LGR Proposal
by 王伟 June 13, 2016

June 13, 2016

Dear ALL Though CGP work is stuck in the coordination on 260 unacceptable variant code points raised by KGP, as requested by Sarmad and IP, I drafted a draft version of CGP LGR proposal based on the current progress as the attached document. The purpose of this document is to give an overview of the proposed LGR in the XML format and the rationale behind the design. It includes the discussions of script features together with the communities or language environments using it, the process and methodology generate the code point repertoire, code point variants and the WLE. It also indicates the issues need further coordination. Please kindly review it and give your valuable advice on it before we send it to IP formally. Thank you very much~ Best regards WANG Wei

2 1

[lgr] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Reference Label Generation Rulesets (LGRs) for the Second Level
by Sarmad Hussain June 8, 2016

June 8, 2016

FYI. Regards, Sarmad News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-06-07-en _____ Reference Label Generation Rulesets (LGRs) for the Second Level 7 June 2016 Open Date: 7 June 2016 Close Date: 18 July 2016 Originating Organization: Global Domains Division Categories/Tags: Second-Level Domains Brief Overview: To facilitate and improve consistency of testing and stability of registry operations of new gTLDs, ICANN has developed reference Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) tables in machine readable format, called Label Generation Rulesets (LGRs) for the second level, for use in Pre-Delegation Testing (PDT) and the Registry Service Evaluation Process (RSEP). At this time reference LGRs for 29 languages <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/second-level-lgr-2015-06-21-en> are being released for public comment. In addition, a process is also being proposed for Evaluation of Deviation from the Reference Second Level LGRs <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/lgr-second-level-evaluation-dev…> [PDF, 255 KB] for feedback from the community. Link: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/lgr-second-level-2016-06-07-en _______________________________________________ lgr mailing list lgr(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lgr

1 0