Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Dear Effectiveness Review Team, Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document. It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4
Hi everyone, Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: - Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. - We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself. Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear Effectiveness Review Team, Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document. It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Dear all, Please find included redline and clean version of template document. In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have: Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Hi everyone, Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself. Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear Effectiveness Review Team, Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document. It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Dear all, As a friendly reminder, I’m attaching the template document Bart circulated last week. Please let us know if you have any comments. Would you like to schedule an additional call? The next CSC meeting is scheduled for 17 September at 20:00 UTC. As discussed on last week’s call, we’ve included an agenda item for this team to meet with the CSC. Lastly, when would you like to schedule the Effectiveness Review Team public session in Barcelona? May I suggest Monday, 22 October block 13:30-15:00? Please let me know if that works for you. Best, Ria From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear all, Please find included redline and clean version of template document. In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have: Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Hi everyone, Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself. Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear Effectiveness Review Team, Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document. It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Sorry, this was lost in my preparation for ITU SG17. I’m still there, but I have just scanned the template and have a few minor comments: Section 4 heading: “... can *also* be...”? 4.a: delete “In addiction,” 6.b. Weren’t we building this into the schedule : it’s not fair to leave this to the review team! 9.5. Question: if there were to be recommendations, could the consultation be done after submission of the review as part of any implementation process? I am slightly nervous that we might see a minor recommendation delaying the report and the report is to the councils who would have responsibility for implementation. 6. Isn’t Barcelona ICANN 63 (twice)? 10. I thought we’d trimmed the timeline...? I don’t particularly need another call until after the CSC and Council discussions. I’m not scheduled to be in Barcelona, but could possibly, and if necessary, do an overnight trip. But not on Monday! However, I’m sure that you will manage fine without me and I could be in on remote. Hope this helps Martin Martin Boyle Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Sep 2018, at 23:27, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
As a friendly reminder, I’m attaching the template document Bart circulated last week. Please let us know if you have any comments. Would you like to schedule an additional call?
The next CSC meeting is scheduled for 17 September at 20:00 UTC. As discussed on last week’s call, we’ve included an agenda item for this team to meet with the CSC.
Lastly, when would you like to schedule the Effectiveness Review Team public session in Barcelona? May I suggest Monday, 22 October block 13:30-15:00? Please let me know if that works for you.
Best, Ria
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Dear all, Please find included redline and clean version of template document. In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have: Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion
Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Hi everyone,
Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion
Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself.
Regards, Philippe
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Dear Effectiveness Review Team,
Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document.
It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ
All the best, Ria
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 clean.docx> <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 redline.docx>
All, On some of Martin’s points: - 6b I tend to agree, in the sense that I don’t quite see what the review team would do other than relying to the liaisons within the CSC. - 9.5 if I understand correctly Martin you suggest that we don’t do number 3 “Conduct a public session at ICANN 63 (October 2018) that is intended to provide an opportunity for the community to provide input to the process”? - On 9.6 I couldn’t find the typo (Barcelona) in the file.. I added Martin’s edits to the attached but didn’t touch the open elements of substance. Maria, Monday would not be possible for me either with the ISPCP outreach session. And wish Martin an enjoyable SG17 meeting… Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Martin Boyle via CSC-EffectivenessRT Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 10:47 PM To: Maria Otanes Cc: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] FW: Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Sorry, this was lost in my preparation for ITU SG17. I’m still there, but I have just scanned the template and have a few minor comments: Section 4 heading: “... can *also* be...”? 4.a: delete “In addiction,” 6.b. Weren’t we building this into the schedule : it’s not fair to leave this to the review team! 9.5. Question: if there were to be recommendations, could the consultation be done after submission of the review as part of any implementation process? I am slightly nervous that we might see a minor recommendation delaying the report and the report is to the councils who would have responsibility for implementation. 6. Isn’t Barcelona ICANN 63 (twice)? 10. I thought we’d trimmed the timeline...? I don’t particularly need another call until after the CSC and Council discussions. I’m not scheduled to be in Barcelona, but could possibly, and if necessary, do an overnight trip. But not on Monday! However, I’m sure that you will manage fine without me and I could be in on remote. Hope this helps Martin Martin Boyle Sent from my iPhone On 4 Sep 2018, at 23:27, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all, As a friendly reminder, I’m attaching the template document Bart circulated last week. Please let us know if you have any comments. Would you like to schedule an additional call? The next CSC meeting is scheduled for 17 September at 20:00 UTC. As discussed on last week’s call, we’ve included an agenda item for this team to meet with the CSC. Lastly, when would you like to schedule the Effectiveness Review Team public session in Barcelona? May I suggest Monday, 22 October block 13:30-15:00? Please let me know if that works for you. Best, Ria From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear all, Please find included redline and clean version of template document. In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have: Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Hi everyone, Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: * Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. * We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself. Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear Effectiveness Review Team, Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document. It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 clean.docx> <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 redline.docx> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Hi All Comments provided in the attached. By way of update, Philippe and I will be providing an update to the GNSO Council on our proposed plan and seeking agreement from the Council to our continued involvement as members of the CSC Effectiveness Review Team. The council meets on 27 September at which time we hope to be confirmed. If we are not confirmed, and the Council decides to run an open process for volunteers, this effort will be delayed by at least 6 weeks. Donna From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of philippe.fouquart@orange.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 2:13 AM To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com>; Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] FW: Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review All, On some of Martin’s points: - 6b I tend to agree, in the sense that I don’t quite see what the review team would do other than relying to the liaisons within the CSC. - 9.5 if I understand correctly Martin you suggest that we don’t do number 3 “Conduct a public session at ICANN 63 (October 2018) that is intended to provide an opportunity for the community to provide input to the process”? - On 9.6 I couldn’t find the typo (Barcelona) in the file.. I added Martin’s edits to the attached but didn’t touch the open elements of substance. Maria, Monday would not be possible for me either with the ISPCP outreach session. And wish Martin an enjoyable SG17 meeting… Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Martin Boyle via CSC-EffectivenessRT Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 10:47 PM To: Maria Otanes Cc: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] FW: Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Sorry, this was lost in my preparation for ITU SG17. I’m still there, but I have just scanned the template and have a few minor comments: Section 4 heading: “... can *also* be...”? 4.a: delete “In addiction,” 6.b. Weren’t we building this into the schedule : it’s not fair to leave this to the review team! 9.5. Question: if there were to be recommendations, could the consultation be done after submission of the review as part of any implementation process? I am slightly nervous that we might see a minor recommendation delaying the report and the report is to the councils who would have responsibility for implementation. 6. Isn’t Barcelona ICANN 63 (twice)? 10. I thought we’d trimmed the timeline...? I don’t particularly need another call until after the CSC and Council discussions. I’m not scheduled to be in Barcelona, but could possibly, and if necessary, do an overnight trip. But not on Monday! However, I’m sure that you will manage fine without me and I could be in on remote. Hope this helps Martin Martin Boyle Sent from my iPhone On 4 Sep 2018, at 23:27, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all, As a friendly reminder, I’m attaching the template document Bart circulated last week. Please let us know if you have any comments. Would you like to schedule an additional call? The next CSC meeting is scheduled for 17 September at 20:00 UTC. As discussed on last week’s call, we’ve included an agenda item for this team to meet with the CSC. Lastly, when would you like to schedule the Effectiveness Review Team public session in Barcelona? May I suggest Monday, 22 October block 13:30-15:00? Please let me know if that works for you. Best, Ria From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear all, Please find included redline and clean version of template document. In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have: Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Hi everyone, Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: * Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. * We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself. Regards, Philippe From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org<mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review Dear Effectiveness Review Team, Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document. It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_JRRpBQ&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=SNweuRvKlsbohdwVw7qOAWaIybep1wfiRQBO88wFxmU&s=NH5269iG-IksbUM8aP8ZZbaimMEITqhSlQa2Sxpk1HE&e=> All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 clean.docx> <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 redline.docx> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Hi all My apologies for my delay in responding to all this - I’ve been out of action for the last week. I’m happy with the changes marked up and agree with Donna’s comments. Cheers Debbie
On 7/09/2018, at 16:12, Austin, Donna via CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> wrote:
Hi All
Comments provided in the attached.
By way of update, Philippe and I will be providing an update to the GNSO Council on our proposed plan and seeking agreement from the Council to our continued involvement as members of the CSC Effectiveness Review Team. The council meets on 27 September at which time we hope to be confirmed. If we are not confirmed, and the Council decides to run an open process for volunteers, this effort will be delayed by at least 6 weeks.
Donna
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of philippe.fouquart@orange.com <mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 2:13 AM To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com <mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com>>; Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>> Cc: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] FW: Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
All,
On some of Martin’s points: - 6b I tend to agree, in the sense that I don’t quite see what the review team would do other than relying to the liaisons within the CSC. - 9.5 if I understand correctly Martin you suggest that we don’t do number 3 “Conduct a public session at ICANN 63 (October 2018) that is intended to provide an opportunity for the community to provide input to the process”? - On 9.6 I couldn’t find the typo (Barcelona) in the file..
I added Martin’s edits to the attached but didn’t touch the open elements of substance.
Maria, Monday would not be possible for me either with the ISPCP outreach session.
And wish Martin an enjoyable SG17 meeting…
Regards, Philippe
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Martin Boyle via CSC-EffectivenessRT Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 10:47 PM To: Maria Otanes Cc: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] FW: Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Sorry, this was lost in my preparation for ITU SG17. I’m still there, but I have just scanned the template and have a few minor comments:
Section 4 heading: “... can *also* be...”? 4.a: delete “In addiction,” 6.b. Weren’t we building this into the schedule : it’s not fair to leave this to the review team! 9.5. Question: if there were to be recommendations, could the consultation be done after submission of the review as part of any implementation process? I am slightly nervous that we might see a minor recommendation delaying the report and the report is to the councils who would have responsibility for implementation. 6. Isn’t Barcelona ICANN 63 (twice)? 10. I thought we’d trimmed the timeline...?
I don’t particularly need another call until after the CSC and Council discussions.
I’m not scheduled to be in Barcelona, but could possibly, and if necessary, do an overnight trip. But not on Monday! However, I’m sure that you will manage fine without me and I could be in on remote.
Hope this helps
Martin
Martin Boyle Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Sep 2018, at 23:27, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear all,
As a friendly reminder, I’m attaching the template document Bart circulated last week. Please let us know if you have any comments. Would you like to schedule an additional call?
The next CSC meeting is scheduled for 17 September at 20:00 UTC. As discussed on last week’s call, we’ve included an agenda item for this team to meet with the CSC.
Lastly, when would you like to schedule the Effectiveness Review Team public session in Barcelona? May I suggest Monday, 22 October block 13:30-15:00? Please let me know if that works for you.
Best, Ria
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org <mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Dear all, Please find included redline and clean version of template document. In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have: Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion
Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com <mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com <mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Hi everyone,
Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say: Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”. We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion
Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i , but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself.
Regards, Philippe
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review
Dear Effectiveness Review Team,
Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document.
It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_J...>
All the best, Ria
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes Secretariat Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 202 249 7540 Mobile: +1 202 679 5185 Skype: maria.otanes.icann Washington, DC Office | UTC-4
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 clean.docx> <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 redline.docx> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. <Template CSC Effectiveness Review version 02 29 August 2018 clean PhF_DA.docx>_______________________________________________ CSC-EffectivenessRT mailing list CSC-EffectivenessRT@icann.org <mailto:CSC-EffectivenessRT@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-effectivenessrt <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-effectivenessrt>
participants (6)
-
Austin, Donna -
Bart Boswinkel -
Debbie Monahan -
Maria Otanes -
Martin Boyle -
philippe.fouquart＠orange.com