August 2009 - ispcp - lists.icann.org

ISPCP representation on Council
by Tony Holmes Aug. 27, 2009

Aug. 27, 2009

All After many years of supporting the ISPCP Constituency and representing their interest on the GNSO Council and numerous working groups, Greg Ruth is moving on from Verizon. His place on the GNSO Council will be filled by Maggie Mansoukia who worked with Greg in Verizon and has also been active in the ISPCP Constituency, again representing them on various task force and working groups. Maggie will be filling this seat until the new Council members are seated in Seoul. I'm sure those of you who worked with Greg across the years will join me in thanking him for the effort he put in across the years. Tony

1 0

Re: ISPCP Call Thursday 27 Aug.
by Anthony Harris Aug. 27, 2009

Aug. 27, 2009

Hi Maggie, You can call me at (54-11) 432-0777, you will get a welcome mesg in Spanish, wait a few secs and it will be picked up. Kind regards Tony Harris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mansourkia, Magnolia" <maggie.mansourkia(a)verizon.com> To: "Knobenw" <KnobenW(a)telekom.de>; <alain.bidron(a)orange-ftgroup.com>; <harris(a)cabase.org.ar>; <mcfadden(a)ispcp.info>; <tony.ar.holmes(a)bt.com>; <ispcp(a)icann.org>; <KnobenW(a)t-com.net>; <tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com> Cc: "Mansourkia, Magnolia" <maggie.mansourkia(a)verizon.com> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:27 AM Subject: ISPCP Call Thursday 27 Aug. All- Please find the bridge details for our call tomorrow. Thursday, 27 August 2009 16.00 UK time (17.00 CEST, 11.00 EST) USA Toll Free: 877-931-0470 Int'l Toll: 203-566-0525 PARTICIPANT PASSCODE: 650520 Tony Harris-If you send me a number where you can be reached at the time of the call, I can do my best to conference you in. I'm sorry I don't have a toll free number to this bridge for Argentina. Thanks, Maggie Magnolia Mansourkia Mobley Chief Privacy Counsel Verizon Communications 703-351-3199 Voice 703-351-3669 Fax 202-744-3745 Mobile

1 0

ISPCP Response on GNSO Administrative structure
by Tony Holmes Aug. 26, 2009

Aug. 26, 2009

Julie Please find attached the official response from the ISPCP on the proposal to change the structure of the GNSO which originated within the GNSO Ops team. This document represents the consensus view of the ISPCP. Regards Tony Holmes Chairman ISPCP

1 0

GNSO Council representation between now and Seoul
by Tony Holmes Aug. 24, 2009

Aug. 24, 2009

Dear ISPCP members I've been informed that due to changes within Verizon, Greg Ruth is no longer able to represent the ISPCP on the GNSO Council. The timing is a little unfortunate as Greg's term expired at the next meeting in Seoul anyway. You'll also be aware that the Constituency will be holding elections shortly in order to seat two new representatives on the new reformed GNSO Council. Against that background we need to find a way forward between now and Seoul in order to cover the two scheduled GNSO meetings before then and there are a number of points that require careful consideration; * All of those currently representing the ISPCP on the GNSO council will be standing down at the Seoul meeting and will not be eligible to stand for re-election, that means for the new Council we start with a completely new slate of candidates * If we bring forward that election with the intention of covering Greg's slot between now and Seoul it restricts those who can stand due to the geographic diversity rule e.g it rules out all candidates from Latin America and Europe as both Tony Harris and I are already on the Council. That hardly seems fair. * If we bring forward an election, under the current ISPCP bylaws we cannot conclude that process in time for the next GNSO call, therefore it would only cover the one remaining teleconference/meeting. For the commercial Stakeholder Group that is unacceptable as we would lose 1 vote on all issues. In order to overcome those problems, I would like to propose the following way forward. For the two remaining meetings Greg's place on Council should be taken by Maggie Mansoukia. Most of you know Maggie from her attendance at ICANN meetings over the years and both being employed by Verizon, Greg and Maggie have always worked very closely on ICANN matters. Maggie has also actively engaged in the ISPCP issues across the years (particularly on the WHOIS Task Force where she represented the Constituency for many years) and is therefore well placed to bridge this short gap. Before proposing this solution I did speak with Maggie and I'm pleased to say that she would be willing to undertake this role if it is the will of the Constituency. Therefore could I ask you to respond back if you would support this approach. Please respond within the next 7 days and no response will be counted as 'no objection to the proposed approach'. I'd also like to take this opportunity on behalf of the Constituency to thanks Greg for all his hard work over many years. Regards Tony

5 4

COMMENT REQUIRED by end of Tuesday 25 August.
by Tony Holmes Aug. 24, 2009

Aug. 24, 2009

Dear ISPCP members Following the support expressed to respond to the GNSO Operations Team's request for comments on a proposed revised structure for the GNSO, the following response has been produced based on comments received. The aim is to forward this to the GNSO Operations team before their conference call on Wednesday 26th August ,. If you require amendment, please respond by the end of Tuesday 25th. Thanks Tony __________________ ISP& Connectivity Providers Constituency Response to GNSO Council Operations Work Team on Proposed GNSO Structure In response to the recent request for comments on the proposal to create a new GNSO Administrative body to deal with administrative issues the ISPCP offers the following comments. The consensus view of the ISPCP Constituency is that the creation of a new Administrative body would not be in the best interest of the GNSO. At a time when the GNSO is fundamentally changing its structure and working methods with the move towards a more progressive role for working groups, its essential the GNSO use the available resource wisely. The GNSO already has too much work and too few volunteers. Creating an additional stream of work would have the effect of diluting the base of volunteers even more and bring into question the whole nature of ICANN as a bottom up organization. As the number of volunteers dwindles, more and more of the work has to be undertaken by staff if the required progress is to be made. That situation would inevitably evolves from coordination and facilitation by staff to actual policy making. In addition such a move adds and additional layer of complexity, with limited reward. The ISPCP does not support the division of the GNSO in this manner.

2 1

Response to GNSO Ops team request for comment
by Tony Holmes Aug. 21, 2009

Aug. 21, 2009

All The GNSO Reform Operations Team that both Wolf-Ulrich and I participate in, recently circulated a request for comments on a proposal that was being discussed within that group on restructuring the GNSO into two separate streams. One dealing with policy issues the other administration. As there was no consensus within the Ops team on this approach they specifically posed the following question: "Do you think that the establishment of a new, additional body to address specific responsibilities - as described herein - would better serve the stakeholder groups that make up the GNSO, or not" Those of you who were present at the ISPCP meeting in Sydney will recall that this issue was discussed and there was no support, basically because it was seen as adding more bureaucracy and overhead. My question to you is should we submit a response from the Constituency stating that? This action was supported during the Sydney meeting but as time has passed I thought I would check once more to see if there is any opposition to this. If we are to respond I would need to do that early next week, so if you are opposed to that action, please reply promptly. Regards Tony

2 1

FW: Policy Developer Process Work Team - Attendance
by Tony Holmes Aug. 14, 2009

Aug. 14, 2009

All Please see and note the attached email from Jeff. Like a number of other Constituencies we're struggling a little with participation in the large number of groups working through the GNSO. To those who volunteered to represent the ISPs, can I urge that you make every effort to attend the sessions whenever possible. Thanks Tony _____ From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us] Sent: 10 August 2009 16:00 To: Neuman, Jeff; Robin Gross; David W. Maher; mike(a)rodenbaugh.com; Philip Sheppard; zahid(a)jamilandjamil.com; Metalitz, Steven; Mason Cole; Avri Doria; tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com; Olga Cavalli; tdavis2(a)speakeasy.net Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Margie Milam; Liz Gasster; Marika Konings; Gisella Gruber-White Subject: RE: Policy Developer Process Work Team - Attendance Importance: High All, I have not gotten a response from anyone on this list and am looking for ideas on how we can improve attendance and participation from each of the constituencies. We had yet another meeting last Thursday and aside from myself and ICANN staff, only 5 others showed up (2 registrars (Bladel & Diaz), 1 registry (Maher), an ALAC rep (Greenberg), and Avri in her personal capacity). There was no rep from the CBUC, ISP, IP or NCUC constituencies. Please find enclosed an updated chart. Some more figures to consider: Out of the 12 meetings since March 19th: · The NCUC rep has attended only 1 meeting (and that was in early April) · One of the 2 CBUC members have attended only 7 or the 12 meetings (none since June) · Of the 3 IP reps, one of them has only showed up in a total of only 4 meetings (None since May) · An ISP rep has shown up for 7 of 12 meetings · Registrars Congrats You have attended all of the meetings and are the model for everyone to follow! · Registries You have participated in 9 of the 12 meetings. Avri, can you please post these results on the GNSO Council website and make a plea during the next meeting for more participation. This may include substituting members of constituencies who can no longer attend or at the very least appointing alternatives. Thanks for your help. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy _____ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: Neuman, Jeff Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:34 AM To: 'Robin Gross'; 'David W. Maher'; 'mike(a)rodenbaugh.com'; Philip Sheppard; zahid(a)jamilandjamil.com; 'Metalitz, Steven'; 'Mason Cole'; Avri Doria; 'tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com'; 'Olga Cavalli'; 'tdavis2(a)speakeasy.net' Subject: Policy Developer Process Work Team - Attendance All, As Chair of the Policy Development Process Work Team, I wanted to write to you all, as Chairs for your respective constituencies and/or nominating committee reps to the GNSO Council, to solicit your help in getting attendance at our bi-weekly conference calls and participation on the mailing lists. Although I understand it is summer and attendance usually goes down, I am attaching a chart that shows the attendance of the members of the Work Team for the past several months. A couple of the constituencies have good records, but most of them are not. Perhaps you can go back to your respective constituencies to see what you can do to get those that are signed up to attend, or to find suitable replacements. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help you all out. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / <mailto:jeff.neuman@neustar.biz> jeff.neuman(a)neustar.biz / <http://www.neustar.biz/> www.neustar.biz _____ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

1 0

SECRETARIAT: Meeting Notes from Sydney Now Available
by Mark McFaddden Aug. 10, 2009

Aug. 10, 2009

All: Notes from the Sydney, Australia ISPCP meeting have been published. I've included the PDF as an attachment, but the same file is also available on the ISPCP web site at: http://www.ispcp.info/notes-syd.pdf mark Mark McFadden, Secretariat ISPCP Constituency, ICANN secretariat(a)ispcp.info Y! IM: mcfadden AIM: McElmside Tw: McElmside Bkite: mcfadden Fb: Mark McFadden

1 0

SECRETARIAT: Call for Nominations - ICANN NomCom
by Mark McFaddden Aug. 10, 2009

Aug. 10, 2009

======================================================================== Internet Service Provider and Connectivity Provider Constituency Generic Names Supporting Organization ======================================================================== 10 August 2009 NOMINATION PERIOD OPEN - ICANN NomCom 2010 Representative In accordance with both the ICANN bylaws and the ISPCP bylaws this is the official call for nominations for an ISPCP representative to ICANN's Nominating Committee. According to the ISPCP Articles adopted at the Santiago meeting of the ISP and Connectivity Providers constituency (and later amended between the Melbourne and Stockholm ICANN meetings) an election of a representative to the ICANN NomCom are to take place thirty days before the first scheduled meeting of the ICANN NomCom. With the adoption of the most recent ICANN By-laws, the ISPCP is required to elect one member to the ICANN NomCom. This member will be taking the seat currently held by Greg Ruth. Greg is not eligible to be nominated and selected again this year. There is a two term limit for NomCom members. We are looking for a person from the constituency to fill this position. The ISPCP Articles call for a nomination period of two weeks. Every member of the ISPCP may nominate one candidate for the position of ISPCP representative to the ICANN Nominating Committee. This mail requests that you nominate an eligible ISPCP member to be elected to the ICANN Nominating Committee. To make a nomination, please mail the following information to the election manager: ->: the name of the nominee ->: the electronic mail address of the nominee ->: the ISPCP member organization to which the nominee belongs ->: if possible, a voice phone number for the nominee During the nomination period, potential nominees will be asked to indicate their willingness to serve as the representative to the ICANN NomCom. The nomination period - . opens on Monday, 10 August 2009 at 0600 GMT . closes on Monday, 24 August 2009 at 2200 GMT. Nominations should be sent to the ISPCP Secretariat at: elections(a)ispcp.info If you have questions relating to the election, the constituency Articles or the nomination process please contact the ISPCP Secretariat at: mcfadden(a)ispcp.info mark Mark McFadden, Secretariat ISPCP Constituency, ICANN secretariat(a)ispcp.info Y! IM: mcfadden AIM: McElmside Tw: McElmside Bkite: mcfadden Fb: Mark McFadden

1 0