July 2010 - ispcp - lists.icann.org

Change of time for conference call
by Tony Holmes Aug. 3, 2010

Aug. 3, 2010

All Those of us in Seoul discussed holding a conference call on Friday 6th November at 13.00 UTC. Tony Harris has since advised that he will be unable to join at that time as it clashes with an important OSC work team call. Therefore I propose that we change the time of this call to 14.30 UTC. Call in details will be circulated shortly. Regards Tony

9 36

ENC: [council] FW: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition
by Jaime Wagner - CGI July 29, 2010

July 29, 2010

fyi Jaime Wagner CGI (Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil) Representante dos Provedores de Acesso e Conteúdo jaime(a)cgi.br (51)8126-0916 j.w(a)gner.net.br -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Gomes, Chuck Enviada em: quarta-feira, 28 de julho de 2010 18:50 Para: GNSO Council Assunto: [council] FW: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition Note that the # of GNSO reps on the AoC SSR RT was increased from 2 to 3. The GNSO had requested 4 but if they gave us 4 the ccNSO and the GAC would have wanted more also. Not what we wanted but better than what we had. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: owner-soac-discussion(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-soac-discussion@icann.org] On Behalf Of Heather.Dryden(a)ic.gc.ca Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:35 PM To: soac-discussion(a)icann.org Cc: rod.beckstrom(a)icann.org; olof.nordling(a)icann.org; alice.jansen(a)icann.org; donna.austin(a)icann.org; denise.michel(a)icann.org; massimiliano.minisci(a)icann.org Subject: [soac-discussion] DNS SSR & WHOIS RT Composition Dear Chairs/Vice-chairs, I am writing to inform you that Rod and I have agreed to the following composition of the two new Review Teams in order that this can be communicated to your respective constituencies. We have endeavoured to align the identified priorities of the various constituencies with the composition of each Review Team. I understand that there will be a public announcement to follow. Best, Heather Security, Stability and Resiliency GAC Chair or Designate 1 GAC 1 GNSO 3 ccNSO 2 ALAC 2 SSAC 2 RSSAC 1 ASO 1 Independent expert 2-3 CEO 1 WHOIS GAC Chair or Designate 1 GAC 3 GNSO 4 ccNSO 1 ALAC 1 SSAC 1 RSSAC ASO 1 Independent expert 2-3 (not seeking endorsement from an SO or AC) CEO 1

1 0

FW: Notice of Internet Industry Alliance [IIIA] meeting [South Africa]
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com July 28, 2010

July 28, 2010

For the attention of all members in case youre interested in attending. Tony From: Elaine [mailto:elaine@hivemind.net] Sent: 19 July 2010 14:06 To: tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com Cc: 'A Harris' Subject: Notice of Internet Industry Alliance [IIIA] meeting [South Africa] Attention: Mr Tony Holmes ICANN ISP Constituency _______________________ Dear Sir Alan Levin kindly provided me with your contact details. We are pleased to announce that the Internet Industry Alliance (IIIA) meeting will be held in Mulderdrift, South Africa this year. The IIIA was formed in 2007 as a forum for ISP organisations from around the world to share information and collaborate on issues of mutual interest. IIIA members and some of the participants in this year's event include: - The Internet Industry Association of Singapore - The United States Internet Industry Association - The Internet Industry Association (Australia) - The Internet Service Providers Association of South Africa - AfrISPA - Camara Argentina de Internet (CABASE) - The Cyber Café Association of India (CCAOI) We have identified your organisation as an ISP representative association/forum that might find it beneficial to attend this year's IIIA meeting to discuss issues of mutual interest to ISPs around the world, and plan future co-operation. The Internet Service Providers' Association of South Africa (ISPA) and UniForum SA (the co.za administrators) will be hosting the Internet Industry Alliance (IIIA) meeting as part of this year's annual industry conference to be held at Kloofzicht Lodge, 1747 Kromdraai Road, Muldersdrift, South Africa from 15 17 September 2010. The first day of the conference brings together representatives of ISP associations from six continents, to debate and discuss Internet industry developments in each region, and to discuss issues of global importance, including: cybercrime, copyright, net neutrality, domain names, content liability, privacy and data retention. A draft programme is available on the iWeek web site: http://www.iweek.org.za/ iWeek 2010 is a free conference, and most of the proceedings are open to anyone involved in the Internet industry. If you are interested in attending please register at: http://www.iweek.org.za/register-for-iweek/. Please contact the ISPA Secretariat if you require assistance with arranging your accommodation. http://www.iweek.org.za/

1 0

RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com July 27, 2010

July 27, 2010

Dear ISPCP members In view of the differing responses to the request to change the time of the call, we will have to stick to the original time of 14.00 UTC on 3rd August. Apologies to those struggling with this time. Regards Tony From: Mansourkia, Magnolia [mailto:maggie.mansourkia@verizon.com] Sent: 27 July 2010 18:38 To: Anthony Harris; Tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com; Jaime Wagner - CGI; ispcp(a)icann.org Subject: RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3 I'll be on holiday that week, but plan to join the call at 14.00. I don't mind changing earlier to 12.00 but cannot do later at 17.00 _____ From: owner-ispcp(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Harris Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 9:38 AM To: Tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com; 'Jaime Wagner - CGI'; ispcp(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3 Tony, UTC 12.00 doesnt work for me, sorry. UTC 17.00 and on is ok for me. Tony Harris ----- Original Message ----- From: Tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com To: 'Jaime Wagner - CGI' <mailto:jaime@cgi.br> ; ispcp(a)icann.org Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 3:41 AM Subject: RE: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3 Jaime/All I have no problems changing the time providing nobody who plans to join the call objects. Please let me know if this will cause difficulties by the end of Thursday 29th. If there is an objection we will stick with the agreed time. In addition please indicate whether it's preferable to move the call forward or back. Tony From: owner-ispcp(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jaime Wagner - CGI Sent: 27 July 2010 03:38 To: tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com; ispcp(a)icann.org Subject: [ispcp] RES: Call on August 3 Our call is confirmed for August, 3 at 14:00 UTC? Could it be anticipated to 12:00 UTC? Or postponed to 17:00UTC or after? Jaime Wagner

2 1

WG: ICANN News Alert -- Public Comment: Initial Report on Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 27, 2010

July 27, 2010

FYI! Is it necessary/possible to comment on behalf of the ISPCP? I'll be on vacation over the deadline and couldn't assist. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: ICANN News Alert [mailto:communications@icann.org] Gesendet: Samstag, 24. Juli 2010 02:57 An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich Betreff: ICANN News Alert -- Public Comment: Initial Report on Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-23jul10-en.htm ________________________________ Public Comment: Initial Report on Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries 23 July 2010 The GNSO Vertical Integration Working Group is seeking comments on its Initial Report on Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries. This Initial Report <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/vi-pdp-wg-initial-rep ort-23jul10-en.pdf> [PDF, 731 KB] is posted for public comment <http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201008-en.htm#vi- pdp-initial-report> as a required step in the GNSO's Policy Development Process on Vertical Integration between Registrars and Registries. The Initial Report describes various proposed solutions for restrictions on vertical integration between registrars and registries for adoption in the New gTLD Program. Please note: The Working Group is working under an extremely aggressive schedule in order to meet the requirements that have been placed on it by the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board. The Working Group is planning to continue its analysis throughout the public comment period. Reviewers are encouraged to submit comments early to provide the group as much time as possible to consider them. The public comment period ends on 12 August 2010. Background: The GNSO Council has commenced a policy development process (PDP) on the topic of vertical integration between registrars and registries. The GNSO Council formed a working group to evaluate whether any policy recommendations should be developed on the topic of vertical integration between registrars and registries affecting both new gTLDs and existing gTLDs. ICANN is currently in the process of finalizing the implementation details for the launch of new gTLDs. ICANN has posted four draft applicant guidebooks and a series of topic papers for public comment describing the manner in which ICANN proposes to implement this program. These documents include proposals on the topic of vertical integration and whether cross-ownership restrictions or other rules related to vertical integration should be adopted to apply to the New gTLD Program. The Initial Report describes several proposals regarding vertical integration that have been developed and analyzed by the VI Working Group. No proposal has achieved consensus support within the VI Working Group. These proposals are included for the purpose of seeking public comment and will be subject to further analysis and debate as the VI Working Group continues to strive to develop a consensus position to recommend to the GNSO Council on an expedited basis. The Initial Report published for public comment is a "snapshot" of a living document that will be revised several times during the public comment period. Reviewers are encouraged to check on the working-group wiki for the latest version of this Initial Report. This public comment forum is an opportunity to comment on any of the proposed vertical integration models that are described the Initial Report. The Initial Report will be posted for a public comment period that closes on 12 August 2010. Comments can be sent to vi-pdp-initial-report(a)icann.org and reviewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/vi-pdp-initial-report/. Additional Information: To review the Issues Report on Vertical Integration Between Registries and Registrars, please refer to http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/report-04dec09-en.pdf [PDF, 254 KB]. The ICANN Board resolution on Vertical Integration is posted at http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-12mar10-en.htm#5. To review the charter describing the policy work undertaken by the Vertical Integration Working Group, please refer to: http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/vi-chartered-objective s-10mar10-en.pdf [PDF, 41 KB]. For information on the details of the implementation planning activities for new gTLDs, please refer to the documents posted at http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm To review updates to the Initial Report that may be developed by the VI Working Group during the public comment period, please refer to the archive of Initial Report snapshots posted at https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?initial_report_snaps hots. Staff responsible: Margie Milam ________________________________ Sign up for ICANN's Monthly Magazine <http://www.icann.org/magazine/> This message was sent from ICANN News Alert to knobenw(a)telekom.de. It was sent from: ICANN, 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 , Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6601. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below. Email Marketing by <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> iContact - Try It Free! <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> <http://app.icontact.com/icp/static/images/icons/email_manage_subscripti on.png> Manage your subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=11118977&l=6333&s=WW8E& m=314492&c=165637> <http://click.icptrack.com/icp/track.php?msgid=314492&act=WW8E&r=1111897 7&c=165637>

6 9

Our comment for DAGv4
by maruyama＠nic.ad.jp July 26, 2010

July 26, 2010

Dear Friends, FYI, JPNIC has submitted a comment for DAGv4. http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/msg00042.html Please note that our claim has some relation to the ongoing vertical integration discussion. Regards, Masa. ---- (Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)

1 0

Our comment for DAGv4
by maruyama＠nic.ad.jp July 25, 2010

July 25, 2010

Dear Friends, FYI, JPNIC has submitted a comment for DAGv4. http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/msg00042.html Regards, Masa. ---- (Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)

1 0

ENC: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
by Jaime Wagner - CGI July 22, 2010

July 22, 2010

fyi Jaime Wagner CGI (Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil) Representante dos Provedores de Acesso e Conteúdo jaime(a)cgi.br (51)8126-0916 j.w(a)gner.net.br -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Gomes, Chuck Enviada em: quinta-feira, 22 de julho de 2010 14:40 Para: council(a)gnso.icann.org Assunto: FW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 Please note that the AoC RT Selectors for the SSR & Whois RTs agreed to my request for an extension of the deadline for SO/AC endorsements to 12 September 2010. That is consistent with the extension to the application period to 29 July, thereby giving the GNSO 45 days for our endorsement process as originally planned. With these two extensions, the GNSO endorsement timeline is as follows: * 29 July - End of application period * 19 August - Due date for SG input (SG primary endorsements + additional candidates supported for diversity purposes) * 26 August - Council meeting * 8 September - Council meeting * 12 September - GNSO endorsement slate due to Selectors. Please make sure that your respective groups are aware of this information. Thanks, Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@icann.org] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:29 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: soac-discussion(a)icann.org Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 Chuck, I am happy to confirm that the selectors have agreed to the extension as requested by you. Very best regards Olof -----Original Message----- From: Olof Nordling Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:27 PM To: 'Gomes, Chuck' Cc: soac-discussion(a)icann.org Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 Chuck, Thank you for this! I will revert a.s.a.p. concerning the confirmation. Very best regards Olof -----Original Message----- From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:52 PM To: Olof Nordling Cc: soac-discussion(a)icann.org Subject: FW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 Importance: High Olof, As you can see in the email string below, On Monday of this week, I asked Councilors to respond if they had any objections to extending the due date for GNSO AoC SSR & Whois RTs to 12 September. No objections were received one conditional statement of support was received from Wolf-Ulrich Knoben. It is very important for me to be able to communicate to the GNSO community whether the extension of the SO/AC deadline for submission of endorsements for the two teams will be extended to 12 September. Please let us know as soon as possible. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: KnobenW(a)telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:57 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; council(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: AW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 Chuck, that could be accepted but should also be communicated as "conditio sine qua non" meaning it being essential for the SG and GNSO evaluation process having the time available as agreed before. Thanks and best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Juli 2010 00:37 An: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO Betreff: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 I have received very little feedback on the following. Is anyone opposed to the extension of the GNSO endorsement deadline to 12 September instead of 31 August? If I do not see any objections by the end of the day on Tuesday, 19 July, I will communicate with Olof that this seems like a workable plan and see if we can get official approval of it. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- > council(a)gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:33 AM > To: Council GNSO > Subject: FW: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for > a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > > Please note the suggestion in item b below from Olof. It seems like a > good solution to me but I would like feedback from Councilors in > consultation with your respective groups. This of course is time > sensitive so please respond right away as possible. > > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@icann.org] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:09 AM > To: Gomes, Chuck; William Drake > Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac-discussion(a)icann.org; Alice > Jansen; Donna Austin > Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for > a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > Chuck, > I think you know that this change occurred with the best of intentions > and that there was a technical mishap in the necessarily short time > frame for the attempted, but derailed, consultation. That aside, I did > the call and I take the blame for the unintended consequences. > > Now, how can we best redress the situation? > > a) Is the suggested correction of the announcement the best way to go? > > b) If not, counting 45 days from 29 July gives 12 September as delivery > date for the GNSO endorsed candidate list. In my response to you about > the 45 days, I used the phrase "best effort" regarding the end of > August deadline. Although certainly putting a squeeze on the sequence > of events to precede the launch deadline, I think that is doable, the > selectors agendas so permitting. > > Please advice on the above. > Thanks > Olof > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:24 PM > To: Olof Nordling; William Drake > Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac-discussion(a)icann.org; Alice > Jansen; Donna Austin > Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for > a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > Olof, > > Holding off is the right thing to do Olof. I was trying to stop the > confusion as quickly as possible but that didn't work. > > It is critical that a decision like this never be handled in this > manner again. And it is totally unreasonable to expect the GNSO to > compact an already cramped process into an even shorter time frame > without concurrence from the GNSO. I agree with others that extensions > are common and generally good but doing so without comparable > extensions for other deadlines should not happen without agreement that > those impacted can live with the changes. > > I had specifically requested 45 days for GNSO processes and that was > granted. Moreover, the process the Council approved was fully public > so it should not come as a surprise that we required time to implement > our endorsement process. Unfortunately, all that seemed to be > completely ignored in the decision to extend without extending the > corresponding deadline for SO/AC endorsements. > > Chuck > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@icann.org] > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 5:55 AM > > To: William Drake > > Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac- > > discussion(a)icann.org; Alice Jansen; Donna Austin > > Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants > for > > a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > > > Hi Bill, > > Certainly, I'll hold it until notified. > > Best > > Olof > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch] > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:47 AM > > To: Olof Nordling > > Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO; soac- > > discussion(a)icann.org; Alice Jansen; Donna Austin > > Subject: Re: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants > for > > a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > > > Hi Olof > > > > On Jul 16, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Olof Nordling wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Chuck, > > > It so happens that there is an error in the recently posted > > announcement - it still displays on the front page with a deadline of > > 15 July - so we need to make a correction anyway. I suggest that we > in > > this correction explicitly and clearly exclude GNSO applications from > > the extension. Would that be satisfactory? We could also make an > > additional announcement stating that "Call for GNSO applications is > > closed", if you prefer. > > > > While I've not had time to poll everyone it's a fair bet that as much > > as half the council is opposed to the exclusion, so could you please > > hold off until we come to an understanding on how to proceed? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > I also copy this to the SOAC list (that should work now, I've been > > assured). > > > > > > Very best regards > > > Olof > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- > > council(a)gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck > > > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:19 PM > > > To: Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO > > > Subject: RE: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants > > for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > > Importance: High > > > > > > > > > Unless further notified to the contrary, this extension will not > > apply to GNSO candidates. The deadline for candidates requesting > GNSO > > endorsements remains today, 15 July. I have been told that the GNSO > > must still provide its endorsements by the end of August; we were > > already in a time crunch for implementing our process, it would be > > impossible to follow the approved process with this extension or > > probably for any extension. > > > > > > I apologize for any confusion this may create, but as long as our > > endorsements are due by the end of August, I see no other > alternative. > > > > > > Chuck Gomes > > > GNSO Council Chair > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- > > >> council(a)gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry > > >> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:37 PM > > >> To: Council GNSO > > >> Subject: [council] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for > a > > >> Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010 > > >> > > >> > > >> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-01jun10-en.htm > > >> > > >> EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of > > Volunteer > > >> Review Team Member > > >> > > >> - Review Team 2: Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS - > > >> - Review Team 4: WHOIS Policy - > > >> > > >> Updated: 15 July 2010 > > >> 13 July 2010 > > >> 1 July 2010 > > >> 1 June 2010 > > >> > > >> Deadline: 15 July 2010 - 23.59 UTC > > >> > > >> Extended to: 29 July 2010 - 23.59 UTC > > >> > > >> The Affirmation of Commitments calls for a periodic review of four > > key > > >> ICANN objectives, namely: > > >> > > >> 1. Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of > > global > > >> Internet users; > > >> 2. Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; > > >> 3. Promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice; > > >> 4. WHOIS policy. > > >> > > >> Affirmation reviews are to be performed by Review Teams composed > of > > >> volunteer community Members representing the relevant Supporting > > >> Organizations and Advisory Committees of ICANN. Please refer to > the > > >> Affirmation Reviews web space for full reference. > > >> > > >> ICANN now invites interested individuals to apply for a position > of > > >> volunteer Review Team Member on the following Review Teams: > > >> > > >> * Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; > > >> * WHOIS policy. > > >> > > >> This call is solely intended for interested individuals who wish > to > > >> apply in representation of a Supporting Organization (SO) or > > Advisory > > >> Committee (AC). Candidatures to serve as independent experts will > > not > > >> be considered. > > >> > > >> Please download the full text of this Call for Applicants [PDF, > 101 > > >> KB], which contains further instructions and information on the > > >> application procedure for interested candidates. > > >> > > >> Interested candidates, please submit your CV, letter of motivation > > and > > >> SO/AC requirements (if applicable) to rtcandidatures(a)icann.org by > 29 > > >> July 2010 - 23:59 UTC. SO/AC requirements may be found at: > > >> http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/call-for-applicants-2- > > and- > > >> 4-en.htm > > >> > > >> Launch dates and deadlines: > > >> > > >> * 29 July 2010 --> Publication of the list of volunteers > > >> * End of August 2010 --> Endorsement by SO/ACs > > >> * First week of September 2010 --> Selectors announce the RT > > >> Members > > >> > > >> Glen de Saint Géry > > >> GNSO Secretariat > > >> gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org > > >> http://gnso.icann.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *********************************************************** > > William J. Drake > > Senior Associate > > Centre for International Governance > > Graduate Institute of International and > > Development Studies > > Geneva, Switzerland > > william.drake(a)graduateinstitute.ch > > www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html > > www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake > > *********************************************************** > > >

1 0

WG: [liaison6c] Call for volunteers proposing a way forward on the RAP Final Report recommendations
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 19, 2010

July 19, 2010

Any frontrunner? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich Dear All, Following on from the GNSO Council discussion on Thursday 15 July, regarding the Registration Abuse Policies (RAP) Final Report Conclusions, Recommendations, & Next Steps http://gnso.icann.org/issues/rap/rap-final-report-conclusion-recommendation… This is a call for volunteers who would be willing to draft a proposed approach with regard to the recommendations contained in the report, which could include the timing of forming groups to consider some of the recommendations in the final report as well as how to deal with those recommendations that did not achieve unanimous consensus. For those recommendations that do not concern the Initiation of a Policy Development Process, proposed next steps / actions by the GNSO Council might be considered too. Please consult with your stakeholder groups and anyone willing to work on this task please contact the gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org. Volunteers are not restricted to Council members and may come from the RAP Working Group itself. While he does not have the time to take the lead on this, Chuck volunteered to assist in this effort if needed. Please submit names to be added to the mailing list for this purpose by 23 July 2010. A progress report on where the group is will be submitted to the Council at its next meeting on 5 August 2010. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

[council] Action items from the 15 July Council meeting
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 19, 2010

July 19, 2010

The following council action items are to dealt with in ste constituency/SG. I suggest to talk about during our next call. Please note the following Councilor action times coming from our 15 July Council meeting and follow-up in your respective groups with the goal of being prepared to further work on the issues in our next meeting on 5 August: * Item 2: Prioritization of GNSO work - Councilors are encouraged to engage in further consultation and discussion in the stakeholder groups and provide input at the next Council meeting on ways to improve the process. * Item 4: Whois Studies - Stakeholder Groups are encouraged to avail themselves of the Staff offer for additional consultation and information on the studies so that informed decisions can be made at the next Council meeting. * Item 6: Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Final Report - The GNSO Secretariat will call for volunteers who may be working group, stakeholder group and or Council members to join the group. While he does not have the time to take the lead on this, Chuck volunteered to assist in this effort if needed. (Note that Glen sent this notice out; please identify any volunteers who would be willing to work on this, possibly members of the RAP WG.) * Item 9: Audio-casting of Council meetings - Councilors are urged to contact their appropriate stakeholder groups and constituencies to provide feedback on the advantages of the audio cast for the next Council meeting. * Item 10.2: Update on Councilor and Council Officer Elections Processes - Stakeholder groups and constituencies are encouraged to organise early elections for council representatives, especially in cases where Councilor terms end in December 2010, so that the elections for the Council chair and vice chairs can be handled in a timely manner. If anyone wants to make a motion or simply propose an idea regarding any of the above for action and/or discussion on 5 August, please do so not later than 28 July so that Councilors can vet these with their respective groups. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich

1 0