January 2010 - ispcp - lists.icann.org

Change of time for conference call
by Tony Holmes Aug. 3, 2010

Aug. 3, 2010

All Those of us in Seoul discussed holding a conference call on Friday 6th November at 13.00 UTC. Tony Harris has since advised that he will be unable to join at that time as it clashes with an important OSC work team call. Therefore I propose that we change the time of this call to 14.30 UTC. Call in details will be circulated shortly. Regards Tony

9 36

FW: Commercial Stakeholder group Breakfast in Nairobi
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com Feb. 2, 2010

Feb. 2, 2010

Dear ISPCP members If you will be in Nairobi and wish to attend this breakfast (see below) please respond back to me by WEDNESDAY 3rd FEB. Thank You. Tony From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 29 January 2010 17:35 To: 'Knobenw'; Jaime Plug In; Tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; BC Secretariat; J. Scott Evans; Rosette, Kristina; Taylor, David Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Stéphane Van Gelder Subject: Commercial Stakeholder group Breakfast in Nairobi Dear All, With regard to the Commercial Stakeholder Group breakfast meeting in Nairobi, would you please be able to give us an idea of and confirm: · the numbers you are expecting to attend the Commercial Stakeholder Group Breakfast on Tuesday morning, 9 March in Nairobi? · the time you will start the meeting 08:00 and run to 10:00? · please confirm that the Commercial Stakeholder Group meeting will follow at 10:30 -12:00? · the names of the Board members and staff you would like to invite? We are thinking that one of the hotels will be a more appropriate place for the breakfast as there is no suitable private space at the convention centre so that is why we need this information. Please respond by COB Thursday 4 February. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

4 3

WG: [council] Review of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) - please submit comments
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Jan. 30, 2010

Jan. 30, 2010

FYI Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 22:59 An: Council GNSO Betreff: [council] Review of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) - please submit comments Forwarded from Marco Lorenzoni Review of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) - please submit comments http://ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-11jan10.htm This is to remind you that ICANN has entrusted Items International, a private consulting firm, with the carrying out of the external review of the ccNSO. The consultants published an on-line survey <http://www.items.fr/icann_survey.php> a while ago which targets both ccTLDs and all other components of the ICANN community. Its scope is to collect mainly qualitative information which will be used by consultants to fulfill their mission; anonymity will be preserved when publishing. The survey will close on February 15th. Unfortunately, very few responses have been received from non-ccTLDs components of the communities; please consult the ccNSO review webpage <http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/ccnso/> where the ongoing activities are published. As representation of the public interest embodies one of ICANN's key principles, we would really appreciate if you could please participate in the survey and thus help the external reviewers produce a useful and workable report. Many thanks in advance. Links if you receive this message in text form: · Survey http://www.items.fr/icann_survey.php · ccNSO review webpage http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/ccnso/ Marco Lorenzoni --------------------- ICANN Director, Organizational Review marco.lorenzoni(a)icann.org Phone: +32.2.234 78 69 Mobile: +32.475.72 47 47 Fax: +32 2 234 7848 Skype: marco_lorenzoni --------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium

1 0

WG: [council] GAC letter regarding EOI
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Jan. 29, 2010

Jan. 29, 2010

FYI Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich Knoben -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Bruce Tonkin Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 00:42 An: council(a)gnso.icann.org Betreff: [council] GAC letter regarding EOI From: http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karklins-to-dengate-thrush-26jan10-e n.pdf Mr. Peter Dengate Thrush Chairman of the Board ICANN Re: GAC advice to the ICANN Board regarding the EoI process Dear Peter, The GAC appreciates the efforts of the Board and staff to explore the possible benefits and downsides of an Expression of Interest (EoI) phase for the new gTLD program. GAC recognises that such a process could help provide data on key questions relating to root scaling, staff administrative workload, and the different types of strings in the first round. However, there is still significant ambiguity about the purpose of such an EoI: mere data gathering or mandatory pre-registration. GAC notes that in the latter case the EoI could have a significant impact on the new gTLD program and that it should not prejudice the treatment of some outstanding policy issues. In this context, the GAC would like to express concerns regarding the consultation process, including that: - the first call for comments in November - December 2009 had very limited visibility and duration; - the objections raised in those limited consultations were not sufficiently examined in the summary of comments prepared by staff; - no request has been made for GAC's opinion, despite the clear public policy implications of the proposal (cf. Article III Sec 6 1 c. of the Bylaws); and - if the Board takes a decision in February 2010 on the EoI, there will have been no opportunity for face-to-face community interaction on this important new proposal before the final decision (contrary to Article III, Sec. 6 2 of the Bylaws). To co-ordinate the global Domain Name System in the public interest, and make its decisions in an accountable and transparent manner as requested by the Affirmation of Commitments, ICANN must provide an opportunity for broad cross-community interaction on this important process before final decisions are made. The GAC believes that the risks raised by the current draft EoI proposal must be more thoroughly evaluated. In particular, the proposed EoI model may: - give an unfair advantage to some ICANN participants who could pre-empt the most valuable strings before the rest of the world is fully aware of the gTLD program; - allow a speculative market for "EoI application slots"; and - penalize developing country applicants, and small non-profit TLD projects that none-the-less operate in the public interest. GAC recalls its March 2007 Principles on new gTLDs and intends to provide further comments on the EoI proposal before or at the Nairobi meeting, taking into account reactions by the community and comments posted. In view of the above, the GAC therefore advises the Board to: - avoid taking a decision on the EoI at its February meeting and defer it until the next ICANN Public meeting. A premature decision could trigger requests for reconsideration and further derail the discussion; - request that staff facilitate a full cross-community deliberation on the EoI at the next ICANN Public meeting, prior to any final decisions; and - ensure that the second summary of comments clearly documents the respective interests of respondents. The GAC would welcome the Board's early consideration and response to this advice. Yours sincerely Janis Karklins Chairman of the Governmental Advisory Committee, Ambassador of Latvia to France

1 0

WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions and action items 28 January 2010
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Jan. 28, 2010

Jan. 28, 2010

FYI! The motion to commence a Policy Development Process on Vertical Integration seems to get accepted (after the absentee voting period). As of the votes of the members who attended the meeting the result was: - Contracted Parties House: 0 in favour, 6 against - Non-Contracted Parties House: 10 in favour, 2 against (ISPCP) Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2010 19:40 An: Council GNSO Betreff: [council] GNSO Council resolutions and action items 28 January 2010 Dear Councillors, Ahead of the official Council minutes, the following resolutions were passed unanimously, Council approved the items below and you are reminded of certain action items. The results of the motion to commence a Policy Development Process on Vertical Integration will be posted at the end of the 72 hour absentee voting period, which ends on 12:54 UTC, Sunday, 31 January 2010. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen 1. Motion to Approve GNSO Council response to the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements and Implementation Processes proposed by Chuck Gomes seconded by Stéphane van Gelder with friendly amendments. Whereas: On 26 December 2009, ICANN Staff posted for public comment a discussion draft (http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/affirmation-reviews-draft-propo… ) that addresses the requirements and implementation processes for the reviews called for in the Affirmation of Commitments (http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-30sep09-en.htm#affirmati… ) On 7 January 2010, the GNSO Council initiated a drafting team to develop comments in response to the discussion draft On 19 January 2010, the drafting team submitted comments for Council consideration, which can be found at http://gnso.icann.org/drafts . The GNSO Council: Approves the comments Requests the Secretariat to post the comments to the public comment forum on behalf of the Council. Passed unanimously by voice vote of those present. Absent at the time of the vote: Adrian Kinderis, Olga Cavalli, Mike Rodenbaugh, Zahid Jamil Action Item: · The Council agreed that the drafting team, under the leadership of Bill Drake, should continue working on how GNSO volunteers should be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams. · The procedures should be presented to the Council on 10 February, 8 days before the Council meeting on 18 February 2010 for approval. · Councillors and stakeholder Groups are requested to provide input to the drafting team by COB on Monday, 1 February 2010. 2. Motion to approve Procedures for the 2010 Election of Board Seat 13 proposed by Chuck Gomes seconded by Olga Cavalli In response to section 3.3 of the GNSO Council Operating Procedures requirement that motions be posted 8 days in advance of meetings, the Council approved an exception to this requirement for this motion. Whereas, the term for ICANN's Board Seat 13, currently held by Bruce Tonkin, ends six months after the conclusion of the ICANN annual meeting, in April 2010; Whereas, Article X, Section 6 of the ICANN Bylaws provide that the GNSO shall make selections to fill Seat 13 as follows: a. the Contracted Party House shall select a representative to fill Seat 13; and b. the Non-Contracted Party House shall select a representative to fill Seat 14. Whereas, the GNSO Council desires to approve the procedures described in Annex 1 for the selection of 2010 Board Seat 13; http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-operating-procedures-redline-28jan10-en.p… Whereas, the GNSO Council desires to amend the GNSO Council Operating Procedures to adopt procedures to commence the selection process for the 2010 Election of Board Seat 13; Whereas, under the ICANN Bylaws, a twenty-one (21) day public comment period should be commenced with regard to amendments to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT: RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the procedures described in Annex 1 for the selection of 2010 Board Seat 13; http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-operating-procedures-redline-28jan10-en.p… RESOLVED FURTHER, that Section 2 of the GNSO Council Operating Procedures are amended to include a new Section 2.4 at the end hereof: "2.4 Board Seat Elections. The process for selecting the individual to fill Board Seat 13, which term expires at the end of April, 2010, is described on Annex 1 hereto. Except as expressly amended above, the GNSO Council Operating Procedures shall continue in full force and effect, as approved by the GNSO Council on 28 October 2009. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to commence a twenty-one (21) day public comment period on this amendment to the GNSO Operating Procedures, and reserves the right to modify the election procedures described in Annex 1 after the conclusion of the public comment period. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council Operations Work Team shall be tasked with developing the procedures for the future selection of Board Seats 13 and 14 to be included in the GNSO Council Operating Procedures. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Secretariat shall support the selection process for the 2010 election of Board Seat 13. Passed unanimously by voice vote of those present. Absent at the time of the vote: Adrian Kinderis, Olga Cavalli, Mike Rodenbaugh, Zahid Jamil Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG) The GNSO Council approved the two new members Rafik Dammak and Karen Anne Hayne as GNSO JIG members and Avri Doria as a JIG observer. Current GNSO JIG membership 1. Edmon Chung, Co-Chair (RySG) - Approved by the Council on 3 Sep 09 2. Terry Davis (NomCom Appointee) - Approved by the Council on 3 Sep 09 3. Stéphane van Gelder (RrSG) - Approved by the Council on 3 Sep 09 4. Rafik Dammak (NCSG) 5. Karen Anne Hayne (CSG) GNSO JIG observers 1. Avri Doria (NCSG) - Originally an ex-officio member as GNSO Council Chair 2. Chuck Gomes (Ex-Officio) Nairobi Meeting Planning: Action Items: · Requests for meeting space in the GNSO Working sessions on Saturday and Sunday should be sent to Stéphane van Gelder and the gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org. · Councillors and Stakeholder groups are requested to indicate specific interest in a GNSO Council session to discuss new gTLD issues on Saturday, 6 March 2010 from 13:00 to 16:00 local time. · A drafting team was formed to prepare for the joint GAC/GNSO meeting on Sunday, 7 March 2010. Volunteers are Rosemary Sinclair and Bill Drake and anyone wishing to join should contact the gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org. · Councillors and Stakeholder groups are requested to provide topics for discussion at the joint ccNSO/GNSO lunch meeting in Nairobi on Monday, 8 March 2010 in addition to the suggested topics: - Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) Review - Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN group (JIG) - ccTLD fast track Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

ENC: [council] Motion to Approve Procedures for Board Seat #13
by Jaime Wagner - CGI Jan. 28, 2010

Jan. 28, 2010

fyi Jaime Wagner ISPs Representative CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee) <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> j(a)bwagner.com.br <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> jaime <mailto:jaime@cgi.br> @cgi.br +55(51)8126-0916 De: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Gomes, Chuck Enviada em: quarta-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2010 22:47 Para: council(a)gnso.icann.org Assunto: [council] Motion to Approve Procedures for Board Seat #13 Prioridade: Alta The following two documents are attached for consideration in our Council meeting tomorrow, 28 January 2010: 1. MOTION TO APPROVE PROCEDURES FOR THE 2010 ELECTION OF BOARD SEAT 13 2. A redlined revised version of 'GNSO Operating Procedures' containing procedures for election of an ICANN Board Director to fill seat #13. I am hereby making the motion referenced in item 1 above. I apologise for the last minute nature of this motion and for the fact that it misses the 8-day deadline for motions stated in the GNSO Operating Procedures. Because of the lateness, we will have to approve an exception to the 8-day requirement before we may act on the motion. Unfortunately, the task of filling seat #13 was missed until just a few days ago and I take responsibility for that. Thanks to Glen for catching it. As you can see in the motion itself, the ICANN Bylaws require very quick action on this election and hence give us very little time to act. We just consulted with the General Council's Office today and learned that a 21-day comment period is needed for approval of the Procedures. Margie kindly wrote the motion in a way that allows us to move forward quickly and meet the Bylaws requirements if the Council approves the motion. Please forward this motion to your Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies right away. I understand that there will be inadequate time to obtain feedback, but I believe that the proposed procedure is non-controversial and consistent with the intent of the Bylaws changes approved last year allowing for the Contracted Party House to elect the Director for seat #13. There will be opportunity to discuss this in our meeting. Thanks for your understanding and cooperation on this. Please ask any questions you have and make comments if you like. Chuck Gomes

1 0

ENC: [council] FW: Nairobi Security Briefing Teleconferences
by Jaime Wagner - CGI Jan. 28, 2010

Jan. 28, 2010

FYI Jaime Wagner ISPs Representative CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee) j(a)bwagner.com.br jaime(a)cgi.br +55(51)8126-0916 -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Glen de Saint Géry Enviada em: quarta-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2010 23:26 Para: Council GNSO Assunto: [council] FW: Nairobi Security Briefing Teleconferences -----Original Message----- From: no-reply(a)icann.org [mailto:no-reply@icann.org] Dear Community: As a part of our efforts to provide more information for attendees and potential attendees of the Nairobi ICANN meeting, the staff are pleased to provide advance notice of an upcoming pair of teleconferences to brief you about about logistical and security arrangements, and allow you to ask questions. Agenda details will be forthcoming shortly, but we wanted to ensure we got the word out so you could 'save the date'. The teleconferences will be approximately one hour long, depending upon the length of the Q&A, and held as follows: 1) Thursday, 28th January, 0600 UTC (1130 New Delhi, 0900 Nairobi, 1400 Beijing, 1700 Sydney (for the Eastern Hemisphere) 2) Friday, 29th January, 2000 UTC (1200 Los Angeles, 1500 New York, 1700 Buenos Aires, 1800 Sao Paulo (for the Western Hemisphere) The agenda and material presented will be identical at each session. Freephone access dial-in numbers are available for many countries worldwide, with dial-outs upon request where needed. Information on how to attend will be provided along with the agenda shortly. Regards, ICANN

1 0

FW: Comments from ISPCP Constituency
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com Jan. 27, 2010

Jan. 27, 2010

The following comments have been submitted on behalf of the ISPCP. Regards Tony From: Tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com [mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com] Sent: 27 January 2010 22:43 To: 'draft-eoi-model(a)icann.org' Subject: Comments from ISPCP Constituency The following comment represents the views of the Internet Service Provider & Connectivity Providers Constituency. Tony Holmes ISPCP Chairman ISP & Connectivity Providers Constituency Constituency Comments on New gTLD Program - Draft expression of Interest/Pre-Registrations Model The ISPCP welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Draft expression of Interest/Pre registration model. The new gTLD program will have a strong impact on both ISPs and Network Operators, and the ISPCP considers the stability and security of the DNS is of prime importance to ISPs and the community that it serves. The ISPCP is reviewing the Expression of Interest (EoI) concept with great interest, and asks the board to consider the following issues in its discussion of the EoI. EoI may be a pragmatic approach and, as we go forward, and a more reliable tool to measure the true level of demand for new gTLDS of different categories. While many concerns remain regarding the EoI process and circumvention of the DAG, the ISPCP is mindful of the beneficial impact of the EoI. The data collected will help clarify and address two of the overarching issues: - Economic demand and impacts - Root scaling issues. It will also provide to ISPs and Network operators useful information that could assist in preparing for this fundamental change. For the EoI data to be fully representative, and to minimize gaming, the EoI should be mandatory for the first round of applications, and for the same reason, a deposit should be required. The ISPCP supports the principle that the deposit should be refundable if the new gTLD program is not launched within a specific period of time that would be known to all EoI candidates. But what is not clear is the timeline in which this is expected to happen and what the conditions will look like for launch of the EoI applicants. We understand that there may be amendments to the Applicant Guidebook and major changes to the RFP following the analysis of the results of the EoI. It is indeed important to assess the interest of the community for this process and amend the process accordingly to better serve it. However, if such amendments are required and have a significant substantive impact on a particular application because of its nature or characteristics (e.g. string or category of application/applicant), the EoI could create false expectations. We ask that ICANN elaborate on the contractual issues that will arise if the Applicant Guidebook conflicts with the EoI process. The EoI objectives are to clarify the impacts of the RFP related to the overarching issues. In this respect, we do not see the value of making public the participant and string information without the explicit consent of the requestor. Knowing the character string and the requestor's identity will not help evaluating the impacts for the above issues. Worse, in the absence of mechanisms in place like appeals, contention/dispute resolution, etc, such disclosure will result in confusion or legal actions without any mechanism in place for the potential applicant and/or its contender(s) to address them. This can only create confusion and uncertainty. A potential applicant should therefore be granted confidentiality for the string requested and/or on its identity if it so requests and public information should be restricted to what is necessary for the community to address in an efficient way the overarching issues. The EoI should aim to help to solve or to have a better view on overarching issues, not to create more confusion in the process, nor to further delay the process for gTLDs expansion. The EoI is a useful tool to gauge impact of the new TLD process, however there needs to be greater clarity and consideration of the concerns raised by the community prior to its launch.

1 0

AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Jan. 27, 2010

Jan. 27, 2010

On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to suggest the following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST). The draft amendment attached is targeted to provide more flexibility to the Review Teams in order to let themselves organize their support teams rather than to constitute support teams in advance. Looking forward to a fruitful discussion Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35 An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; william.drake(a)graduateinstitute.ch; council(a)gnso.icann.org Cc: ispcp(a)icann.org Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR Thanks Wolf. If you could propose a suggested edit, it would be very helpful. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org > [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW(a)telekom.de > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM > To: william.drake(a)graduateinstitute.ch; council(a)gnso.icann.org > Cc: ispcp(a)icann.org > Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR > > > Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd > like to address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There > must be a clear distinction between the RTs and potential STs > in order to avoid STs emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the > composition of the ST pools has carefully to be taken into > consideration or should even be regulated. If applicable > this should be expressed in the council response. > > Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response. > > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org > [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von William Drake > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40 > An: GNSO Council List > Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR > > Hello, > > Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to > the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements > and Implementation Processes, for discussion with our > respective SGs and in the Council. > > Best, > > Bill > > >

1 0

TR: [ispcp] Expression of Interest Pubblic comments
by alain.bidron＠orange-ftgroup.com Jan. 26, 2010

Jan. 26, 2010

[http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/orange_logo.gif] Alain Bidron FT/PRESIDENCE/NCPI/NAD/EAS/NAN Head of Naming Addressing Numbering Unit tel. + 33 1 57 36 17 24 mob. + 33 6 87 65 90 94 alain.bidron(a)orange-ftgroup.com<mailto:alain.bidron@orange-ftgroup.com> [http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/ampersand.gif] ________________________________ De : Mansourkia, Magnolia [mailto:maggie.mansourkia@verizon.com] Envoyé : mardi 26 janvier 2010 15:54 À : BIDRON Alain NCPI/NAD; ispcp(a)icann.org Objet : RE: [ispcp] Expression of Interest Pubblic comments Thanks for putting this together. I agree with the substance, and made a few minor edits. ________________________________ From: owner-ispcp(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of alain.bidron(a)orange-ftgroup.com Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 5:23 AM To: ispcp(a)icann.org Subject: [ispcp] Expression of Interest Pubblic comments New version with editorial changes, please ignore the previous one. Dear colleagues. As indicated in our last conference call, attached is a proposal drafted between Tony Holmes and myself, for an ISPCP position to be send in response to the public comment request on the gTLD program - Draft Expression of Interest/Pre-registrations model. See: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#draft-eoi As the deadline is the 27 January 2010, please provide any comment within the next 24 hours. Regards. Alain [http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/orange_logo.gif] Alain Bidron FT/PRESIDENCE/NCPI/NAD/EAS/NAN Head of Naming Addressing Numbering Unit tel. + 33 1 57 36 17 24 mob. + 33 6 87 65 90 94 alain.bidron(a)orange-ftgroup.com<mailto:alain.bidron@orange-ftgroup.com> [http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/ampersand.gif] ________________________________ De : owner-ispcp(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] De la part de alain.bidron(a)orange-ftgroup.com Envoyé : mardi 26 janvier 2010 10:21 À : ispcp(a)icann.org Objet : [ispcp] Expression of Interest Pubblic comments Dear colleagues. As indicated in our last conference call, attached is a proposal drafted between Tony Holmes and myself, for an ISPCP position to be send in response to the public comment request on the gTLD program - Draft Expression of Interest/Pre-registrations model. See: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#draft-eoi As the deadline is the 27 January 2010, please provide any comment within the next 24 hours. Regards. Alain [http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/orange_logo.gif] Alain Bidron FT/PRESIDENCE/NCPI/NAD/EAS/NAN Head of Naming Addressing Numbering Unit tel. + 33 1 57 36 17 24 mob. + 33 6 87 65 90 94 alain.bidron(a)orange-ftgroup.com<mailto:alain.bidron@orange-ftgroup.com> [http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/ampersand.gif] ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ******************************** ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ******************************** ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ********************************

1 0