July 2010 - ispcp - lists.icann.org

WG: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 15 July 2010.
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 19, 2010

July 19, 2010

FYI Best regards Wolf-Ulrich Knoben

1 0

WG: [liaison6c] EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 15, 2010

July 15, 2010

FYI Best regards Wolf-Ulrich http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-01jun10-en.htm EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - Review Team 2: Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS - - Review Team 4: WHOIS Policy - Updated: 15 July 2010 13 July 2010 1 July 2010 1 June 2010 Deadline: 15 July 2010 - 23.59 UTC Extended to: 29 July 2010 - 23.59 UTC The Affirmation of Commitments calls for a periodic review of four key ICANN objectives, namely: 1. Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users; 2. Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; 3. Promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice; 4. WHOIS policy. Affirmation reviews are to be performed by Review Teams composed of volunteer community Members representing the relevant Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees of ICANN. Please refer to the Affirmation Reviews web space for full reference. ICANN now invites interested individuals to apply for a position of volunteer Review Team Member on the following Review Teams: * Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; * WHOIS policy. This call is solely intended for interested individuals who wish to apply in representation of a Supporting Organization (SO) or Advisory Committee (AC). Candidatures to serve as independent experts will not be considered. Please download the full text of this Call for Applicants [PDF, 101 KB], which contains further instructions and information on the application procedure for interested candidates. Interested candidates, please submit your CV, letter of motivation and SO/AC requirements (if applicable) to rtcandidatures(a)icann.org by 29 July 2010 - 23:59 UTC. SO/AC requirements may be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/call-for-applicants-2-and-4-en.… Launch dates and deadlines: * 29 July 2010 --> Publication of the list of volunteers * End of August 2010 --> Endorsement by SO/ACs * First week of September 2010 --> Selectors announce the RT Members Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

FW: [liaison6c] FW: Audiocast details
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com July 15, 2010

July 15, 2010

FYI From: owner-liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-liaison6c@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: 14 July 2010 23:56 To: liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: [liaison6c] FW: Audiocast details Pease distribute as widely as possible for the GNSO Council meeting, 15 July at 11:00UTC. Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 15 July 2010 <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-15jul10-en.htm> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-15jul10-en.htm <https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_for_gnso_council_meeting _15_july_2010> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_for_gnso_council_meeting_ 15_july_2010 On Behalf Of Marika Konings Dear All, The audiocast for tomorrows GNSO Council meeting will be available from http://stream.icann.org/gnso/. Please do note that this is a trial so it might not be perfect (yet). We would, however, appreciate any feedback you, members of your stakeholder groups / constituencies or others participating have on the audiocast so we can take it into account going forward. With best regards, Marika Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

ENC: [liaison6c] FW: Audiocast details
by Jaime Plug In July 15, 2010

July 15, 2010

Tomorrow´s meeting can be followed real time. My skype is jaime_wagner if any of you may want to exchange ideas during the meeting. Jaime Wagner <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> jaime(a)corp.plugin.com.br Cel (51) 8126-0916 Fax (51) 3123-1708 De: owner-liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-liaison6c@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Glen de Saint Géry Enviada em: quarta-feira, 14 de julho de 2010 19:56 Para: liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org Assunto: [liaison6c] FW: Audiocast details Pease distribute as widely as possible for the GNSO Council meeting, 15 July at 11:00UTC. Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 15 July 2010 <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-15jul10-en.htm> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-15jul10-en.htm <https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_for_gnso_council_meeting _15_july_2010> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_for_gnso_council_meeting_ 15_july_2010 On Behalf Of Marika Konings Dear All, The audiocast for tomorrows GNSO Council meeting will be available from http://stream.icann.org/gnso/. Please do note that this is a trial so it might not be perfect (yet). We would, however, appreciate any feedback you, members of your stakeholder groups / constituencies or others participating have on the audiocast so we can take it into account going forward. With best regards, Marika Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

WG: [council] Your Input Requested on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Initial Report
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 13, 2010

July 13, 2010

FYI Mit freundlichen Grüßen Best regards Wolf-Ulrich http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-12jul10-en.htm Your Input Requested on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Initial Report Public comment period open until 1 August 2010 12 July 2010 The GNSO Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group published its Initial Report [PDF, 1.02 MB] on 31 May. The PEDNR WG was tasked to address questions in relation to what extent registrants should be able to renew their domain names after they expire. At issue is whether the current policies of registrars on the renewal, transfer and deletion of expired domain names are adequate. In the Initial Report, the WG has reviewed current registrar and ICANN practices regarding domain name expiration, renewal, and post-expiration recovery. Furthermore, in order to assess the views of the WG members and determine where there might be agreement or consensus on a possible approach forward, a survey was conducted amongst the WG membership, details of which are also included in the Initial Report. The WG is now looking for your input on the Initial Report to help inform its deliberations going forward. Comments can be submitted directly to the public comment forum (see http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201008-en.htm#pednr-i…) and/or you can provide your input by responding to the following short survey (see http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AUYRGHCV4) As prescribed by the ICANN by-laws, the public comment forum will remain open for a period of 20 days until 1 August 2010. Deadline and how to submit comments Comments are welcome via e-mail to pednr-initial-report(a)icann.org and/or by responding to the survey (http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AUYRGHCV4) until 1 August 2010. Access to the public comment forum from which comments can be posted can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201008-en.htm#pednr-i…. An archive of all comments received will be publicly posted at http://forum.icann.org/lists/pednr-initial-report/. Further information: * PEDNR PDP Initial Report – http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-initial-report-31may10-en.pdf [PDF, 1.02 MB] * PEDNR PDP Initial Report – Executive Summary o English [PDF, 128 KB] o العربية [PDF, 149 KB] o 中文 [PDF, 270 KB] o Français [PDF, 220 KB] o Español [PDF, 191 KB] o Русский [PDF, 275 KB] * PEDNR WG workspace – https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/ Background At the ICANN Meeting in Cairo in November 2008, the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), voted to request an Issues Report on the subject of registrants being able to recover domain names after their formal expiration date. The ALAC request was submitted to ICANN policy staff and the GNSO Council on 20 November 2008. The Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery [PDF, 422 KB] was submitted to the GNSO Council on 5 December 2008. The GNSO Council initiated a PDP on 7 May 2009 and tasked a Working Group to answer the following charter questions: * Whether adequate opportunity exists for registrants to redeem their expired domain names; * Whether expiration-related provisions in typical registration agreements are clear and conspicuous enough; * Whether adequate notice exists to alert registrants of upcoming expirations; * Whether additional measures need to be implemented to indicate that once a domain name enters the Auto-Renew Grace Period, it has expired (e.g., hold status, a notice on the site with a link to information on how to renew, or other options to be determined); * Whether to allow the transfer of a domain name during the RGP . The Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) PDP Working Group started its deliberations in July 2009. Staff responsible: Marika Konings

1 0

WG: [council] FW: 2 Applications for the WHOIS Policy Review
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 10, 2010

July 10, 2010

As per today the following GNSO related applications have been received (see http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/) Applicants for the Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS Review Team Eric Brunner Williams Applicants for WHOIS Policies Review Team James Bladel Eric Brunner Williams Amber Sterling Kim G. Von Arx Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2010 14:37 An: Council GNSO Betreff: [council] FW: 2 Applications for the WHOIS Policy Review Wichtigkeit: Hoch Forwarded From: Alice Jansen Dear Glen, Find attached two applications for the WHOIS Policy Review Team: · Amber Sterling · Kim Von Arx Thank you, Kindest regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational Reviews

1 0

FW: CSG / Thursday 22 July at 1600 UTC (90min)
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com July 8, 2010

July 8, 2010

Please see below arrangements for a call with the CSG affiliated candidates for the WHOIS and SSR teams. I hope as many ISPCP members as possible will join this call. Regards Tony From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@msk.com] Sent: 08 July 2010 14:32 To: cdigangi(a)inta.org; marilynscade(a)hotmail.com; Metalitz, Steven; Sarah Deutsch; Tony Harris; tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com Subject: FW: CSG / Thursday 22 July at 1600 UTC (90min) CSG Exec Committee, Per our discussions, please see below for dial in information for a teleconference on July 22 to which we will invite all declared CSG-affiliated candidates for the Whois and SSR review teams. This call will be open to all interested members of our 3 constituencies, and will be a "candidates' forum" and not a decision-making venue. Please publicize the call among your constituency members. Steve Metalitz _____ From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:09 AM To: Metalitz, Steven Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org; Gisella Gruber-White Subject: CSG / Thursday 22 July at 1600 UTC (90min) Dear Steve, Please find hereafter the conference call details for the CSG call on Thursday 22 July 2010 at 1600 UTC (duration 90 minutes) ------------------------------------------------------------- Participant passcode: CSG For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 06-800-12755 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

1 0

Main points from ISPCP conference call 5 July 2010
by Tonyarholmes＠btinternet.com July 8, 2010

July 8, 2010

The following is a summary of the main issues and actions discussed. 1. CSG Charter update The latest version of the CSG Charter will be circulated later this week to those people who agreed to work on the drafting team; Tony Harris, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, Jaime Wagner, Alain Bidron, Tony Holmes. Please let the secretariat know if any names are missing. 2. AoC The timescale for nominations for the SSR and WHOIS teams was discussed. It was clarified after the call that the deadline for applications is 15 July. According to the process accepted in Brussels "...no later than 21days after the deadline for applications, the stakeholder groups will inform the Council of their endorsements..." which means 05 Aug. Having gained support within the CSG for an ISP nomination to the SSR team, the ISPCP will look to review possible nominations from the BC and IP Constituencies before endorsing any candidates for these two panels. 3. Vertical Integration Thomas Rickert (ECO) joined the call for this item. Thomas suggested the current ISPCP approach may impose limitations on the involvement of some potential back end providers of registry services. The possibility of a compromise being developed by the VI WG, such as a 20% cap on registrations before vertical separation is called for, was also discussed. Thomas stated there was as yet, no agreed ECO position, which is also the current situation for the ISPCP constituency. Thomas stated he would provide additional input for the ISPCP to consider and he will liaise with Tony Harris who is the constituency representative on the WG. 4. New gTLDs - Malicious conduct The proposal to forward a letter to the ICANN Board from the CSG stating there were still major concerns over the overarching issue of malicious conduct with regard to the introduction of new gTLDs was discussed. Whilst concern exists within the constituency over the possible negative impact a call for additional action may have on the timetable for the introduction of new gTLDs, there was no agreement on whether the Constituency should add their support by signing the proposed letter. The ISPCP Exec officers will inform the CSG that a decision on whether to support this initiative will only be made when a detailed draft can be considered. 5. Council issues The pending motion on string similarity was discussed. This proposed that in certain situations it would not be correct for applications to fail the SS evaluation as this would cause no detrimental confusion and that in this case - and only then - an extended review should be granted to the applicant. The ISPCP support the view that strict rules would need to be set under which the extended review is permitted, thereby ensuring the string similarity review is the normal case and the extended one an exception. These rules would also need to be worked out with participation of the community. ISPCP Council members will inform Council of the ISPCP view. 6. Date of next ISPCP call is Tuesday 3rd August at 14.00 UTC Details of the call will be circulated closer to the time.

1 0

WG: [council] Motion re Study on WHOIS Misuse
by KnobenW＠telekom.de July 8, 2010

July 8, 2010

Any comment? Can we support? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mike Rodenbaugh Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010 03:52 An: 'GNSO Council' Betreff: [council] Motion re Study on WHOIS Misuse I submit the attached motion (copied also below) for consideration by the Council at our meeting next week. Would appreciate a second, and am happy to answer any questions. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> GNSO Council motion to pursue study of Whois Misuse. Whereas: In October 2007, the GNSO Council concluded that a comprehensive and objective understanding of key factual issues regarding the gTLD Whois system would benefit future GNSO policy development efforts ( http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/ <http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> ). Before defining the details of these studies, the Council solicited suggestions from the community for specific topics of study on WHOIS. Suggestions were submitted ( http://forum.icann.org/lists/WHOIS-comments-2008/ <http://forum.icann.org/lists/WHOIS-comments-2008/> ) and ICANN staff prepared a 'Report on Public Suggestions on Further Studies of WHOIS', dated 25-Feb-2008 ( http://gnso.icann.org/issues/Whois-privacy/Whois-study-suggestion-report -25feb08.pdf <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/Whois-privacy/Whois-study-suggestion-repor t-25feb08.pdf> ). On 28-Mar-2008 the GNSO Council resolved to form a WHOIS Study Working Group to develop a proposed list, if any, of recommended studies for which ICANN staff would be asked to provide cost estimates to the Council (http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-27mar08.shtml <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-27mar08.shtml> ). The WHOIS Study WG did not reach consensus regarding further studies, and on 25-Jun-2008 the GNSO Council resolved to form another group of volunteers (WHOIS Hypotheses WG) to review the 'Report on Public Suggestions on Further Studies of WHOIS' and the GAC letter on WHOIS studies. ( http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf> ). This WG was tasked to prepare a list of hypotheses to be tested, and reported to the Council on 26-Aug-2008. ( https://st.icann.org/Whois-hypoth-wg/index.cgi?whois_hypotheses_wg#Whois _study_hypotheses_wg_final_report ). On 5-Nov-2008, the Council convened a volunteer group of Councilors and interested constituency members to draft a resolution regarding studies, if any, for which cost estimates should be obtained. The Whois Study Drafting Team further consolidated studies and data requested by the GAC ( http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf> ). For each of the consolidated studies, constituencies were invited to assign priority rank and assess feasibility. 5 constituencies provided the requested rankings, while 2 constituencies (NCUC and Registrars) indicated that no further studies were justified. The GAC was also invited to assign priorities, but no reply was received. The Drafting Team determined that the six studies with the highest average priority scores should be the subject of further research to determine feasibility and obtain cost estimates. On 04-Mar-2009, Council requested Staff to conduct research on feasibility and cost estimates for selected Whois studies and report its findings to Council. (See Motion 3 at https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?04_mar_2009_motions <https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?04_mar_2009_motions> ). On 23-Mar-2010, Staff presented its latest report on feasibility and cost estimates for Whois Studies. ( http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10 -en.pdf) This report included a Staff Analysis and Recommendations for the first study, regarding WHOIS Misuse. The WHOIS Misuse study addressed 3 originally requested studies (1, 14, and 21) and GAC data set 2. The hypothesis of the WHOIS Misuse study is: "Public access to WHOIS data is responsible for a material number of cases of misuse that have caused harm to natural persons whose registrations do not have a commercial purpose." At ICANN's meeting in Brussels, representatives of the GAC reiterated their interest in ICANN's response to the GAC letter of Apr-2008, which included these requests for further studies of WHOIS ( http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf> ), stating: First and foremost, the GAC believes that studies of WHOIS gTLD data should be undertaken by neutral third parties and should create a factual record that documents the uses and abuses of WHOIS data recognized by the GAC WHOIS Principles. The goal should be to initially compile data that provides a documented evidence base regarding: * the amount and source of traffic accessing WHOIS servers and the types and numbers of different groups of users and what those users are using WHOIS data for; and * the types and extent of misuses of WHOIS data and what harm is caused by each type of misuse, including economic, use of WHOIS data in SPAM generation, abuse of personal data, loss of reputation or identity theft, security costs and loss of data." The Affirmation of Commitments requires that ICANN conduct reviews of WHOIS policy and implementation "to assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust." The first such review must be organized by 30-Sep-2010. ( http://www.icann.org/en/documents/affirmation-of-commitments-30sep09-en. htm <http://www.icann.org/en/documents/affirmation-of-commitments-30sep09-en .htm> ) The proposed budget for FY 2011 includes at least $450,000 for WHOIS studies. Resolved: Council requests ICANN staff to proceed with the WHOIS Misuse Study, as described in Staff's 23-Mar-2010 Report, using the vendor selection process described in Annex of that same report. ( http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10 -en.pdf <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar1 0-en.pdf> ).

1 0

ENC: [liaison6c] FW: AoC Reviews - Call for Applicants
by Jaime Plug In July 7, 2010

July 7, 2010

Jaime Wagner <mailto:jaime@corp.plugin.com.br> jaime(a)corp.plugin.com.br Cel (51) 8126-0916 Fax (51) 3123-1708 De: owner-liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-liaison6c@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Glen de Saint Géry Enviada em: terça-feira, 6 de julho de 2010 12:40 Para: liaison6c Assunto: [liaison6c] FW: AoC Reviews - Call for Applicants Dear All, Please make sure that this reminder is widely distributed. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Forwarded From: Alice Jansen [mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org] Sent: mardi 6 juillet 2010 17:12 To: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: AoC Reviews - Call for Applicants Importance: High Dear Chuck, We would like to inform you that to date, the overall number of received applications for the Affirmation Reviews 2 and 4 tallies up to 5: * Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS Review team à 2 applications; * WHOIS Policy Review à 3 applications. Please note that so far, 2 candidates have expressed their wish to represent the GNSO during the process http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/ : * Eric Brunner-Williams SS&R (preference) + WHOIS * James Bladel - WHOIS As you know, the deadline for submitting candidatures will expire on July 15th at 23:59 UTC - <http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/call-for-applicants-2-and-4-en. htm> http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/call-for-applicants-2-and-4-en.h tm Given the poor number of applications received, we would be really grateful if you could please consider issuing a reminder of this forthcoming deadline to your community. Many thanks in advance for your help, Best regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational Reviews alice.jansen(a)icann.org Phone: +32.2.234.78.64 Mobile: +32.4.73.31.76.56 Fax: +32.2.234.78.48 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium

1 0