- ispcp - lists.icann.org

Fwd: [council] Motion for the deferral of RPMs phase 2
by Osvaldo Novoa 07 Oct '24

07 Oct '24

Dear all, The GNSO Council Chairman is proposing to defer UDRP Review (Rights Protection Mechanism Phase 2) for a further 6 months, it has already been defer 18 months due to a delay in the implementation of RPMs Phase 1 recommendations. I think it is a reasonable proposal. Please let us know if you agree with the proposal or not. Best regards, Osvaldo > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "DiBiase, Gregory via council" <council(a)icann.org> > Subject: [council] Motion for the deferral of RPMs phase 2 > Date: 3 October 2024 at 12:38:07 PM GMT-3 > To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > Reply-To: "DiBiase, Gregory" <dibiase(a)amazon.com> > > Attachment protected by Amazon: Motion to Defer RPMs P2 for a Furth...ths .docx <https://us-west-2.secure-attach.amazon.com/6142b596-01b1-44cf-a223-ea27f5d0…>Amazon has replaced attachment with download link. Downloads will be available until November 02, 2024, 15:38 (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think <https://amazonexteu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_ehuz6zGo8YnsRKK> > For more information click here <https://docs.secure-attach.amazon.com/guide> > Dear Councilors, > > The attached motion proposes deferring next steps on the RPMs PDP Phase two (UDRP Review) for a further 6 months and requesting an updated Policy Status Report (PSR). The rationale for the deferral is below, however, this is just a proposal. Please discuss with your SGs. We can move this topic to a Discussion Item at October’s meeting if Councilors feel more dialogue is warranted. > > Rationale: > > The implementation of RPMs Phase One is estimated to be delayed from December 2024 to third quarter 2025 and, consequently, we recommend deferring next steps on the RPMs PDP Phase two UDRP Review) for a further 6 months while also requesting an updated Policy Status Report (PSR). > As you may recall, the Council previously discussed the need to review the RPMs charter in advance of launching Phase Two of the PDP. The Council determined that a PSR should be requested from ICANN org, in order to better understand if new issues or information has emerged that would be relevant to a comprehensive review of the policy. ICANN org’s Global Domains and Strategy (GDS) team completed the PSR [gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>] and shared it with the Council for discussion during the July 2022 meeting. Discussions in subsequent meetings seemed to indicate support from the Council to delay next steps based on a number of reasons, but primarily because of the amount of competing work. The Council agreed during its November 2022 meeting that because of the launch of the Phase One RPMs Implementation Review Team (IRT), which would likely have overlapping community support with a Phase Two PDP, the delay for next steps should be tied to the completion or key milestones for the IRT. > During its meeting on 16 February 2023, the GNSO Council agreed to defer next steps on the RPMs PDP Phase Two for 18 months and to provide a rationale for its decision. Accordingly, the reasons for the deferral are that the IRT will occupy the same people and staff as Phase Two, and the IRT is expected to take about 18 months to complete its work. Thus, to avoid overloading community and staff resources, the Council agreed that it is preferable to pause Phase Two until the IRT has concluded its work. The Council also emphasized that this timeframe is consistent with that which it had suggested in its previous discussions, and that the 18-month deferral could always be revisited if the IRT were to take more, or less, time to complete. > In September 2024, GNSO Council support staff advised Council leadership of an estimated delay of the implementation of RPMs Phase One from December 2024 to third quarter 2025. Consequently, leadership requests Council approve a further deferral of 6 months as the reasons for the original 18-month deferral still apply. However, since considerable time has passed since the last Policy Status Report was published in July 2022, the GNSO Council is also requesting an updated PSR, so that when the deferral concludes, the Council will have updated resources to properly determine the appropriate next steps. > > This motion for deferral will be added to the consent agenda for the GNSO Council meeting on 17 October 2024. Approval of the accompanying motion to defer will start the 6-month period from 17 October. In accordance with standard procedure, this motion is hereby submitted by Council leadership to the GNSO Council list by Monday, 07 October 2024, the document and motion deadline. > Thanks, > Greg > _______________________________________________ > council mailing list -- council(a)icann.org <mailto:council@icann.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave(a)icann.org <mailto:council-leave@icann.org> > > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

6 5

Applicant Support Program funding for next round of new gTLDs
by Osvaldo Novoa 26 Sep '24

26 Sep '24

Hello all, Icann org has just updated the funding plan for the ASP. This is a draft since the application fee hasn’t yet been established. Best regards, Osvaldo

1 0

Business Discussion
by info 13 Sep '24

13 Sep '24

1 0

Fwd: [UA-discuss] Re: UA Day 2025: Call for Proposals
by anil Jain 26 Aug '24

26 Aug '24

Dear all, I would like to share following information which may be useful to some of us: Thanks Anil Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Seda Akbulut via UA-discuss <ua-discuss(a)icann.org> > Date: 26 August 2024 at 4:37:57 PM GMT+1 > To: ua-discuss(a)icann.org > Subject: [UA-discuss] Re: UA Day 2025: Call for Proposals > Reply-To: Seda Akbulut <seda.akbulut(a)icann.org> > > > Dear all, > > Here are the social media post for the UA Day 2025 Call for Proposals. > Feel free to repost and share. > > Social posts: > X: https://x.com/UASGTech/status/1828087489439105081%20%5Bx.com%5D > LindkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7233853833712447489 > Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/uasgtech/posts/pfbid034GM5nvEftPC75LYY5gj… > > Best regards, > Seda > > From: Seda Akbulut <seda.akbulut(a)icann.org> > Date: 26 August 2024 Monday at 16:34 > To: "ua-discuss(a)icann.org" <ua-discuss(a)icann.org> > Subject: UA Day 2025: Call for Proposals > > Dear all, > > Call for proposals for UA Day 2025 has been opened. Please see the announcement and call for proposal details below. > > · Call for proposals for UA Day 2025: https://universalacceptance.day/ > · Announcement: https://uasg.tech/2024/08/global-internet-community-encouraged-to-submit-ev… > > Feel free to share with your network. > > Thanks and regards, > Seda Akbulut > > UA Program Manager > Global Domains and Strategy > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > > _______________________________________________ > UA-discuss mailing list -- ua-discuss(a)icann.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ua-discuss-leave(a)icann.org > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

Fwd: [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ
by Osvaldo Novoa 23 Aug '24

23 Aug '24

Dear all, For your information, new estimated fee for new domains applicants. Best regards. Saludos, Osvaldo Novoa Inicio del mensaje reenviado: > De: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt(a)icann.org> > Fecha: 23 de agosto de 2024, 09:49:35 GMT+2 > Para: subpro-irt(a)icann.org > Asunto: [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ > Responder-Para: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> > > > Dear IRT, > > Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list. > > If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items. > > Best regards, > > Marika > _______________________________________________ > SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt(a)icann.org > To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave(a)icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

2 1

Fwd: [council] FW: Letter on Accountability
by Osvaldo Novoa 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

11 10

SubPro Fees
by Osvaldo Novoa 08 Aug '24

08 Aug '24

Dear Colleagues, As requested in our call I am enclosing a document explaining how ICANN org determined the fees for the next round of new gtlds. The budget for the SubPro is US$70 million, the ODA estimated that there were going to be 2000 applications for new gtlds. ICANN org considered this a maximum estimate and to reduce the risk they made all the calculations based on 1000 applications. This is how they reached the sum of US$208.000 for the application fee. Anyway, ICANN org will reimburse the applicants if the number of applications is higher. Hope this informations is useful. Best regards, Osvaldo

3 5

Fwd: [GNSO-TPR] Updated Initial Report for Review
by Osvaldo Novoa 24 Jul '24

24 Jul '24

Dear colleagues, Enclosed is the draft of the Transfer Policy Review Working Group final report which will be publish for public comment probably in August. Best regards, Osvaldo > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Christian Wheeler via GNSO-TPR <gnso-tpr(a)icann.org> > Subject: [GNSO-TPR] Updated Initial Report for Review > Date: 23 July 2024 at 6:24:28 PM GMT-3 > To: "gnso-tpr(a)icann.org" <gnso-tpr(a)icann.org> > Reply-To: Christian Wheeler <christian.wheeler(a)icann.org> > > Dear TPR WG members, > > Support staff have prepared an updated TPR Initial Report (attached) based on your feedback from the WG calls and google doc assignments of the last 3 weeks. The WG’s most recent textual changes are highlighted in green within the updated Initial Report. > > Your current Action Item is to perform a final review of this Initial Report and identify any last textual revisions before it is published for Public Comment. Please provide any feedback via this new google doc before our next WG call (Tuesday, 30 July at 16:00 UTC): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D_GEgTyVzH2Qley6Ps775TErd-ogswmoj7coZFL… > Note: we have attached both PDF and Word versions of the updated Initial Report—please use the PDF version when referencing line numbers in the google doc. > Thank you all, and if you have any questions regarding this latest Initial Report draft, please let us know. > > Kind regards, > Christian on behalf of the TPR WG Support Team > > _______________________________________________ > GNSO-TPR mailing list -- gnso-tpr(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-tpr@icann.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-tpr-leave(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-tpr-leave@icann.org> > %(web_page_url)slistinfo/%(_internal_name)s

1 0

Council draft response to the Kigali GAC Communique
by Osvaldo Novoa 15 Jul '24

15 Jul '24

Hello all, As agreed on today’s call, here is the draft of the Council’s answer to the GAC Communiqué. It has been forwarded to the Board as advanced draft, it will be considered by the Council on the next meeting, on July 18. Best regards, Osvaldo

1 0

Request for comments
by Osvaldo Novoa 11 Jun '24

11 Jun '24

Dear colleagues, The chairman of the Transfer Policy Review Working Group has asked the Constituencies or Stakeholders Groups that haven’t yet send their position on the Recommendations that are being included in their final report do so. There are some recommendations on Change of Registrant Data (CORD) which the BC and the IPC have serious objections. I am enclosing a document with this recommendations and the objections on them. On other point. On 23 May 2024, ICANN opened a Call for Volunteers to participate in the Pilot Holistic Review <https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/call-for-volunteers-pilot-ho…>. I am enclosing Pilot Holistic Review Team Member Role Description. The review team may contain up to 21 members, plus an ICANN Board Director or Liaison to serve as a member of the review team (designated by the ICANN Board). Each SO and AC will have an opportunity to nominate up to seven applicants to serve on the review team. I think this review is very important for our Constituency and we should have at least one member. If there is no other candidate I would like to volunteer representing the ISPCP. The candidates have till June 19 to apply so we have little time to do it. I hope to hear from you soon. Best regards, Osvaldo

4 3