- ispcp - lists.icann.org

WG: AW: Outreach -- Topic for GNSO in Prague?
by KnobenW＠telekom.de May 30, 2012

May 30, 2012

Re: AW: Outreach -- Topic for GNSO in Prague? Wolf-Ulrich it is scheduled for 12:00 to 12:30 pm on Saturday the 23rd. Julie

1 0

WG: [council] Fwd: Advance Notice for Prague Sessions
by KnobenW＠telekom.de May 30, 2012

May 30, 2012

FYI Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012 12:44 An: GNSO Council List Betreff: [council] Fwd: Advance Notice for Prague Sessions Councillors, As a heads-up, please see the message from Kurt below. Thanks. Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM Group NBT France ---------------- Head of Domain Operations Group NBT Début du message réexpédié : De : Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz(a)icann.org<mailto:kurt.pritz@icann.org>> Objet : Advance Notice for Prague Sessions Date : 30 mai 2012 03:25:35 HAEC As the time for the Prague meeting approaches, we continue to work on three initiatives that have been important to the community. These are: strategic planning, budgeting, and outreach. ICANN will soon be requesting your participation in community brainstorming and working sessions on these topics in Prague. Since you will be receiving these notices separately, and realizing there are so many sessions to attend, I wanted to give you some advance notice that they were coming so you could plan for them all. The Meeting Schedule is to be posted by 4 June, but the current draft schedule shows these community sessions as follows: (1) Strategic Planning Working Sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday from 9:00-11:00; (2) Outreach Initiative Working Session on Thursday morning at 8:00; and (3) Finance Working Session on Budget Process on Sunday from 16:30-18:00. We hope that through this advance notification, you will be able to work with your community to find opportunities for participation in each session listed above. Individual invitations to each of the sessions listed above will be sent shortly to this mailing list, providing more detailed information and agendas. Your participation is appreciated and we look forward to the interaction in these sessions. Best Regards, Kurt J. Pritz

1 0

WhoIs
by KnobenW＠telekom.de May 30, 2012

May 30, 2012

All, As we discussed some weeks ago, I'd like to introduce a "motion to address WhoIs access" to the council meeting on June 07 (see attached). I'll send it to the list after our call today. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Best regards Wolf-Ulrich

1 0

RAP Uniformity of Reporting recommendation is coming back to the Council
by Mike O'Connor May 29, 2012

May 29, 2012

hi all, i'd like to slip one more item in front of you, since the topic is likely to come up at the next Council meeting. word on the street is that now that the Council has the report back from Compliance, they're likely to tube the whole project with the standard hand-wringing over how there's such a workload problem. so here's a little rant that i just dashed off that tries to make the case on the other side. i would point out that this was a unanimous-consensus recommendation of the working-group, so at a minimum i'd like to see a darn nifty rationale back from the Council if they decide to kill it. here's my rant: could we stick a brief discussion of this topic on the agenda for the Wednesday call? thanks, mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

2 1

review materials for our comment on the WHOIS review-team recommendations
by Mike O'Connor May 28, 2012

May 28, 2012

hi all, as i was starting to think about comments on the WHOIS Review Team, i realized that it would be really helpful to have a redline version that compared the reports before and after the first round of comments. i bugged Emily Taylor ((the Chair of the review team) and she made that happen (thanks Emily!!). a link to the redline is here: http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/whois/final-report-redline-11may12… here are links to the public comment box http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/whois-rt-final-report-11may12-e… and announcement http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11may12-en.htm Emily also shared some pointers with me as to what to pay attention to (thanks for these too, Emily): Focus on: - The executive summary. If you read that, you've pretty much got the lot. The first part is mostly unchanged, until we start to get to the Findings and Recommendations. The format of the findings and recommendations has been reworked, so that each recommendation is introduced by the relevant findings. The text of the findings is mostly new minted, but takes the same approach as the previous draft. The recommendations are mostly the same idea, with bits of clarification when it was clear that we'd confused people (!). - The substantively changed recommendations are: 1. strategic priority is fuller, and is now split out from compliance, which also has a fuller, standalone set of recommendations. 2. Privacy/proxy are now handled together, and we're no longer suggesting voluntary best practices for proxies. Instead we're asking for an accreditation process to be developed (it will need a PDP to be sure). 3. The look-up - the old recommendation 17 which had two alternatives - has been changed. I hope, simplified. We're now proposing operational amendments to Internic, which should be possible without policy development. In a nutshell, it's "make this less horrible for users". - Chapter 4 (Compliance) is completely rewritten - Appendix B (which is completely new) is my correspondence with staff about compliance staff numbers, spend etc... maybe we can take this up on our call this Wednesday. mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

1 0

ICANN role and remit in security, stability and resiliency -- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June
by Mike O'Connor May 27, 2012

May 27, 2012

hi all, Patrick Jones just reminded me about this comment period. we may want to weigh in, no? http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-ssr-role-remit-17may12-en… i'd be interested in joining the gang of comment-drafters on this one. anybody else interested? mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

3 3

Outreach
by KnobenW＠telekom.de May 27, 2012

May 27, 2012

All, At our next call on coming Wednesday we should discuss the (still open) outreach item (OTF = Outrech Task Force). As you remember at the public ICANN meeting in San José I was chairing a discussion on that, and a small discussion group was asked to follow up (J. Berard, Ch. Gomes, B. Drake, R. Damak, myself e.a.). This group needs as an input a clear layout of the constituency views on the subject in addressing our specific concerns we have with the OTF proposal and our suggestions. For your info I attach the OTF recommendations. Some GNSO members have raised concerns re the general OTF approach and would like to see that "project" being grounded. Others have just problems with the detailed OTF structure and tasks. The constituency should therefore comment on * allocating the survey to develop the outreach strategy (see 2.1, page 3) * responsibility of the SGs/constituencies and the OTF for outreach planning and implementation * OTF structure (see 2.1, page 5+) * any other items of concern Best regards Wolf-Ulrich

2 1

WG: WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey Webinar 1 June 2012, at 13:00 & 20:00 UTC
by KnobenW＠telekom.de May 27, 2012

May 27, 2012

Anyone interested? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2012 13:44 An: council(a)gnso.icann.org Betreff: [council] WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey Webinar 1 June 2012, at 13:00 & 20:00 UTC WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey Webinar 23 May 2012 In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>) to receive the call details. The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council's WHOIS Survey Working Group (WSWG) requests community input on a draft WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey, to assess the content of the survey before releasing it for public solicitation. In parallel with the Public Comment period, the Working Group is hosting two webinar sessions to brief the community on the background of this effort and to solicit input from experts on technical requirements for a new WHOIS protocol, in particular people knowledgeable about technical aspects of WHOIS who can help assess if the survey asks the right questions and in the right style to elicit useful and clear technical feedback. The Working Group seeks specific suggestions on changes to language and questions that will make it clearer for experts to complete. Members of the Working Group will provide a briefing on Friday 1 June at 13.00 UTC and Friday 1 June at 20.00 UTC, summarizing the purpose of this effort and reviewing the work called for in the Working Group's charter. 13:00 UTC click on this link: http://tinyurl.com/85s8fou 20:00 UTC click on this link http://tinyurl.com/7qydxhm The webinars will also review the sections of the survey as they relate to the proposed technical requirements outlined in the GNSO WHOIS Service Requirement Report - http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-service-requirements-final-report-… that was prepared by Staff at the GNSO Council's request in July 2010. The two sessions are duplicates, scheduled to accommodate different time zones. Each session, scheduled to run for 60 minutes, will be conducted in English only. The meeting will be run in Adobe Connect with a slide presentation along with a dial-in conference bridge for audio. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of the session. During the course of the webinar, questions may be submitted using the chat function of Adobe Connect. If you are not able to participate in either of the live sessions, the recording of the session will be made available shortly after the meeting. The policy staff is always available to answer any questions that you email to policy-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:policy-staff@icann.org>. In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>) to receive the call details. Please indicate which call you would like to join, Friday at 13.00 UTC or Friday at 20.00 UTC (to convert those times into your local time, see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html) We will send you an e-mail reminder before the event with log-in and dial-in details. Please DO NOT RSVP to any other ICANN staff members e-mail address. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Agenda for ISPCP call today
by tony holmes May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

ISPCP Conference call 15th May 2012 at 15.30 UTC. Dial in details have been circulated separately. Adobe link: An Adobe Connect room has been set up for the ISPCP http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ispcp/ Draft agenda 1. Update on GNSO Council issues 2. ICANN operating plan and budget 3. WHOIS Review Team Final report http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11may12-en.htm 11 May 2012 Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 11 May 2012 Purpose (Brief): The WHOIS Policy Review Team, constituted under ICANN's Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce, submitted its <http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/whois/final-report-11may12-en.pdf> Final Report and Recommendations [PDF, 1.44 MB] to the ICANN Board and this document has been posted for public comment. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/whois-rt-final-report-11may12-en .htm 4. FY13 Operating plan & Budget ICANN is now opening a public comment forum for the draft Operating Plan and Budget for fiscal year 2013 <http://www.icann.org/en/about/financials/proposed-opplan-budget-v1-fy13-01m ay12-en.pdf> [PDF, 3.28 MB]. Community members are kindly asked to provide feedback on the various aspects of the proposed budget and implementation of ICANN resources for the coming fiscal year, including operational growth tied to carry-over and new projects and the core functions of ICANN. 5. Update on preparation for the Prague meeting 6. AoB

1 0

WG: FOR REVIEW: Revised Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group
by KnobenW＠telekom.de May 11, 2012

May 11, 2012

Any comment from our side? I think we could live with the changes in the final report. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012 21:47 An: council(a)gnso.icann.org Cc: Steve Sheng; Stéphane Van Gelder Betreff: [council] FOR REVIEW: Revised Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group Dear GNSO Council Members, On behalf of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group (IRD-WG), please find attached its Revised Final Report for GNSO Council consideration. The report is attached in clean and redlined versions. For further background, Steve Sheng produced a presentation for the 10 May GNSO Council meeting which is posted at: https://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/status-update-ird-wg-final-report-sli…. The Revised Final Report is the result of changes suggested by the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC). The IRD-WG approved the changes with some additional minor edits. You may be interested in the rationale for the SSAC's changes. Most of the changes correct technical and other errors in the document. The only substantive change is that the SSAC proposed an additional recommendation (recommendation 4). The rationale for this recommendation is that SSAC members asked why standards agreed to in Section 4.2 of the report were not part of the final recommendations for action. For example, Nameserver, Phone/fax, Dates, Registration Status are fields where the IRD-WG had rough consensus on the standards, but in the original report there was no recommendation relating to these standards. Recommendation 4 suggestions actions that could be taken on those standards. Please let me know if you have any questions that I can convey to the IRD-WG members as you consider this report. With best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund Policy Director ICANN

1 0