- CPWG - lists.icann.org

Meeting invitation: At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call on Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 13:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 27, 2019

Nov. 27, 2019

Dear All, The next At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call is scheduled for Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 13:00 UTC for 90 mins. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/uww9hyt The agenda (to be updated) and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/r5UzBw Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566 / Meeting ID: 765-717-566 – Please note, the zoom room link and Meeting ID will remain the same for each weekly meeting. Real time transcription (RTT) available at (subject to availability): https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN [streamtext.net] [streamtext.net]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.streamtext.net_pla…> ADIGO Conference Bridge: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: https://www.adigo.com/icann [adigo.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.adigo.com_icann&d=…> At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Wiki Space: https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Kind regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org [atlarge.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__atlarge.icann.org_&d=D…> Facebook: facebook.com/icann [facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_icann…>atlarge [facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_icann…> Twitter: @ [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANNAtLar…>ICANNAtLarge [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANNAtLar…>

6 5

Comments by Tuesday, 26 Nov: DRAFT PTI and IANA FY21 Operating Plan and Budgets
by Evin Erdogdu Nov. 27, 2019

Nov. 27, 2019

Dear All, Please provide comments by Tuesday, 26 November at 23:59 UTC on the updated ALAC statement on DRAFT PTI and IANA FY21 Operating Plan and Budgets. The draft is posted to the At-Large workspace for your review: https://community.icann.org/x/24EzBw? Kind Regards, Evin

3 7

ALS ISOC netherlands 'calls on ISOC Global to reverse the sale of the .ORG domain to private equity firm Ethos Capital'
by Bastiaan Goslings Nov. 26, 2019

Nov. 26, 2019

All, Fyi see at the bottom https://isoc.nl/nieuws/brief-aan-de-leden/ This was sent to the ISOC Chapter delegates list, if I’m not mistaken - I’m not subscribed. I talked to the ISOC NL director but do not know yet how many chapters actually endorsed the statement or plan to do so. I was not involved btw, it was a board initiative. regards Bastiaan

4 3

another great article from The Register
by Marita Moll Nov. 26, 2019

Nov. 26, 2019

*As pressure builds over .org sell-off, internet governance orgs fall back into familiar pattern: Silence* https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/26/org_selloff_internet/ Marita

1 0

Transcript of ISOC board Q&A
by Marita Moll Nov. 26, 2019

Nov. 26, 2019

For your perusal -- on the issue of PIR sale https://isoc.live/bot/148/ISOC_BOT_148_Q&A.pdf Marita

1 0

Brainstorming
by Roberto Gaetano Nov. 26, 2019

Nov. 26, 2019

I was thinking of starting jotting down some ideas about what are the things that we should consider about the transfer of control of .org - other than the fear about the price raise that we have already abundantly discussed. I believe that it is essentially a matter of trust. A year ago, day more, day less, ISOC had issue a call for candidatures for PIR Board members - myself and two other Directors were ending our term in 2019 and needed to be replaced. The selection process was supervised by ISOC Board of Trustees - or a committee thereof. That was guaranteeing alignment of the PIR Board with ISOC values. Who will select the two PIR Directors that will replace the ones ending their terms? What will be the requested profile? When ISOC was selecting, the requested profiles were public, as the call for candidatures. If the process is meant to follow a similar path it should be starting now. This is important for two reasons: first because of the transparency of the selection of Directors who will supervise the “Public Interest” Registry - but also because the process was run by an organization that was trusted by the community. Anybody here trusting the investment fund that is taking over? I remember that when I was chairing the PIR Board we had regular meetings with ISOC’s Board of Trustees. That was ensuring that the technical decisions taken by PIR were aligned with ISOC’s principles. This is now gone. PIR Board will, at the most, meet with the investors to make sure that the profits are maximized. PIR has taken over the years positions against some of the unethical or dangerous practices that had as sole purpose to squeeze more money from the market without looking at the unintended negative effects, like for instance the wildcard - see as a reference the CircleID article at http://www.circleid.com/posts/pir_opposes_sitefinder_will_not_implement_sim… <http://www.circleid.com/posts/pir_opposes_sitefinder_will_not_implement_sim…>. PIR also curbed the so-called "domain tasting” by charging Registrars who were practicing it. But besides fighting against unethical practices, PIR has also positively supported good practices, like for instance DNSSEC - PIR was the first gTLD to sign the zone, see https://www.securityweek.com/dnssec-becomes-reality-today-icann-brussels <https://www.securityweek.com/dnssec-becomes-reality-today-icann-brussels>. It should be reminded that implementation of DNSSEC was not bringing additional income, just additional work. I have been in the Board of PIR for 6 years, 2+ of them as Chair, and I acknowledge that I might be biased, but those above are facts, not opinions. Will PIR under the new regime be allowed to take the same stance in defence of “doing the right thing” according to its ethics, or will it be forced to “do the thing that brings a better return on investment”? You can guess my answer, but what is yours? Let me stress it again, it is not about the fees, it is about having or not a champion that will stand up for “doing the right thing” in a market that is dominated by greed. Without a .org run in the public interest, even with sometimes some mistakes, but always with good intentions and with the ability to change decisions when the Internet users told us we were wrong (remember the SCADR issue?), the Internet will be a different place. And this is what is, IMHO, the real problem. Best regards, Roberto

8 13

Re: [CPWG] [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-11-20 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call
by Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Nov. 25, 2019

Nov. 25, 2019

Hi all, I have put a draft comment on RDS WHOIS2 review. Kindly take a look and put your comments. Thanks Hadia From: Evin Erdogdu (Confluence) [mailto:no-reply@icann.org] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 1:10 AM To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Subject: [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-11-20 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call There's 2 new edits on this page [page icon]<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-11-20+Cons…> Action items: 2019-11-20 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-11-20+Cons…> [cid:image002.png@01D5A099.3BEDD360] Evin Erdogdu edited this page Here's what changed: [☐] DoH - Microsoft implementation to be on agenda next week. Guest speaker to be asked (from SSAC) - @Olivier Crepin-Leblond</display/~olivier.crepin-leblond>, @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck>, @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu>. Reference Microsoft announcement re: DOH over https : https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Networking-Blog/Windows-will-improve… and CircleID post: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20191118_microsoft_announces_plans_to_adopt_d… [☐] @Claudia Ruiz</display/~claudia.ruiz> / @Yesim Nazlar</display/~yesim.nazlar> Single Issue called to be scheduled the week of 2 December (TBD) on ISOC selling PIR. Goal to issue ALAC advice during the 30 day ICANN review process. [☐] Elements of SSR2 recommendations to be incorporated into ALAC Advice on DNS Abuse. @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu>/ @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck>. Reference The SSR2 wiki: SSR2 Review</pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58740224> [☑] @Justine Chew</display/~justine.chew> volunteered to review / be initial penholder of Implementation Plan for the GNSO Consensus Policy Relating to the Protection of Certain Red Cross Names<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Imp…>. [☐] @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck> to finalize ALAC Advice on DNS abuse for next CPWG call (27 November), with slide presentation. [☐] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to circulate recording of At-Large DNS Abuse session at ICANN66 to the CPWG mailing list. [☐] @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck> to coordinate with staff and ALAC leadership on distributing GeoNames survey to ALSes / At-Large channels. [☐] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to mark Proposed IANA SLAs for ccTLD Creation and Transfer<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A++Pr…> as No Statement. [☑] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to request extension for Invitation to Provide Input for PDP 3.0 Implementation<https://community.icann.org/x/Y4kzBw> on behalf of ALAC. [☐] @Hadia Elminiawi</display/~hadia.elminiawi> to work with @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> on drafting and submitting the ALAC statement on Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) Review Team Final Report<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Reg…>. [☑] @Holly Raiche</display/~holly.raiche> volunteered to provide input on Invitation to Provide Input for PDP 3.0 Implementation<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Inv…>. [☐] @Claudia Ruiz</display/~claudia.ruiz> to schedule next CPWG on Weds 27 Nov at either 13 or 19 UTC. Go to page history<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=120820…> View page<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-11-20+Cons…> Stop watching space<https://community.icann.org/users/removespacenotification.action?spaceKey=a…> • Manage notifications<https://community.icann.org/users/editmyemailsettings.action?src=mail&src.m…> This message was sent by Atlassian Confluence 6.15.8

7 9

Still about .org and PIR
by Roberto Gaetano Nov. 25, 2019

Nov. 25, 2019

FYI, I am at the IGF wearing my PIR T-shirt with the motto “your voice”. I have to use it before it becomes obsolete! Cheers, Roberto

4 4

EFF : Nonprofit Community Stands Together to Protect .ORG
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Nov. 24, 2019

Nov. 24, 2019

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/11/nonprofit-community-stands-together-p…

16 32

PIR
by Maureen Hilyard Nov. 24, 2019

Nov. 24, 2019

https://www.facebook.com/203294399456/posts/10157447297264457/?sfnsn=mo

2 1