March 2025 - Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

IRT Session #17: Meeting Cancellation for Thursday 27 March 2025
by Dana Kuebler March 24, 2025

March 24, 2025

Hello IRT, Hoping all found their way home safely from ICANN82 and have fully recovered from all the traveling. We are cancelling IRT Session #17, this Thursday 27 March 2025 to allow IRT members to utilize session time to complete assigned tasks. Reminder: Tasks are due Thursday 27 March, EOD Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250307a Review Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> and comment on questions and assumptions 19 March 2025 27 March 2025 20250307b Provide priority comments for Threshold Question 3: Part B, within the Draft Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> document 19 March 2025 27 March 2025 Please review the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance & examples on how to best make comments. For the Alignment Document, please review the instructions in that document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> for how to best give your input. REMINDER: please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments on either document. We look forward to further discussion Session #18, Thursday 10 April 2025 @15:30 UTC. Invites will be sent out this week. Please reach out to us if you do not receive an invite.

1 0

Recordings for IRT Meeting #16 - 12 March 2025
by Dana Kuebler March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

Hello IRT, Thank you for your thoughtful comments and informative discussions during our ICANN82 session. The session #16 recordings are available here,<https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IRT/pages/106366110/12+Ma…> transcripts will be posted shortly. We look forward to further discussion Thursday, 27 March 2025 @15:30 UTC. Invitations for this session have been sent. Please reach out to us if you did not get an invite. Based on requests from IRT members, we are adjusting the due dates from 19 March to 27th of March for the following tasks. Please reply on-list if you have any concerns with the proposed adjusted due date. Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250307a Review Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> and comment on questions and assumptions 19 March 2025 27 March 2025 20250307b Provide priority comments for Threshold Question 3: Part B, within the Draft Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> document 19 March 2025 27 March 2025 Please review the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance & examples on how to best make comments. For the Alignment Document, please review the instructions in that document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> for how to best give your input. REMINDER: please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments on either document. Safe travel to all those heading home from ICANN82

1 0

Reminder: IRT Preparation for ICANN82 Discussion
by Dana Kuebler March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

Hello IRT, We look forward to connecting Wednesday, 12 March 2025 16:00 UTC for our scheduled<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann82.sched.com/event/1vpbs/gds-ppsai-…> ICANN82 IRT Session. Please add priority comments or feedback to existing responses directly within the Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…>, in preparation for further discussion. Reminder, please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments. If you missed the last session, here is the link<https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IRT/pages/106366007/27+Fe…> to catch up.

2 2

IRT Tasks: Review and Provide Comments - Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures document. Due Wednesday 19 March 2025
by Leon Grundmann March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you for your thoughtful comments and informative discussions last week. We ask you to continue your focused review and addition of priority comments on Threshold Category 3: Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> with a focus on Part B: Can these frameworks be aligned with existing work on RDRS, Registration Data Policy, and other existing procedures and remain consistent with the policy recommendations? To support this effort we have prepared an Alignment Document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> based on the previously published Wave.1.5 report<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-phas…>. Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250304 Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions discussed during IRT Session 27 Feb 2025 (See IRT email<https://lists.icann.org/hyperkitty/list/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org/threa…> on 04 Mar 2025 for TQs: H, L, O, M, N) 10 Mar 2025 20250307a Review Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> and comment on questions and assumptions 19 March 2025 20250307b Provide priority comments for Threshold Question 3: Part B, within the Draft Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> document 19 March 2025 Please review the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance & examples on how to best make comments. For the Alignment Document, please review the instructions in that document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> for how to best give your input. REMINDER: please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments on either document. We kindly request your review and feedback to the Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> comments in preparation for further discussion in our next IRT meeting Session #16 at ICANN82, on Wednesday 12 March 2025. Best regards, The IPT

1 0

IRT Task #20250305: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: Monday 10 March 2025
by Dana Kuebler March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you all for your time and feedback on draft responses to threshold questions. We would like to address several candidate threshold questions that are shown in the IRT Threshold Question tracker<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rqfRaG1yL8HU48u0_3rIHkREoWN0Psr0rT_…>. During the recent IRT sessions on 13 and 27 February 2025, each of the below questions were discussed and an approach was proposed to address each of them as part of existing threshold questions. Please see below the assessment and handling discussed for the relevant candidate threshold questions. For any IRT members who were not present at the last session, and who have any objections to the handling of these questions, please reply on-list by Monday, 10 March 2025. Consolidation of several of candidate threshold questions related to or with a dependency on TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested?: * TQ.H: Contracted Party Addition(s): Questions related to possible GNSO structural changes including potential creation of a new contracted party, or even ICANN Bylaws amendments, are dependent on the implementation model selected and could be included as part of TQ.B. * TQ.L: Point of contact requirement for P/P providers, which requestors can contact - can be combined with TQ.B, as it relates to the implementation model which will be selected. * TQ.O: Customer surrendering domain name in lieu of disclosure - requirements for P/P provider - can be combined with TQ.B, as it also relates to the implementation model, as it is a question about how the P/P provider is covered in a case where provider is not also the registrar. Additionally, we propose including both TQs M and N to be addressed as part of TQ.C: Illustrative Disclosure Framework - policy or not?, given the dependency on Council's response to whether the illustrative disclosure framework must inform our policy, or if it the IPT and IRT have leeway in drafting such disclosure frameworks during implementation, or perhaps even to reject some or all of what is proposed in Annex B. * TQ.M: Providing evidence of wrongdoing (copyright infringement case) and * TQ.N: "General Policy Stated Herein" question The IPT is also currently working on several possible implementation models to present and discuss with the IRT, which we intend to share within the next several weeks, to support TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested? Thank you again for your support and efforts, The IPT

1 0

IRT Task 20250304: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions
by Leon Grundmann March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you all for your time and feedback on draft responses to threshold questions. We would like to address several candidate threshold questions that are shown in the IRT Threshold Question tracker<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rqfRaG1yL8HU48u0_3rIHkREoWN0Psr0rT_…>. During the recent IRT sessions on 13 and 27 February 2025, each of the below questions were discussed and an approach was proposed to address each of them as part of existing threshold questions. Please see below the assessment and handling discussed for the relevant candidate threshold questions. For any IRT members who were not present at the last session, and who have any objections to the handling of these questions, please reply on-list by Monday, 10 March 2025. Consolidation of several of candidate threshold questions related to or with a dependency on TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested?: * TQ.H: Contracted Party Addition(s): Questions related to possible GNSO structural changes including potential creation of a new contracted party, or even ICANN Bylaws amendments, are dependent on the implementation model selected and could be included as part of TQ.B. * TQ.L: Point of contact requirement for P/P providers, which requestors can contact - can be combined with TQ.B, as it relates to the implementation model which will be selected. * TQ.O: Customer surrendering domain name in lieu of disclosure - requirements for P/P provider - can be combined with TQ.B, as it also relates to the implementation model, as it is a question about how the P/P provider is covered in a case where provider is not also the registrar. Additionally, we propose including both TQs M and N to be addressed as part of TQ.C: Illustrative Disclosure Framework - policy or not?, given the dependency on Council's response to whether the illustrative disclosure framework must inform our policy, or if it the IPT and IRT have leeway in drafting such disclosure frameworks during implementation, or perhaps even to reject some or all of what is proposed in Annex B. * TQ.M: Providing evidence of wrongdoing (copyright infringement case) and * TQ.N: "General Policy Stated Herein" question The IPT is also currently working on several possible implementation models to present and discuss with the IRT, which we intend to share within the next several weeks, to support TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested? Thank you again for your support and efforts, The IPT

1 0