April 2017 - Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Accreditation and de-accreditation of NA-TPPPs
by Chris Pelling April 30, 2017

April 30, 2017

All very good points Theo, food for thought certainly. Sent from Chris on the move! On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:41 PM +0100, "theo geurts" <gtheo(a)xs4all.nl> wrote: Hi all, I think we are jumping the gun when it comes to the de-accreditation approach as proposed by the poll from last week. While trying to come up with a process, it became rather messy, and eventually, I gave up, as every solution was rather poor. So I reversed the process and started with the accreditation process to see if that would yield better results. The process for registrars offering privacy services or its affiliates is not problematic as we roughly have an idea and we have the WG recommendations. Now the non-affiliated third party privacy providers (NA-TPPP), that is a rather different beast. A classic example for those who spend time in the data metrics policy making WG where you can't qualify or quantify a problem, and you can't turn to the CPH to ask them for information or input due to the fact these TPPP are not regulated at all. NA-TPPP who or what are they? Some of them seem to be on the surface semi-professional while others seem to be a hobby project that grown out of portion and the rest is somewhere in between. The business model they use: You give them your registrant data, and they give you a set of privacy information that you can use at your registrar for free. One has to wonder how sustainable this business model is. How to onboard an NA-TPPP? For Registrars it is easy to get ICANN accredited in a sense, there is a good reason. A Registrar wants to register .com domain names? Then the requirement is to become ICANN accredited and only then you can start the accreditation process with Verisign. Onboarding an NA-TPPPs sounds like selling ice cream on the north pole. We barely have an idea who they are, and for sure they have no idea who or what ICANN is (sorry if I am bursting some bubbles here). Outreach will be problematic. Fees. NA-TPPPs do not sell domain names, they "offer" a service. For every registration and renewal a Registrar pays 18 cents to ICANN, wich goes into the ICANN budget. RDE Though the NA-TTTP might (it better be) have the registrant data, the Registrar is not included in this escrow deposit as they do not know where the privacy service info is used by the registrant. WDRP Audit requirement, who is going to pay for this? ERRP See WDRP ICANN involvement when NA-TPPP goes out of business. Worst case scenario the NA-TPPP gets breached and loses all data and backups. This has happened before in the past. ICANN would have to reach out to all registrants and somehow get Registrars in the mix. I am not sure how this scenario would unfold. Most likely it will be a costly business. Operational concerns IRTP C. This discussion still needs to take place somewhere. But if an NA-TPPP goes down we need to make sure that there is no loss of domain names or exposure of personal data. I think I am going to stop here for now. But I think we still need to get the accreditation process done first and then move on to the de-accreditation part. Best regards, Theo Geurts

1 0

Accreditation and de-accreditation of NA-TPPPs
by theo geurts April 30, 2017

April 30, 2017

Hi all, I think we are jumping the gun when it comes to the de-accreditation approach as proposed by the poll from last week. While trying to come up with a process, it became rather messy, and eventually, I gave up, as every solution was rather poor. So I reversed the process and started with the accreditation process to see if that would yield better results. The process for registrars offering privacy services or its affiliates is not problematic as we roughly have an idea and we have the WG recommendations. Now the non-affiliated third party privacy providers (NA-TPPP), that is a rather different beast. A classic example for those who spend time in the data metrics policy making WG where you can't qualify or quantify a problem, and you can't turn to the CPH to ask them for information or input due to the fact these TPPP are not regulated at all. *NA-TPPP who or what are they?* Some of them seem to be on the surface semi-professional while others seem to be a hobby project that grown out of portion and the rest is somewhere in between. *The business model they use:* You give them your registrant data, and they give you a set of privacy information that you can use at your registrar for free. One has to wonder how sustainable this business model is. *How to onboard an NA-TPPP?* For Registrars it is easy to get ICANN accredited in a sense, there is a good reason. A Registrar wants to register .com domain names? Then the requirement is to become ICANN accredited and only then you can start the accreditation process with Verisign. Onboarding an NA-TPPPs sounds like selling ice cream on the north pole. We barely have an idea who they are, and for sure they have no idea who or what ICANN is (sorry if I am bursting some bubbles here). Outreach will be problematic. *Fees. * NA-TPPPs do not sell domain names, they "offer" a service. For every registration and renewal a Registrar pays 18 cents to ICANN, wich goes into the ICANN budget. *RDE* Though the NA-TTTP might (it better be) have the registrant data, the Registrar is not included in this escrow deposit as they do not know where the privacy service info is used by the registrant. *WDRP* Audit requirement, who is going to pay for this? *ERRP* See WDRP *ICANN involvement when NA-TPPP goes out of business. * Worst case scenario the NA-TPPP gets breached and loses all data and backups. This has happened before in the past. ICANN would have to reach out to all registrants and somehow get Registrars in the mix. I am not sure how this scenario would unfold. Most likely it will be a costly business. *Operational concerns* IRTP C. This discussion still needs to take place somewhere. But if an NA-TPPP goes down we need to make sure that there is no loss of domain names or exposure of personal data. I think I am going to stop here for now. But I think we still need to get the accreditation process done first and then move on to the de-accreditation part. Best regards, Theo Geurts

1 0

Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT poll deadline extended to 3 MAY; 2 MAY IRT meeting canceled
by Amy Bivins April 27, 2017

April 27, 2017

Dear Colleagues, Please note that references to “April” in the subject line and note below should be “May.” Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:39 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT poll deadline extended to 3 April; 2 April IRT meeting canceled Hi Darcy and all, Yes, certainly. Everyone, please complete this survey no later than your end of day next Wednesday, April 3. Thank you for your participation and contribution. So far, we have 9 responses that show a clear preference among IRT members to use “option 1” as a starting point in designing the de-accreditation process. Also, next week’s IRT meeting, scheduled for 2 May, will be canceled because we do not have new materials prepared to discuss. I regret that this will result in cancellations two weeks in a row (our meeting on 9 May is canceled due to the GDD Summit), but the break will allow time to ensure we have materials ready to discuss at our next meeting, scheduled for 16 May. Calendar updates will be distributed separately. I apologize for any inconvenience. When we re-convene in mid-May, we expect to be discussing the PSWG proposal, as soon as the PSWG is able to distribute it to the IRT. We will also discuss proposals on accreditation criteria/processes and de-accreditation following the initial IRT discussions, and we expect that we will be able to begin discussing the accreditation agreement shortly, as well. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 3:24 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April Thanks, Theo. I appreciate your suggestion and agree with you about adding option #3 and #4 to the survey. @Amy, I think it would be helpful if you could give us more than 3 days to complete the survey. Can we leave this open for at least a week? Darcy From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of gtheo <gtheo(a)xs4all.nl <mailto:gtheo@xs4all.nl> > Reply-To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> > Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April Hi Amy, I am struggling a little with this poll in the sense of committing to it. The mentioned principles recommended by the WG are fine. But the two possible options that ICANN sees as solutions are by no means complete. I appreciate the speediness of staff, but we are talking bout registrants here and procedures and how that will affect them. Option 1 looks like a path forward but requires a lot of work in the sense of getting it right. Option 2 looks not practical, as this procedure applies to registrars and not privacy providers. Making this work will also require a lot of work. Option 3? Work on option 1 and use it as a starting point and develop a framework and map out the actors and the possible scenarios. We will run into a lot of practical issues here, like for example is a 30 days notice enough and how are bounces being dealt with? This looks simple, but it will get complex fast. Option 4, other solutions? Thanks, Theo Amy Bivins schreef op 2017-04-25 06:16 PM: Dear Colleagues, Pursuant to our discussion on the Privacy/Proxy IRT call today, please complete the following one-question survey NO LATER THAN YOUR END OF DAY FRIDAY, 28 APRIL, 2017, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3D8F2B5 The introduction to the survey includes the background that was provided on the call. I encourage those who could not attend to also listen to the recording before answering the survey. The recording and other meeting materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/25+April+2017. Thank you for your participation on the call today and also on this poll. We need all of you to participate to ensure we have a clear view of your opinions on this topic. Details about next week's IRT meeting will be provided by the end of this week. Best, Amy AMY E. BIVINS Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

1 0

IRT poll deadline extended to 3 April; 2 April IRT meeting canceled
by Amy Bivins April 27, 2017

April 27, 2017

Hi Darcy and all, Yes, certainly. Everyone, please complete this survey no later than your end of day next Wednesday, April 3. Thank you for your participation and contribution. So far, we have 9 responses that show a clear preference among IRT members to use “option 1” as a starting point in designing the de-accreditation process. Also, next week’s IRT meeting, scheduled for 2 May, will be canceled because we do not have new materials prepared to discuss. I regret that this will result in cancellations two weeks in a row (our meeting on 9 May is canceled due to the GDD Summit), but the break will allow time to ensure we have materials ready to discuss at our next meeting, scheduled for 16 May. Calendar updates will be distributed separately. I apologize for any inconvenience. When we re-convene in mid-May, we expect to be discussing the PSWG proposal, as soon as the PSWG is able to distribute it to the IRT. We will also discuss proposals on accreditation criteria/processes and de-accreditation following the initial IRT discussions, and we expect that we will be able to begin discussing the accreditation agreement shortly, as well. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 3:24 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April Thanks, Theo. I appreciate your suggestion and agree with you about adding option #3 and #4 to the survey. @Amy, I think it would be helpful if you could give us more than 3 days to complete the survey. Can we leave this open for at least a week? Darcy From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of gtheo <gtheo(a)xs4all.nl <mailto:gtheo@xs4all.nl> > Reply-To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> > Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April Hi Amy, I am struggling a little with this poll in the sense of committing to it. The mentioned principles recommended by the WG are fine. But the two possible options that ICANN sees as solutions are by no means complete. I appreciate the speediness of staff, but we are talking bout registrants here and procedures and how that will affect them. Option 1 looks like a path forward but requires a lot of work in the sense of getting it right. Option 2 looks not practical, as this procedure applies to registrars and not privacy providers. Making this work will also require a lot of work. Option 3? Work on option 1 and use it as a starting point and develop a framework and map out the actors and the possible scenarios. We will run into a lot of practical issues here, like for example is a 30 days notice enough and how are bounces being dealt with? This looks simple, but it will get complex fast. Option 4, other solutions? Thanks, Theo Amy Bivins schreef op 2017-04-25 06:16 PM: Dear Colleagues, Pursuant to our discussion on the Privacy/Proxy IRT call today, please complete the following one-question survey NO LATER THAN YOUR END OF DAY FRIDAY, 28 APRIL, 2017, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3D8F2B5 The introduction to the survey includes the background that was provided on the call. I encourage those who could not attend to also listen to the recording before answering the survey. The recording and other meeting materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/25+April+2017. Thank you for your participation on the call today and also on this poll. We need all of you to participate to ensure we have a clear view of your opinions on this topic. Details about next week's IRT meeting will be provided by the end of this week. Best, Amy AMY E. BIVINS Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

1 0

IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April
by Amy Bivins April 26, 2017

April 26, 2017

Dear Colleagues, Pursuant to our discussion on the Privacy/Proxy IRT call today, please complete the following one-question survey no later than your end of day Friday, 28 April, 2017, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3D8F2B5 The introduction to the survey includes the background that was provided on the call. I encourage those who could not attend to also listen to the recording before answering the survey. The recording and other meeting materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/25+April+2017. Thank you for your participation on the call today and also on this poll. We need all of you to participate to ensure we have a clear view of your opinions on this topic. Details about next week's IRT meeting will be provided by the end of this week. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org

4 4

Draft Language
by Darcy Southwell April 25, 2017

April 25, 2017

Hi, Amy. At the very end of today’s call, Steve Metalitz asked a question in the chat that I think you answered at the very end: steve metalitz: Staff, assuming you get further guidance through a poll or otherwise, when could we expect t see a specific proposal with draft language? *** Amy Bivins 2: Re: Steve, we could draft language for either quickly, but will have questions re: specifics to discuss I think we all realize that questions and discussions will come from the draft language, but I think they will be far more productive if we have draft language to discuss (rather than theoretical concepts). I would encourage staff to draft a proposal based on the PDP recommendations. Then we can have material conversations about how this program. Thanks, Darcy ---------------- Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

3 2

Recap of 18 April Privacy/Proxy IRT meeting, agenda for 25 April
by Amy Bivins April 20, 2017

April 20, 2017

Dear Colleagues, Thanks again for a very productive discussion on our Privacy/Proxy IRT call this week. I'm attaching a summary document of the input we received from you related to the PP provider accreditation process. The call recording, slides and attendance list are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/18+April+2017. The main takeaways from this meeting are as follows: 1. IRT members recommended that ICANN should not limit eligibility for privacy/proxy providers to apply for accreditation in an initial application round at the outset of the program. Thus, if there is an initial applicant round, any provider should be eligible to apply, regardless of whether the provider is affiliated with a registrar. 2. ICANN should consider streamlining the application process for registrar-affiliated privacy/proxy providers, possibly by not requiring those providers to answer questions about/demonstrate understanding of requirements that the registrar is already required to comply with pursuant to the RAA. 3. ICANN should require providers to complete a training course/exam as a condition to (before) obtaining accreditation. Next Steps On This Topic The ICANN organization will complete work on proposed accreditation criteria/processes, in light of the IRT's feedback, to present to the IRT for discussion. Other Action Items IRT members asked a few questions that could not be answered during the meeting, including: (1) What is the current volume of registrar accreditation applications processed by ICANN? (2) How many applications for accreditation did ICANN receive at the launch of the registrar accreditation program? Answers are as follows: (1) ICANN received 9-12 applications/quarter in each of the last three quarters if you do not count the bulk accreditations received (counting each in a bulk accreditation batch as 1 application). (2) In our first announcement on the registrar accreditation program, on 21 April 1999, ICANN announced that 34 companies had applied and met the accreditation criteria <https://www.icann.org/news/icann-pr-1999-04-21-en>. By the end of 1999 ICANN had announced a total of 98 applicants that met the criteria <https://www.icann.org/news/icann-pr-1999-12-21-en>. ICANN announced in May 2000 that we were up to 124 companies <https://www.icann.org/news/icann-pr-2000-05-11-en>. Next IRT Meeting The IRT's next meeting is scheduled for this upcoming Tuesday, 25 April, at 1400 UTC. The calendar reminder will be distributed separately. On this call, we will discuss the registrar de-accreditation process. Caitlin Tubergen, who manages this process for the Registrar Services & Engagement Team, will be with us on the call. A description of the process is available at, https://www.icann.org/resources/files/dartp-2013-07-11-en. As this process was referenced by the PDP WG, we want to provide a quick primer on the process for the IRT, and then we will discuss possible challenges to applying this process in the Privacy/Proxy context. The goal of the call is to solicit the IRT's views on how this process should-or should not-be applied to privacy/proxy providers. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact me or reply to the list. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org

1 0

Pirate Bay Founder to offer Anonymous Domain Registration Service
by Carlton Samuels April 20, 2017

April 20, 2017

Privacy....with a twist. https://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-founder-launches-anonymous-domain-regis… -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= > >

2 1

PPSAI IRT call today ?
by Metalitz, Steven April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Sorry if I have missed it but does the PPSAI IRT have a call today and if so what is the agenda? Thanks. [image001] Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation T: 202.355.7902 | met(a)msk.com<mailto:met@msk.com> Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | www.msk.com<http://www.msk.com/> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.

8 13

Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] [Ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] REMINDER: Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program IRT CALL ON IN 20 minutes at 14:00 UTC
by Amy Bivins April 18, 2017

April 18, 2017

Hi Steve, We have a short agenda today-we are only discussing one topic: the accreditation process. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@msk.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 9:50 AM To: Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter(a)icann.org> Cc: Amy Bivins <amy.bivins(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [Ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] REMINDER: Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program IRT CALL ON IN 20 minutes at 14:00 UTC Thanks Michelle. Can you circulate the agenda please? Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation T: 202.355.7902 | <mailto:met@msk.com> met(a)msk.com Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.msk.com_&d=DwMF-g&c =FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=uerz4ckt1v4Qhbv-TplkjKTey9bgt dWrvLyZDu0mXuk&m=G6p4KbYSFeLF-elVJ0y8mX_95dvlTA95VJNN2uPe2Cs&s=i3MucG_J_BcVO CrFuZC3NvW7Q8EGuhHdpL7DFZqqOfo&e=> www.msk.com[msk.com] 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU. From: ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Michelle DeSmyter Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 9:45 AM To: ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <mailto:ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Ntfy-gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] REMINDER: Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program IRT CALL ON IN 20 minutes at 14:00 UTC Dear Colleagues, Please find below the remote participation details for the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program IRT Meetings which will be held on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 at 14:00 UTC for 1 hour 30 minutes. Adobe Connect link: <https://participate.icann.org/ppirt> https://participate.icann.org/ppirt Participant code: 4824695647 Dial-In Phone Numbers: US: +1-719-457-6209 Canada, Calgary: +1 403 407 5793 Canada, Montreal: +1 514 669 5928 Canada, Toronto: +1 647 426 9172 Canada, Vancouver: +1 604 222 7836 Argentina (toll free): 0800 800 1223 Argentina, Buenos Aires: +54 (0) 11 5172 6003 Australia (toll free): 1 800 804 786 Australia, Brisbane: +61 (0) 7 3015 0535 Australia, Melbourne: +61 (0) 3 8687 0553 Australia, Sydney: +61 (0) 2 8017 6064 Austria (toll free): 0800 8866 3413 Austria, Vienna: +43 (0) 1 25302 1785 Bahrain (toll free): 800 04212 Bahrain, Manama: +973 1619 8739 Belarus (toll free): 8 820 0011 0341 Belgium (toll free): 0800 39279 Belgium, Brussels: +32 (0) 2 400 6928 Brazil (toll free): 0800 887 0233 Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: +55 21 4560 0072 Brazil, Sao Paulo: +55 11 4935 7169 Bulgaria (toll free): 00800 111 4950 Bulgaria, Sofia: +359 (0) 2 491 6045 Canada (toll free): 1 855 950 3717 Chile (toll free): 171 800 835 783 Chile, Santiago: +56 (0) 2 2666 0696 China (national): +400 613 8103 China, Beijing: +86 10 5667 0003 China, Shanghai: +86 21 2039 7081 Colombia (toll free): 01 800 755 0102 Colombia, Bogota: +57 1 508 8137 Croatia (toll free): 0800 805 940 Cyprus (toll free): 800 97424 Czech Republic (toll free): 800 701 532 Czech Republic, Prague: +420 225 986 554 Denmark (toll free): 80 70 35 86 Denmark, Copenhagen: +45 32 72 78 10 Egypt (toll free): 0800 000 0593 Estonia (toll free): 800 011 1589 Estonia, Tallinn: +372 622 6551 Fiji (toll free): 00800 3322 Finland (toll free): 0800 772 236 Finland, Helsinki: +358 (0) 9 2310 1677 France (national): 0811 655 100 France (toll free): 0800 946 531 France, Paris: +33 (0) 1 70 37 16 56 Germany (national): 01801 003 899 Germany (toll free): 0800 588 9170 Germany, Frankfurt: +49 (0) 69 2222 10612 Germany, Munich: +49 (0) 89 2030 31207 Greece (toll free): 00800 128 913 Greece, Athens: +30 211 181 3824 Hong Kong: +852 3018 9111 Hong Kong (toll free): 800 901 787 Hungary (toll free): 068 001 9673 Hungary, Budapest: +36 1408 8953 Iceland (toll free): 800 9847 India, Bangalore: +91 (0) 80 6127 6710 India, Chennai: +91 (0)44 6688 6061 India, Delhi: +91 (0) 11 6641 1394 India, Mumbai: +91 (0)22 6187 5028 Indonesia (toll free): 007 803 321 8927 Ireland (national): 1890 907 630 Ireland (toll free): 1800 937 649 Ireland, Dublin: +353 (0) 1 526 9421 Israel (toll free): 1809 213 168 Israel, Tel Aviv: +972 (0)3 721 7943 Italy (toll free): 800 146 094 Italy, Milan: +39 02 3600 8006 Italy, Rome: +39 06 8750 0676 Japan (mobile): 0120 632 611 Japan (toll free): 0120 305 211 Japan, Osaka: +81 (0) 6 4560 2410 Japan, Tokyo: +81 (0) 3 4560 1270 Kazakhstan (toll free): 8800 333 7554 Latvia (toll free): 8000 4418 Latvia, Riga: +371 6601 3627 Lithuania (toll free): 8800 31449 Lithuania, Vilnius: +370 5205 5468 Luxembourg: +352 2088 1749 Luxembourg (toll free): 800 28433 Malaysia (toll free): 1 800 816 152 Malaysia,Kuala Lumpur: +60 (0) 3 7724 8010 Mexico (toll free): 01 800 733 4102 Mexico, Guadalajara: +52 33 4162 4504 Mexico, Mexico City: +52 55 8421 0326 Mexico, Monterrey: +52 81 4162 5648 Morocco (toll free): 0800 091 296 Morocco, Casablanca: +212 (0) 520 48 0022 Netherlands (toll free): 0800 020 2597 Netherlands, Amsterdam: +31 (0) 20 716 8345 New Zealand (toll free): 0800 452 947 New Zealand, Auckland: +64 (0) 9 929 1825 New Zealand, Christchurch: +64 (0) 3 974 2596 New Zealand, Wellington: +64 (0) 4 909 4674 Nigeria, Lagos: +234 1 277 3944 Norway (toll free): 800 56081 Norway, Oslo: +47 21 00 48 15 Panama (toll free): 00800 223 1390 Panama, Panama City: +507 8 335 913 Peru, Lima: +51 (0) 1 700 9571 Philippines (toll free): 1 800 111 013 99 Philippines, Manila: +63 (0)2 395 3426 Poland (toll free): 00 800 121 4356 Poland, Warsaw: +48 22 295 3570 Portugal (toll free): 800 784 442 Portugal, Lisbon: +351 21 316 4093 Qatar (toll free): 00 800 100 491 Romania (toll free): 0800 801 035 Romania, Bucharest: +40 (0) 21 529 3992 Russia (toll free): 8 800 500 9241 Russia, Moscow: +7 495 646 9181 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 844 6641 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 850 0219 Singapore: +65 6622 1957 Singapore (toll free): 800 616 3192 Slovakia (toll free): 0800 002 002 Slovakia, Bratislava: +421 (0)2 3321 5498 Slovenia (toll free): 0800 81193 Slovenia, Ljubljana: +386 1600 8695 South Africa (toll free): 0800 999 434 South Africa, Johannesburg: +27 (0)11 589 8321 South Korea (toll free): 00798 6136 1454 South Korea, Seoul: +82 (0) 2 6007 0079 Spain (toll free): 900 828 035 Spain, Barcelona: +34 93 800 1946 Spain, Madrid: +34 91 114 6653 Sweden (toll free): 0200 125 588 Sweden, Stockholm: +46 (0) 8 5065 3956 Switzerland (toll free): 0800 740 360 Switzerland, Geneva: +41 (0) 22 595 4795 Switzerland, Zurich: +41 (0) 44 580 7207 Taiwan (toll free): 0800 666 596 Taiwan, Taipei: +886 (0) 2 2650 7329 Thailand (toll free): 001 800 6136 1473 Turkey (toll free): 00800 4488 26642 Turkey, Istanbul: +90 212 375 50 49 UAE (toll free): 8000 3570 2662 UK (03): +44 (0)330 336 6002 UK (toll free): 0800 358 6385 Ukraine (toll free): 0800 500 896 Uruguay (toll free): 0004 019 0152 USA /Canada (toll free): 1-866-398-2885 Venezuela (toll free): 0 800 162 7451 Vietnam (toll free): 1800 9226 Costa Rica (toll free): 800 542 5328 France (national): 0821 231 671 India (toll free): 1800 200 9415 Indonesia, Jakarta: +62 21 2188 9084 Ireland (national): 0818 270 271 Japan (national): 0570 085 744 Serbia (toll free): 0800 190 712 UK (national): 0844 473 5010 UK (national): 0845 545 0015 Venezuela, Caracas: +58 212 720 2164

2 1