- GNSO-RPM-WG - lists.icann.org

Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Please respond: Welcome to the GNSO RPM TMCH mailing list!
by Dawahi Khouloud July 13, 2016

July 13, 2016

It didnt work for me .I wasn't receiving mail .I already contacted Nathalie to fix the problem .It should be fixed by now . Kind regards , On Jul 13, 2016 2:05 PM, "Dorrain, Kristine via Gnso-rpm-tmch" < gnso-rpm-tmch(a)icann.org> wrote: > Appears to be working! Looking forward to digging in! > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Nathalie Peregrine < > nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > We believe there may have been a few technical glitches in the setting > up of this mailing list, hopefully we have discovered the solution. > > > > If you would all be so kind as to respond to this email by the > affirmative so we can ensure everyone who volunteered is correctly > subscribed, that would be wonderful. > > > > Thanks all! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Nathalie > > _______________________________________________ > > Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list > > Gnso-rpm-tmch(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list > Gnso-rpm-tmch(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch >

1 0

Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in all gTLDs PDP Working Group 13 July 2016
by Terri Agnew July 13, 2016

July 13, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in all gTLDs PDP Working Group call held on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 at 17:00 UTC. MP3: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-rpm-review-08jun16-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-rpm-review-13jul16-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXz…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/rhiOAw Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 13 July 2016: Terri Agnew:Welcome to the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in all gTLDs PDP Working Group call held on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 at 17:00 UTC Terri Agnew:members wiki page with SOI's: https://community.icann.org/x/3iWAAw Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):Hello Everyone Mary Wong:Hi Maxim, everyone. George Kirikos:Hi folks. Mary Wong:Hi George George Kirikos:Hi Mary. How are you today? Mary Wong:Hey George, very well, thanks - just got off a planning call with Phil and Petter for our OTHER Working Group meeting tomorrow :) Mary Wong:Hope you're well, and everyone else too! George Kirikos:Are we going to have calls during the Olympics??!!?? Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):it is not a war ... so we don't have to stop :) Mary Wong:@George, that's the plan :) :) George Kirikos:Ahhh, ok. :) I'll have to set the PVR if there's anything good during our calls. Martin Silva Valent:hello everyone! George Kirikos:Welcome Martin. Yuri Chumak:hello George Kirikos:Welcome, Yuri. catherine.douglas:Terri - not sure how long I can remain on the call, but will do best to remain as long as possible. George Kirikos:We're now up to 240 participants in the PDP https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950 (140 members, 100 observers). Terri Agnew:thank you for this information Catherine Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):do we know who WIPO is this time? Mary Wong:@George, we're still trailing the Next-Generation Registration Directory Service to Replace WHOIS PDP group (by just a little) :) George Kirikos:@Mary: They had a head start. :-) In 2018, when we get to the UDRP, I think we'll see our group get even larger. Mary Wong:@Maxim, Brian Beckham from WIPO is signed up as a member of this Working Group. Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):tanks Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):*thanks George Kirikos:*6 will mute, I think. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Hi all. I'm in Adobe, but finishing another call and will join audio in a few minutes. Terri Agnew:Correct, on audio *6 to mute or unmute Marina Lewis:Hi everyone WIPO:Thanks Mary - FYI the reason I sign in as "WIPO" is because I am joined by other colleagues here in my office. Laurie Anderson:Hi all, sorry to be tardy, another meeting went long. Kathy Kleiman:Hi Brian, Might we ask who is joining you at WIPO? Great to know everyone participating... VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:'Evening everyone. Mary Wong:FYI these slides are a summary of the full Provider responese, all of which have been posted to the Working Group wiki. George Kirikos:The others at WIPO might want to add a "SOI", if they've not already done so. Mona:I'm on Adobe and will cut the call out. Mona:thanks for the call out Adobe is ok Terri Agnew:thanks for this information Mona, will cancel dial out with the op Caroline Chicoine:On Question 8, Forum responded wondering whetehr ICANN's compliance program is where people gowith issues rather than using PDDRP and wondering whether we have asked ICANN compliance group whether any complaints they have received since new gtld launch relate to something that could have been brought under PDDRP. Might be good to know if we have not done yet. George Kirikos:I'm surprised by WIPO's answer, given that their website mentions mediation, see: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/ Mary Wong:@Caroline, thanks - Compliance staff attended our Helsinki WG meeting but we have not specifically followed up with them on this point. We can certainly do so. Laurie Anderson:Is anyone having an issue with the audio? Mine keeps cutting out. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:I'm on the Adobe audio and I'm hearing fine except the feedback issues. Terri Agnew:@Laurie, my AC audio is solid, please let me know if a dial out is needed Ivett Paulovics:Mediation is recommended by the applicant guidebook as dispute resolution method Kathy Kleiman:@Caroline: I had listed the same question. Perhaps we should invite them for the meeting? Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:George: All the providers offer stand-alone mediation services. I think the question is regarding the benefit of adding it to the PDDRP. Laurie Anderson:Terri, thank you. I disconnected my VPN so working better now. Laurie Anderson:Easier to understand when you hear all the words :) George Kirikos:Here's a link to ICANN Compliance reports: https://www.icann.org/compliance/notices (includes both registrar & registry compliance) Ivett Paulovics:Page 330 Applicant Guidebook 21.2: The parties are encouraged, but not required to participate in informal negotiations and/or mediation at any time throughout the dispute resolution process but the conduct of any such settlement negotiation is not, standing alone, a reason to suspend any deadline under the proceedings. J. Scott Evans:I still think we need to take a look at the burdne of proof issue. J. Scott Evans:All 3 providers pointed to that as an issue. Mary Wong:@J Scott we can add that as an item to the list to be compiled when we get to the next agenda item. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:I still like the idea of some straw proposals as I think J Scott mentioned in Helsinki. I'd love to come up with a few use cases and get some outside counsel input and perhaps even a response from ICANN on what they would do in that situation if the complainant elected to go directly to ICANN. Mona:Recent surveys indicate that mediation settlement rates for intellectual property disputes are as high as 70%. Mediation is a cost-effective, efficient way to resolve trademark disputes.INTA endorses mediation as an effective way to resolve trademark disputes. Petter Rindforth:I think we already have a clear answer to question 5: Obviously Not Mona:this is taken from an overview by INTA Kathy Kleiman:@Laurie: I am hearing moments of silence online... George Kirikos:I'm on the phone, and the sound is good, Kathy. Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):too high price is a questionabe threshold ... who sets it? Laurie Anderson:@Kathy, I shut down my VPN and that fixed it for me. Kathy Kleiman:@Laurie - tx! Greg Shatan:You're welcome, Phil... Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:If we end up going down the route of recommending a "class complaint" under PDDRP, I think great care needs to be taken. The resources available to multiple joined brand owners could cripple a small registry. We willl want to make sure the RySG is well-represented in that discussion, as the potential respondents. Beth Allegretti:Thanks Susan. We may want to see about adding "class action" language to the PDDRP. It would be difficult for a single brand to show a pattern of bad action, much easier for a group of brands. susan payne:@Kristine, that is a good point. Maybe "class complaint" isn't the right term. But it seems to me highly unlikley that a single brand owner alone would have evidence of the kind of behaviour intended to be addressed by the PDDRP Greg Shatan:There needs to be a way to either have a class action, consolidate cases and/or have a joint action. Otherwise this is close to being a sham. What good is a forum for complaints, if there's no one to bring an action? Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):Should we ask RySG ? Petter Rindforth:Top-Level Dispute (PDDRP 6.1):"A complainant must assert and prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the registry operator's affirmative conduct in its operation or use of its gTLD string that is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's mark, causes or materially contributes to the gTLD doing one of the following: (a) taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the reputation of the complainant's mark; or (b) impairing the distinctive character or the reputation of the complainant's mark; or (c) creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark. An example of infringement at the top-level is where a TLD string is identical to a trademark and then the registry operator holds itself out as the beneficiary of the mark." Ivett Paulovics:Susan you intend for class complaint consolidation? George Kirikos:I think most registries (and/or complainants) would respond by exercising their rights under Section 22, i.e. go to court, rather than use this procedure. George Kirikos:i.e. if court is available, and is ultimately where this would end up, why would a party logically prefer this procedure over the courts? Greg Shatan:Kristine, let's not forget that brand owners come in all sizes too. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Initially, it was a way to get ICANN compliance to act. After RegisterFly and Lead Networks, it got better. Greg Shatan:A PDDRP at the top level is more likely to be brought by a single brandowner. A PDDRP relating to problems at the second level is where the "where's the complainant" problem really arises. Ivett Paulovics:@George maybe because it is cost-effective and swift in comparison to the court George Kirikos:Here's a link to the policy, in case folks aren't reading it: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/pddrp-04jun12-en.pdf WIPO:While the PDDRP uses the term "Complainant", it also implies that a consolidated (or "class") complaint would be permitted (see 13.3 "each side of the dispute if a matter has been consolidated"). Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:+1 J Scott susan payne:@ Petter - I was thinking of the 2nd level rather than the top level: "(a) there is a substantial pattern or practice of specific bad faith intent by theregistry operator to profit from the sale of trademark infringing domain names; " Mary Wong:Staff will follow up with our Compliance colleagues. J. Scott Evans:I think we should, obviously. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Good Idea- Lets do this Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Yes, please send a homework reminder. :) Mary Wong:@J Scott, @Kristine, @Phil, will do. WIPO:To the extent relevant in the PDDRP context, UDRP panels have also described conditions under which a consolidation would be appropriate in the UDRP context; see WIPO Overview 2.0 at 4.16: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview2.0/#416. J. Scott Evans:@Mary. Thanks. Petter Rindforth:@Susan - I agree: On the second level, it is not sufficient to show that the registry operator is on notice of possible trademark infringement through registrations in the gTLD. An example of infringement at this level is where a registry operator has a pattern or practice of actively and systematically encouraging registrants to register second level domain names and to take unfair advantage of the trademark to the extent and degree that bad faith is apparent. Another example of infringement is where a registry operator has a pattern or practice of acting as the registrant or beneficial user of infringing registrations, to monetize and profit in bad faith. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Phil, I suggest going a step furhter with compliance and presenting them with use cases or situations. to see if there is any situation that ICANN compliance would NOT deal with directly and push to the PDDRP. Caroline Chicoine:My perpesctive on this changes depending on whetehr the PDDRP is the only mechanism or is it the mechanism of last resort (i.e., compliance does in fact have mechanisms to deal with issues that do not necessarily rise to the level of bringing of a PDDRP action). Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:YEs George Kirikos:Sound is very low? VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Kristine your Audio is not clear and Audible Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Oh, I'm sorry...on a different headset today. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Summary: Hypotheticals to ICANN will help the group determine which areas area being adequately dealt with by ICANN and where there might still be gaps that the PDDRP could be useful to solve. We want to target any PDDRP updates to those areas of actual usefullness. catherine.douglas:so sorry, but must bow out. Renee Reuter:I need to leave the call. Sorry. Robin Gross:I was wondering if TM-PDDRP claims should be limited in time until after General Availability/public launch? Is there really enough evidence of a Registry's intent before/during Sunrise? Thanks. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:We should support this - simultaneously change a little and make it suitable to the new work environment VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:ICANN 57 - Yippeeee VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Group-My Guests :-) Mary Wong:@Phil, all - as a proposed F2F meeting will likely take place during Day 1 of the ICANN57 meeting, no additional funding is available for this meeting. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:There are Direct Flihts to Hyderabad so Logistics are not a Nightmare - If you have any questions, please feel free to write to me for clarifications : va(a)bladebrains.com<mailto:va@bladebrains.com> | va(a)thevaibhav.com<mailto:va@thevaibhav.com> Mona:I'm going too VAIBHAV AGGARWAL::-) George Kirikos:I think when groups are this large, F2F meetings are going to be less effective. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Yes The Logest in ICANN for a While Susan Kawaguchi:The RDS is also considering having a face to face meeting in Hyderabad George Kirikos:Since, only 1 person speaks at a time, if you have 100 ppl there, it just means 99 ppl are listening while that 1 person speaks.... Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):roll a dice for a mic time? VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:November is the Best time to Visit India as its winters with the weather encouraging you to experience life while on business mates Ivett Paulovics:I'm probably not going to Hyderabad. To Copenhagen yes. George Kirikos:Groups above 7 or 8 ppl are hard to manage F2F. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:George, I thought the Helsinki F2F WG meeting was pretty full and still effective.. Greg Shatan:There are no direct flights to Hyderabad from New York (so I assume none from the US). One needs to leave the US on November 1 to arrive November 3, which is too late. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:F2F will be great as this will help speed up VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Shud ve do a Interim Doodle Greg Shatan:Agree with Kristine, larger F2Fs have been quite useful. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:I can Shre information about travelling here if anyone wants J. Scott Evans:I have to excuse myself for another call. Thanks Phil, Kathy and WG members. George Kirikos:Bye everyone. Kristine Dorrain - Amazon Registry:Thanks all, I have to jump off. Jay Chapman:Thanks, all! Reg Levy - MMX:Thank you ,all Salvador Camacho Hernandez 2:Thanks to all! Mary Wong:Thank you everyone! VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Cheers - Robin Gross:Thanks Phil and all, bye! Darcy Southwell:Thanks, all. Laurie Anderson:thanks everyone! Maxim Alzoba (FAITID):bye all Jonathan Frost:Thanks Phil, Kathy, and all Ivett Paulovics:thanks VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Ciao Phil Marano (Mayer Brown):Bye all

1 0

Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Response of the Registries Stakeholder Group to our Working Group's request for input
by Paul Keating July 13, 2016

July 13, 2016

Mary, I think that give the anticipated complexity and length of our work we should start categorizing the issues being raised so that they are given appropriate attention when those issues are addressed. Can the Staff please propose a system of categorization so that this can be achieved. I would suggest folders pertaining to issues in which sub folders can be created as needed. This should be accessible to members so that materials can be easily deposited into the correct folder/subnfolder. Each member can then deposit material which can be circulated via link when that particular issues presents itself in the topical agenda. Of course I am not certain that you have systems to handle such a task and if not then perhaps appointing a particular staff person to organize this material may be appropriate. It should be freely accessible to members via the portal, however. Regards, Paul From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:34 AM To: "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Response of the Registries Stakeholder Group to our Working Group's request for input > Dear all, > > Please find attached the response from the Registries Stakeholder Group to the > letter that had been sent by our Working Group on 28 May to all GNSO > Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies as well as the other ICANN Supporting > Organizations and Advisory Committees. As you will recall, our letter sought > stakeholder input on our work and methodology. > > Staff will discuss how best to ensure that the Registries¹ concerns and > suggestions for each of the RPMs for which they provided feedback can be > considered. We will also post this and any other responses received > (including the recent note from the RSSAC) to the WG wiki shortly. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > > Mary Wong > > Senior Policy Director > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > > Telephone: +1-603-5744889 > > > _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list > gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

3 2

Agenda and documents for Working Group meeting on Wednesday 13 June 2016
by Mary Wong July 12, 2016

July 12, 2016

Dear all, The proposed agenda for our next call, scheduled for Wednesday 13 June at 1700 UTC, is as follows: 1. Roll call (via Adobe Connect and telephone bridge attendance only) and updates to Statements of Interest 2. Continue review of responses received from the three TM-PDDRP providers (see tabular summary circulated on 16 June; also uploaded to the 15 June WG wiki page under “Follow Up”: https://community.icann.org/x/Gx_OAw) 3. Discuss additional issues, concerns and other topics requiring further clarification, including any need for additional follow up with the three TM-PDDRP providers 4. Next meeting – note rotation times and calendar invitations 5. Planning for ICANN57 For those who were not able to attend the Working Group meeting held during ICANN56 on 30 June or who wish to review the transcript and slides from that meeting, these are available at: http://sched.co/7Gl1. The first part of that meeting focused on a review of the community feedback from the open dialogue session held on 27 June, with a discussion of the TM-PDDRP taking up the second half of the session. To review the community input from 27 June, please see this summary posted on the WG wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/RQSbAw. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889

3 2

Call for RSVPs: GNSO Working Group Communication Tools Classroom | 26 July 2016 at 13:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine July 12, 2016

July 12, 2016

GNSO Working Group Communication Tools Classroom | July 26 2016 | 13:00 UTC Please RSVP via this form<http://goo.gl/forms/mR4HD9XNZU> by 25 July 2016. Are you a new GNSO Working Group Member? Do you have questions you never asked about Adobe Connect or other participation tools that are used to facilitate Working Group deliberations? The upcoming Communication Tools Classroom is the place to look for answers to these and any other questions you may have in relation to Working Group tools. Please join the SO/AC Support team on July 26, 2016 at 13:00 UTC for the Communication Tools Classroom. In an informal setting, new Working Group members will be familiarized with the communication tools they will be using when taking part in GNSO Working Groups. Agenda: 1. Welcome 2. Introduction to the SO/AC Support team & Policy Support Staff 3. Where to find relevant information: a. GNSO Master Calendar b. Individual Working Group Wiki pages. 4. Working Group Mailing lists: a. Difference between statuses (Observer/ Member) 5. Working Group Members a. Statements of Interests b. Email invitations c. Calendar invitations 6. Adobe Connect room 7. Questions This session will be recorded and the recordings will be made available on the GNSO Calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar>. We look forward to your participation! Please RSVP via this form<http://goo.gl/forms/mR4HD9XNZU> by 25 July 2016.

1 0

Response of the Registries Stakeholder Group to our Working Group's request for input
by Mary Wong July 12, 2016

July 12, 2016

Dear all, Please find attached the response from the Registries Stakeholder Group to the letter that had been sent by our Working Group on 28 May to all GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies as well as the other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. As you will recall, our letter sought stakeholder input on our work and methodology. Staff will discuss how best to ensure that the Registries’ concerns and suggestions for each of the RPMs for which they provided feedback can be considered. We will also post this – and any other responses received (including the recent note from the RSSAC) – to the WG wiki shortly. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889

1 0

FW: RSSAC response on Rights Protection Mechanism Request
by Glen de Saint Géry July 11, 2016

July 11, 2016

For your attention. Thank you Kind regards, Glen de Saint Géry From: Steve Sheng Sent: vendredi 8 juillet 2016 17:57 To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org> Cc: RSSAC Admin Committee <rssac-admin-committee(a)icann.org> Subject: RSSAC response on Rights Protection Mechanism Request Dear Glen, Thank you for your 29 May outreach letter from the GNSO PDP Working Group on the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms in all gTLDs. Attached please find the RSSAC response. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any other questions. Best Steve

1 0

Domain Name Protection under Jordanian Legal system ( Book Publication)
by Hudhayfa Bustanji July 1, 2016

July 1, 2016

Dear RPM members,,Am delighted to announce that my first book has been published under title " Domain Name Protection under Jordanian Legal System". According to the contract with the publisher ( Lambert academic publishing), the book will be available in 40 country around the world. ***For those who interested, this link can help you to pick up the book somewhere in your countryhttps://www.omniscriptum.com/en/omniscriptum/distributors/ *** Please note that you can buy the book online through many websites such as amazon and vivaletra. See https://www.vivaletra.com/store/gb/book/domain-name-protection-under-jordan… | | | | | | | | | | | Domain Name Protection under Jordanian Legal System By Huthaifa Albustanji Domain Name Protection under Jordanian Legal System, 978-3-659-89990-4, This book aims to demonstrate the inadeq... | | | | Regards. Huthaifa Albustanji

1 0

Working Group meeting on Thursday 30 June at ICANN56
by Mary Wong June 29, 2016

June 29, 2016

Dear all, You can find the agenda, slides and Adobe Connect information for the open Working Group meeting being held during ICANN56 in Helsinki at this link: http://sched.co/7Gl1. The meeting is scheduled to take place from 0800-1030 Helsinki time on Thursday 30 June, and as noted previously, is open to anyone who is interested (unlike our regular meetings, which are open only to members). We look forward to seeing you at the meeting, whether in person in Helsinki or via remote participation. Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889

1 0

ICANN56: GNSO Sessions How to Get Organized and Remote Participation Details
by Terri Agnew June 23, 2016

June 23, 2016

Dear all, Pre-ICANN meeting email inboxes are full at the best of times, so the GNSO SO/AC Support team has done away with the individual Remote Participation (RP) details and have created a one-stop wiki page for all your RP queries. In addition to this, ICANN meetings' team has put together a new ICANN meeting website which allows you to download all GNSO-related meetings to your inbox calendar in one go. 2 LINKS TO BOOKMARK NOW: ICANN56 Meeting Schedule<https://icann562016.sched.org/> GNSO Remote Participation w<https://community.icann.org/x/yCWOAw>iki page<https://community.icann.org/x/yCWOAw> Step 1 Go to the Meeting Schedule webpage, and if not done yet, create a log in when prompted. Every session on the schedule ca be selected and added to your calendar inbox. To get a general description of the session, please hover your mouse over the session title and a summary of the session will appear as well as a "add to my schedule" option. Step 2 Please download the ICANN56 Mobile App to automatically receive the latest updates to your schedule (available on Apple and Android products, look for "ICANN56") Step 3 All Adobe Connect rooms (which can be found on the session information on the Meeting Schedule and on the GNSO Remote Participation wikip age) will provide audio streaming. If you cannot join an Adobe Connect room for a session, and will need to dial in with your phone, please refer to the GNSO Remote Participation wiki page for the audio pass codes and dial in numbers. Please also follow the previous steps if you wish to take part in the session over the phone. Glen de St Gery and Terri Agnew will be onsite to assist you directly. For all GNSO meeting related queries (RP or others), please email us at: gnso-secs(a)icann.org<applewebdata://FB60497E-61D8-4FE9-BF9C-EB238191E416/gnso-secs@icann.org> and we will be more than happy to assist! Kind regards, GNSO SO/AC Support team

1 0