- GNSO-RPM-WG - lists.icann.org

Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] [Ext] RE: REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report
by Ariel Liang Nov. 6, 2018

Nov. 6, 2018

Hello Kristine, Thank you very much for letting us know! Since we have received clarifying questions/comments only from Rebecca and George so far, staff will keep the Google Doc open till tomorrow EOD in case there are additional questions/comments from other Working Group members. In the meantime, we will share the Google Doc with Analysis Group for them to review/respond. Thank you, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry From: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com> Date: Monday, November 5, 2018 at 6:05 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Hi Ariel, I apologize that I apparently didn’t make note of the date this was due. My comments will be a day late – I’m sorry for not noting this deadline before. Best, Kristine From: GNSO-RPM-WG [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Friday, November 02, 2018 9:49 AM To: gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Dear RPM Working Group Members, We hope this email finds you well. It was nice seeing some of you in Barcelona! This is a reminder for submitting your clarifying questions/comments on Analysis Group’s Final Report by Monday, 05 November. Kindly note that Analysis Group just sent staff the data files that include the full text of open text responses. They are uploaded on this wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/aQ9pBQ> under “V. Data Files - Open Text Responses to Survey Questions”. Thank you for your time and review! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 7:04 AM To: "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> Subject: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Dear RPM Working Group Members, Following the presentation of Analysis Group on the TMCH Sunrise & Claims survey results (Session 2 & 3 during ICANN63), staff have created a google doc to facilitate the process of gathering clarifying questions and comments for Analysis Group’s Final Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>. Specifically, you are welcome to focus your clarifying questions/comments on the Survey Results Section (Section V, pp.7-45). The full responses to all survey questions are included in the Appendix A.1-4; you are also encouraged to ask clarifying questions or comment on the survey results not highlighted in Section V. When providing input, please reference the page number, as well as the chart/table number (if applicable) of the Final Report. Everyone can suggest edits/comment on the Google Doc, so your input will show as redline and can be identified with individuals. Please provide your input no later than Monday, 05 November. Session 2 [63.schedule.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__63.schedule.icann.org_…> and Session 3 [63.schedule.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__63.schedule.icann.org_…> audio and AC room recordings are already available on the meeting pages. Transcripts should be available shortly after ICANN63. Thank you for your time and contribution! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry

3 2

Next Working Group Meeting: Wednesday, 14 November at 1700 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 6, 2018

Nov. 6, 2018

Dear RPM PDP Working Group members, On behalf of the Co-Chairs, please note that we will not hold a Working Group meeting tomorrow, 07 November. The next scheduled meeting will be held on Wednesday, 14 November at 1700 UTC for 90 minutes. A calendar invite and notice will be sent separately. Per the timeline, we had anticipated reviewing the responses from Analysis Group to the clarifying questions/comments on the Final Report of the TMCH Sunrise and Claims surveys on 07 November. However, as you may have seen the Co-Chairs have agreed to extend the deadline for Working Group members to submit clarifying questions/comments to EOD on Wednesday, 07 November to provide more time for members to review the report and submit feedback. Following this extension, the revised plan is as follows: Ask Analysis Group to respond to all clarifying questions/comments by Wednesday, 21 November (two-week period for their response); Schedule a follow-up Working Group call with Analysis Group to go through their responses on Wednesday, 28 November, if needed. In the meantime, we’ll revert to the Trademark Clearing House (TMCH) refresher presentation that was planned for 14 November per the timeline. This is a session with staff from ICANN’s Global Domains Division (GDD) to explain in some detail the TMCH Functional Specification, i.e. “how it works” rather than “what it is”. In particular, an area of focus would be how and when a registry and/or registrar interacts with the TMCH database, the CNIS etc. in the form of a functional, operational walk through. See the following draft agenda: Draft Agenda: Review Agenda/Statements of Interest Updates TMCH Refresher Presentation (How it Works) AOB Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie On Behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs

1 0

Deadline Extension - Wed 7 Nov: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report
by Ariel Liang Nov. 6, 2018

Nov. 6, 2018

Dear RPM Working Group members, After consulting with the Co-Chairs, the deadline for submitting clarifying questions/comments for the Sunrise & Claims survey final report has been extended till EOD Wednesday, 7 November. Please submit your input directly in the Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t…. As a reminder, the raw data files that include the full text of open text responses are uploaded on this wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/aQ9pBQ> under “V. Data Files - Open Text Responses to Survey Questions”. Thank you for your contribution. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 5, 2018 at 6:53 PM To: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com>, "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Hello Kristine, Thank you very much for letting us know! Since we have received clarifying questions/comments only from Rebecca and George so far, staff will keep the Google Doc open till tomorrow EOD in case there are additional questions/comments from other Working Group members. In the meantime, we will share the Google Doc with Analysis Group for them to review/respond. Thank you, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry From: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com> Date: Monday, November 5, 2018 at 6:05 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Hi Ariel, I apologize that I apparently didn’t make note of the date this was due. My comments will be a day late – I’m sorry for not noting this deadline before. Best, Kristine From: GNSO-RPM-WG [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Friday, November 02, 2018 9:49 AM To: gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Dear RPM Working Group Members, We hope this email finds you well. It was nice seeing some of you in Barcelona! This is a reminder for submitting your clarifying questions/comments on Analysis Group’s Final Report by Monday, 05 November. Kindly note that Analysis Group just sent staff the data files that include the full text of open text responses. They are uploaded on this wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/aQ9pBQ> under “V. Data Files - Open Text Responses to Survey Questions”. Thank you for your time and review! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 7:04 AM To: "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> Subject: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Dear RPM Working Group Members, Following the presentation of Analysis Group on the TMCH Sunrise & Claims survey results (Session 2 & 3 during ICANN63), staff have created a google doc to facilitate the process of gathering clarifying questions and comments for Analysis Group’s Final Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>. Specifically, you are welcome to focus your clarifying questions/comments on the Survey Results Section (Section V, pp.7-45). The full responses to all survey questions are included in the Appendix A.1-4; you are also encouraged to ask clarifying questions or comment on the survey results not highlighted in Section V. When providing input, please reference the page number, as well as the chart/table number (if applicable) of the Final Report. Everyone can suggest edits/comment on the Google Doc, so your input will show as redline and can be identified with individuals. Please provide your input no later than Monday, 05 November. Session 2 [63.schedule.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__63.schedule.icann.org_…> and Session 3 [63.schedule.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__63.schedule.icann.org_…> audio and AC room recordings are already available on the meeting pages. Transcripts should be available shortly after ICANN63. Thank you for your time and contribution! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry

1 0

REMINDER: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report
by Ariel Liang Nov. 5, 2018

Nov. 5, 2018

Dear RPM Working Group Members, We hope this email finds you well. It was nice seeing some of you in Barcelona! This is a reminder for submitting your clarifying questions/comments on Analysis Group’s Final Report by Monday, 05 November. Kindly note that Analysis Group just sent staff the data files that include the full text of open text responses. They are uploaded on this wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/aQ9pBQ> under “V. Data Files - Open Text Responses to Survey Questions”. Thank you for your time and review! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 7:04 AM To: "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report Dear RPM Working Group Members, Following the presentation of Analysis Group on the TMCH Sunrise & Claims survey results (Session 2 & 3 during ICANN63), staff have created a google doc to facilitate the process of gathering clarifying questions and comments for Analysis Group’s Final Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t…. Specifically, you are welcome to focus your clarifying questions/comments on the Survey Results Section (Section V, pp.7-45). The full responses to all survey questions are included in the Appendix A.1-4; you are also encouraged to ask clarifying questions or comment on the survey results not highlighted in Section V. When providing input, please reference the page number, as well as the chart/table number (if applicable) of the Final Report. Everyone can suggest edits/comment on the Google Doc, so your input will show as redline and can be identified with individuals. Please provide your input no later than Monday, 05 November. Session 2<https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901716> and Session 3<https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901722> audio and AC room recordings are already available on the meeting pages. Transcripts should be available shortly after ICANN63. Thank you for your time and contribution! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry

2 1

Corrected Action Item: RPM PDP WG Meetings 21-22 October 2018 (ICANN63)
by Julie Hedlund Oct. 24, 2018

Oct. 24, 2018

Dear All, Per the emails below, please see the following corrected action item (action item 1a). The wiki pages also have been corrected at: Sunday, 21 October 2018, Sessions 1 and 2: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-21+ICANN63+Barcelo… Monday, 22 October 2018, Sessions 3 and 4: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-22+ICANN63+Barcelo… Action Items: URS: Staff will update the table of individual proposals to remove the levels of support and update the list of the sections of the Initial Report in which they will appear; Staff will send to the WG the updated table of individual proposals and the table of sub team proposals; Staff will review the timeline and indicate where they might be able to start on the URS portion of the Initial Report and possible efficiencies for WG review. TMCH Sunrise and Claims: TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report: WG members should submit clarifying questions & comments by Monday 05 November using the Google doc tool at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t… [docs.google.com] See the email sent by Ariel Liang on 23 October 2018. Staff will send the final version of the questions to Analysis Group and to the WG to review prior to the next meeting on 07 November. Staff will send to the WG the links to the TMCH Sunrise and Claims data sub teams and their final output to the WG and Sub Team members, and request members to confirm interest/new volunteers; Co-Chairs and WG members will consider whether to re-establish the data sub teams. Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 5:03 PM To: Justine Chew <justine.chew(a)gmail.com>, "BECKHAM, Brian" <brian.beckham(a)wipo.int> Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] [Ext] RE: Action Items: RPM PDP WG Meetings 21-22 October 2018 (ICANN63) Thank you Joyce and Brian for your additional comments. Unless there are any objections staff will not include the support levels in the table of individual proposals and update the action item accordingly. Best, Julie From: Justine Chew <justine.chew(a)gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 5:00 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] [Ext] RE: Action Items: RPM PDP WG Meetings 21-22 October 2018 (ICANN63) Hi Julie, I agree with Phil and Brian (in replying to Phil), in that there is no need to update the support levels in the Individual Proposals table even, given that those proposals were all going into the Initial Report for the purpose of soliciting public comments. Thanks, Justine Chew ----- On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, 16:36 Julie Hedlund, <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> wrote: Phil, Apologies if it is unclear. Staff was referencing updating the table of individual proposals, which is just the tool for determining how proposals would appear in the Initial Report. You are correct that the level of support will not indicated in the Initial Report, but it had been indicated in the table. If you wish we can remove the level of support from the table, but in any case it will not appear in the Initial Report. Best, Julie From: "Corwin, Philip" <pcorwin(a)verisign.com> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 4:31 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Action Items: RPM PDP WG Meetings 21-22 October 2018 (ICANN63) Thank you Julie. Subject to feedback from the other co-chair and other WG members, I believe there is one error in the action items; namely, this one – “Staff will update the table of individual proposals to reflect all proposals as having adequate support and updating the sections of the Initial Report in which they will appear” (emphasis added) My recollection is that we agreed yesterday that all individual proposals would be placed in the IR for the purpose of soliciting public comment without any designation of support level. Best, Philip Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: GNSO-RPM-WG [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:11 AM To: gnso-rpm-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [GNSO-RPM-WG] Action Items: RPM PDP WG Meetings 21-22 October 2018 (ICANN63) Dear All, Please see below the action items captured by staff from the RPM PDP Working Group meetings held on 21-22 October 2018 at ICANN63. Staff have posted these to the wiki space. The transcripts, meeting slides (general and the Analysis Group presentation), and the Analysis Group report are posted on the wikis at: Sunday, 21 October 2018, Sessions 1 and 2: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-21+ICANN63+Barcelo… Monday, 22 October 2018, Sessions 3 and 4: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-22+ICANN63+Barcelo… Sessions 1 and 4 were on the review of the individual URS proposals and Initial Report drafting. Sessions 2 and 3 were on Analysis Group presenting the results of the TMCH Sunrise and Claims Surveys. The next meeting will be in two weeks on Wednesday, 07 November at 17:00 UTC for 90 minutes. A meeting invite will be sent separately. Note that in the US the change to Standard Time occurs on Sunday, 04 November, but the UTC time of the meeting remains the same. The effect is that for US members the meeting will begin one hour earlier than under Daylight Saving Time. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == ACTION ITEMS URS: Staff will update the table of individual proposals to reflect all proposals as having adequate support and updating the sections of the Initial Report in which they will appear; Staff will send to the WG the updated table of individual proposals and the table of sub team proposals; Staff will review the timeline and indicate where they might be able to start on the URS portion of the Initial Report and possible efficiencies for WG review. TMCH Sunrise and Claims: TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report: WG members should submit clarifying questions & comments by Monday 05 November using the Google doc tool at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t… [docs.google.com] See the email sent by Ariel Liang on 23 October 2018. Staff will send the final version of the questions to Analysis Group and to the WG to review prior to the next meeting on 07 November. Staff will send to the WG the links to the TMCH Sunrise and Claims data sub teams and their final output to the WG and Sub Team members, and request members to confirm interest/new volunteers; Co-Chairs and WG members will consider whether to re-establish the data sub teams. _______________________________________________ GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list GNSO-RPM-WG(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

1 0

Action Items: RPM PDP WG Meetings 21-22 October 2018 (ICANN63)
by Julie Hedlund Oct. 23, 2018

Oct. 23, 2018

Dear All, Please see below the action items captured by staff from the RPM PDP Working Group meetings held on 21-22 October 2018 at ICANN63. Staff have posted these to the wiki space. The transcripts, meeting slides (general and the Analysis Group presentation), and the Analysis Group report are posted on the wikis at: Sunday, 21 October 2018, Sessions 1 and 2: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-21+ICANN63+Barcelo… Monday, 22 October 2018, Sessions 3 and 4: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-22+ICANN63+Barcelo… Sessions 1 and 4 were on the review of the individual URS proposals and Initial Report drafting. Sessions 2 and 3 were on Analysis Group presenting the results of the TMCH Sunrise and Claims Surveys. The next meeting will be in two weeks on Wednesday, 07 November at 17:00 UTC for 90 minutes. A meeting invite will be sent separately. Note that in the US the change to Standard Time occurs on Sunday, 04 November, but the UTC time of the meeting remains the same. The effect is that for US members the meeting will begin one hour earlier than under Daylight Saving Time. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == ACTION ITEMS URS: Staff will update the table of individual proposals to reflect all proposals as having adequate support and updating the sections of the Initial Report in which they will appear; Staff will send to the WG the updated table of individual proposals and the table of sub team proposals; Staff will review the timeline and indicate where they might be able to start on the URS portion of the Initial Report and possible efficiencies for WG review. TMCH Sunrise and Claims: TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report: WG members should submit clarifying questions & comments by Monday 05 November using the Google doc tool at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t…. See the email sent by Ariel Liang on 23 October 2018. Staff will send the final version of the questions to Analysis Group and to the WG to review prior to the next meeting on 07 November. Staff will send to the WG the links to the TMCH Sunrise and Claims data sub teams and their final output to the WG and Sub Team members, and request members to confirm interest/new volunteers; Co-Chairs and WG members will consider whether to re-establish the data sub teams.

4 5

Note to Mr. Kirikos Regarding His Characterization of URS Sub-team Recommendations as "Wishlists"
by Corwin, Philip Oct. 23, 2018

Oct. 23, 2018

Mr. Kirikos: This note is sent in my capacity as co-chair. It is in reference to a statement you made in chat during yesterday's final session of the WG. A full excerpt of the relevant chat exchange appears below. The statement I am commenting upon is, "George Kirikos: (14:01) It was only asserted afterwards (especially by those who participated in the sub-teams, to advantage their wishlists)." I did not comment in real time on this assertion because I did not wish to disrupt the important and constructive discussion that was taking place within the WG. The assertion that sub-team members seek to elevate the status of sub-team recommendations because that would advantage their "wishlists" (sic) appears to imply that the recommendations consist of wish lists. I believe that this assertion is untrue as to both the motivations of sub-team members and the nature of the recommendations. Sub-teams were open to participation by an WG member and you could have joined any or all of them. I participated in almost every meeting of the Providers sub-team and saw no evidence that its members were pursuing any personal or organizational agenda. What I did see was serious consideration of all available data, and constructive efforts to develop and compromise on responsive recommendations seeking to correct operational and policy shortfalls revealed by the data. Sub-team recommendations were subsequently vetted and extensively discussed by the full WG and generally adopted for public comment purposes absent significant change. However they are characterized they carry greater weight than individual URS proposals due to their joint development. I perceive your use of the term "wishlists" pejorative in intent, in both implying that sub-team members joined to pursue preordained agendas, and that the resulting recommendations are fanciful or unrealistic. For example, using the term wish list in that sense, if I believed in Santa Claus I would send him a wish list that started with a private jet whisking me to a five star resort on a tropical island, and finding a gift wrapped Aston Martin in my garage upon return. Finally, I find your use of the term particularly inappropriate given that all fourteen of your individual URS proposals, including one to eliminate the URS entirely, are going to be included in the Initial Report for the solicitation of public comment. If others shared your attitude they might observe that those fourteen proposals constitute your personal URS wish list. In closing, I strongly urge you to refrain from using terms that denigrate the efforts and ideas of other WG members, and to confine your remarks to the merits or deficiencies of proposed operational or policy changes. ************************************************************************************************************************* George Kirikos: (13:55) Sub-team recommendations don't necessarily have support. Griffin Barnett: (13:56) Agree with Susan re differentiating sub-team recommendations vs. "individual" WG member proposals George Kirikos: (13:56) <COMMENT>Sub-team recommendations don't necessarily have any support outside the subteam. So, disagree with Susan.</COMMENT> Greg Shatan: (13:56) I thought we were treating the subteam recommendations as Preliminary Recommendations.. George Kirikos: (13:57) <COMMENT>Disagree with Phil. It was a rebuttable assumption not of SUPPORT, but support for INCLUSION in the Initial Report.</COMMENT> Greg Shatan: (13:58) Disagree with George. Agree with Phil. George Kirikos: (13:59) GregS: See page 6 of the slides (next). Greg Shatan: (13:59) Glad to hear that Panama City was not a fever dream. George Kirikos: (13:59) "s have a rebuttable presumption, subject to WGfeedback, of enjoying an adequate level of support to be included in theInitial Report for the purpose of soliciting community input;" Georges Nahitchevansky: (14:00) The individual proposals are just that, proposals by an individual and should be noted as such. The sub-team recommendations had multiple data points and views -- and compromises were reached. They represent way more consensus than a proposal by an individual and should should be in a different category. As an aside, any individual could have joined one or all of the sub-teams. So if someon, such as George K, did not join any of the groups when he could of then I think he should be barred form aguing they have no support (after no joining when you could is akin to consent that the sub-teams are constituted were adequate) George Kirikos: (14:01) @GeorgesN: disagree, because that standard wasn't set *before* the creation of the subteams. George Kirikos: (14:01) It was only asserted afterwards (especially by those who participated in the sub-teams, to advantage their wishlists). Martin Silva: (14:02) + 1 on Georges Martin Silva: (14:02) lot of us were in subteams doing a lot of compromises all around Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

2 1

Submit Clarifying Questions & Comments - TMCH Sunrise & Claims Survey Final Report
by Ariel Liang Oct. 23, 2018

Oct. 23, 2018

Dear RPM Working Group Members, Following the presentation of Analysis Group on the TMCH Sunrise & Claims survey results (Session 2 & 3 during ICANN63), staff have created a google doc to facilitate the process of gathering clarifying questions and comments for Analysis Group’s Final Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S3OLDD0IviloUjvqlcXq3GMENStYhFeozi57I4t…. Specifically, you are welcome to focus your clarifying questions/comments on the Survey Results Section (Section V, pp.7-45). The full responses to all survey questions are included in the Appendix A.1-4; you are also encouraged to ask clarifying questions or comment on the survey results not highlighted in Section V. When providing input, please reference the page number, as well as the chart/table number (if applicable) of the Final Report. Everyone can suggest edits/comment on the Google Doc, so your input will show as redline and can be identified with individuals. Please provide your input no later than Monday, 05 November. Session 2<https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901716> and Session 3<https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901722> audio and AC room recordings are already available on the meeting pages. Transcripts should be available shortly after ICANN63. Thank you for your time and contribution! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry

1 0

Final Report: TMCH Sunrise & Trademark Claims Survey
by Ariel Liang Oct. 22, 2018

Oct. 22, 2018

Dear RPM PDP Working Group members, Analysis Group will present the TMCH Sunrise and Trademark Claims survey results during session 2<https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901716> and session 3<https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901722> of the Working Group meetings at ICANN63. To facilitate your participation in the sessions, please find attached the Final Report prepared by the Analysis Group. Key findings from the survey results are from page 6 to page 52. The complete survey results are included in the appendixes. Analysis Group plans to review the survey results in the order of the report and engage in discussions with the Working Group. The order is as follows: 1. Actual Domain Name Registrants 2. Potential Domain Name Registrants 3. Trademark Owners 4. New gTLD Registry Operators 5. Registrars Selling Domain Names Registered in the New gTLDs As a refresher and for those who may not be familiar with the survey, page 2 to page 6 provides background information of this survey project. The complete final survey questions are also included in the appendixes. The survey was launched on 6 September and closed on 5 October 2018. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel & Berry

2 3

REMINDER TODAY: ICANN63: Schedule of RPM PDP Working Group Meetings
by Julie Hedlund Oct. 22, 2018

Oct. 22, 2018

Dear Working Group members, As a reminder please see below the schedule and links for the RPM PDP Working Group meetings at ICANN63 for Sessions 3 and 4 today. Please also see the attached PDF for details. Please also see the full ICANN63 schedule at: https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings. Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie Barcelona ICANN63: Face-to-Face Full RPM PDP WG Meetings (with remote participation in the links below): GNSO - RPM working group (3 of 4): 12:15 - 13:30, Mon, Oct 22, 2018 – lunch provided for WG members Remote Participation -- https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901722 Wiki Agenda: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-22+ICANN63+Barcelo… GNSO - RPM working group (4 of 4): 13:30 - 15:00, Mon, Oct 22, 2018 Remote Participation -- https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901723 Wiki Agenda: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-10-22+ICANN63+Barcelo…

1 0