August 2007 - NA-Discuss - lists.icann.org

FW: [Secretariat] Fwd: Simultaneous Multilanguage Teleconferences - AReality!
by Thompson, Darlene Aug. 14, 2007

Aug. 14, 2007

Wow! This is really interesting - see below Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-6531 Fax: (867) 979-8870 dthompson(a)gov.nu.ca ________________________________ From: secretariat-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:secretariat-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:40 PM To: secretariat(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Secretariat] Fwd: Simultaneous Multilanguage Teleconferences - AReality! Dear Secretariats: I'm very happy to forward you the below! Carlton, this means we can do the monthly meetings in two languages - but it will require strong chairing ; see below. Begin forwarded message: From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> Date: 14 August 2007 18:36:25 BDT To: icann-staff(a)icann.org Subject: Simultaneous Multilanguage Teleconferences - A Reality! Dear Colleagues: I'm very pleased to tell you that we have today proven that it is possible for a teleconference to be simultaneously interpreted in multiple languages without disruption of the flow of the meeting. Verizon has a little-known interpretation option available. What this does is provide a subconference of the main conference, where those who speak, for example, French, are linked to the main conference by the interpreter. The interpreter hears the main conference in English and interprets this into French; the French-speakers hear only the French interpretation. When the French speakers wish to speak, the flow reverses - and the English main conference hears the interpreted English of the interpreter, while the interpreter hears the French speaker. It does require some discipline on the part of those on the conference: 1) Each speaker needs to say their name - the interpreter then says the name of the person whom they are interpreting, so those on the subconference know whom they are 'listening' to. 2) Conference attendees need to avoid overtalking - multiple people speaking at the same time - by asking to take the floor. 3) It works best if those not speaking for a while mute their line to preserve the clarity of the call 4) Last, but not least - participants need to speak slowly, to allow the interpreters to keep up. Verizon do not supply the interpreters, by the way; this is done by a separate service. We used Paragon, who provide some of the written translation services for ICANN at the moment. I'm personally breathing a big sigh of relief as we have one At-Large region - Latin America and the Caribbean - who have a large number of participants that do not speak English well, and they want to start holding monthly meetings to work on policy but have been holding back until we tried this service out, as the language barrier combined with a telephonic connection and a highly technical subject matter would have been too much of a barrier. I did speak to the French speaker from my call today and was told that she was able to feel like a full participant in the work of the ALAC for the first time and was overjoyed. If any of you want to know more about how to make this work, please let me know. It may interest you to know that the quality of the call management by Verizon was the best I have ever experienced; there were minor issues but I have to say this call was the smoothest running of any Verizon teleconference I've been on in almost a year. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax (UK): +44 (20) 7681-3135 Fax (Swiss): +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile (UK): +44 (7774) 932798 Mobile (Swiss): +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Meeting Summary from Yesterday
by Thompson, Darlene Aug. 14, 2007

Aug. 14, 2007

Hi all, For those of you who were unable to attend the telephone conference yesterday, attached are the meeting summary notes as taken by myself and Nick for your review. These can also be found on-line at: 13 August 2007 <http://st.icann.org/naralo/?13_august_2007> . Darlene Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-6531 Fax: (867) 979-8870 dthompson(a)gov.nu.ca

2 1

FW: [Secretariat] FW: Time / other requirements for NomCom people
by Thompson, Darlene Aug. 14, 2007

Aug. 14, 2007

See forward(s) below Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-6531 Fax: (867) 979-8870 dthompson(a)gov.nu.ca -----Original Message----- From: secretariat-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:secretariat-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:41 AM To: secretariat(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Secretariat] FW: Time / other requirements for NomCom people Dear Secretariats: The following email from Adam may help the community understand the time requirements of NomCom members. ------ Forwarded Message From: Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:42:31 +0900 To: Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> Cc: <donna.austin(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: Time / other requirements for NomCom people >Adam, do you have a simple document outlining >the above? If so can you send it? I don't remember such a document. But Donna (cc'd) might have a better memory than me. Timeline of the 2007 committee might help: * Announcement of Formal Call --1 February 2007 * Deadline of Formal Call for Full Consideration -- 1 May 2007 * Deadline extended until 18 May 2007 23:59 UTC * Review and Evaluation -- May to early July * Face-to-Face Meeting and Selection -- early July 2007 * Results Announced to ICANN Secretary -- before 2 October 2007 * Selected candidates take their positions as the conclusion of the ICANN General Meeting 2007, 2 November 2007 The 2007 NomCom held it's first meeting after the Sao Paulo ICANN meeting (December 8 and 9). The 2007 AGM in LA is earlier, so the 2008 schedule may move forward a month. The commitment is essentially: To be able to attend one ICANN meeting (i.e. LA), ideally for the full meeting (from Monday Oct. 29) but at least to be there for the NomCom session which will be the afternoon of Friday Nov 2, and all day Saturday November 3. NomCom's final task is the selection meeting, a requirement for all members. The meeting usually takes 3 full days. The location and date will be decided by the NomCom. Usually the location is wherever's easiest for the majority, or the chair's choice. Likely timing is June or July 2008. So the NomCom works from November 2007 to mid-summer 2008. Work during the period from the first face to face meeting to the end of recruitment includes approx 6 conference calls of the full committee. i.e. around one call every 6 weeks. Members should recruit candidates, and how much time they take doing that is a personal choice. But it can take some hours. If each member recruits 5 candidates then there would be over 100 candidates in the pool. Took a lot of effort to get 90 candidates this year, and people worked hard at recruitment. The main work (time) begins once recruitment has finished. All candidates will give the names of 3 or 4 people who provide references. Chasing these references (making sure people submit them) can take some time. Each candidates submits a statement of interest (SOI), essentially an application form these a usually 4-5 pages. 90 SOIs is 2007, add 3 or 4 references for each candidate and it adds up to a lot of reading. Members should be familiar with all candidates. There is a burst of activity as the date of the selection meeting approaches. NomCom usually breaks into sub-groups that evaluate candidates in detail. There might be 3 or 4 2-hour teleconferences during this period of about 3 weeks. Some NomCom members, particularly those not very familiar with ICANN may be asked to attend one of the other ICANN meetings held in the early part of 2008. But this is not required, and is for the chair to decide. Overall, the NomCom is a reasonably light time commitment by ICANN working group standards. However, the commitment toward the end of the process is intense. I expect during June and perhaps early July depending on the timing of the selection meeting, NomCom will be quite time consuming, many calls and a lot of reading. Thanks, Adam >Some of the community members are asking... We >are getting some activity on this now at last >btw. > >-- > >Regards, > >Nick Ashton-Hart >Director, At-Large >ICANN >PO Box 32160 >London N4 2XY >United Kingdom >Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] >USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 >Fax (UK): +44 (20) 7681-3135 >Fax (Swiss): +41 (22) 594-85-44 >Mobile (UK): +44 (7774) 932798 >Mobile (Swiss): +41 (79) 595 54-68 >email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org >Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: >nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart >Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart ------ End of Forwarded Message _______________________________________________ Secretariat mailing list Secretariat(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat_atlarge-lists.i… Secretariat wiki at: http://st.icann.org/secretariat

1 0

REMINDER: Teleconference TODAY, 1900
by Nick Ashton-Hart Aug. 13, 2007

Aug. 13, 2007

Happy Mondays :) I thought it would be good to send out a reminder to everyone that the monthly NARALO teleconference for August is today at 1900 UTC. For complete details, see https://st.icann.org/naralo/index.cgi?13_august_2007. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax (UK): +44 (20) 7681-3135 Fax (Swiss): +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile (UK): +44 (7774) 932798 Mobile (Swiss): +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

asking advice on intros to better broadband
by Dharma Dailey Aug. 12, 2007

Aug. 12, 2007

Hi Everybody, A few of us are pulling together "basic basic" information on why people should get involved in changing/developing/watchdogging their communication systems. These "basic basic" booklets will be on the web. Portions of them, such as charts and such, will be formatted for printing out and for power point presentations. They will be free for anyone to use. Our audience is the general public in the US or those who work with the general public in the US to expand knowledge and involvement on these issues. The project has a specific focus on municipal and community networks: thus these tools are meant to supplement the kind of presentation you would give to a local neighborhood association or for a print out you could hand to your alderman. Those of you who do general education/outreach on broadband in your community or play along on TV please look at these blurbs below and tell me if this looks like the kind of material that would be helpful to you in your work. If it wouldn't be helpful that would also be good to know. If you do public outreach on broadband and want something in here that isn't-- please let me know!!! If you are interested in the project, ping me and I'll keep you in the loop. Thanks, Dharma Dailey Overview- Why should I care about communication? What is a network? How do different network choices affect my ability to communicate? Examples- Real World Examples of Who's Been There and Done That (examples will be organized categorically by the kind of network and the kind of business/sustainability model) Process-- How do networks get built? How do all the pieces and players fit together? (i'm dying for a couple of flow charts that show people the typical muni rollout.from start to finish on a single piece of paper- and such ) Choices- Business Models, Key Technologies, and Handy Dandy Networking Tools (matrix of types of networks; chart of public giveaways and subsidies for each communications industry; networking technology cheat sheet with pictures, matrix of business models) Impact- How do you know if a network works? What are the tools for evaluating the social utility of a network? What are the tools for evaluating the economic impact of a network? Who watchdogs vendors? If things aren't working well, what recourse do you have?

1 0

Fwd: [alerts-text] ICANN Launches Latest Consultation on New Top-Level Domains
by Bret Fausett Aug. 10, 2007

Aug. 10, 2007

Begin forwarded message: > From: ICANN News Alert <ICANN-Alerts(a)icann.org> > Date: August 10, 2007 12:07:28 PM PDT > To: <alerts-text(a)greenriver.icann.org> > Subject: [alerts-text] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Launches Latest > Consultation on New Top-Level Domains > Reply-To: ICANN-Alerts(a)icann.org > > ICANN > > <http://www.icann.org/> > > News Alert > > <http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-10aug07.htm> > > ________________________________ > > > ICANN Launches Latest Consultation on New Top-Level Domains > > Public, stakeholder comments sought on proposals for new top-level > domain process > > 10 August 2007 > > MARINA DEL REY, Calif.: The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names > and Numbers (ICANN) is taking another step towards its goal of > bringing new generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) online with today’s > launch of a public consultation on a key report from ICANN’s > Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO). > > “This is all about providing Internet users with choice. More top- > level domains -- the part of the domain name that comes after the > last dot -- mean more competition, more options, and the > possibility for more targeted or user-specific domain names,” said > Dr Paul Twomey, ICANN’s President and CEO. “When coupled with > ICANN’s current work on introducing internationalized domain names, > it is possible that hundreds and, eventually, more than 1,000 new > TLDs could be created.” > > The GNSO report describes proposed global policies related to the > creation of new top-level domains that advance ICANN’s mission of > preserving the security, stability and interoperability of the > Internet. > > “The report raises some interesting questions -- like how to deal > with proposals that may be considered controversial by some groups > or individuals. That’s why it’s so important that as many people as > possible share their advice and help us ensure that the new gTLD > process works,” added Dr Twomey. > > While all input is welcomed and encouraged, the consultation is > looking for comments in a number of areas: > > * the package of principles, proposed policy recommendations and > implementation guidelines for new gTLDs, > * the selection criteria for new top-level domains related to > applicants, strings, and processes, > * contractual conditions for new top-level domain operators, and > * proposed procedures for resolving objections to strings or > applicants. > > The specific policy recommendations, as well as the online comment > forum, and links to provide comments are available at <http:// > www.icann.org/public_comment/#gtld-draft-final-report>. The > consultation closes at 4 pm PDT on 30 August 2007. > > A complete summary and analysis of community feedback will be made > available at the end of the comment period, and considered by the > GNSO Council prior to its vote on the report on 6 September 2007. > If the Council accepts the policy recommendations, it will be then > be considered by the ICANN Board. > > “The policy proposals laid out in the report have been generated > from the ground up, and the consultation is ICANN’s opportunity to > fine tune them with the help of the interested Internet community,” > added Dr Twomey. > > About ICANN: > > ICANN is responsible for the global coordination of the Internet's > system of unique identifiers like domain names (like .org, .museum > and country codes like .uk) and the addresses used in a variety of > Internet protocols that help computers reach each other over the > Internet. Careful management of these resources is vital to the > Internet's operation, so ICANN's global stakeholders meet regularly > to develop policies that ensure the Internet's ongoing security and > stability. ICANN is an internationally organized, public benefit > non-profit company. For more information please visit: > www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> . > > Media Contacts: > > Jason Keenan > Media Adviser, ICANN (USA) > Ph: +1 310 382 4004 > E: jason.keenan(a)icann.org > > International: > Andrew Robertson Edelman (London) > Ph: +44 7921 588 770 > E: andrew.robertson(a)edelman.com > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please visit <http:// > www.icann.org/newsletter> > > If you have questions or comments about this mailing list, send an > email to ICANN-Alerts(a)icann.org > > >

1 0

FW: [Secretariat] Fwd: [APAC-Discuss] Change of deadlines: ICANN 2008NomCom Rep
by Thompson, Darlene Aug. 10, 2007

Aug. 10, 2007

See below Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-6531 Fax: (867) 979-8870 dthompson(a)gov.nu.ca ________________________________ From: secretariat-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:secretariat-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:35 AM To: secretariat(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Secretariat] Fwd: [APAC-Discuss] Change of deadlines: ICANN 2008NomCom Rep Dear Secretariats: I wanted you to see the email below from Raj in AP. It really is important for the regions to decide by 16th September who they want to see ALAC appoint to the NomCom seats. Begin forwarded message: From: "Rajnesh D. Singh" <rajnesh(a)pacificit.org> Date: 9 August 2007 13:00:37 BDT To: Asia-Pacific Discuss <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [APAC-Discuss] Change of deadlines: ICANN 2008 NomCom Rep Reply-To: rajnesh(a)pacificit.org Colleagues, With reference to the recent request on this list by Adam Peake, Associate Chair of current NomCom, revised deadlines are as follows: Deadline for nominations from ALS': September 3rd 2007 2300 UTC Vetting of nominations and consensus process: September 4th to September 10th Reach consensus: by September 10th Vote (if no consensus): September 11th to September 15th Announce and relay result: September 16th 2007 The website has been updated as well: https://st.icann.org/asiapac/index.cgi?nominations_to_icann_2008_nominat ing_committee Please action as necessary and I look forward to your input. -- Kind regards, Rajnesh D. Singh Chair, ICANN Asia Pacific Regional At-Large Organisation www.apralo.org _______________________________________________ APAC-Discuss mailing list APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss_atlarge-lis ts.icann.org Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org

4 3

Conversation with Dave Piscitello
by Brendler, Beau Aug. 7, 2007

Aug. 7, 2007

Hello, everyone... A little while ago I had a conversation with Dave Piscitello of the SSAC and Nick Ashton-Hart. The substance of the conversation was, what could WebWatch do, and/or what could be done in general, to connect consumers to some of the ICANN discussions about security and stability issues. As you know, one of the issues I am trying to confront is how to interest and educate consumers about the work ICANN is doing and what its role in Internet governance is, while trying to represent their interests as best and appropriately as possible. The conversation was to determine if there are studies WebWatch might undertake in the area of consumer protection and domain names. We also talked about some of the work SSAC is doing with the Anti-Phishing Working Group and discussed the possibility of convening some people from these groups in Los Angeles. We're also trying to address questions like, if consumers knew more about things like DNSSEC and signed domains and the like (and their cost), would consumers want to somehow pay to participate in an Internet with more secure domain names? I've also begun talking with Nick about some possibilities for consumer education, that would include creating some consumer-friendly content. Would be happy to hear your comments about this and other security issues. As soon as a public version of the SSAC August report is available we can post it here. Regards, Beau Brendler, Director Consumer Reports WebWatch http://www.consumerwebwatch.org

5 7

Developing accountability for registrars discussion
by Brendler, Beau Aug. 7, 2007

Aug. 7, 2007

Hello, there. I wanted to make this group aware of an off-list discussion forwarded to me, which I responded to, related to the RAA evaluations and creating some sort of system of accountability for registrars. I am not in the RAA working group, and probably don't have time to be, but this group may want to contribute to this discussion or have its own here, as I think the RAA work should be of considerable interest to consumers. Danny Younger responds to Seth Reiss and my response is last. Beau Brendler Director, Consumer Reports WebWatch http://www.consumerwebwatch.org From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> Date: 20 July 2007 18:21:49 BDT To: "Seth M. Reiss" <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com>, raa-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [RAA-WG] Starting the discussion Hi Seth, Registrars have, on several occasions, attempted to create a code of conduct. Their most recent version (which dates back several years) is here: http://www.icann-registrars.org/html_docs/CodeofConduct3.htm The list of registrars willing to agree to this code of conduct -- zero -- is maintained here: http://www.icann-registrars.org/listcodeofconductsubscribing.htm One approach might be to have the registries each individually craft a code of conduct for their accredited registrars (this is what Eurid, the .eu registry operator did) -- see http://www.eurid.eu/images/Documents/CoC/rules_proc_en.pdf So far, these codes rely on voluntary compliance; unfortunately, there is little actual incentive for registrars to comply. regards, Danny --- "Seth M. Reiss" <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: I like Vittorio's idea of developing a best practices industry code for registrars. Registrars can decide to comply on a voluntary basis and perhaps even undergo audits with independent companies so compliance can be checked. Registrants can decide to pay a few extra dollars to use compliant registrars and obtain the additional security. This would keep ICANN out of the policing roles, which I suspect it prefers to avoid. Beau Brendler wrote: This exchange was forwarded to me and I wanted to offer whatever help we can on this topic, as I think it is an important one. Briefly, WebWatch about five years ago now developed a basic set of guidelines to "improve the credibility of Web sites," as we said at the time. We also developed several sets of category-specific guidelines (one for search engines, another for travel Web sites, another for health Web sites). We had some good success with the general guidelines, and some less measurable but notable success with the more industry-specific ones. I wanted to briefly outline here how we did it, because I think some of the principles might be portable. * Survey research of consumers. We did a national poll of U.S. Web users (six months experience minimum) over 18 to find out what types of characteristics of Web sites they considered "credible." We did this so that we could point to empirical data in any forthcoming campaign to get companies, Web publishers, etc., to join -- so that we didn't turn people off by saying, "we're Consumer Reports, and here's what you should do to make your Web site more credible." The guidelines are here: http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/consumer-reports-webwatch-guidelines.cfm The national poll was expensive but was probably some of the most important money we spent. * Publication of guidelines. We used the survey research to create the guidelines, then publicized them and went directly to a number of companies, some of them Fortune 500, to get feedback. * Compliance mechanism. We stopped short of creating a seal of approval, since our research showed that such seals tend to be much more popular among the community of sealholders than recognizable by consumers. In addition, seals can be faked, upkeep and policing is costly, etc. So we started a pledge campaign, with an online form, where companies and Web publishers could make a promise to uphold the guidelines. Our staff would then review the site, and pass it or fail it (about 90 percent of the failed sites made changes and improvements and re-pledged, and passed). * We listed the sites on a page on our Web site (http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/praise-worthy.cfm) and allow participating sites to link back to the guidelines page (not the page where their company is named). We still continue to get pledges and add company names to the list. * We created a national advertising campaign to promote the sites that pledged, and the guidelines themselves as a sort of consumer bill of rights. I think a similar system could be used for the registrars. Indeed, it is voluntary compliance, but the "wisdom of the masses" assists in enforcement -- we do get e-mails from consumers when they interact with a company on the compliance list that doesn't measure up. In those cases, we investigate, then publicize the investigation and the result. The low compliance rate in the venture you describe below may be due to a number of factors, but I would guess if there were more third-party involvement it might create more incentive.. _______________________________________________ RAA-WG mailing list RAA-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/raa-wg_atlarge-lists.ica nn.org RAA WG Online: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?registrant_registrar_relations "Whenever a single political movement corners power we find ourselves in the realm of totalitarian kitsch." -- Kundera

5 5

Massive Internet Impact Possible Due to Relaxed TLD Application Process
by Robert Guerra Aug. 7, 2007

Aug. 7, 2007

http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_impact_tld_application/ Massive Internet Impact Possible Due to Relaxed TLD Application Process Jul 31, 2007 10:36 AM PST By CircleID Reporter Kieren McCarthy’s latest column at Guardian Unlimited discusses the massive impact—and controversies—that the new top-level domain (TLD) names will bring about. The rules for the creation of TLDs are being relaxed starting next year. From the article: “From 2008, anyone wanting their own piece of the internet is welcome to apply for it. It won’t be cheap (there will an application fee of around $100,000) and it won’t be simple (you have to prove you are capable of running a complex piece of the net’s infrastructure)—but it could mean a change in the way the online world works.” Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! may all own their own TLD one day - ‘news.google’, ‘finance.yahoo’ or ‘games.msn’ - possibilities are endless. Read Full Story at Guardian Unlimited http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/jul/31/comment.internet

2 1