- NA-Discuss - lists.icann.org

WHOIS study analysis
by Brendler, Beau Jan. 26, 2009

Jan. 26, 2009

Per our call last week: Here are my suggested re-scored priorities for all studies. However, I will start first with the re-groupings assigned letters. In each case, I established the priority score for each letter grouping, using original scoring from the list of all studies (in other words, the scores for the letter groupings make sense when compared to the entire chart of proposed studies, I did not score them separately.) A word on feasibility: Since I come from a research/investigative organization, my bias is towards the conclusion that just about anything can be studied. I did not assign a feasibility score to the letter groupings of studies. However, I did include a "yes" or "no" feasibility assessment for the individual study scores. 5=Highest 1=Lowest LETTER GROUPINGS: A: Studies 1, 14, 21 & GAC data set 2: 2 B: Studies 13, 17, GAC 1 and GAC 11: 5 C: GAC Studies 5 & 6: 4 D: Studies 18, 19, GAC 9 & GAC 10: 4 E: Studies 3 & 20: 3 The top grouping priority that emerges is: B: Studies 13, 17, GAC 1 and GAC 11: Outside these letter groups, the top-priority study grouping I would suggest for ALAC is: GAC 3, 16, GAC 12-15,24, GAC 7, 17, 6, GAC 1, 13 & GAC 11, 8. Note that GAC 3, 16, 24, GAC 7, GAC 1, and 8 do not appear in the letter groupings. Why were these studies, which I encourage ALAC to recommend as high priorities, not included? Study Table: Study Priority Score Feasible? 1 2 N 14 2 Y (SSAC has already studied) 15 3 Y 21 & GAC 2 2 N GAC 3 5 Premise needs development 16 5 Y 22 4 Y 23 2 Y GAC 12-15 5 Y 24 5 Y 2 1 Y 5 1 Y GAC 7 5 Y GAC 8 4 Y 17 5 Y 18, 19, GAC 9 & 10 4 Y 6 5 Y GAC 1 5 Y 13 & GAC 11 5 Y GAC 2 2 N 3 4 Y Metalitz 1 4 Y 20 3 Y 12 4 Y 8 5 Y 11 4 Technical analysis GAC 4 3 N GAC 5 4 Y GAC 6 4 Y ________________________________ From: At-Large Staff [mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 2:18 PM To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; Alan Greenberg; Brendler, Beau; Danny Younger; Gareth Shearman; seth.reis(a)lex-ip.com; sylvia.caras(a)gmail.com Subject: Doodle: WHOIS Briefing - follow up call / UTC timing Dear All, Apologies - timings on Doodle are in UTC for this call. Thank you Kind regards Gisella On 23/01/2009 11:11, "At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: Dear All, Further to the WHOIS Briefing call by Liz Gasster yesterday, it was decided to have a follow up call to review the revised document Beau is in the process of developing. Please find attached the link to the doodle pole. It would be much appreciated if you could respond at your earliest convenience. http://doodle.com/fwixwace6fqu88cg Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org *** Scanned ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.

1 0

Fast Flux report
by Brendler, Beau Jan. 26, 2009

Jan. 26, 2009

http://gnso.icann.org/issues/fast-flux-hosting/fast-flux-initial-report-26j… ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.

1 0

FW: Draft New gTLD statement
by Brendler, Beau Jan. 26, 2009

Jan. 26, 2009

Note that I am speaking rather strongly on behalf of NA-RALO here, on the basis of this position as we discussed in our most recent NA conference call. BB -----Original Message----- From: Brendler, Beau Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:25 AM To: 'Patrick Vande Walle'; Cheryl Langdon-Orr Subject: RE: Draft New gTLD statement Thanks, Patrick. You wrote: "The Euralo statement includes a sentence that says "ICANN should launch the process with no further delay." I leave it up to the chair to decide how to move forward with this now. This statement is in direct opposition to the NA-RALO position and we will not support it. Further, we do not believe consistency with past ALAC statements is a particularly important criteria. Thanks for sending this. BB -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Vande Walle [mailto:patrick@vande-walle.eu] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 7:32 AM To: Brendler, Beau; Cheryl Langdon-Orr Subject: Re: Draft New gTLD statement [Taken Nick out of the discussion] --Patrick I did not hear strong oppositions from the Euralo community to the draft gTLD statement that we received yesterday. The Euralo community will forward to the ALAC a series of comments that it would like to see included as an appendix to main ALAC comments. I guess the other RALOs may want to do this, too. The Euralo statement includes a sentence that says "ICANN should launch the process with no further delay" and would like to see this statement included in the main ALAC statement. I am aware some people think the whole process should be stopped, or at least suspended. On the other hand, advising ICANN to go forward with the process would certainly be in continuity of all previous ALAC statements. Best, Patrick *** Scanned ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.

3 3

Welcome Knujon to ICANN At-Large!
by At-Large Staff Jan. 23, 2009

Jan. 23, 2009

Friday, 23 January 2009 TO: Knujon FROM: ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) SUBJECT: At-Large Structure Certification ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is pleased to inform you that Knujon has been certified as an At-Large Structure (ALS). The ALAC greatly appreciates your group¹s interest in involving individual users in ICANN and looks forward to working with you and your colleagues. The purpose of ALS certification is to recognize that your organization meets the necessary criteria to involve individual Internet users at the local or issue level in ICANN activities, and that your organization will support its individual members' informed participation in ICANN efforts that affect end-users. The ALAC is eager to promote a productive working relationship between your organization, other ALS, and the ALAC (and ICANN in general), and your input on how we can make this a success would be greatly appreciated. We would like to offer some initial tools to help your organization keep its members informed (about significant news from ICANN and information on ICANN policy-development efforts) and engaged in activities of interest: - Point of Contact for your Organisation: Please send an email to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org identifying the names and email addresses of one or two individuals who will be the point of contact for information and correspondence regarding ICANN At-Large. If this changes, please let us know. - At Large Mailing Lists. There are many At Large email lists, for each region; you can signup for them and manage your subscriptions at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo. The points of contact you identify will automatically be added to your region¹s list just for accredited ALSes to discuss regional issues; you are invited to join others as you wish. - ALS information. Information about your organization will be shared with the At-Large community to enable individuals interested in your group's activities to contact you, and to encourage cooperation with other groups interested in ICANN activities in your geographic region. Please complete and email the form at the bottom of this note to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. - ALAC website. The ALAC website (www.atlarge.icann.org) is a good source for ICANN news and information of interest to individual Internet users. We encourage you to provide your members with a link. The ALAC relies on volunteers to translate information into multiple languages. Translations of documents on the website are welcome and should be sent to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. - At-Large Regional Websites. Regional webpages also have been created to distribute information (including in local languages) on activities, events and issues of particular interest to people in each region. These are being very substantially revised in the next couple of weeks but you should keep the URLs handy and check back regularly. They are: African Region: http://www.afralo.org/ Asia/Australia/Pacific Region: http://www.apralo.org/ European Region: http://www.euralo.org/ Latin America/Caribbean Region: http://www.lacralo.org/ North American Region: http://www.naralo.org/ - Regional WiKi: Each At-Large Region has a Wiki that allows the region to collaborate. These are maintained by the community and create the regional websites shown above. This framework is in the final stages of preparation but if you wish to have a user account, send an email to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org We look forward to working with you and your organization's members to advance individual Internet users' interests within ICANN. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact us at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. Sincerely, The At-Large Advisory Committee www.atlarge.icann.org staff(a)atlarge.icann.org --------------------------- Name: Location (city/country/region; whatever is relevant to your membership): Mission: Member benefits: Contacts (name/s and email address/es -- title/s optional): Website: Other (additional informational you would like included): Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Welcome Garth!
by Evan Leibovitch Jan. 23, 2009

Jan. 23, 2009

Please welcome Garth Bruen to the NARALO mailing list! Garth is the person behind Knujon, our newest ALS, which has the claim of having shut down more than 200,000 junk mail sites. Good to see you here, Garth. And I'm looking forward to seeing you at the Summit! - Evan

1 0

WHOIS studies
by Brendler, Beau Jan. 22, 2009

Jan. 22, 2009

Colleagues... Based on my organization's own research into WHOIS issues, and my understanding and experience of the related issues, here is how I recommend the ALAC submit its priority list for WHOIS studies (see meeting announcement below). There is a scale also for feasibility, which I left blank for two reasons: 1) I don't necessarily have the expertise to determine which studies are feasible or not; 2) All these studies look feasible to me, feasibility being primarily in this case cooperation of the registrar community (and possibly the law enforcement community) in providing usable data. Area 1: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 1 5 14 5 15 2 21/GAC 2 4 GAC 3 1 Area 2: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 16 3 22 2 23 5 GAC 12-15 2 24 1 Area 3: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 2 5 5 5 GAC 7 1 Area4: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 17 1 18, 19, GAC 9 & GAC 10 2 Area 5: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 6 1 GAC 1 1 13 & GAC 11 1 GAC 2 2 Area 6: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 3 2 Metalitz 3 20 4 12 2 Area 7: Number Suggested Rank of Priority 8 2 11 3 GAC 4 2 GAC 5 2 GAC 6 Combine with GAC 5 ________________________________ From: Heidi Ullrich [mailto:Heidi.Ullrich@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:31 PM To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com; Sébastien Bachollet; Brendler, Beau; patrick(a)vande-walle.eu; hawadiakite(a)gmail.com; mbashir(a)mbash.net; Alan Greenberg; nguyenthuhue(a)gmail.com; Gareth Shearman; ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp; jsalgueiro(a)cantv.net; Vanda Scartezini UOL; Fatimata Seye Sylla; vivekvc2001(a)yahoo.co.in Cc: Nick Ashton-Hart; Matthias Langenegger Subject: INVITATION: WHOIS BRIEFING BY LIZ GASSTER THURSDAY 22 JAN 20:30-21:30 UTC Dear All, Liz Gasster, Senior Policy Counselor for the GNSO, has offered to participate in a teleconference on WHOIS. The results of the doodle in which 6 out of 7 people voted indicated that Thursday, 22 January at 20:30-21:30 UTC would be the best time. Please find participation instructions under: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?how_can_i_participate_in_this_meet…. If there is interest for French or Spanish interpretation for this meeting, please contact us as soon as possible. Please note, however, that we can not guarantee interpretation for this meeting due to time constraints. As a reminder, participants will be asked to engage in a discussion to rank the WHOIS issues that were presented at the last ALAC meeting by priorities. Please find further information on the WHOIS priority issues under: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?alac_whois_discussion_13_january_2009 Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org *** Scanned ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.

2 2

Re: [NA-Discuss] [ALAC-Internal] WHOIS studies
by Brendler, Beau Jan. 22, 2009

Jan. 22, 2009

Thanks, Carlton. I agree it's time to act as well, but my goal here is practical politics. It looks to me like at least some of these studies are going ahead, regardless of whether the at-large (or the NCUC) feels WHOIS has been studied to death or not. I want to encourage us to prioritize the studies that appear to be focused most on "consumer" and end-user issues. I do not believe users hold privacy more dear than the dream of an Internet that functions according to the terms of binding agreements with registrars. The documents are heavy going, I agree. That's why I recommend ALAC adopt "GAC 3" as its sort of working statement on WHOIS: "There are technical measures available that would effectively curtail misuse of data published on WHOIS databases while preserving legitimate use and open access to the databases." Though that statement is missing a critical element, in my opinion, which is improving the quality of WHOIS data and enforcing existing provisions in the RAA on WHOIS (which are points covered in some of the other studies on the list), if GAC 3 goes forward, and reasonable evidence of its truth be found, would it not come close to settling the division between the two WHOIS camps? -----Original Message----- From: alac-internal-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-internal-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlton Samuels Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:20 PM To: ALAC Internal List Cc: Liz Gasster; NA Discuss Subject: Re: [ALAC-Internal] WHOIS studies Beau: Having spent time trying to digest the Hypotheses document, I tend to agree with your ranking for Area #1. Thereafter, it becomes a fuzzy model, to be treated almost like a self-organising system. My time in the academic environment has left me cold to committees and the real prospect of "analysis paralysis". Yes, I intuitively understand the contextual framework here. We have collectively decided that having data that informs knowledge-enabled action is the key thing, hence the WHOIS data requirement and the studies. Bottomline, we must have that dataset right. To my mind, it would have been far more simple to set a bar for collection, storage, protection and dissemination of WHOIS data - which is clearly in ICANN's remit - and make conformance to these conditional for doing business with ICANN. We know that there are entities that misuse that WHOIS data. And misuse is presumably based on some settled standard. Reason and outcome dictate we should discourage misuse and enforce sanctions against those who insist on misuse. The laws, equity and regulations are useful and applicable here. The base requirement for conformance then is a law - or set of laws - and rules that will enable enforcement. This is where the interests of the nation states intervene. Or, rather, intersect. But with respect to the WHOIS data, it is the final custodian that has the duty to declare the rules and the laws pertaining misuse. This looks like a treaty situation to me. Finally, in the words of [former Secretary of Defence] Rumsfeld, there are the "unknown unknows". This is perhaps the only thing he's ever said that I'm in agreement. Those will have to remain on hold until such time as they are revealed. Enough of the studies. It is time to act. Carlton On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Brendler, Beau <Brenbe(a)consumer.org>wrote: > Colleagues... > > Based on my organization's own research into WHOIS issues, and my > understanding and experience of the related issues, here is how I > recommend the ALAC submit its priority list for WHOIS studies (see > meeting announcement below). There is a scale also for feasibility, > which I left blank for two reasons: 1) I don't necessarily have the > expertise to determine which studies are feasible or not; 2) All these > studies look feasible to me, feasibility being primarily in this case > cooperation of the registrar community (and possibly the law > enforcement community) in providing usable data. > > Area 1: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 1 5 > 14 5 > 15 2 > 21/GAC 2 4 > GAC 3 1 > > Area 2: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 16 3 > 22 2 > 23 5 > GAC 12-15 2 > 24 1 > > Area 3: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 2 5 > 5 5 > GAC 7 1 > > Area4: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 17 1 > 18, 19, > GAC 9 & > GAC 10 2 > > Area 5: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 6 1 > GAC 1 1 > 13 & GAC 11 1 > GAC 2 2 > > Area 6: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 3 2 > Metalitz 3 > 20 4 > 12 2 > > Area 7: > Number Suggested Rank of Priority > 8 2 > 11 3 > GAC 4 2 > GAC 5 2 > GAC 6 Combine with GAC 5 > ________________________________ > From: Heidi Ullrich [mailto:Heidi.Ullrich@icann.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:31 PM > To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com; Sébastien > Bachollet; Brendler, Beau; patrick(a)vande-walle.eu; > hawadiakite(a)gmail.com; mbashir(a)mbash.net; Alan Greenberg; > nguyenthuhue(a)gmail.com; Gareth Shearman; ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp; > jsalgueiro(a)cantv.net; Vanda Scartezini UOL; Fatimata Seye Sylla; > vivekvc2001(a)yahoo.co.in > Cc: Nick Ashton-Hart; Matthias Langenegger > Subject: INVITATION: WHOIS BRIEFING BY LIZ GASSTER THURSDAY 22 JAN > 20:30-21:30 UTC > > > Dear All, > > > > Liz Gasster, Senior Policy Counselor for the GNSO, has offered to > participate in a teleconference on WHOIS. The results of the doodle in > which > 6 out of 7 people voted indicated that Thursday, 22 January at > 20:30-21:30 UTC would be the best time. Please find participation instructions under: > > > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?how_can_i_participate_in_this > _meeting > . > > > > If there is interest for French or Spanish interpretation for this > meeting, please contact us as soon as possible. Please note, however, > that we can not guarantee interpretation for this meeting due to time constraints. > > > > As a reminder, participants will be asked to engage in a discussion to > rank the WHOIS issues that were presented at the last ALAC meeting by priorities. > Please find further information on the WHOIS priority issues under: > > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?alac_whois_discussion_13_january_2 > 009 > > > Regards, > > Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella > Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff > email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > *** > Scanned > > ** > This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) > named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any > attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not > the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute > or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all > or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in > error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and > permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system. > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Internal mailing list > ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge- > lists.icann.org > > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > At-Large <http://st.icann.org/alacAt-Large> Website: > http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ ALAC-Internal mailing list ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists… ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org *** Scanned ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.

1 0

Congratulations Gareth Shearman on his appointment to the At-Large Advisory Committee
by Nick Ashton-Hart Jan. 21, 2009

Jan. 21, 2009

Dear Gareth: It is my pleasure on behalf of the Staff of ICANN to welcome you as the newest member of the At-Large Advisory Committee. We note that your term ends at the end of the ICANN AGM in 2009, since you are finishing the term of departing ALAC member Robert Guerra. We will add you to the relevant wikis and email lists forthwith. If we can provide a briefing to help you get up to speed it would be our pleasure to do so. If you could provide a bio of a length similar to that of the other members of the committee which may be found at http://www.icann.org/en/committees/alac/ we will arrange for it to be posted; if you wish, we will also include a picture if you provide one, though that is of course voluntary. We will announce your appointment on atlarge.icann.org as soon as we have your bio to include in the announcement. Once again our congratulations! -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA DD: +1 (310) 578-8637 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [NA-Discuss] [ALAC-Internal] Travel Problems
by Evan Leibovitch Jan. 20, 2009

Jan. 20, 2009

Rudi Vansnick wrote: > As I'm in contact with Knujon (Garth & Bob) I would really appreciate to > know if I can tell them to need to respond to a query for funding travel > asap. > Yes yes yes! Nick, why didn't Knujon get an initial email about travel arrangements? - Evan

3 3

Re: [NA-Discuss] [ALAC-Internal] Travel Problems
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 20, 2009

Jan. 20, 2009

Travel funding is available fo rthem hey are qualified as an ALS so YES they should respond to whatever they have been asked to do... CLO 2009/1/21 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick(a)isoc.be> > As I'm in contact with Knujon (Garth & Bob) I would really appreciate to > know if I can tell them to need to respond to a query for funding travel > asap. > Being the workshop leader in which they would participate actively, I > need a quick response to this question. I'm travelling on 29/1 to New > York, trying to meet them there for a preparatory meeting for the workshop. > > Rudi Vansnick > > > > Evan Leibovitch schreef: > > Brendler, Beau wrote: > >> We have not approved the application of Knujon to become an > >> accredited North American ALS, correct? > >> > > NARALO expedited the regional approval, and I explicitly recall being > > told that they qualified for the Summit. > > > > - Evan > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC-Internal mailing list > > ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists… > > > > > > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > > At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.10/1904 - Release Date: > 20/01/2009 7:49 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Internal mailing list > ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists… > > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > At-Large <http://st.icann.org/alacAt-Large> Website: > http://atlarge.icann.org > -- Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)

1 0