February 2019 - RDS-WHOIS2-RT

Draft FINAL Report
by Alan Greenberg March 1, 2019

March 1, 2019

As you will have noted, for a variety of reasons we have not yet issued the final report. My intention is to do so prior to my leaving for Kobe 12 days from now. Note that we are still awaiting consensus on the recommendations from two team members. The document attached will be updated to address a number of comments/action items, but is close to final. If you plan to review it (as I hope you all will), please do so quickly. As it is cleaned up, I will send revisions. Alan

2 2

RDS-WHOIS2 RT Engagement Session at ICANN64
by MSSI Secretariat Feb. 26, 2019

Feb. 26, 2019

Engagement Session with the RDS-WHOIS2 Review Team<https://64.schedule.icann.org/meetings/962070> (click link for meeting description on ICANN64 Schedule) Adobe Connect link: https://participate.icann.org/kix64-emerald Date: Tuesday, 12 March 2019 Time: 9:00-10:15 AM/local Kobe time Location: Emerald - see venue map here<https://64.schedule.icann.org/floor_maps/3664/shapes/42152> RDS-WHOIS2 Engagement Session wiki page here<https://community.icann.org/x/-QNIBg>

1 0

CALL FOR CONSENSUS: Final Recommendations
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 21, 2019

Feb. 21, 2019

Dear review team members, Following up on the action item identified on today’s plenary call #48<https://community.icann.org/x/Fp4WBg> and Alan’s previous email, review team members are kindly invited to indicate whether you support the attached final recommendations. Should there be any non-support of a recommendation please explain your objection. Please reply no later than 23:59 UTC on Thursday, 07 February 2019. If you are NOT supporting any recommendation, early notice will be appreciated. Minority Statements to be sent no later than Wednesday 13 February 2019 - 12:00 UTC Please note that on today’s call, R5.1 priority level was assigned to High Priority. If you have any comments or concerned, please submit them in reply to this email. Alan, Lili, Carlton, Susan, Dmitry and Cathrin have confirmed support of all recommendations on plenary call #48<https://community.icann.org/x/Fp4WBg>. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

4 5

Urgent: Recommendation Consensus Call
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 13, 2019

Feb. 13, 2019

Dear Volker, Stephanie, and Thomas, Following-up on Alan’s email sent to the mailing list on Friday 1 February 2019 and the action item identified on plenary call #49, please indicate asap whether you support the attached 22 recommendations. Should there be any non-support of a recommendation please explain your objection. If you are NOT supporting any recommendation, early notice will be appreciated. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

1 0

Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Consumer Trust
by Alan Greenberg Feb. 10, 2019

Feb. 10, 2019

As discussed in Brussels, the Consumer Trust section has been revised to focus on RDS-related issues and to remove an extensive review of the first RT's methodology and thought processes. For your convenience, I am attaching a PDF of the final version. You can see the edits at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xOfxwS-qiXbA2d_bt_QoZRDNU_lus05KQGR0K16…, and a clean version - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J2kdCRH1ftDd78ZoYrYcwA8HCrMEgPyaUW8DsKL…. There were no recommendations for this section and that has not changed. Alan

2 1

Plenary Call #49 | 11 February 2019 | 15:00 - 16:30 UTC
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 9, 2019

Feb. 9, 2019

Dear review team members, In preparation for your plenary call #49<https://community.icann.org/x/GJ4WBg>, scheduled for Monday 11 February at 15:00-16:30 UTC, please find the below meeting agenda and attached slides: 1. Welcome, roll-call, SoI 2. Consumer Trust 3. Prioritization 4. Webinars 5. Timeline and Future Activities 6. A.O.B. Please note that final report sections are being sent for translation, thank you in advance for adding any other edits in suggested mode and/or letting us/the review team know about your changes. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

1 0

URGENT: Recommendation Consensus Call
by Alan Greenberg Feb. 4, 2019

Feb. 4, 2019

Attached please find the full text of the 22 Recommendations that are in our Final Report. Note that the CM Recommendations, which refer to Contractual Compliance, have been renamed CC for clarity. With the exception of R5.1 and CC.3, all recommendations are as agreed to during the December F2F meeting, a few with minor editorial wording changes. R5.1 was re-written and distributed to the RT on 16 December (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/2018-December/001039.html) due to objections to the version of R5.1 drafted and discussed at the end of the F2F meeting. It was discussed during the 17 December 2018 plenary meeting with agreement from all present, and was reported in the meeting results with no objections being raised. CC.3 was mentioned during the F2F meeting but was not acted upon. It too was distributed in the above-mentioned e-mail and discussed with objections at the 17 December 2018 plenary meeting. No objections were raised following publication of the meeting results. All team members (with the exception of Chris who I presume will abstain) should indicate whether that support these recommendations. Should there be any non-support of a recommendation please explain your objection. Please reply no later than 23:59 UTC on Thursday, 07 February 2019. If you are NOT supporting any recommendation, early notice will be appreciated. Priority estimates will be discussed during the meeting on Monday, 04 February 2019. We expect the GoogleDoc version of the report to be close to finalized on Monday. Alan

3 2

Apologies
by Erika Mann Feb. 4, 2019

Feb. 4, 2019

Dear Alan, dear friends - I’m not able to join the call tomorrow. I’m in an area with extremely poor Internet connection and no fixed phone connection. Apologies! Erika Sent from my iPhone

2 1

Plenary Call #48 | 4 February 2019 | 15:00 - 16:30 UTC
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 4, 2019

Feb. 4, 2019

Dear review team members, In preparation for your plenary call #48<https://community.icann.org/x/Fp4WBg>, scheduled for Monday 4 February at 15:00-16:30 UTC, please find the below meeting agenda: 1. Welcome, roll-call, SoI 2. Review of Draft Report Updates * WHOIS1 Recs #5-9: Data Accuracy * WHOIS1 Rec #4: Compliance * Objective 4: Consumer Trust * Objective 6: ICANN Contractual Compliance Actions, Structure and Processes 3. Prioritization 4. Final Report Timing and Deadlines 5. A.O.B. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

1 1

Measurement of Consensus
by Alan Greenberg Feb. 2, 2019

Feb. 2, 2019

In our draft report, for each recommendation, we reported "Level of Consensus" as "No objections". Shouldn't that be reported as "Full Consensus"? That states it in a positive instead of negative way, and is also what is specified in our Terms of Reference. Alan

4 3