- RDS-WHOIS2-RT - lists.icann.org

Request for discussion with ICANN GDD/Compliance - ARS
by Alice Jansen Aug. 19, 2018

Aug. 19, 2018

Dear Review Team Members, Following up on the request you formulated on call #38 for a call with ICANN GDD and Compliance to discuss “why so many ARS-generated tickets are closed with no action (are the records changed, the domains transferred or not renewed, etc)” - this is to inform you that our colleagues will attend a portion of your call #39 to address additional questions you may have. In anticipation of the discussion, please refer to the following materials that were shared with you these past few months/weeks. * https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/71604714/Written%20Impleme… * https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rec4-compliance/2018-August/00007… * https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/71604711/Compliance%20ques… * https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-dataaccuracy/2018-August/000049.h… * https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-dataaccuracy/2018-July/000048.html * https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/2018-July/000788.html In addition, ICANN Compliance invites you to refer to: * WHOIS ARS metrics and closure reasons; Link to Phase 2 Cycle 5 metrics https://whois.icann.org/en/whoisars-contractual-compliance-metrics * Compliance quarterly report Registrar Closed Complaints by Closure Code, which are inclusive of WHOIS ARS tickets – link to the latest quarterly report https://features.icann.org/compliance/dashboard/2018/q2/registrar-resolved-… Thanks, Kind regards Alice

3 2

Consolidated Draft Report 17 August
by Lisa Phifer Aug. 17, 2018

Aug. 17, 2018

Dear Review Team, Attached you will find a consolidated draft RDS-WHOIS2 review report for your consideration, in Word and PDF formats. As noted in email sent by Alice earlier today, please review this consolidated draft and raise any substantive concerns you may have on recommendations, findings, and other content to the full RT mailing list ASAP and no later than 26 August COB. You will note that this consolidated draft does not contain redlines. If you wish to see redlined edits made since 30 July, please refer to the associated subgroup report posted on that subgroup's wiki page. This consolidated draft also includes copy-edits for consistency and grammar. If you feel that a copy-edit accidentally changed the intent of any text in your subgroup's report, please flag that in comments on the consolidated draft. If you wish to make comments in redline form, please be sure to comment against the attached consolidated draft v1.8 17 August and not any prior version. Finally, thanks all for your timely delivery of the many subgroup inputs now incorporated into this draft. Thanks to your efforts, we're now entering the final stretch of our roadmap to public comment. Best, Lisa

1 0

Executive Summary
by Alan Greenberg Aug. 16, 2018

Aug. 16, 2018

Slightly late, but here is the Executive Summary. I am not fully happy with it, but I think it is in sufficiently good shape to include in the consolidated draft. Alan

2 1

Section on Bylaw Revision
by Alan Greenberg Aug. 16, 2018

Aug. 16, 2018

Section 4.6(a)(v) of the ICANN Bylaws specifies that each Specific Review team may recommend that may recommend that the review in question should no longer be conducted or should be amended. I determining the scope of the present RDS-WHOIS2 Review, section 4.6(e)(iii) of the Bylaws was considered: "The review team for the Directory Service Review ("Directory Service Review Team") will consider the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD") Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data as defined by the OECD in 1980 and amended in 2013 and as may be amended from time to time." The RT decided that this section of the Bylaw mandated scope should be omitted from the issues to be addressed, based on the complete lack of consideration of such guidelines in the current WHOIS implementation and the fact that at the time, an ongoing PDP was considering whether to incorporate such guidelines on its recommendations. Since that decision, the discussion of RDS(WHOIS) in ICANN has evolved and considerable focus has been targeted at the EU GDPR, its impact on the current WHOIS, and how it will influence RDS developments. Given: - the focus on GDPR and the ongoing efforts to address this effectively in the short to medium term; - the fact the OECD Guidelines have been made less relevant by the actual regulations and laws in Europe and other jurisdictions; and - the more generalized requirement for the RDS Specific Review to consider safeguards for protecting RDS data; the RT believes that section 4.6(e)(iii) of the ICANN Bylaws is no longer needed. RECOMMENDATION: The ICANN Board should take action to remove ICANN Bylaws section 4.6(e)(iii).

4 4

Interesting piece
by Erika Mann Aug. 16, 2018

Aug. 16, 2018

http://domainincite.com/23325-how-a-single-whois-complaint-got-this-registr… Sent from my iPhone

3 4

How Big is the Domain Business
by Carlton Samuels Aug. 16, 2018

Aug. 16, 2018

John Levine's take. Read the comments and answers too. http://www.circleid.com/posts/20180813_how_big_is_the_domain_business/ -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

2 1

Compliance subgroups reports
by Susan Kawaguchi Aug. 15, 2018

Aug. 15, 2018

Hello All, Please see the latest versions of the Compliance subgroup reports. Lisa adeptly created two reports separating the original recommendation 4 report from the Topic 6 Compliance report. Please see those attached. She also fixed a few typos and revised some of the language for readability. I have reviewed those edits and confirmed that there was no change to the meaning or intent of the sentences with these few edits. Thanks so much Lisa for all the hard work on the reports we couldn't have done this without you! Volker made a few edits to the report discussing grandfathered domain names. He also edited the recommendation on grandfathered domain names. I have added a version with his edits but kept the agreed upon recommendation. We will need to discuss any changes on the next plenary call. Best regards, Susan

2 1

CONFIRMED - 10-12 Dec F2F in Brussels
by Alice Jansen Aug. 15, 2018

Aug. 15, 2018

Dear Review Team Members, This is to confirm that the review team face-to-face meeting #4 will be held on 10-11-12 December 2018 at the ICANN office in Brussels, Belgium. Meeting objectives will be as follows: * Agree on/incorporate edits needed to report based on public comment received * Finalize recommendations * Finalize report contents MSSI-Secretariat has already circulated a calendar invite to save these dates in your calendar. ICANN constituency-travel will be in touch to book your flights. Thanks, Kind regards Alice

1 0

Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Executive Summary
by Lisa Phifer Aug. 14, 2018

Aug. 14, 2018

Thanks Alan. This draft Exec Summary will be incorporated into the consolidated report to be distributed for one last review cycle this week. Best, Lisa At 05:37 PM 8/14/2018, Alan Greenberg wrote: >Slightly late, but here is the Executive Summary. I am not fully >happy with it, but I think it is in sufficiently good shape to >include in the consolidated draft. > >Alan > > >_______________________________________________ >RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list >RDS-WHOIS2-RT(a)icann.org >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt

1 0

Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] New draft: Rec1 Strategic Priority
by Lisa Phifer Aug. 14, 2018

Aug. 14, 2018

1 0