- ChineseGP - lists.icann.org

ToDo : draft letters to IP and ICANN
by HiroHOTTA March 19, 2016

March 19, 2016

19 March, 2016 Hiro Hotta, JGP Two letters from CJK GPs to ICANN and IP 1. Confirmation of the purpose/content of the letters I described below about the intention and brief content of the letters we are supposed to formally send to IP and ICANN. If the below is confirmed in CJK coordination meeting, draft of the letters will be crafted and reviewed by all CJK GP members. 2. result of Marrakech Meeting CJK met on Sunday 6 and Thursday 10 March 2016 and concluded that CJK will send the two (2) formal letters, (letter-a) to IP requesting for the rationale of IP's request to reduce allocatable variants (letter-b) to ICANN requesting for the enhancement of TLD application process to enable more than one applied-for labels to be allocated, even if LGR blocks one of them when another of them is input to LGR 3. proposed letters 3.1 letter-a to IP This is a simple letter asking for their rationale in writing. Such rationale may be essential for all the GPs to determine the allocatability in some of the LGR. So far, IP seems - to accept the following three Chinese labels that are variants of each other * applied for * all traditional * all all simplified - to reject the Japanese labels that are variants of each other even if every variant label is EQUALY VALID as a Japanese word We need to know the clear criteria for acceptance and rejection. 3.2 letter-b to ICANN This is a letter requesting ICANN to incorporate our request to be included in the future TLD application procedure. ICANN says that once a label is decided to be blocked by the LGR, such a label cannot be definitely allocated at the moment of the application and also in the future. However there are cases where (x) blocked label-A and its variant label-B are equally needed to be allocated at the time of application in the case even if LGR does not implement the demand of the language community (y) blocked label-B will be needed to be allocated even if the applicant did not know that label-B is one of the blocked variant of label-A or label-B will be needed to become allocatable in the future (x) can be implemented if the application procedure can review more than one label as input at the same time and give both of them a green light. (y) can be implemented if the application procedure can notify the applicant about the blocked labels and allow the applicant to ask for giving 'allocatable' to some of blocked variant labels. /END Hiro

1 0

[klgp190_21q] KR comments RE: C var. groups (meaning in English)
by KIM Kyongsok March 18, 2016

March 18, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang Wei and others: Enclosed you will find KR's comments RE: C var. groups. Meanings of Hanja chars in Unacceptable C var. groups are translated into English. Please let me know if there is a problem. Thanks. -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 2

[klgp200_4] KR_Hg_Hj_rep_vg_list_v0.4_20160318.xlsx
by KIM Kyongsok March 18, 2016

March 18, 2016

Dear Mr. Wang and others: Enclosed you will find KR_Hg_Hj_rep_vg_list_v0.4_20160318.xlsx KR announces a new version of K-LGR: v0.4, 2016.03.18. - No change in Hangul repertoire (11,172 syllables) - No change in Hanja repertoire (4,819 chars) - # var groups: 37 --> 47 Please let me know if there is a problem. Thanks. -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

1 0

Re: [ChineseGP] [Koreangp] 答复: Draft agenda for CJK Beijing meeting 20th-21st
by 박민정 March 18, 2016

March 18, 2016

3 3

CJK Integration Procedure (v0.5)
by Yoshiro YONEYA March 18, 2016

March 18, 2016

Dear all, Please find attached CJK Integration Procedure (v0.5). Changes are below: Page 1, line 1: Algorithm => Procedure v0.4 => v0.5 Page 2, line 62: ... execute either (a) ... => ... responsible GP execute either (a) ... Page 2, line 66-67: <null> => Whether “review” type is included in ${IR-list} is differ by each GP. Therefore, each GP should decide “review” type treatment independently. Please review. Regards, -- Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya(a)jprs.co.jp>

1 0

KLGP v0.3: klgp171_4_KR_Hg_Hj_rep_var_list_v0.3_20150813.xlsx
by KIM Kyongsok March 17, 2016

March 17, 2016

Dear Everybody: Per Action Item at Marrakech, KLGP v0.3 is being sent here. The file name is klgp171_4_KR_Hg_Hj_rep_var_list_v0.3_20150813.xlsx which has not been changed since Aug., 2015. Thanks. -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok

2 1

Re: [ChineseGP] 答复: Re: [Koreangp] 答复: Draft agenda for CJK Beijing meeting 20th-21st
by 박민정 March 16, 2016

March 16, 2016

1 0

action item list (as of 10/MAR/2016)
by HiroHOTTA March 16, 2016

March 16, 2016

------------------------------------------------------------------------ @@ action Item List [ICANN Dublin + Marrakech] as of 10/MAR/2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ D : from Dublin CJK meetings M : from Marrakech meetings those items that C+J+K have already confirmed the completion were already removed from the list If any progress has been made on the action item after 10 March, the status of the action item is shown on the line beginning with ==> D3. Yoneya will re-write the name of the title from "Algorithm" to "Procedure" and add some explanation (especially regarding 'review') to the "Algorithm" (now "Procedure") document before Beijing Meeting. [JGP] D4. Each of CJK GPs will share their own repertoire and variants in both XML and excel format. If GP doesn't have them in both formats, send them only in the existing format before Beijing meeting. [CGP, JGP, KGP] ==> JGP done (by XML) KGP done (by excel) CGP Not yet D5. CJK will check and confirm the template of Root LGR proposal and ask for IP's advice if necessary [CGP, JGP] step1: Yoneya will send the edited template to CJK mailing lists which includes differentiation mark <common> for CJK and <individual> for each GP step2: CJK will check the drafted template and confirm step3: ask for IP's advice if necessary ==> pending D7. CGP and JGP will devise a joint statement and then KGP will consider whether to make a joint statement with C and J in KGP LGR proposal ==> Pending. D10. Yoneya will draft a temporary schedule for each step of CJK integration procedure and send it to Kenny for his check. After that. Yoneya and Kenny will share it with CJK mailing lists to solicit their opinions about the schedule [JGP] ==> This step will be start after Beijing Meeting ------- M2. Edmon will provide to CGP/JGP/KGP an analysis document regarding possible scenarios for import and export of variants among 3 GPs before Beijing Meeting. (about 8-10 slides) [Edmon] M6. Show the IP’s rationale regarding reduction of allocatable label to CGK [IP] ==> Make to be a joint statement of Beijing Meeting. M7. CGP and JGP will show the example of variant SLD’s registration which has label-1 to label-N [CGP, JGP] M8. Write the draft proposal in format. [CGP, JGP, KGP] M9. Decide who to have the authorization to post IP ML and send it to Sarmad. [CJK] ==> decide who can post at Beijing Meeting. M10. KGP will send the 37 variant groups. [KGP] ==> done. M11. Confirm the member attending the CJK Coordination Groups [CJK] ==>done. ------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

JGP's LGR-alpha-1 (in XML and Excel format)
by Yoshiro YONEYA March 16, 2016

March 16, 2016

Dear all, Please find attached JGP's LGR-alpha-1 (in both XML and Excel format). No changes since last year. Regards, -- Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya(a)jprs.co.jp>

1 0

Re: [ChineseGP] [Koreangp] 答复: Draft agenda for CJK Beijing meeting 20th-21st
by 박민정 March 14, 2016

March 14, 2016

2 1