- Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl - lists.icann.org

Recordings for IRT Meeting #16 - 12 March 2025
by Dana Kuebler March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

Hello IRT, Thank you for your thoughtful comments and informative discussions during our ICANN82 session. The session #16 recordings are available here,<https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IRT/pages/106366110/12+Ma…> transcripts will be posted shortly. We look forward to further discussion Thursday, 27 March 2025 @15:30 UTC. Invitations for this session have been sent. Please reach out to us if you did not get an invite. Based on requests from IRT members, we are adjusting the due dates from 19 March to 27th of March for the following tasks. Please reply on-list if you have any concerns with the proposed adjusted due date. Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250307a Review Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> and comment on questions and assumptions 19 March 2025 27 March 2025 20250307b Provide priority comments for Threshold Question 3: Part B, within the Draft Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> document 19 March 2025 27 March 2025 Please review the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance & examples on how to best make comments. For the Alignment Document, please review the instructions in that document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> for how to best give your input. REMINDER: please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments on either document. Safe travel to all those heading home from ICANN82

1 0

Reminder: IRT Preparation for ICANN82 Discussion
by Dana Kuebler March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

Hello IRT, We look forward to connecting Wednesday, 12 March 2025 16:00 UTC for our scheduled<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann82.sched.com/event/1vpbs/gds-ppsai-…> ICANN82 IRT Session. Please add priority comments or feedback to existing responses directly within the Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…>, in preparation for further discussion. Reminder, please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments. If you missed the last session, here is the link<https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IRT/pages/106366007/27+Fe…> to catch up.

2 2

IRT Tasks: Review and Provide Comments - Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures document. Due Wednesday 19 March 2025
by Leon Grundmann March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you for your thoughtful comments and informative discussions last week. We ask you to continue your focused review and addition of priority comments on Threshold Category 3: Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> with a focus on Part B: Can these frameworks be aligned with existing work on RDRS, Registration Data Policy, and other existing procedures and remain consistent with the policy recommendations? To support this effort we have prepared an Alignment Document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> based on the previously published Wave.1.5 report<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-phas…>. Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250304 Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions discussed during IRT Session 27 Feb 2025 (See IRT email<https://lists.icann.org/hyperkitty/list/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org/threa…> on 04 Mar 2025 for TQs: H, L, O, M, N) 10 Mar 2025 20250307a Review Alignment of Disclosure Frameworks to Existing Work/Procedures<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> and comment on questions and assumptions 19 March 2025 20250307b Provide priority comments for Threshold Question 3: Part B, within the Draft Disclosure Framework Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> document 19 March 2025 Please review the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance & examples on how to best make comments. For the Alignment Document, please review the instructions in that document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gx_OsTUYmF3bab1j__is2S4edYZ3r5DtEHpsTMc…> for how to best give your input. REMINDER: please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments on either document. We kindly request your review and feedback to the Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> comments in preparation for further discussion in our next IRT meeting Session #16 at ICANN82, on Wednesday 12 March 2025. Best regards, The IPT

1 0

IRT Task #20250305: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: Monday 10 March 2025
by Dana Kuebler March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you all for your time and feedback on draft responses to threshold questions. We would like to address several candidate threshold questions that are shown in the IRT Threshold Question tracker<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rqfRaG1yL8HU48u0_3rIHkREoWN0Psr0rT_…>. During the recent IRT sessions on 13 and 27 February 2025, each of the below questions were discussed and an approach was proposed to address each of them as part of existing threshold questions. Please see below the assessment and handling discussed for the relevant candidate threshold questions. For any IRT members who were not present at the last session, and who have any objections to the handling of these questions, please reply on-list by Monday, 10 March 2025. Consolidation of several of candidate threshold questions related to or with a dependency on TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested?: * TQ.H: Contracted Party Addition(s): Questions related to possible GNSO structural changes including potential creation of a new contracted party, or even ICANN Bylaws amendments, are dependent on the implementation model selected and could be included as part of TQ.B. * TQ.L: Point of contact requirement for P/P providers, which requestors can contact - can be combined with TQ.B, as it relates to the implementation model which will be selected. * TQ.O: Customer surrendering domain name in lieu of disclosure - requirements for P/P provider - can be combined with TQ.B, as it also relates to the implementation model, as it is a question about how the P/P provider is covered in a case where provider is not also the registrar. Additionally, we propose including both TQs M and N to be addressed as part of TQ.C: Illustrative Disclosure Framework - policy or not?, given the dependency on Council's response to whether the illustrative disclosure framework must inform our policy, or if it the IPT and IRT have leeway in drafting such disclosure frameworks during implementation, or perhaps even to reject some or all of what is proposed in Annex B. * TQ.M: Providing evidence of wrongdoing (copyright infringement case) and * TQ.N: "General Policy Stated Herein" question The IPT is also currently working on several possible implementation models to present and discuss with the IRT, which we intend to share within the next several weeks, to support TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested? Thank you again for your support and efforts, The IPT

1 0

IRT Task 20250304: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions
by Leon Grundmann March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you all for your time and feedback on draft responses to threshold questions. We would like to address several candidate threshold questions that are shown in the IRT Threshold Question tracker<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rqfRaG1yL8HU48u0_3rIHkREoWN0Psr0rT_…>. During the recent IRT sessions on 13 and 27 February 2025, each of the below questions were discussed and an approach was proposed to address each of them as part of existing threshold questions. Please see below the assessment and handling discussed for the relevant candidate threshold questions. For any IRT members who were not present at the last session, and who have any objections to the handling of these questions, please reply on-list by Monday, 10 March 2025. Consolidation of several of candidate threshold questions related to or with a dependency on TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested?: * TQ.H: Contracted Party Addition(s): Questions related to possible GNSO structural changes including potential creation of a new contracted party, or even ICANN Bylaws amendments, are dependent on the implementation model selected and could be included as part of TQ.B. * TQ.L: Point of contact requirement for P/P providers, which requestors can contact - can be combined with TQ.B, as it relates to the implementation model which will be selected. * TQ.O: Customer surrendering domain name in lieu of disclosure - requirements for P/P provider - can be combined with TQ.B, as it also relates to the implementation model, as it is a question about how the P/P provider is covered in a case where provider is not also the registrar. Additionally, we propose including both TQs M and N to be addressed as part of TQ.C: Illustrative Disclosure Framework - policy or not?, given the dependency on Council's response to whether the illustrative disclosure framework must inform our policy, or if it the IPT and IRT have leeway in drafting such disclosure frameworks during implementation, or perhaps even to reject some or all of what is proposed in Annex B. * TQ.M: Providing evidence of wrongdoing (copyright infringement case) and * TQ.N: "General Policy Stated Herein" question The IPT is also currently working on several possible implementation models to present and discuss with the IRT, which we intend to share within the next several weeks, to support TQ.B. Accreditation Program - was it ever officially requested? Thank you again for your support and efforts, The IPT

1 0

Recordings available for IRT Meeting #15 - 27 February 2025
by Dana Kuebler Feb. 28, 2025

Feb. 28, 2025

Hello IRT, Just a quick update that IRT session #15 recordings are available here,<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=423165961> transcripts will be posted shortly. Reminder to complete your registration for ICANN82<https://meetings.icann.org/en/meetings/icann82/>. We look forward to further discussion at ICANN82 Session <https://icann82.sched.com/event/1vpbs/gds-ppsai-irt-working-session> Wednesday, 12 March 2025 @06:00 UTC. All the best, Dana

1 0

IRT Task 20250206b: Final review and comments on Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment - Due 20 Feb 2025
by Leon Grundmann Feb. 14, 2025

Feb. 14, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you for the warm welcome to Jason Kean, who will be onboarding as the project lead for PPSAI and a big thank you to Dennis for all he has done to move the work forward and thank you for the continued support on the IPT. We ask that the IRT continue to review and finalize comments on the Ext: IRT Doc - Disclosure Frameworks Assessment (06Feb25)<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…>. Please review IPT Priority 1 (for immediate IRT consideration and potential GNSO Council escalation) and Priority 2 (flagged for IRT discussion in implementation) assessment comments and identify: 1. Impacts from new laws or policies: There are additional areas under new law or policy that have not been noted in the document, and which should also be revisited by the IRT. 2. Clarify additional inconsistencies: Identify any additional aspects of the frameworks that do not align (or could or should be better aligned) with existing work or procedures (e.g. on RDRS, RDP or other existing policies or procedures). 3. Provide further rationale: to support or object to an existing priority assessment comment. Please review the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance & examples on how to best make comments. REMINDER: please select a small, specific portion of text when making comments. Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250206b Final review and comments Ext: IRT Doc - Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment (06Feb25) 20 Feb 2025 We kindly request your review and feedback to the assessment comments in preparation for further discussion in our next IRT meeting Session #15, Thursday 27 February 2025. Best regards, The IPT

1 0

Recordings available for IRT Meeting #14: 13 February 2025
by Dana Kuebler Feb. 13, 2025

Feb. 13, 2025

Hello IRT, Just a quick update that IRT session #14 recordings are available here,<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=423165958> transcripts will be posted shortly. We look forward to further discussion next Thursday, 27 February 2025 @15:30 UTC. All the best, Dana

1 0

IRT Task 20250206: Review Ext: IRT Doc - Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment (06Feb25). Due: 13 Feb 2025
by Leon Grundmann Feb. 6, 2025

Feb. 6, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you all for your input on threshold questions as we progress through our workplan. As promised, to further our discussion on recommendations that may be impacted by changes in law, inconsistencies, gaps in ICANN consensus policy in today's current environment, we are assigning the review of Ext: IRT Doc - Disclosure Frameworks Assessment (06Feb25)<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…>. Please note that this is an annotated excerpt of the Draft Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation Agreement (PPAA) from 13 Sept 2018, and intentionally omits portions of the full draft PPAA to simplify the IRT review process. Task # IRT Task (homework) Due Date 20250206a Initial review and comments Ext: IRT Doc - Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment (06Feb25) 13 Feb 2025 20250206b Final review and comments Ext: IRT Doc - Draft Disclosure Frameworks Assessment (06Feb25) 20 Feb 2025 Please see the IRT Comment Guidelines section<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1prbyViSAFL866FjYD9VSwSH4aGjkJZgNYn6m3NX…> of the assessment for guidance on making comments. We request your review and feedback to the assessment comments in preparation for further discussion in our next IRT meeting Session #14, Thursday 13 February 2025. Please reach out on list with any questions and check the document for IRT comments one more time on the 14th prior to the meeting. Best regards, The IPT

1 0

Re: IRT Task 20250123: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: 3 Feb 2025
by Dana Kuebler Feb. 6, 2025

Feb. 6, 2025

Dear IRT, Thank you for completing IRT Task 20250123. For ease of tracking, I’ll address both of your comments here. * Roger, you are correct. We do not yet have alignment on whether the Illustrative Disclosure Framework is just an “illustrative“ example. This is addressed in TQ.C<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jvVfgLtnqzcSarbL2UfeHQV_CykUbpv-DB_m5ZA…>. The focus of TQ.D, on the other hand, related to unclear objectives for IP requests. Clarifying objectives can be found in Annex B<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1nS5WTk0p79XR…> of the final report and do not appear to need GNSO guidance. * Volker, your point on TQ.I is already covered within TQ.A and we have further noted your concerns within the IRT input section for additional context for GNSO consideration. Please let us know if you have further comments to close out this task. Thank you for your continued support. Kind Regards, The IPT From: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 3:54 PM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org> Cc: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org>, Volker Greimann <volker.greimann(a)centralnic.com> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Re: IRT Task 20250123: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: 3 Feb 2025 Dear Dennis, thank you for the summary. I would propose we expand a bit on the third bullet TQ:I as it is not just GDPR that has changed the landscape but also changes to the contracts and new ICANN policies that had an effect on the applicability of the original recommendations. Unless, of course, this is already included in TQ:A in which case I withdraw my proposal. Sincerely, Volker Greimann General Counsel & Head of Policy and Compliance - Online Division volker.greimann(a)centralnic.com Office: +49-172-6367025 Web: www.teaminternet.com Team Internet Group PLC (AIM:TIG). Registered Office: 4th Floor, Saddlers House, 44 Gutter Lane, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 6BR. Team Internet is a company registered in England and Wales with the company number 8576358. ________________________________ From: Dennis Chang via Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org> Sent: 24 January 2025 12:26 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl(a)icann.org> Cc: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Task 20250123: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: 3 Feb 2025 Dear IRT, Thank you all for your time and feedback on draft responses to threshold questions. With three sessions remaining in our work plan on the 3 threshold questions [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1jvVfgLtnqzcS…> we would like to address the remaining candidate questions that are shown in the IRT Threshold Question tracker.. Please review our proposed assessment and handling of the following candidate threshold questions, as found in the IRT Threshold Question Tracker [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rqfRaG1y…>. Please reply to this message on the list if you have any objections by Monday, 3 Feb 2025. * TQ.D: (Unclear objectives around Illustrative Disclosure Framework for IP requests). GNSO Guidance may not be needed as clarification of the objectives for framework are in Annex B [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1nS5WTk0p79XR…> of final report. * TQ.G: (Conflict with Transfer Policy Recommendations). This does not appear to be a threshold question, but is a coordination concern and would be useful to consider for further discussion during implementation. This has been a noted topic in implementation tracker for reference. * TQ.I: (GDPR Changing the landscape) This focus of this candidate threshold question appears to be duplicative of content already included in the drafting of TQ.A: Definitions & Industry use. * TQ.J: (Higher risk of inadvertent publication of a customer’s details in the course of de-accreditation for unaffiliated providers?) Threshold Question appears to fall into clarifying questions and has been discussed in the industry practices session during ICANN81. We are making steady progress and intend to focus our discussions in the upcoming session on Threshold Question 3 relating to disclosure frameworks. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet

1 0