- ispcp - lists.icann.org

WG: IRTP Part C Request for Input Template
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Dec. 5, 2011

Dec. 5, 2011

FYI! Please feel free to feed back to the GNSO secretariat Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2011 17:38 An: tony holmes; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich Cc: GNSO Secretariats Betreff: IRTP Part C Request for Input Template Dear All, Please distribute to all your members. The GNSO Council has formed a Working Group of interested stakeholders and Stakeholder Group / Constituency representatives, to collaborate broadly with knowledgeable individuals and organizations, in order to consider recommendations for a number of issues related to the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP). Part of the working group's effort will be to incorporate ideas and suggestions gathered from Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies through this Stakeholder Group / Constituency Statement. Inserting your Stakeholder Group's / Constituency's response in this form (see attached) will make it much easier for the Working Group to summarize the responses. This information is helpful to the community in understanding the points of view of various stakeholders. However, you should feel free to add any information you deem important to inform the working group's deliberations, even if this does not fit into any of the questions listed below. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR RESPONSE AT THE LATEST BY 6 JANUARY 2012 TO THE GNSO SECRETARIAT (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org) which will forward your statement to the IRTP Part C Working Group. Thanks, Marika

1 0

GNSO toolkit
by tony holmes Nov. 25, 2011

Nov. 25, 2011

Dear ISPCP members Below is a draft of the email I propose to send to Rob Hoggarth in response to the action point I was given during our recent conference call. It explains the ISPCP approach to the provision of the GNSO toolkit, following the discussion we had with Rob in Dakar and our last conference call. Please let me have any comments or amendments by c.o.p 29th December. I will then submit the final version to Rob. Thank You Tony ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Rob The ISPCP Constituency very much appreciated the opportunity to discuss our requirements from the GNSO toolkit with you during the Dakar meeting. We have since held an ISPCP conference call reflecting on those discussions and consider it would be helpful to forward a brief note summarising the current situation and our requirements. The ISPCP greatly appreciate the work undertaken within the GNSO and by staff which has resulted in the establishment of the toolkit. When fully available its comprehensive menu should ensure all involved parties have the ability to participate in the policy development process and represent their stakeholder groups in an effective and efficient manner. As recognised during our discussions we have not quite reached that stage, but we are all aware that the level of commitment required from volunteer members who form ICANNs GNSO Constituencies has greatly increased, along with the scope and pace of policy development. Handling that situation in an environment where participation has to be carefully weighed against other demands placed on participants by the organisations they represent is in itself, a considerable challenge. Against that background the ISPCP and other Constituencies have already benefitted from using some elements of the toolkit. In particular the ISPCP have been very appreciative of the support given to organising its meetings, organising conference calls and assistance in conducting elections for Constituency officers. However as discussed in Dakar some of the elements that would make a considerable difference to our Constituency are not readily available, in particular, Constituency web site hosting and content maintenance and the provision of grants/funding for constituencies to assist us in providing their own support. We are also aware that no firm timeline currently exists for the provision of those tools. On that basis the ISPCP would like to request that a budget allocation is made available to assist in bridging that gap. It is accepted that any funds made available should only be used for the specified purpose and meet in full the requirements for transparency, accountability and audit control. Because if the budget implications this email has also been copied to Xavier Calvez Chief Financial officer. Submitted on behalf of the ISPCP Constituency Tony Holmes ISPCP Chairman

2 2

Note of main issues from ISPCP conference call 14th November
by tony holmes Nov. 23, 2011

Nov. 23, 2011

All Below is the revised note of the ISPCP conference call held on 14th November following editorial comments received. Please note the that the next call is scheduled for 2nd December. Tony -------------------- 1. SO/AC stakeholder support services request. Reference was made to the presentation 'FY13 Initial Consultation From Framework to Adopted Budget' given by Xavier Calvez (new CFO) in Dakar, and the invitation to SO/ACs to submit relevant budget requests. Following discussion within the CSG Executive Group which have taken place since the Dakar meeting, it was concluded that the ISPCP will align with the other CSG Constituencies and submit a request for $25k to cover the following aspects. - Secretarial support - Travel for officers - Communications materials - Outreach - Expenses for Constituencies An initial draft will be produced by Tony Holmes/ Olivier Muron and Tony Harris and then circulated for comment, prior to the 7th December deadline 2. GNSO Toolkit Following the session on the GNSO toolkit held during the ISPCP Constituency meeting in Dakar, which was attended by Rob Hogarth ICANN staff, the ISPCP now need to follow up in writing the feedback given on key points. An initial draft will be prepared by Tony Holmes and Tony Harris and circulated for comment. 3. Request for input on selection criteria for NomCom appointees A request had been received from Vanda Scartezini Chair, of this year's Nominating Committee, to help establish selection criteria in line with the ATRT Recommendations. An initial draft will be produced by Olivier Muron, Tony Harris and Tony Holmes and circulated for comment. 4. Update and preparation of input for GNSO meeting 17th November On the 17th November discussion will take place on a proposal to create a GNSO outreach task force. It was explained that within the GNSO there were opinions that this group should include comprehensive membership and was therefore likely to become quite large. From discussion it was concluded the role of such a group remains unclear, particularly with regard to its fit with outreach activities that would be undertaken at the Constituency/ stakeholder levels. In addition there was recognition that two of the leading proponents of this work were no longer eligible to participate at the Council level. It was agreed the ISPCP would not support proposals to establish this group at the current time. Two competing motions will be proposed regarding a PDP on the UDRP. It was concluded the ISPCP should make the point that further experience is required before launching any PDP. On that basis ISPCP Council reps will not support any motion which proposes it should commence immediately. 5. Date of next Conference call Friday 2nd December commencing at 14.00 UTC

1 0

GNSO council meeting Nov 17
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

All, Just a short update on the major results of the council meeting from yesterday (agenda + comments inserted): Item 3: Outreach Task Force Charter The motion to adopt the OTF charter failed (9 yes, rest abstentions). A small team (so far Zahid Jamil; William Drake; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; Wendy Seltzer; john(a)crediblecontext.com; Neuman, Jeff; Dykes, Roy plus Julie Hedlund from staff) shall work on a revised motion which may include resolved clauses for the Council to approve the revised charter. Item 4: UDRP Mary's motion (to start a PDP immediately) failed. Jeff's motion (to start a PDP 18 months after the implementation of new gTLDs) was suggested with an amendment made by D. Taylor: <<Competiting Proposed Motion on the UDRP PDP.doc>> That shall be on the next council agenda. Item 5: Dakar Board resolution on the Registrar Accreditation Agreement Amendments RAA FYI, the update on RAA amendments given by staff can be found at http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/presentation-gnso-raa-update-17nov1 1-en.pdf MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference, held on Thursday, 17 November, 2011 at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20111117-en.mp3 Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich

1 0

RE: [ispcp] Draft note of main issues from ISPCP conference call 14th November
by tony holmes Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Thanks Alain Right both times of course. Guess it was a long day! Ill make the corrections Regards Tony From: alain.bidron(a)orange.com [mailto:alain.bidron@orange.com] Sent: 15 November 2011 20:13 To: tony holmes; ispcp(a)icann.org Subject: RE: [ispcp] Draft note of main issues from ISPCP conference call 14th November Two short comments on my side, The name of the new CFO is Xavier Calvez and not Javier Calvez, and the next conference call is Friday 2nd December, not January. Regards Alain <http://www.orange.com/> Alain Bidron FT/OLNC/NAD/EAS/NAN Head of Naming Addressing Numbering Unit tel. + 33 1 57 36 17 24 mob. + 33 6 87 65 90 94 <blocked::mailto:alain.bidron@orange-ftgroup.com> alain.bidron(a)orange.com _____ De : owner-ispcp(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] De la part de tony holmes Envoyé : mardi 15 novembre 2011 19:18 À : ispcp(a)icann.org Objet : [ispcp] Draft note of main issues from ISPCP conference call 14th November All The following note is intended to catches the main issues and actions from the 14th November Conference call. If you have any comments please submit them within the next 5 days. Thank You Tony -------------------- 1. SO/AC stakeholder support services request. Reference was made to the presentation FY13 Initial Consultation From Framework to Adopted Budget given by Javier Calvez (new CFO) in Dakar, and the invitation to SO/ACs to submit relevant budget requests. Following discussion within the CSG Executive Group which have taken place since the Dakar meeting, it was concluded that the ISPCP will align with the other CSG Constituencies and submit a request for $25k to cover the following aspects. - Secretarial support - Travel for officers - Communications materials - Outreach - Expenses for Constituencies An initial draft will be produced by Tony Holmes/ Olivier Muron and Tony Harris and then circulated for comment, prior to the 7th December deadline 2. GNSO Toolkit Following the session on the GNSO toolkit held during the ISPCP Constituency meeting in Dakar, which was attended by Rob Hogarth ICANN staff, the ISPCP now need to follow up in writing the feedback given on key points. An initial draft will be prepared by Tony Holmes and Tony Harris and circulated for comment. 3. Request for input on selection criteria for NomCom appointees A request had been received from Vanda Scartezini Chair, of this years Nominating Committee, to help establish selection criteria in line with the ATRT Recommendations. An initial draft will be produced by Olivier Muron, Tony Harris and Tony Holmes and circulated for comment. 4. Update and preparation of input for GNSO meeting 17th November On the 17th November discussion will take place on a proposal to create a GNSO outreach task force. It was explained that within the GNSO there were opinions that this group should include comprehensive membership and was therefore likely to become quite large. From discussion it was concluded the role of such a group remains unclear, particularly with regard to its fit with outreach activities that would be undertaken at the Constituency/ stakeholder levels. In addition there was recognition that two of the leading proponents of this work were no longer eligible to participate at the Council level. It was agreed the ISPCP would not support proposals to establish this group at the current time. Two competing motions will be proposed regarding a PDP on the UDRP. It was concluded the ISPCP should make the point that further experience is required before launching any PDP. On that basis ISPCP Council reps will not support any motion which proposes it should commence immediately. 5. Date of next Conference call Friday 2nd January commencing at 14.00 UTC ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorization. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange shall not be liable if this message was modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.

1 0

Draft note of main issues from ISPCP conference call 14th November
by tony holmes Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

All The following note is intended to catches the main issues and actions from the 14th November Conference call. If you have any comments please submit them within the next 5 days. Thank You Tony -------------------- 1. SO/AC stakeholder support services request. Reference was made to the presentation 'FY13 Initial Consultation From Framework to Adopted Budget' given by Javier Calvez (new CFO) in Dakar, and the invitation to SO/ACs to submit relevant budget requests. Following discussion within the CSG Executive Group which have taken place since the Dakar meeting, it was concluded that the ISPCP will align with the other CSG Constituencies and submit a request for $25k to cover the following aspects. - Secretarial support - Travel for officers - Communications materials - Outreach - Expenses for Constituencies An initial draft will be produced by Tony Holmes/ Olivier Muron and Tony Harris and then circulated for comment, prior to the 7th December deadline 2. GNSO Toolkit Following the session on the GNSO toolkit held during the ISPCP Constituency meeting in Dakar, which was attended by Rob Hogarth ICANN staff, the ISPCP now need to follow up in writing the feedback given on key points. An initial draft will be prepared by Tony Holmes and Tony Harris and circulated for comment. 3. Request for input on selection criteria for NomCom appointees A request had been received from Vanda Scartezini Chair, of this year's Nominating Committee, to help establish selection criteria in line with the ATRT Recommendations. An initial draft will be produced by Olivier Muron, Tony Harris and Tony Holmes and circulated for comment. 4. Update and preparation of input for GNSO meeting 17th November On the 17th November discussion will take place on a proposal to create a GNSO outreach task force. It was explained that within the GNSO there were opinions that this group should include comprehensive membership and was therefore likely to become quite large. From discussion it was concluded the role of such a group remains unclear, particularly with regard to its fit with outreach activities that would be undertaken at the Constituency/ stakeholder levels. In addition there was recognition that two of the leading proponents of this work were no longer eligible to participate at the Council level. It was agreed the ISPCP would not support proposals to establish this group at the current time. Two competing motions will be proposed regarding a PDP on the UDRP. It was concluded the ISPCP should make the point that further experience is required before launching any PDP. On that basis ISPCP Council reps will not support any motion which proposes it should commence immediately. 5. Date of next Conference call Friday 2nd January commencing at 14.00 UTC

1 0

Draft agenda for todays conference call (13.30 UTC)
by tony holmes Nov. 14, 2011

Nov. 14, 2011

Draft Agenda 1. SO/AC Stakeholder support services request 2. GNSO Toolkit request 3. Request for input on selection criteria from NomCom 4. Update/input on GNSO Council issues 5. AoB 6. Date for next call

4 3

ISPCP conference call 14 Nov - change of time
by tony holmes Nov. 10, 2011

Nov. 10, 2011

Dear ISPCP members The date of next ISPCP conference call was scheduled at the Dakar meeting for Monday 14th November commencing at 14.00 UTC. I would like to request that the time of the call is advanced by 30 minutes which means it would commence at 13.30 UTC and end at 14.30 UTC. Could you please let me know if this is acceptable. I will then seek Gisella's assistance to circulate the call in details. Thanks Tony

3 2

WG: [council] Competiting Proposed Motion on the UDRP PDP
by KnobenW＠telekom.de Nov. 10, 2011

Nov. 10, 2011

All, pls. find attached a 2 competing motions on the UDRP to be voted on the council meeting next week, one as separate attachment. Any comments are welcome! Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Neuman, Jeff Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. November 2011 18:33 An: GNSO Council Betreff: [council] Competiting Proposed Motion on the UDRP PDP I know that Mary has submitted a motion on the UDRP, but I ask that this one be submitted and voted upon in the event that Mary's motion fails. I am not pre-supposing it will, but here is a motion just in case. This is in line with the discussions we all had in Dakar about delaying a PDP on the UDRP for 18 months after the first delegation, but still addressing the transfer issue now. There are some links that need to be inserted. Thanks. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Whereas the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group submitted a final report the GNSO Council on 29 May 2010 (see http://gnso.icann.org/issues/rap/rap-wg-final-report-29may10-en.pdf) recommending an issue report on the current state of the UDRP considering both (a) How the UDRP has addressed the problem of cybersquatting to date, and any insufficiencies/inequalities associated with the process, and (b) Whether the definition of cybersquatting inherent within the existing UDRP language needs to be reviewed or updated, and Whereas, on February 3, 2011, the GNSO Council requested an Issues Report in accordance with the recommendations of the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group [LINK], and Whereas, a Preliminary Issue Report was published on 27 May 2011 [LINK] and series of webinars and workshops were held soliciting public comment to allow for the ICANN community to provide feedback on the analysis and recommendations contained therein, and Whereas, a Final Issue Report was published on 3 October 2011 [LINK] in which ICANN staff recommended the GNSO Council consider the "perspective of the majority of the ICANN community, and the advice of the Government Advisory Committee (GAC), and the At-Large Advisory Committee" and that "a PDP be delayed until after the New gTLD Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) has been in operation for at least eighteen months. . . [to] allow the policy process to be informed by data regarding the effectiveness of the URS, which was modeled on the UDRP, to address the problem of cybersquatting." RESOLVED, that the GNSO approved the initiation of a PDP and the establishment of a Working Group on recommendation #7 of the IRTP Part B Working Group concerning the requirement to lock a domain name subject to UDRP proceedings, which the GNSO Council at its meeting on 22 June 2011 received and agreed to consider when it takes up consideration of the Final Issue Report on the Current State of the UDRP. RESOLVED further, the GNSO Council requests a new a new Issue Report on the current state of all rights protection mechanisms implemented for both existing and new gTLDs, including but not limited to, the UDRP and URS, should be delivered to the GNSO Council by no later than eighteen (18) months following the delegation and launch of the first new gTLD. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman(a)neustar.biz <mailto:jeff.neuman@neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz/> ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

1 0

FW: NCPH Vice chair
by tony holmes Oct. 27, 2011

Oct. 27, 2011

ISPCP members - FYI Wolf-Ulrich - Congratulations, I have no doubts whatever you will do an excellent job! Tony From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: 27 October 2011 12:04 To: Metalitz, Steven; Marilyn Cade; J. Scott Evans; tony holmes; Tony Harris (harris(a)cabase.org.ar) Robin Gross; Konstantinos Komaitis; Amber Sterling; Chris Chaplow Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: NCPH Vice chair Dear All, I am delighted to announce that Wolf-Ulrich Knoben has been elected by the Non Contracted Parties House as the GNSO Council vice chair. 11 votes in favour 2 ballots not returned Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0