- NA-Discuss - lists.icann.org

History of the At-Large definition
by Danny Younger May 5, 2007

May 5, 2007

Shortly after ICANN's creation a Membership Advisory Committee (MAC) was formed that examined issues related to At-Large membership. The MAC found consensus on the following definition of who/what is an at-large community member: "1. At-large membership is for those individuals and organizations that are not represented by the Supporting Organizations. It includes individual users and should not be limited to IP address holders or domain name holders. We want as large and diverse a representation of users as possible." http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rcs/conrades.html One might reasonably ask "as ICANN has a home for both commercial and non-commercial organizations (the BC and the NCUC -- and logically, that should cover the entire gamut of organizations out there), what type of organizations don't have representation within the Supporting Organizations?" There are certain commercial interests (such as domain name resellers) that are not granted participatory opportunities within the BC due to BC Charter exclusions. There are also noncommercial organizations that are denied membership in the NCUC owing to charter considerations: Ineligible organizations. The membership of the NCUC specifically excludes: -- Political organizations whose primary purpose is to hold government office and/or elect government officials -- Commercial organizations and associations of or for the benefit of commercial entities (even if they are non-profit in form) -- Organizations that provide services under contract or MoU with ICANN, or are represented in ICANN through another Supporting Organization The MAC wanted to make sure that the At-Large would constitute the catch-all category so that no entity would be excluded from the ICANN process (this is why their definition included "organizations that are not represented by the Supporting Organizations"). This consensus definition of the At-Large was later changed (some would say perverted) by members of the At Large Organizing Committee (ALOC) that were hand-picked by former ICANN Chairman of the Board Esther Dyson after ICANN had eliminated all elected At-Large directors. The new definition created by these ICANN insiders allowed for almost any organization (even those already represented by constituency structures) to become part of the At-Large. This change of definition served to divide the community of civil society organizations and to dilute their collective impact and well-served ICANN's interests (as they had described the Civil Society element that kept raging for ICANN reform as ICANN's single largest distraction). Instead of the At-Large being recognized as a body that was primarily comprised of individuals (with an occasional organizational entity as part of the mix), the new at-large definition posited organizations as the primary stakeholders in the at-large with individuals treated almost as an afterthought. In most RALOS now, individuals either don't have voting rights or their rights are not on a par with those of organizational entities). The broad At-Large community has never accepted the new definition of the at-large that was foisted upon us. The current definition has no consensus-based support and it primarily serves to exclude the very individuals that are what the at-large community was all about. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

4 4

Re: [NA-Discuss] Domain Tasting Issues Report
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 4, 2007

May 4, 2007

I believe it is imminently to be transmitted to the GNSO Council. On 04/05/07, Danny Younger <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Many of you will recall the correspondence posted > below that indicated that the ALAC would have a > request finalized for an Issues Report on Domain > Tasting by April 30. What is the current status of > this initiative? > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > As mentioned briefly at the GNSO Council meeting in > Lisbon, the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is in > the process of submitting a request for an Issues > Report from ICANN staff on the subject of Domain > Tasting - specifically the exploitation of the 5-day > (or 120 hour) Add Grace Period during which a domain > can be deleted (among other things) for a full credit > of registration charges. > > In order to maximize the chances for a properly framed > Issues report and ultimately a successful PDP (if > deemed necessary), it has been recommended that the > ALAC seek support from interested GNSO constituencies > including their views of why the domain tasting policy > should be changed, the positive or negative effects of > such a change, and how such a change falls under the > scope of the GNSO PDP > (http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexA) and > Consensus Policies as defined in Registry agreements. > > Our intent is to have a draft request for an Issues > Report ready by April 23, and the request finalized by > April 30. I therefore request your input with due > haste. > > > Alan Greenberg > ALAC Liaison to the GNSO > > http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg03383.html > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Minutes etc for 27th April teleconference
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 4, 2007

May 4, 2007

Dear All: We've created a meeting page for the teleconference on the 27th, provided links to retrieve the recording of the meeting, and posted the Verizon-prepared transcript alongside the minutes prepared by Darlene and forwarded to the list. The URL is: https://st.icann.org/naralo/index.cgi?27_april_2007 I have also created a link from the main NARALO page on ICANNWiki to the Meetings and Events page on the Wiki, and a link from the Wiki to the main NARALO page. If you are wondering why we didn't post all the meeting details directly to ICANNWiki, this is due to nothing other than the fact that I find MediaWiki quite difficult to use (I don't know it at all well), whereas SocialText I've got a good handle on. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

2 1

Minutes, Recordings, and Transcripts of At-Large meetings
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 3, 2007

May 3, 2007

Dear colleagues: As many of you know, there have been difficulties and delays with minutes of At-Large meetings being posted expeditiously or in a consistent way. This email is to update you on a standardised process going forward which should greatly improve records-keeping and resolve all these issues. Henceforward, we will be handling these duties in a different way, so that they will be posted much more quickly: 1) We will be recording meetings at ICANN International meetings onsite. The recordings will then be immediately available, instead of waiting for the conference service to make them available (we have also had technical problems and delays with accessing recordings from the conference service, especially in respect of very long meetings such as are regularly a feature of international meetings). For teleconferences, these recordings will be posted, as has been the case for several months now, as soon as we have access to them. 2) The recordings will be sent directly off for transcription; generally the transcripts will come back in a matter of a few days - at which point they will be posted. 3) Very summarised minutes will be produced which give only: those attending / not attending, decisions taken, voting results, and agenda items tabled for discussion at a later meeting - because they are so summarised, you can expect these meetings to be available within minutes after the meeting concludes. To update you on the secretariat-activities left over from the Lisbon meetings: We are in the process of uploading recordings of the African and European regional meetings, and also the ALAC meetings, from the Lisbon ICANN meeting. These recordings will be transcribed as well, and having sourced an affordable transcription service, we are now in the process of getting the transcriptions done. Both transcripts and audio recordings will be posted as they become available. Please accept our apologies for the delays in these administrative tasks from Lisbon in particular. The volume of meetings - the European meetings alone ran to more than 24 hours of meeting time - has done us the favour of exposing the lack of scalability of our previous procedures, but this has also provided an opportunity to improve the accessibility of meeting results and information. LOCATIONS: All of the material related to meetings of the community will continue to be posted on the wikis. The URLs for all of the wikis are now visible from the bottom of the front page of each Wiki, and also at alac.icann.org - to make them all easier to find. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

IGNORE telcon information for Friday 4th May
by At Large Staff May 2, 2007

May 2, 2007

Dear North America region, Please IGNORE the email that was just sent out to na-als and na-discuss regarding a telcon to be held this Friday, 4th May. This was sent to the North America lists in error. Regards At-Large Staff

1 0

Upcoming telephone conference for Friday 4th May
by At Large Staff May 2, 2007

May 2, 2007

Please find below details for this Friday's telcon: Time - 16:00 UTC Passcode - EURO07REG Regards At-Large Staff *PARTICIPANT INFORMATION* ------------------------------ *PARTICIPANT ACCESS INFORMATION* ------------------------------ Please join MR NICK ASHTON HART on MAY-04-2007 (Friday) at 04:00 PM UNIVERSAL TIME. Access information is below. *AUDIO PARTICIPANT ACCESS* ------------------------------ CALL DATE: MAY-04-2007 (Friday) CALL TIME: 04:00 PM UNIVERSAL TIME DURATION: 1 hr LEADER: MR NICK ASHTON HART *DIAL-IN NUMBERS:* *Country* * * *Toll Numbers* *Freephone/ Toll Free Number* AUSTRALIA 61-2-8211-1386 1-800-880-485 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-89-654 0800-999-636 BELGIUM 32-2-402-2432 0800-4-8360 BRAZIL 0800-8912038 CHINA* 10800-712-1193 10800-120-1193 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156463 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-15 DENMARK 45-7014-0238 8088-6075 FINLAND 358-106-33-164 0-800-1-12056 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-75 080-511-1431 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-75 080-511-1431 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-75-00-04 080-511-1431 GERMANY 49-69-2222-52104 0800-216-1601 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0639 00800-12-5999 HONG KONG 852-2286-5632 800-964-136 HUNGARY 06-800-15227 INDIA 000-800-852-1216 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3500 IRELAND 353-1-246-0036 1800-931-782 ISRAEL 1-80-9303048 ITALY 39-02-3600-0326 800-906-585 JAPAN 81-3-5539-5154 00531-12-1149 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1314 MALAYSIA 1-800-80-8121 MEXICO 001-866-627-0541 NETHERLANDS 31-20-710-9321 0800-023-4655 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4641 0800-443-793 NORWAY 47-21-59-00-14 800-11982 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072119 POLAND 00-800-1210067 PORTUGAL 8008-12179 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-9613011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9197 800-120-4057 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-93390 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1052 00798-14800-6323 SPAIN 34-91-414-15-44 800-099-279 SWEDEN 46-8-566-10-782 0200-887-612 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-7718 0800-000-038 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7346 00801-137-565 THAILAND 001-800-1206-65091 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9015 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3215 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2115 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7019-0812 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1415 0800-018-0795 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3439 USA 1-210-795-0472 877-818-6787 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3205 *Access to your conference call will be either of the numbers listed, dependent on the participants' local telecom provider Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. PASSCODE: EURO07REG For security reasons, the passcode and the leader's name will be required to join your call. ------------------------------ Verizon Business would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now <http://www.mymeetings.com/mymeetings/remove.jsp>. Thank you. Verizon Business and its affiliates respect your privacy and work hard to safeguard the privacy of your personal data. We want you to know that we apply our long-standing commitment to safeguarding privacy to our online and Internet activities. For information on Verizon Business privacy policy, please go to: http://www22.verizon.com/privacy/

2 1

Re: [NA-Discuss] [NA-ALS] ACTION REQUIRED: Vote for our Operating Principles
by Jean Armour Polly May 2, 2007

May 2, 2007

Hi, I would subscribe to the ALS list but since I'm not an ALS, I didn't think I should until some future time when status of individual delegates became more clear. :-) I'm not sure if there are any unaffiliated users currently out on the NA-Discuss list to acclaim either Wendy or myself as a "confirmed" delegate to represent individual users. Is there any way we can tell if there is anyone else on the list who is unaffiliated at this time? If there's an unaffiliated user out there could you please caucus with Wendy and/or me? As I said on the conference call, we haven't really tried to engage individuals at all, so far.... If I get a vote, and it's not clear if I do, I would vote no on the Operating principles and yes on the Code of Conduct. The no on the operating principles is just to explore the bicameral idea a bit more. I just think it deserves a good look. In my opinion we could still vote again on the OP by the end of May and if all goes well still announce in San Juan. Jean Armour Polly Unaffiliated individual from Jamesville NY USA Ex-ALAC NA via Nomcom At 12:56 PM -0400 5/1/07, Luc Faubert recently said: >Wendy, > >If you vote as an unaffiliated user voting delegate, I suppose you >consider yourself and Jean to be the voting delegates for unaffiliated >users. You may want Jean to know that she should vote as well. She isn't >subscribed to NA-ALS, so I am copying Jean. > >I notice the http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Contacts page still has >"Unaffiliated Users (nominees)" above your names. Does the "nominees" >refer to the fact that both of you are still candidates or that you have >been seated as delegates? Maybe I missed something, but I haven't seen >any unaffiliated user posts on NA-Discuss to confirm your seating. > >There is a bit of vagueness concerning the situation. Hope we can clear >things up. > >Also, you say you vote against the Code of Conduct for the same reasons >that you stated before: > >> Re: the Code of Conduct >> >> Note that any email that forwarded another's mail could be >> alleged to infringe a copyright (though in many instances >> there'd be a fair use defense, I don't really think that >> copyright or trademark belongs in the code of conduct). > >We have however modified the Code of Conduct to take your reservations >into account following last Friday's conference call (see my mail posted >on this list on 04.27). > >Regards, > > >_________________________________________ >Luc Faubert >Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / >IT governance and change management consulting >+1 514 236 5129 >www.LucFaubert.com >www.LucFaubert.com/blog >www.isoc.qc.ca >www.ccig.ca >www.uqbm.qc.ca >www.maillons.qc.ca > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy@seltzer.com] >> Sent: 1 mai 2007 12:10 >> To: Luc Faubert >> Cc: All Accredited At Large Structures (ALS) in the North >> AmericanRegion >> Subject: Re: [NA-ALS] ACTION REQUIRED: Vote for our Operating >> Principles >> >> As a nominated individual rep, I vote NO to the OP and Code >> of Conduct, because the pre-formation period is the optimal >> time to add individual participation options. Otherwise, >> individuals will always be fighting the vested interests of >> those already in. >> >> For reasons already expressed, I vote against the Code of Conduct. >> >> --Wendy >> >> John L wrote: >> >> Today we vote to ratify our NARALO Operating Principles >> and Code of Conduct: > > >> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP >> > >> > No, because I want to explore the bicameral structure that can >> > enfranchise the individual users that ALAC is supposed to > > represent. > > > See Jean's recent message noting that Vint and other board members > > > encourage different RALO structures, and the US is a > > particularly weak > > > place to recruit ALS. > > > >> >> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct >> > >> > No, basically for the reasons that Wendy outlined. I >> suggest that we >> > delete the trademark and copyright line both because nobody here is >> > qualified to say what constitutes infringement (fair use and fair >> > dealing rules are different in every country) and it's hard >> to see how >> > an infringement by itself would be disruptive. >> > >> > Also, my experience says that you suspend someone for a >> week and if he >> > doesn't get the hint, then you banish him for years. Rather than >> > writing that into the text, I'd remove the six months and leave the >> > language that says that the chair suspends the person for >> the shortest >> > period consistent with the offender's prior behavior. >> > >> > R's, >> > John >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > NA-ALS mailing list >> > NA-ALS(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-als_atlarge-lists.i >> > cann.org >> > >> > Draft MoU with ICANN: >> > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU >> > >> > Draft Operating Principles: >> > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP >> > >> > Draft Code of Conduct: >> > http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org >> phone: +1.617.418.3456 / +44 (0)1856 287203 // cell: >> 914.374.0613 Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute >> Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School >> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society >> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html >> http://www.chillingeffects.org/ >>

3 3

Selection of our Chair and Secretariat
by Luc Faubert May 1, 2007

May 1, 2007

Hello all, [I am cross-posting because not all voting delegates subscribed to NA-ALS are subscribed to NA-DISCUSS.] In the event that our Operating Principles are adopted (the voting period ends today), we are to select our Chair and Secretariat by this Friday. As per our OP, the Chair will be a person; the Secretariat may be a person or an organization. No other restrictions apply, so they do not have to be from a certified ALS. You are invited to either self-nominate or propose others before this Thursday 23:59 PST. If our OPs are adopted today, we will vote for our Chair and Secretariat on Friday. The persons/organization with the most votes for each seat will win. The responsabilities of our Chair are (lifted from our OP): * The Chair shall act as moderator and facilitator of the work of the NARALO. * The Chair shall be empowered to issue Calls for Statements of Interest for service on the ALAC and to sign and receive any official correspondence to and from ICANN or the At-Large Structures. * The Chair and Secretariat shall be ineligible to serve on the ALAC or ICANN's Nominating Committee in any year in which they serve for NARALO. * In the event that the Chair determines that rough consensus does not exist for the selection of one or more candidates for ALAC seats, the General Assembly will vote. In the event of a tie, the Chair will cast an extra vote. * Rough consensus, as determined by the Chair, will generally be used within the NARALO to manage its current affairs (e.g. producing recommendations to ICANN). * The NARALO Chair is empowered to suspend or restrict a person's posting rights when the content that person has posted is inappropriate and represents a pattern of abuse. The Chair defines and determines what is inappropriate content on a case-by-case basis. Our definitions are not limited to this list. If the Chair suspends posting rights or deletes a comment or link, he will say so and explain why. When determining the duration of the suspension, the Chair is encouraged to take into account the overall nature of the postings by an individual and whether particular postings are an aberration or typical. The responsabilities of our Secretariat are: * The Secretariat will have administrative and informative functions. * It will be responsible for maintaining a working communications system and for ensuring the information flux about the issues under discussion between the NARALO participants. * The person(s) fulfilling the function of Secretariat to the NARALO shall be ineligible to simultaneously serve as the Chair of the General Assembly. * The role of the Secretariat could be exercised by a person or an organization, as long as they fulfill the language requirements. _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com <http://www.lucfaubert.com/> www.LucFaubert.com/blog www.isoc.qc.ca <http://www.isoc.qc.ca/> www.ccig.ca <http://www.ccig.ca/> www.uqbm.qc.ca <http://www.uqbm.qc.ca/> www.maillons.qc.ca <http://www.maillons.qc.ca/>

4 6

Fwd: Nom Com announcement
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 1, 2007

May 1, 2007

Begin forwarded message: > From: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones(a)icann.org> > Date: 30 April 2007 23:29:08 BDT > To: <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> > Subject: Nom Com announcement > > Dear ALAC and ALS representatives, > > > > Please note that the ICANN Nominating Committee has today extended > the deadline of Statements of Interest until 18 May 2007 23:59 UTC. > See http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-30apr07.htm and > below for more information: > > > > ICANN Nominating Committee Extends Deadline for Statements of > Interest to 18 May 2007 > > 30 April 2007 > > In order to provide additional time for candidates to submit > Statements of Interest, the 2007 ICANN Nominating Committee has > extended the deadline for Statements of Interest until 18 May 2007 > 23:59 UTC. Candidates should submit completed Statements of > Interest to nomcom2007(a)icann.org. > > The 2007 Nominating Committee began its work in December 2006 at > the ICANN Annual Meeting in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and is actively > seeking qualified candidates for the following key positions within > ICANN: > > 3 seats on the ICANN Board of Directors > 2 members to Generic Names Supporting Organization Council (GNSO) > 3 members of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) > (from Africa, Latin America and Caribbean and Asia/Australia/ > Pacific regions) > 1 Country Code Names Support Organization Council (ccNSO) member > The 2007 Nominating Committee has received 33 Statements of > Interest, 29 of the candidates are male, while 4 are female. 14 > candidates are from Europe, 6 are from Asia/Australia/Pacific, 5 > are from Latin America/Caribbean, 5 are from North America, and 3 > are from Africa. > > 25 candidates have declared a willingness to serve on the ICANN > Board, 12 have declared a willingness to serve on the GNSO Council, > 7 have declared a willingness to serve on the ccNSO Council, and 7 > have declared a willingness to serve on the ALAC. Please note that > some candidates have asked to be considered for more than one > position. > > Those individuals selected by the Nominating Committee will have a > unique opportunity to work with accomplished colleagues from around > the globe, address intriguing technical coordination problems and > related policy development challenges with diverse functional, > cultural, and geographic dimensions, and gain valuable insights and > experience from working across these boundaries of knowledge, > responsibility and perspective. > > Information about the 2007 Nominating Committee is available at > http://nomcom.icann.org. Information on the formal call for > Statements of Interest is available athttp://nomcom.icann.org/ > formal-call-2007.html. > > > > > > Patrick L. Jones > > Registry Liaison Manager & > > Staff support to the ICANN Nominating Committee > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > > 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 > > Marina del Rey, CA 90292 > > Tel: +1 310 301 3861 > > Fax: +1 310 823 8649 > > patrick.jones(a)icann.org > > > >

1 0

Re: [NA-Discuss] Action Items
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 1, 2007

May 1, 2007

Indeed though the recent Obmudsman investigation has recommended that the current review process is duplicative of the existing board reconsideration process and should therefore be discarded, so restating any part of this in an MoU would be unwise. On 01/05/07, Jean Armour Polly <mom(a)netmom.com> wrote: > > > Re decertification, There's this > http://www.alac.icann.org/framework.htm > > > ... IV. Procedures for Board review of ALAC certification decisions: > ALAC decisions to certify or de-certify an At-Large Structure are subject > to review according to procedures to be established by the Board. The ALAC > proposes that review procedures be established, as proposed below: > 1. A request for review of an ALAC decision to certify or > de-certify an ALS would be required to be filed within 60 days after the > ALAC posts notice of the action on its web site. Requests for review would > be submitted by email to xxxxxx. No particular form is required, but > requesting parties would include at least the following information: > 2. name, address, and contact information for the requesting party > (including postal and email addresses); > 3. the specific action for which review is sought; > 4. the date of the action; > 5. the facts supporting the request for review; > 6. the grounds on which the Board should conduct its review; and > 7. any documents the requesting party wishes to submit in support > of its request. > The ICANN Board will appoint three of its Directors to consider such > requests and conduct the reviews. The Board appointed review group will > notify the ALAC of the request for review. The review group may request > additional information from all parties involved in the review, as well as > other sources. Requests for review and the Board review group's activities > and decisions will be made public on the ICANN website. The review group > may, in its discretion, grant a party's request to keep certain information > confidential. For any matters that the review group determines not to > disclose, the review group's decision will describe in general terms the > nature of the information and the reason for nondisclosure. > The review group will endeavor to complete its work and issue its final > decision within 30 days of the filing of the request; its decision will be > made public on the ICANN web site. > To protect against abuse of the review process, a request for review may be > dismissed by the review group where it is frivolous, non-substantive, or > otherwise abusive.... -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0