- RDS-WHOIS2-RT - lists.icann.org

Plenary Call #20 | 19 February | 14:30 UTC
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 19, 2018

Feb. 19, 2018

Dear Review Team Members, In preparation for your call #20<https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/Meeting+%2320+-+19+February+2018>, scheduled for Monday, 19 February 2018 – 14:30-16:00 UTC, please find below the meeting agenda: 1. Welcome, roll-call, SoI updates 2. Subgroups Status Update •WHOIS1 Rec #1 - Strategic Priority: Cathrin •WHOIS1 Rec #4: Compliance: Susan •WHOIS Rec #10: Privacy/Proxy Services: Volker •WHOIS Rec #11: Common Interface: Volker •Anything New: Stephanie •Law Enforcement Needs: Thomas •Consumer Trust: Erika 3. Subgroups Membership Review 4. Safeguarding Registrant Data 5. Outreach Plan: Blog Post 6. Face-to-Face Meeting 7. Confirm Decisions Reached and Action Items 8. A.O.B. You should all have received dial-in details to join this call. If not, please contact us (off list) at rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-staff@icann.org>. If you cannot attend the plenary call, please kindly let us know now in reply to this email. If you are a rapporteur and cannot attend the plenary call, please assign a deputy to provide a status on your subgroup status. As always, let us know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

4 3

Brian Krebs on WHOIS, GDPR and security
by Dmitry Belyavsky Feb. 16, 2018

Feb. 16, 2018

Worth reading: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/02/new-eu-privacy-law-may-weaken-security/

1 0

Questions for each subgroup
by Alan Greenberg Feb. 9, 2018

Feb. 9, 2018

Several questions were asked of each SubGroup Rapporteur, due before the 09 Feb Plenary (this Friday). Here are the answers for my SubGroups. Alan ================ WHOIS Rec #3: Outreach >Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? No. >How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for >example, will you divide review between subgroup members) Each member will review all of the documents (largely web-based) and will independently review for consistency and completeness. The Subgroup will then meet to integrate findings. >How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for >example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) We will need one or more calls once independent work is done. >How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? Not needed at this point. >How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? As above, will meet (teleconference) to attempt to unify findings. Based on those, we will decide whether any additional recommendations are required. Results of analysis and possible further recommendations will be compiled by one subgroup member and reviewed by the others prior to the April meeting in Brussels. ================ Safeguard Registrant Data >Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? No. >How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for >example, will you divide review between subgroup members) Rapporteur will draft a strawman response to be reviewed and modified by team members. >How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for >example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) This is a relatively easy task prior to GDPR. Post-initiial GDPR, we can predict that the answers will be different, but it is less clear if the response will be measurably more complex. Both e-mail and teleconferences will be used. >How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? Not needed at this point. >How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? Noted above.

5 4

Call #19 - Action Items/Decisions reached
by Alice Jansen Feb. 9, 2018

Feb. 9, 2018

Hi RDS-WHOIS2 Review Team Members, Thank you for attending plenary call #19. Your meeting archives can be found at: https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/Meeting+%2319+-+9+February+2018 Attached to this email, you will find a recap of the meeting. Please note the following action items and decision reached: Subgroups – Progress Updates Action item: Rapporteurs who are delayed in answering questions (due 9 February) for their subgroup must send their input to this mailing-list as soon as possible. * WHOIS1 Rec #1 - Strategic Priority: Cathrin * WHOIS1 Rec #4: Compliance: Susan (next steps plan submitted) * WHOIS Rec #10: Privacy/Proxy Services: Volker * WHOIS Rec #11: Common Interface: Volker * Anything New: Stephanie * Law Enforcement Needs: Thomas * Consumer Trust: Erika As a reminder, questions are: * Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? * How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members) * How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives? (for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) * How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? * How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? Action item: Outreach subgroup to discuss who the targets for outreach are and how well was each target's needs met. As a reminder, subgroups must now begin the work plan execution phase i.e. conduct analysis with the objective of producing findings by 22 February. Findings will lead to a set of draft recommendations and a subgroup report (see template here[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_do…>) that will discussed at the Brussels face-to-face meeting (16-17-18 April). As always, please feel free to reach out to us at rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-staff@icann.org> if you need help scheduling a call for your subgroup. Subgroups – Membership Review Action item: ICANN org to ask Erika Mann and Thomas Walden whether would be interested in volunteering for data-accuracy subgroup. @Erika, Thomas - Lili has asked for additional help on the WHOIS1 Recs #5-9 Data accuracy subgroup<https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/WHOIS1+Rec+%235-9%3A+Data+Accuracy>. Would it be possible for you to help on this subgroup? WHOIS1 Implementation Assessment Decision reached: The review team has established the effectiveness tool<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79433132/FinalRDS-WHOISRT2…> as the point of reference for subgroups to conduct the implementation assessment of their respective WHOIS1 recommendation(s). As such, subgroups working on WHOIS1 recs implementation assessment, please use the tool. Have a nice weekend, Best regards Alice

1 0

RDS WHOIS RT Plenary call
by Walden, Thomas L. Feb. 9, 2018

Feb. 9, 2018

I will be delayed calling into today’s call. Due to the Shutting Down and Re-opening of the govt, I have several meetings and calls I need to attend. We have to notify and re-establish several employees. Sorry about the late notice. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

Plenary Call #19 - 9 February 2018 13:30 UTC
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 9, 2018

Feb. 9, 2018

Dear Review Team Members, In preparation for your call #19<https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/Meeting+%2319+-+9+February+2018>, scheduled for tomorrow, 9 February 2018 – 13:30-15:00 UTC, please find below the meeting agenda: 1. Welcome, Roll-Call, SoI Updates 2. Subgroups Status Update 3. Rec. 11: Common Interface 4. Subgroups Membership Review 5. Work plan Review 6. Draft Framework for WHOIS1 Implementation Assessment 7. Fact Sheet (as of 31 December 2017) 8. Confirm Decisions Reached and Action Items 9. A.O.B. You should all have received dial-in details to join this call. If not, please contact us (off list) at rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-staff@icann.org>. As always, let us know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

2 1

Answers to Questions
by Carlton Samuels Feb. 9, 2018

Feb. 9, 2018

Here are the answers for my Sub-Group. Carlton =========================================== WHOIS Rec # 2 : Single WHOIS Policy Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? *NO. * How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members) *Each member will review the recommendation, the implementation record and statements from senior ICANN officers and make a determination as to whether the recommendation was fully implemented and if not, where are the gaps. * How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives?(for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) *Work will be conducted via email but we will be open to a request from any team member to use alternate means, including a call. * How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? *We are not anticipating any at the minute.* How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? *Rapporteur will collate the findings of each member in a single document and present it for advice and consent to the other members of the team before the f2f at Brussels.*

1 0

Plenary call #17: review needed on Terms of Reference; Subgroups Update.
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 7, 2018

Feb. 7, 2018

Dear Review Team members, On today’s plenary call, review team members in attendance discussed and agreed to the addition brought to the Terms of Reference as suggested below by Alan: “In recognition that the WHOIS landscape will be changing, perhaps radically, over the coming months as ICANN addresses how it will respond to the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the RT may choose to defer some or all of its work in relation to the scope items on Law Enforcement Needs, Consumer Trust and Safeguarding Registrant Data until it is more clear what path ICANN will be following. Should any work be deferred, individual timelines may slip. However, it is the intent of the RT that the overall schedule calling for the final report to be delivered by the end of December 2018 not change appreciably.” See attached for more information. Review team members in attendance also ratified the leadership decision to notify the ccNSO Council that no specific skills, and thus no ccNSO members, are needed on the Review Team. Action item: Cathrin, Chris, Erika, Lili, Thomas, Volker to review and send edits/comments on the above. In absence of objections/concerns raised by 7 Feb EOD, the proposals will be considered as accepted. Subgroups update Action item: Rapporteurs must be prepared to present on plenary call #18 (5 February 2018) how their subgroup is going to tackle their work. If unable to participate, the rapporteur must assign subgroup member. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

3 2

Action items to be completed before plenary call #19 - 9 February 2018
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 6, 2018

Feb. 6, 2018

Dear Review Team members, Thank you for attending plenary call #18<https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/Meeting+%2318+-+5+February+2018>. Please read the below and complete the identified action items prior to the next plenary call (Friday 9 February at 13:30 UTC). Per the Review Team work plan<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64084086/RDS-WHOIS2%20Work…>, subgroups should have a final work plan and statement by now. Subgroups must now begin the work plan execution phase i.e. conduct analysis with the objective of producing findings by 22 February. Findings will lead to a set of draft recommendations and a subgroup report (see template here<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/71604702/Proposed%20Subgro…>) that will discussed at the Brussels face-to-face meeting (16-17-18 April). Subgroups Work Plan As indicated on yesterday’s call, subgroups must move quickly into next steps to ensure Brussels is a fruitful meeting. With the objective of confirming subgroups’ respective work plans, rapporteurs have an action item to provide answers (via RT mailing-list) to the following questions, prior to the 9 February plenary call: * Has your subgroup identified any needed briefings/resources? * How will your subgroup review/analyze relevant documentation? (for example, will you divide review between subgroup members) * How will you conduct investigation of identified objectives? (for example, will you need calls or conduct work via email) * How will you conduct relevant interviews (as appropriate)? * How will your subgroup produce its summary of key findings? With respect to question 1, please direct any briefing requests you may have to your support team. As a reminder, in the event your subgroup needs a discussion with Subject Matter Experts, questions must be sent in advance of the call (e.g. similar to what the Compliance subgroup in preparation for their 1 February meeting with ICANN organization’s compliance management). Additionally, if you believe your subgroup may need external resources to conduct a study, this must be flagged as soon as possible. Membership review Rapporteurs are asked to identify by 9 February whether additional subgroup members are needed on their team. There is call for additional volunteers on WHOIS1 implementation – Rec 5-9 – data accuracy. ToR & ccNSO As a reminder 7 February – end of day – is your deadline to raise any concerns/objectives on edits to Terms of Reference and ccNSO related decision. See here for more details -http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/2018-February/000322.html Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

1 0

Agenda - Call # 18 - 5 February @ 14:30 UTC
by Jean-Baptiste Deroulez Feb. 6, 2018

Feb. 6, 2018

Dear Review Team Members, In preparation for your call #18<https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/Meeting+%2318+-+5+February+2018>, scheduled for today, 5 February 2018 – 14:30-16:00 UTC, please find below the meeting agenda: 1. Welcome, roll-call, SoI updates 2. Subgroups Status Update, Roadmap to Face-to-Face Meeting, Membership Review 3. Law Enforcement Subgroup 4. ICANN62 5. Plenary Call #19 Agenda 6. Confirm Decisions Reached And Action Items 7. A.O.B. You should all have received dial-in details to join this call. If not, please contact us (off list) at rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-staff@icann.org>. As always, let us know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Jean-Baptiste

2 1