January 2014 - Gac-gnso-cg - lists.icann.org

Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] TO DO: GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document
by Winterfeldt, Brian J. Jan. 15, 2014

Jan. 15, 2014

Dear all: I think the updated version of the document looks great, and would only add one inquiry to the Working Group phase of the PDP, namely whether it is possible to create a neutral party, possibly within ICANN staff, charged with flagging any PDPs with clear public policy implications for the GAC. The aim is to lighten their load in making sure that PDPs with obvious policy implications, such as the recently initiated Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation PDP, do not slip through any cracks. It would be great to hear views on this suggestion. Thank you, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 brian.winterfeldt(a)kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/> From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:53 AM To: GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org<mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org> Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document All, For our records, an updated version of document which tracks current and purposed mechanisms for GAC engagement in the GNSO PDP. Jonathan =========================================================== CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================

6 8

Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Reverse liaison
by Manal Ismail Jan. 14, 2014

Jan. 14, 2014

Many thanks Marika and Olof for a very useful and timely document .. Hope it encourages members to volunteer to lead the work of this track .. I have discussed with Jonathan and we both feel it would be a good idea to pursue a budget request, specially that it will not oblige us to go down that route but merely provide us with the means to do so if we choose .. Please let us know what you think .. Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 3:49 PM To: GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Reverse liaison Dear All, Following Suzanne's suggestion that staff could possibly put some ideas together in relation to the concept of a reverse liaison, Olof and I had a little brainstorm and came up with the attached which as a first step tries to identify what the respective objectives and expectations are. Fleshing out that part of the conversation further may assist in determining whether or not a 'reverse liaison' would be the best mechanism to achieve the expectations. We also tried to identify a number of questions that would need to be addressed should it be determined that a liaison is the way to go, as well as some possible alternatives that could be considered should it be decided that a liaison is not the most effective mechanism to achieve these objectives. As the issue of funding of a possible liaison has come up on various occasions, Olof and I have also discussed whether it would be an idea to submit a special budget request on behalf of the GNSO and GAC that would foresee for funding for a liaison to attend the ICANN meetings in FY15. This could be presented as a pilot project which would allow the GNSO-GAC to experiment with this position and consider at the end of FY15 whether this should be continued as a pilot, transformed into a fixed funded slot or discarded. Obviously, we are still in the early phases of determining whether a liaison is the way to go and the nature of that role, but unfortunately, the deadline for special budget requests is 7 March. If you all think this would be a helpful approach, Olof and I could go ahead and complete the required forms for your review, noting that at any point the GNSO-GAC could decide to withdraw the request should a different approach be pursued. As noted by Mikey, the group is still looking for topic leads to address this issue, so hopefully this may encourage some of you to come forward. We look forward to receiving your feedback. Olof & Marika

5 8

Reverse liaison
by Marika Konings Jan. 10, 2014

Jan. 10, 2014

Dear All, Following Suzanne's suggestion that staff could possibly put some ideas together in relation to the concept of a reverse liaison, Olof and I had a little brainstorm and came up with the attached which as a first step tries to identify what the respective objectives and expectations are. Fleshing out that part of the conversation further may assist in determining whether or not a 'reverse liaison' would be the best mechanism to achieve the expectations. We also tried to identify a number of questions that would need to be addressed should it be determined that a liaison is the way to go, as well as some possible alternatives that could be considered should it be decided that a liaison is not the most effective mechanism to achieve these objectives. As the issue of funding of a possible liaison has come up on various occasions, Olof and I have also discussed whether it would be an idea to submit a special budget request on behalf of the GNSO and GAC that would foresee for funding for a liaison to attend the ICANN meetings in FY15. This could be presented as a pilot project which would allow the GNSO-GAC to experiment with this position and consider at the end of FY15 whether this should be continued as a pilot, transformed into a fixed funded slot or discarded. Obviously, we are still in the early phases of determining whether a liaison is the way to go and the nature of that role, but unfortunately, the deadline for special budget requests is 7 March. If you all think this would be a helpful approach, Olof and I could go ahead and complete the required forms for your review, noting that at any point the GNSO-GAC could decide to withdraw the request should a different approach be pursued. As noted by Mikey, the group is still looking for topic leads to address this issue, so hopefully this may encourage some of you to come forward. We look forward to receiving your feedback. Olof & Marika

1 0

Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference
by Manal Ismail Jan. 10, 2014

Jan. 10, 2014

Many thanks Mikey and Suzanne for volunteering .. Thanks Suzanne for your flexibility .. I support the idea of co-chairing as far as the leads agree and we have enough volunteers J .. Looking forward to hearing other colleagues views .. Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Suzanne Radell Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:06 PM To: Jonathan Robinson; 'Mike O'Connor' Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference Hi all, if need be, I will be happy to shift to the "day to day" issue, to permit us to have at least one lead for each topic. I am still interested in hearing others' views regarding the concept of shared leads for each topic. Best regards, Suz From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:42 PM To: 'Mike O'Connor'; Suzanne Radell Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference We have two topics and two volunteers so far. One from GAC and one from GNSO - possibly for the same topic? We did not put a deadline / time for when the leads need to be in place but agreed the need for speed. Therefore, I suggest we work to a deadline of tomorrow (midnight UTC) and then move ahead with the work of the two groups next week. Thanks, Jonathan From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor Sent: 08 January 2014 15:50 To: Suzanne Radell Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference hi Suzanne, dang. i just had a brain-dead day yesterday. i put the "early engagement in the PDP" phrase up in the subject line of my note - i should have repeated it down in the body. anyway, that's the one i was volunteering to help with as well - i'm pretty familiar with the PDP. i'm completely unfamiliar with the issues associated with the "day to day cooperation" part. all that said, i'd be completely fine with you as the rapporteur on the Early Engagement piece. i'll be a really active participant. but if you wanted, you could switch to Day to Day Cooperation. thanks, mikey On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Suzanne Radell <SRadell(a)ntia.doc.gov> wrote: Hi all, and many thanks for the exchanges yesterday during our call. I'd be happy to volunteer to either lead or co-lead (what do you all think of a GAC-GNSO shared lead?) the second piece of the project, GAC early engagement in GNSO PDPs. If I've understood Mikey's email properly, he has volunteered to lead the day to day cooperation element, yes? If not, my apologies. Best regards, Suz Suzanne Murray Radell Senior Policy Advisor, NTIA/OIA 202-482-3167 From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:53 AM To: Mike O'Connor; GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference Many thanks Mikey for volunteering to take notes of yesterday's call and for sending them so quickly !! We, Jonathan and I, would like to particularly highlight the following urgent actions, for those who were not on the call yesterday: - The deadline for submitting comments on the charter was agreed to be next Friday, Jan. 10th - Call for volunteers to lead 2 tracks of work, GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation & GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP .. Both agreed to work in parallel with 2 different leads and the participation of the entire group Looking forward to receiving comments and welcoming volunteers .. Kind regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:20 PM To: GAC-GNSO-CG(a)icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial,unedited notes from today's teleconference GAC GNSO 7-Jan * 1. Summarise status quo * + - 2. Scope of Work - Charter o Remove "yet to be addressed" line + - "Initial proposal" -- are there any beyond the Reverse Liason? * Table -- circulated to the list * + - Reverse liaison -- on the table -- * There may be opportunities for additional mechanisms * Looking for ideas to complement Reverse Liaison * Ask staff for proposals and ideas + - Highlight the problem of "different working methods" * Hard to maintain the current "episodic" norm * Matching GAC working methods with the current process * + - Amplify in "what it problem to be solved" -- perhaps add to a different section as well * Appears in Chronology section * Appears in Objectives -- perhaps clarify/amplify here * Taking the Joint Report as a given -- presuming that there's agreement Title - GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in Policy Development Processes Should "Who will be affected...." change to "Who is impacted by this issue and proposals resulting from this consultation group"? Clarify timeline Clarify whether this is a one-time effort, or an ongoing iterative project + - Stakeholders: * Iron out the differences between staff structure -- include Secretariats * Anyone interested in gtld policy -- explicitly mention GAC and GNSO + - Out Scope * Timely exchange of information * Delete the phrase from "out of scope"? * + - 3. Way forward - work plan from here * Approach in the charter is OK - two tracks w/leaders, work as a single group * + - 4. Practical issues including meeting times * Time of day works * Meeting *dates* are more difficult -- maybe the focus of the Doodle poll? * 5. AOB * + - Actions * All - review and propose edits -- by Friday this week * Charter group - finalize draft for next meeting * All - consider volunteering to lead one of the 2 tracks of work * All - react to the questions in the table that Jonathan circulated to the list * Chairs? -- get on the agendas of our respective org's - progress/update PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com <http://www.haven2.com/> , HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

2 1

GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document
by Jonathan Robinson Jan. 9, 2014

Jan. 9, 2014

All, For our records, an updated version of document which tracks current and purposed mechanisms for GAC engagement in the GNSO PDP. Jonathan

4 6

additional questions for the table that Jonathan circulated
by Mike O'Connor Jan. 8, 2014

Jan. 8, 2014

hi all, i went through the table that Jonathan circulated earlier this week and added some questions, and a “yes!” comment on the Appendix. here’s my draft mikey PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

2 2

volunteering for rapporteur for the "early engagement in the PDP" part of our work
by Mike O'Connor Jan. 8, 2014

Jan. 8, 2014

hi all, i would like to be considered for the rapporteur role for the “early engagement in the PDP” track of our work. thanks, mikey PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

2 1

Transcript & MP3 recording GAC / GNSO Consultation Group teleconference Tuesday 07 January 2014 1400 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry Jan. 7, 2014

Jan. 7, 2014

Dear All , For your information, the transcript of the call today has been posted on page http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan And can be directly viewed at http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-gac-07jan14-en.pdf Thank you. Kind regards, Glen De : gac-gnso-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Glen de Saint Géry Envoyé : mardi 7 janvier 2014 19:57 À : gac-gnso-cg(a)icann.org Objet : [Gac-gnso-cg] MP3 recording GAC / GNSO Consultation Group teleconference Tuesday 07 January 2014 1400 UTC Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the GAC / GNSO Consultation Group teleconference held on Tuesday 07 January 2014 at 1400 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-gac-20140107-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan Please also note that the next call is scheduled for Tuesday 21 January at 14:00 UTC. The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Government Advisory Committee Manal Ismail - co-chair - Egypt Ana Neves - Portugal Suzanne Radel - USA Mark Carvell - UK GNSO Council Jonathan Robinson - co-chair - Registries Stakeholder Group David Cake -Non Commercial Stakeholder Group Volker Greimann - -Registrars Stakeholder Group Brian Winterfeldt -Intellectual Property Constituency Mikey O'Connor -Internet Service Providers & Connectivity Providers Constituency Amr Elsadr - Non Commercial Stakeholder Group Apology: Gema Campillos - Spain Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez, Costa Rica ICANN Staff: Marika Konings Olof Nordling Nathalie Peregrine Glen de Saint Géry ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Public archives of the mailing list can be found at: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/ Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Adobe Chat transcript: Marika Konings:Welcome to the GAC-GNSO Engagement Consultation Group meeting of 7 January 2014 Nathalie Peregrine:Hello Manal! Manal Ismail:hello Manal Ismail:i can hear you very well Manal Ismail:can you hear me ? Glen de Saint Gery 2:we cannot hear you Jonathan Robinson:Hi. I can hear audio but cannot yet speak. May dial in. Mike O'Connor:anybody taking notes or would you like me to do that? Jonathan Robinson:Good point Mikey. It will be recorded but capturing agreements could be helpful Mike O'Connor:i'm on it Amr Elsadr:Hi all. Dialling in. Amr Elsadr:On the call now. Amr Elsadr:Yup. Mike O'Connor:that's a typo -- my mistake Suzanne Radell:Thanks, Mikey; agree with your characterization. Volker Greimann:apologies, the previous meeting ran a bit too long Suzanne Radell:Jonathan, I agree completely. Amr Elsadr:@Mark: Do you feel your concerns were addressed appropriately? If not, we should make changes to make sure they are. Amr Elsadr:@Manal: +1 Suzanne Radell:Likewise; suggest deletion of that bullet under "Out of scope" Amr Elsadr:I also agree with Suzanne. Mike O'Connor:Mark -- could you type that title suggestion into the chat? i got most of it but wasn't quite keeping up with you Brian Winterfeldt:I think that makes sense Jonathan. Brian Winterfeldt:@Suzanne. Happy to review and give feedback by end of the week. Mark Carvell:Agree with Jonathan's proposal. My title suggestion is GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in Policy Development Processes. Also should "Who will be affected...." to "Who is impacted by this issue and proposals resulting from this consultation group"?. Suzanne Radell:Concur with Jonathan and Manal; two leads with discussions within/among the entire group Mike O'Connor:i agree -- it's so cold here that my brain is not yet functioning Mike O'Connor:thanks Mark! Mike O'Connor:here's what i have for Actions so far, Jonathan Mike O'Connor:Actions All - review and propose edits -- by Friday this week All - consider volunteering to lead one of the 2 tracks of work All - react to the questions in the table that Jonathan circulated to the list Chairs? -- get on the agendas of our respective org's - progress/update Brian Winterfeldt:Thank you drafting team for your work on the draft charter! Suzanne Radell:Thanks to Jonathan and Mikey for your summaries Volker Greimann:thank you all Manal Ismail:Thank you all Ana Neves:Thanks and keep in touch Brian Winterfeldt:Thank you Jonathan and Mikey! Amr Elsadr:Thanks and good bye. Mark Carvell:On definition of problem and the challenge of ensuring the GAC keeps in step with policy developement process and does not end up delaying it, I will take another look. If currently implicit in the text, I think this needs underlining: an objective is to reassure stakeholders that early GAC engagement is not going to be disruptive in any way! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Meeting Invitation: GAC GNSO Consultation Meeting, Tuesday 21st January 2014 at 14:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine Jan. 7, 2014

Jan. 7, 2014

Dear All, Reminder: The meeting of the GAC GNSO Consultation Group is scheduled on Tuesday 21st January 2014 at 14:00 UTC. 06:00 PST, 09:00 EST, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET For other times: http://tinyurl.com/lorghjo Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnsocouncil-gac/ The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. _______________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: GAC GNSO For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. _______________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 06-800-12755 INDIA 000-800-852-1268 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

MP3 recording GAC / GNSO Consultation Group teleconference Tuesday 07 January 2014 1400 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry Jan. 7, 2014

Jan. 7, 2014

Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the GAC / GNSO Consultation Group teleconference held on Tuesday 07 January 2014 at 1400 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-gac-20140107-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan Please also note that the next call is scheduled for Tuesday 21 January at 14:00 UTC. The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Government Advisory Committee Manal Ismail - co-chair - Egypt Ana Neves - Portugal Suzanne Radel - USA Mark Carvell - UK GNSO Council Jonathan Robinson - co-chair - Registries Stakeholder Group David Cake -Non Commercial Stakeholder Group Volker Greimann - -Registrars Stakeholder Group Brian Winterfeldt -Intellectual Property Constituency Mikey O'Connor -Internet Service Providers & Connectivity Providers Constituency Amr Elsadr - Non Commercial Stakeholder Group Apology: Gema Campillos - Spain Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez, Costa Rica ICANN Staff: Marika Konings Olof Nordling Nathalie Peregrine Glen de Saint Géry ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Public archives of the mailing list can be found at: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/ Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Adobe Chat transcript: Marika Konings:Welcome to the GAC-GNSO Engagement Consultation Group meeting of 7 January 2014 Nathalie Peregrine:Hello Manal! Manal Ismail:hello Manal Ismail:i can hear you very well Manal Ismail:can you hear me ? Glen de Saint Gery 2:we cannot hear you Jonathan Robinson:Hi. I can hear audio but cannot yet speak. May dial in. Mike O'Connor:anybody taking notes or would you like me to do that? Jonathan Robinson:Good point Mikey. It will be recorded but capturing agreements could be helpful Mike O'Connor:i'm on it Amr Elsadr:Hi all. Dialling in. Amr Elsadr:On the call now. Amr Elsadr:Yup. Mike O'Connor:that's a typo -- my mistake Suzanne Radell:Thanks, Mikey; agree with your characterization. Volker Greimann:apologies, the previous meeting ran a bit too long Suzanne Radell:Jonathan, I agree completely. Amr Elsadr:@Mark: Do you feel your concerns were addressed appropriately? If not, we should make changes to make sure they are. Amr Elsadr:@Manal: +1 Suzanne Radell:Likewise; suggest deletion of that bullet under "Out of scope" Amr Elsadr:I also agree with Suzanne. Mike O'Connor:Mark -- could you type that title suggestion into the chat? i got most of it but wasn't quite keeping up with you Brian Winterfeldt:I think that makes sense Jonathan. Brian Winterfeldt:@Suzanne. Happy to review and give feedback by end of the week. Mark Carvell:Agree with Jonathan's proposal. My title suggestion is GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in Policy Development Processes. Also should "Who will be affected...." to "Who is impacted by this issue and proposals resulting from this consultation group"?. Suzanne Radell:Concur with Jonathan and Manal; two leads with discussions within/among the entire group Mike O'Connor:i agree -- it's so cold here that my brain is not yet functioning Mike O'Connor:thanks Mark! Mike O'Connor:here's what i have for Actions so far, Jonathan Mike O'Connor:Actions All - review and propose edits -- by Friday this week All - consider volunteering to lead one of the 2 tracks of work All - react to the questions in the table that Jonathan circulated to the list Chairs? -- get on the agendas of our respective org's - progress/update Brian Winterfeldt:Thank you drafting team for your work on the draft charter! Suzanne Radell:Thanks to Jonathan and Mikey for your summaries Volker Greimann:thank you all Manal Ismail:Thank you all Ana Neves:Thanks and keep in touch Brian Winterfeldt:Thank you Jonathan and Mikey! Amr Elsadr:Thanks and good bye. Mark Carvell:On definition of problem and the challenge of ensuring the GAC keeps in step with policy developement process and does not end up delaying it, I will take another look. If currently implicit in the text, I think this needs underlining: an objective is to reassure stakeholders that early GAC engagement is not going to be disruptive in any way! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0