November 2014 - Gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg

REMINDER: PLEASE RSVP Monthly GNSO WG Newcomer Open House Session
by Nathalie Peregrine Dec. 9, 2014

Dec. 9, 2014

Reminder: Monthly GNSO WG Newcomer Open House Session These ongoing monthly sessions are for new GNSO WG participants to come together and discuss any questions they may have about GNSO Working Groups, procedures and/or processes. We know there is a lot of information to digest when you join a GNSO Working Group and these monthly meetings are an opportunity for newcomers and more experienced participants to meet in an informal setting without the pressure of "real work" that needs be done. The agenda is flexible. The presenters will be ready with a standard set of materials if people would like to discuss them. Feel free to submit questions, either in advance or at the beginning of the meeting, if there is a topic that you would like to explore in more depth . Providing useful answers to a wide range of questions is part of the reason why these meetings are Thursday 4 September at 20.00 UTC Thursday 2 October at 12.00 UTC Thursday 6 November at 20.00 UTC Thursday 4 December at 12.00 UTC To convert to your local time zone, please see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html If you are interested to join the next meeting on 4 September or any of the future meetings, please let the GNSO Secretariat know ( <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> gnso-secs(a)icann.org) and we will send you the call details. If there are any specific questions you already have, or any overviews or introductions you think would be helpful (e.g. GNSO Policy Development Process or GNSO Working Group guidelines), please let us know in advance and we will prepare materials accordingly. Feel free to share this invitation with others that you think may be interested. We look forward to welcoming you at the next meeting! Nathalie Peregrine GNSO Secretariat

2 5

Virtual continuation of Thursday 20's T&T meeting
by Dillon, Chris Dec. 3, 2014

Dec. 3, 2014

Dear colleagues, As I mentioned in my last meeting I would like to continue Thursday's call virtually, encouraging you to comment on version 5 of the Draft initial report (attached). Here are the comments I would have made if we had had more time: p.12 Mike asks us [MZ14 and MZ31] whether "increase in users that are not familiar with the Latin script" should be replaced with "increase in users whose languages are not based on the Latin script". Both aspects are true, but the latter wording hints at the former and so is a good replacement. As a statement the latter version would also be less Anglocentric. In MZ15, Mike suggests that some statements about law enforcement are actually broader. That seems true and I can at least add "for example". However, does anyone have concrete examples of organizations apart from law enforcement for which transformation to a Latin script would be useful? p.13 In ER16 and ER17 Erika highlights an apparent contradiction. The bullet point at the top of p.12 says that transformation would need to take place at a later stage (than entry by registered name holders) and that this would be detrimental to accuracy and consistency. The bullet point above the ccTLD graphic argues that only the data fields should be transformed by the registrar or registry. I will make clear the distinction between transformation (of data - how we have been using the term "transformation" on its own) and transformation of field names. Moreover, accuracy (at least senses 1 and 2 in the footnote) and consistency are likely to be worse the greater number of players involved i.e. if registrants were to do the transformation. CD18 Is anyone aware of reasons why the ccTLD approach exemplified wouldn't work with gTLDs? I reckon MZ21 is addressed by "not justified by benefits to others", the last line of p.12. MZ22 suggests the text "if no consensus is reached the status quo will be maintained". The key thing here is whether we're talking about the current Whois status quo where the system cannot accept non-Latin script data (answer "no" as this does not encourage the development of the Internet in wide areas of the world not using the Latin script), or a new DNRD with no Latin script (answer "no" as such a system would be very expensive, as it would need to be replaced soon) or a new DNRD with non-Latin script functionality (answer: possibly "yes" as the status quo would not involve transformation, except possibly of field names). ER23 picks up how we would handle a situation where we move from no clear consensus to a greater level of consensus. The short answer is to use the GNSO procedure. ER27 Automated transformation cannot occur if data are not marked as being in a language. ER29 "it" refers to "contact information data" and so should be "them". India-based companies are an interesting case, as in many cases there will be three or more possible languages - Hindi, English and a local language. If the language is not stipulated, there will be consistency issues in the event of transformation. Lars suggests the language the registrar operates in, but again there could be several and bad actors could deliberately apply in different languages to different registrars. As usual I welcome your views on any of these issues, or issues not in this list. I shall circulated a new version of the draft initial report shortly before our meeting on Thurs. 4 December. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

2 2

Straw poll on number of options
by Dillon, Chris Dec. 1, 2014

Dec. 1, 2014

Dear colleagues, During Thursday's call, we had a straw poll: Are you in favor of having only one option in the initial report? As you know, in the versions of the draft initial report until now there have been two options (recommendations for and against mandatory transformation), but if it is possible to have only one, the report will likely have a stronger effect. Whatever the result of the report, the arguments for and against will remain in it; this poll only concerns the options. Please send your vote to the list if you did not vote on Thursday. The options are: Yes, No and Abstain. Please vote by 14:00 UTC on Thursday 27 November. (Note that there is no meeting on that day; the next one is 4 December.) In summary - This is not a consensus call on the options. - This is to decide whether the initial report should have one set of recommendations or two sets of recommendations. - If a majority believes it should be only one set, the WG, at a later stage (probably during our next meeting, on 4 December) will decide which set it will be. - Please bear in mind that this is the initial report and following public comments on it we will be able to modify/amend/change/reverse our draft recommendations. Incidentally, I shall email soon asking for your comments on version 5 of the report and including the rest of mine. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

8 16

Policy staff Retreat 1 - 5 December 2014
by Nathalie Peregrine Nov. 28, 2014

Nov. 28, 2014

Dear all, Policy staff will be on a their annual training retreat from the 1st to the 5th December 2014. Whilst minimum coverage of conference calls will be provided, please expect delays regarding email response time. If you do have an urgent request, please mark URGENT in the email title, so we can treat it as a matter of priority. We thank you for your understanding. Kind regards Nathalie GNSO Secretariat

1 0

RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options
by Dillon, Chris Nov. 25, 2014

Nov. 25, 2014

Dear Justine, Yes; just to confirm - we did take note of last Thursday’s vote (also in the transcript) and you don’t need to vote again. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon> From: Justine Chew [mailto:justine.chew@gmail.com] Sent: 25 November 2014 11:22 To: Dillon, Chris Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options Dear Chris, I trust you took note of the votes cast by WG members who were on last Thursday's call (just to confirm that I do not need to vote again)? Many thanks, Justine Chew ----- On 25 November 2014 at 17:31, Dillon, Chris <c.dillon(a)ucl.ac.uk<mailto:c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote: Dear colleagues, During Thursday's call, we had a straw poll: Are you in favor of having only one option in the initial report? As you know, in the versions of the draft initial report until now there have been two options (recommendations for and against mandatory transformation), but if it is possible to have only one, the report will likely have a stronger effect. Whatever the result of the report, the arguments for and against will remain in it; this poll only concerns the options. Please send your vote to the list if you did not vote on Thursday. The options are: Yes, No and Abstain. Please vote by 14:00 UTC on Thursday 27 November. (Note that there is no meeting on that day; the next one is 4 December.) In summary - This is not a consensus call on the options. - This is to decide whether the initial report should have one set of recommendations or two sets of recommendations. - If a majority believes it should be only one set, the WG, at a later stage (probably during our next meeting, on 4 December) will decide which set it will be. - Please bear in mind that this is the initial report and following public comments on it we will be able to modify/amend/change/reverse our draft recommendations. Incidentally, I shall email soon asking for your comments on version 5 of the report and including the rest of mine. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599<tel:%2B44%2020%207679%201599> (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

1 0

MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting - 20 November 2014
by Terri Agnew Nov. 20, 2014

Nov. 20, 2014

Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Thursday 20 November at 14:00 UTC at: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-20141120-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-20141120-en.mp3 On page: <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Jennifer Chung – RySG Chris Dillon – NCSG Rudi Vansnick – NPOC Ubolthip Sethakaset – Individual Peter Green (Zhang Zuan)-NCUC Jim Galvin - RySG Justine Chew – Individual Apologies: Petter Rindforth – IPC Amr Elsadr – NCUC Emily Taylor – RrSG Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP ICANN staff: Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffmann Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: <http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx> http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew GNSO Secretariat Adobe Chat Transcript for Thursday 20 November 2014: Terri Agnew:Dear all, Welcome to the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG call on 20 November 2014 Chris Dillon:Hello everyone Chris Dillon:https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/20+November+2014 Chris Dillon:https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/Comments+on+Initial+rep… Rudi Vansnick:are there standards of transformation we could lean on ? Peter Green （CONAC）:@Rudi, it is really difficult to have such standards Chris Dillon:Pinyin is certainly complex. Peter Green （CONAC）:Yes, Pinyin is an example, but generally, language diversity and accuracy is the main challenge to have such standards Justine Chew:No I don't think it's just you Jim. Rudi Vansnick:i would suggest not limiting to 1 (one) Justine Chew:I don't see how the existing content can continue in the current form if we were to proceed with non-mandatory approach. Chris Dillon:The arguments stay in the document. Justine Chew:So you're saying let's present arguments for both approaches and based on these conclude that only 1 set of recommendations be put forth? Chris Dillon:Yes. Jennifer Chung:Thanks for the clarification Chris and Jim Rudi Vansnick:the minus could be abstention ! Julie Hedlund:My apologies everyone, but I have to drop off the call to go to another meeting. Julie Hedlund:Have a great day! Chris Dillon:Bye Rudi Vansnick:thanks Chris for the great work (also to Lars) Jennifer Chung:I will have to send in my apologies for next Thursday because of Thanksgiving Rudi Vansnick:start now with a blank one Justine Chew:I see the position Chris is faced with because we still need to refer to existing provided comments. Jennifer Chung:Thanks all, bye.

1 0

Today's meeting
by Dillon, Chris Nov. 20, 2014

Nov. 20, 2014

Dear colleagues, Please find a draft agenda for today's meeting at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/20+November+2014 We will be continuing through the comments tabled at the last meeting and there is a new version of the draft initial report attached to this email which includes comments from ICANN Legal. The .docx contains substantial modifications from last week and the week before and the new comments (formatting and uncontroversial word-level changes have been removed to improve readability). The PDF is a clean version. Finally, at the end of the meeting, whether or not we have got through all the comments, there will be a straw poll on whether we should get rid of the options. Let me stress that this doesn't affect the arguments for mandatory transformation, which will remain in the document whichever way we go. Please note that next week is the last scheduled meeting before the release of the initial report. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

1 0

MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting - 13 November 2014
by Terri Agnew Nov. 13, 2014

Nov. 13, 2014

Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Thursday 13 November at 14:00 UTC at: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-20141113-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-20141113-en.mp3 On page: <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Jennifer Chung – RySG Chris Dillon – NCSG Mae Suchayapim Siriwat – GAC Pitinan Kooarmornpatana – GAC Petter Rindforth – IPC Amr Elsadr – NCUC Rudi Vansnick – NPOC Emily Taylor – RrSG Ubolthip Sethakaset – Individual Wanawit Ahkuputra – GAC Peter Green (Zhang Zuan)-NCUC Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP Apologies: Jim Galvin - RySG ICANN staff: Amy Bivins Lars Hoffmann Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: <http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx> http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew GNSO Secretariat Adobe Chat Transcript for Thursday 13 November 2014: Lars Hoffmann: Dear all, Welcome to the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG call on 13 November 2014 pitinan kooarmornpatana:hello all Chris Dillon:Hello Pitinan Amr Elsadr:Hi all. Hope you're all well. Chris Dillon:Hello Amr Amr Elsadr:Apologies for not being able to provide input to the draft report via email. Been a full week. Chris Dillon:There has been a lot of input recently and t think there will be much more today. Terri Agnew:Mae Suchayapim Siriwat has joined Amr Elsadr:That's very clever. :) Lars Hoffmann:the document is synched so that we are all on the same page. let me know if youhave trouble reading. Lars Hoffmann:*pun intended Amr Elsadr:BTW..., not that it's really that important, but I'm not listed as a WG member in the report. Terri Agnew:Wanawit Ahkuputra has joined Petter Rindforth:It will be necessary to split the costs Rudi Vansnick:@amr +1 Amr Elsadr:@Emily: Thanks for making my point more eloquently than I did. Amr Elsadr::) Emily Taylor:Thanks Chris Amr Elsadr:I'm not sure I understand the question. Amr Elsadr:Emily's point should be added to the first bullet on page 12. Terri Agnew:Peter Green has joined Peter Green (CONAC):Hi, sorry I am late Terri Agnew:Wolf Ulrich Knoben has joined Amr Elsadr:My name is transliterated from Arabic to Latin script in different ways. Just saying. :) Amr Elsadr:In my case after the r. Amr Elsadr:Amr and Amro. Emily Taylor:I was thinking similar - like the name Sayeed, Said, Sayid, Zayid etc Amr Elsadr:Yes Emily. Also Sayed. :) Emily Taylor::) Amr Elsadr:That could also create confusion. Said and Saeed are different names that may not be distinguishable by non-Arabic speakers. Petter Rindforth:That's correct Rudi Vansnick:this was a very fruitful meeting Emily Taylor:I support Amr's suggestion of some further research into the extent of the issue - I believe this addresses the points I was trying to make at the beginning of my personal comments on the draft Amr Elsadr:Aaaah!! Petter just shot me down!! :D Petter Rindforth:;-) Emily Taylor:Really appreciate you going through the RrSG's comments in such detail. I hope that they have been helpful in unpacking some of the issues. Pitinan Kooarmornpatana 2:Thanks chris :) Pitinan Kooarmornpatana 2:Thanks Emily Emily Taylor:thanks chris Rudi Vansnick:bye Jennifer Chung:Thanks Chris, thanks all. Chris Dillon:Goodbye everyone Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.

1 0

Re: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday 30 October 2014 / some further comments/questions, etc
by Petter Rindforth Nov. 13, 2014

Nov. 13, 2014

> Dear All, > Just a last minute summary of > > Some further comments/questions/inputs/suggestions: > > (collected from the IP point of view) > > Note thatICANN issued an advisory last month clarifying technical aspects of provisions of the 2013 RAA and new gTLD Registry Agreement regarding uniform requirements for presenting Whois data.<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registry-agreement-spec4-raa-rdds-201…>.Significantly , it states that “Registries and Registrars are encouraged to only use US-ASCII encoding and character repertoire for WHOIS port 43 output.” The purpose is to facilitate parsing of Whois data by automated tools such as ICANN’s centralized Whois data portal,<http://whois.icann.org/>. Similar arguments would apply to facilitating machine translation. > > Thus the status quo is (or will be, by February 2015) that contracted parties are at least “encouraged” to transliterate into ASCII if Whois data is submitted in some other script. > Has anyone heard any howls of outrage from registries and registrars over this? > The advisory also states”All domain name labels in the values of any of the fields described in section 1.4.2 of the 2013 RAA, and sections 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7 of Specification 4 of the Registry Agreement (e.g., Domain Name, Name Server, email) MUST be shown in ASCII-compatible form (A-Label). > > For example, a name server with an IDN label should be shown as: > Name Server: ns1.xn--caf-dma.example.” > > The referenced fields include virtually all the registrant data we are concerned with. See the listing in section 1.4.2 of Specification 3 of the 2013 RAA,<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en>. > I’m not certain whether this ASCII requirement applies only to the labels (e.g., “Name Server”) or to the content following the label --- the example given suggests the latter—which further solidifies the idea that contracted parties are already required to transliterate Whois data into ASCII. But I could be misreading this requirement. > > §§§ > > · "I think it would be useful to suggest the requirement that all Whois text be machine-readable text. I’m not sure if that’s already a recommendation of the EWG report, but as one can imagine, the Whois systems that substitute graphics for the e-mail (which, for all we know, could spread to other fields) would stymie attempts at automated translation by users of Whois. > > · Does anyone have any ideas for avoiding flight by bad actors to the least translatable languages? One idea would be to require: > > ·Whois info to be in either the language of the registrar or registrant (i.e. can’t pick some random language just to make it hard to translate),and > > ·translation or transliteration is required if it’s not in a) Latin characters, b) one of the six U.N. languages, or c) possibly some larger but reasonable set of well-known and widely translatable languages (say, 20 or so)." > -- > Petter Rindforth, LL M > > Fenix Legal KB > Stureplan 4c, 4tr > 114 35 Stockholm > Sweden > Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 > Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 > E-mail: petter.rindforth(a)fenixlegal.eu > www.fenixlegal.eu > > > NOTICE > This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. > Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu > Thank you > > > 16 oktober 2014, Terri Agnew <terri.agnew(a)icann.org> skrev: > > > > Dear All, > > > > The nextTranslation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group teleconference is scheduled forThursday 30 October 2014 at 1300 UTC > > > > 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CEST > > For other places see: <http://tinyurl.com/mzwzbwl> > > > > Adobe ConnectWITH AUDIO enabled: > > <http://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnsocontactinfopdpwg/> > > > > > > Mailing list archives: > > <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/> > > > > Wiki page: > > <https://community.icann.org/x/FTR-Ag> > > > > The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: > > <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/> > > > > > > The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. > > Please confirm your dial-out requests > > GNSO Secretariats<gnso-secs(a)icann.org> > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > > Participant passcode: CONTACT > > > > Dial in numbers: > > Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ > > Toll Free NumberARGENTINA 0800-777-0519AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795BRAZIL 0800-7610651CHILE 1230-020-2863CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324ESTONIA 800-011-1093FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856HUNGARY 06-800-12755INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368ISRAEL 1-80-9216162ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439LATVIA 8000-3185LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065MEXICO 001-866-376-9696NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065PERU 0800-53713PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716POLAND 00-800-1212572PORTUGAL 8008-14052RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 > > > > > > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > Terri Agnew > > > > > >

3 3

Draft Agenda
by Lars Hoffmann Nov. 12, 2014

Nov. 12, 2014

Dear all, For tomorrow¹s call, please find below the suggested draft agenda. Also, please note that I have attached an amended version of the work plan that takes into consideration ICANN52 in Singapore. Many thanks and see you tomorrow on the call. Best wishes, Lars Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday, 13 November 2014; 14:00 UTC Draft Agenda 1. Welcome 2. Roll Call 3. Statements of Interest 4. Discussion of Comments on Mailing List 5. AOB

1 0