Dear All,
With reference to public comments on recommendation 28 of the draft report,
I need the team's input to proceed further. There are many aspects of this
recommendation that I am not familiar with.
Attached you would find the public comments related to the recommendation
and my responses to each of these comments. Please have a look at the
attached file and my responses to see if that makes sense. Also, I need
your advice related to Row Number 5, 8 and 9 of the attached file.
Row 5 is a comment from RySG in which they are inquiring whether
our recommendation is only related to TLD or it also applies to the
second level.
Row 8: Our recommendation seems to suggest that there should be
an independent study related to name collision in addition to NCAP
study and then both these studies should be vetted by third parties.
This seems to be a two-step process. Is this what we meant by
the recommendation?
Row 9: I need your input about how we can make the reporting
criteria (mechanism) SMART.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Naveed -
