April 2017 - Gnso-ssc - lists.icann.org

SSC / Team review for RDS
by Johan Helsingius April 21, 2017

April 21, 2017

I am happy to report that the motion was passed unanimously by the GNSO council. Many thanks to everybody! Julf

4 7

Mp3, AC Recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Standing Selection Committee 19 April 2017
by Nathalie Peregrine April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Dear all, Please find below the mp3, attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chat for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC Mp3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-19apr17-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p891o5tzgib/<https://participate.icann.org/p891o5tzgib/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=adafe81581d64faa…> <%0bhttps:/participate.icann.org/p73kn3lhxcu/> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/aL-RAw Attendees: Frederic Guilemaut Maxim Alzoba Julf Helsingius Hibah Kamal-Grayson (temporary alternate for Susan Kawaguchi) Poncelet Illelji Lori Schulman Osvaldo Novoa Apologies: Renate Ribeira Aquino ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 19 April 2017 Nathalie Peregrine:Dear all, welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC Nathalie Peregrine:Meeting page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Poncelet Ileleji:Good day all Osvaldo Novoa:Hello all Julf Helsingius:Evening! Nathalie Peregrine:Welcome Poncelet, Osvaldo and Julf! Poncelet Ileleji:Thanks Nathalie Frederic Guillemaut 2:Hello Everyone Maxim Alzoba:Marika, could you request call out to +7 916 6761580? Maxim Alzoba:ok Maxim Alzoba:I will mute phone mic for now. Maxim Alzoba:Marika, could you send us the latest edits to our mail list? (which we see now on Adobe dashboard) Julf Helsingius:Exactly Maxim Alzoba:thanks Lori Schulman:Hi, i am fine with the approach. Maxim Alzoba:at least it is the way forward Lori Schulman:It seems fair Julf Helsingius:I don't mind a short call. Maxim Alzoba:short call will help us to live more of a life :) Julf Helsingius:Marika, can you (just to be sure) re-send the redline version to me? Julf Helsingius:Thanks! Maxim Alzoba:Thanks everyone ! Julf Helsingius:late Nathalie Peregrine:21:00 UTC Julf Helsingius:yes, 21:00 UTC Lori Schulman:I will let IPC know. Maxim Alzoba:bye All Julf Helsingius:Thanks, Marika (and everybody)! Lori Schulman:Appreciate it and the written summary. It made it easier. Frederic Guillemaut 2:thank you Frederic Guillemaut 2:very efficeint ;-) Poncelet Ileleji:Thanks Marika Poncelet Ileleji:Thanks Marika Poncelet Ileleji: Bye all

1 0

Fwd: Amended motion - Nomination of GNSO candidates for the RDS RT
by Johan Helsingius April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

FYI... -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Amended motion - Nomination of GNSO candidates for the RDS RT Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:39:33 +0200 From: Johan Helsingius <julf(a)julf.com> To: GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org> CC: gnso-secs(a)icann.org <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Dear council members, With regards to my motion for item 7 on the agenda for our meeting on 20 April 2017 - "Approval of GNSO Nominees for the Registration Directory Services Review Team", I hereby submit a revised motion based on the consensus of the SSC. The SSC was tasked to select the top three candidates, with up to four additional candidates for positions to be filled if other SO/ACs didn't take up their full number. Unfortunately selecting the top three candidates would result in a lack of balance in representation of constituencies. Recognizing this, the group would like to recommend that the GNSO Council consider the top four recommended candidates as primary with guaranteed seats. This is based on our understanding that some other SO/ACs are not taking up their full number on the RDS RT, and we believe the GNSO has a strong case in asking to be able to fill one of the places that are available due to this. Julf

1 0

Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Dear All, Please find below notes and actions items from our (very brief!) call today. Note that Marika will shortly re-circulate the red-lined motion for your reference. Kind regards, Emily ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC for 60 minutes Notes: Support received to date on the proposal: Poncelet, Renata, Julf, Maxim, Frederic, Osvaldo, Hibah, Lori - The only person unable to attend the call is Renata. She provided approval for the plan over email. - Current status: A call was held on Monday (17 April) to discuss options going forward. There was a desire to have more balance in the representation of candidates, recognizing the SSC is expected to select a top three candidates with up to four additional candidates. - There was general agreement that group would like to recommend that the GNSO Council consider the top four recommended candidates as primary with guaranteed seats. - Julf will put forward the proposal to the GNSO Council. If the Council does not does not support this approach, Julf will withdraw the motion and request additional time for the SSC to deliberate on selection of the top 3 candidates. - All are in agreement to go forward with this approach. - ACTION ITEM: Marika will send final red-lined version of the motion after this call. - The GNSO Council meeting is on Thursday at 21:00 UTC. Following the meeting, staff will report back with the outcome. If the GNSO Council accepts the SSC proposal, the SSC can move forward with its next assignment, the GNSO representative to the Empowered Community. If it does not, the SSC will resume deliberations on the RDS-RT candidates. From the SSC Charter: The SSC shall strive as far as possible to achieve balance, representativeness, diversity and sufficient expertise appropriate for the applicable selection process. In order to achieve balance and diversity on the Review Teams, the SSC is strongly encouraged to employ a system of rotation to Review Team selections. Any Stakeholder Group which nominated candidates(s) for a Review Team but did not have a candidate selected for that Review Team shall be preferred as a qualified applicant from their Stakeholder Group for one of the three guaranteed slots for the next GNSO Review Team appointment processes. F

1 0

For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT
by Marika Konings April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Dear All, As discussed during today’s meeting, please find attached the proposed modifications to the motion to reflect the proposed path forward to recommend that candidates 1-4 are considered primary candidates with a guaranteed seat. As the SSC is expected to operate with full consensus, you are all requested to share your views on the mailing list. A next call will be scheduled for Wednesday 19 April (please remember to add your availability to the doodle poll: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh#table) You can also provide your comments / edits to the revised motion via google docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JXXdW7gKqlrl_w_wom5TeDae5ahR4KqI9UhVoDx…. Thank you for your feedback. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

8 14

LAST REMINDER: **UPDATED Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS for call on Wednesday, 19 April 2017
by Terri Agnew April 18, 2017

April 18, 2017

As discussed on Mondays call we may still hold the call on Wednesday. If you have already completed the doodle, please go back in and edit your name slot to select times that will work on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. To edit, hover over your name and a pencil icon appears, select this icon. If having trouble ok to enter a new name slot. Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Tuesday, 18 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

1 0

REMINDER: **UPDATED Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

As discussed on todays call we may still hold the call on Wednesday. If you have already completed the doodle, please go back in and edit your name slot to select times that will work on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. To edit, hoover over your name and a pencil icon appears, select this icon. If having trouble ok to enter a new name slot. Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

2 1

Mp3, AC Recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Standing Selection Committee 17 April 2017
by Terri Agnew April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

Dear all, Please find below the mp3, attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chat for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC Mp3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-17apr17-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p73kn3lhxcu/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/aL-RAw Attendees: Frederic Guilemaut Maxim Alzoba Julf Helsingius Hibah Kamal-Grayson (temporary alternate for Susan Kawaguchi) Renate Ribeira Aquino Apologies: Poncelet Illelji Lori Schulman Osvaldo Novoa ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 17 April 2017 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Monday, 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes Terri Agnew:agenda wik page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> &d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=6Y-ib9I5_ub3eYQSe4f4wfzYorB94qLInYJi-bbmnjk&s=I5nQ_aIzl3XubA_rynkzAaXaOsrxE60ZkEwAys2euDc&e= Maxim Alzoba:Hello Terri, could I test adobe audio - just in case it works for me Maxim Alzoba:Ok, great Maxim Alzoba:Hello Frederic Frederic Guillemaut:Hello Maxim, Hello Emily and Terri Maxim Alzoba:I am thinking about moto helmet with bluetooth mic :) so outside audio does not affect Maxim Alzoba:Hello Julf Julf Helsingius:Maxim: I have one of those. It is still noisy in a helmet. :) Maxim Alzoba:also - I wonder what people think when they see you in a caffee in a helmet ? Maxim Alzoba::) Julf Helsingius:a throat mike might work better Julf Helsingius:I suggest waiting Maxim Alzoba:I think two-3 minutes waiting is ok Julf Helsingius:Got the reminder, let's start Maxim Alzoba:Marika, please add to the note, that the note of Frederic was supported by me. Maxim Alzoba:and that Both Frederic and me referenced to " sufficient expertise " in technolgy Terri Agnew:Welcome Renata Aquino Ribeiro Maxim Alzoba:Hello Renata Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hello and thank you Julf Helsingius:Right, so seems we know we don't have consensus support for a change of the motion, and there is not consensus support for going ahead with the motion Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I believe Poncelet disagrees with the change regardless of there being 3 or 4 Julf Helsingius:That's how I understood it too Julf Helsingius:So no consensus eiher way Maxim Alzoba:We have not reached it yet, and it does not mean we should not try Julf Helsingius:We can't reach it on this call Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Yes I agree there is no consensus Renata Aquino Ribeiro:and we already have an opposer Renata Aquino Ribeiro:by email that is Maxim Alzoba:yes, Poncelet Ileleji could not attend Maxim Alzoba:and we can not reach it without him, but we could try to refine ideas we have now Maxim Alzoba:NOTE: I do not belive that SSAC is going to leave RDS-RT without attendance, their presence might be necessary for balanced view. Maxim Alzoba:I suggest additional questions to top 7 candidates to understand how their technicl expertise is applicable Julf Helsingius:I agree the timescale was challenging Maxim Alzoba:the deadline was artificial, and with proper justification we could request timeline extension. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I would like to know if these additional seats will be available, because that would help us in consensus. Julf Helsingius:Yes, knowing about additional seats would help Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Isn't there any way to get this response soon? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:there is already someone from Rr on 4th seat isn't there? Marc? Marika Konings 2:Volker is currently ranked 4th, with Marc on 5th Julf Helsingius:Volker from Rr as 4, Marc from Ry as 5 Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Right, either way, I guess it makes us reach consensus if the 4th is accepted Julf Helsingius:Yes, probably Julf Helsingius:I think we would have pretty good argumets to James to argue for a 4th position Renata Aquino Ribeiro:And perhaps we can send that communication to SO/ACs to ask them for support Julf Helsingius:I don't think the issue is about skills - I think we haev a pretty good picture of that. The skills needed are not technical. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes, the skills were already judged by the survey Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I'd also try making a case in council for 4 Maxim Alzoba:my suggestion is to to some more in-depth due diligence Maxim Alzoba:and we might ask GNSO Council to review possiblity of extension of 3 granted seats to 4 Maxim Alzoba:with description of current disagreement (diversity vs technological expertise) Frederic Guillemaut:i agree with the extension to 4 seats Maxim Alzoba:I agree with extension to 4 Julf Helsingius:I support 4 as well Renata Aquino Ribeiro:+1 extension Julf Helsingius:Seems that would be full consensus of all of us on the call Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes Julf Helsingius:Yes, that sounds like a good formulation, Marika Renata Aquino Ribeiro:+1 Maxim Alzoba:My suggestion: 1. we ask for extension of the timeline (we describe the current deadlock and situation we face with "divercity v.s. tech expertise". 2. We suggest 4 seats as a resolution or 3. we need the extension for more id-depth due diligence Julf Helsingius:Yes, so extension only becomes an option if 4 people are not accepted Terri Agnew:Doodle: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__doodle.com_poll_ymw59t3… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__doodle.com_poll_ymw59t3…> &d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=6Y-ib9I5_ub3eYQSe4f4wfzYorB94qLInYJi-bbmnjk&s=8ogstzbBZ78GgK905onXFXP4u6_zr3aWhMDLswbPT-w&e= Maxim Alzoba:Could we have Google docs& offline word copy of the draft, so we can comment on it Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I also believe an extension of time is not what we are asking now, an extension of seats only Maxim Alzoba:I can not edit my checkboxes in the poll for the time Maxim Alzoba:found it Maxim Alzoba:thanks Renata Aquino Ribeiro:i think next steps are good Renata Aquino Ribeiro:drafting a new motion and asking for gnso to analyse Julf Helsingius:Marika: should I flag the possilble developments to the council? Maxim Alzoba:Thanks Everyone Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes julf Julf Helsingius:Sure. Will do that tomorrow morning Frederic Guillemaut:thank you all, Maxim Alzoba:bye all Frederic Guillemaut:enjoy chocolate Renata Aquino Ribeiro:thanks have a great week Julf Helsingius:thanks and bye

1 0

SSC / Team review for RDS
by Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- photo <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> <http://twitter.com/safebrands> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> Skype: mailclub1 <#> www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com> Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.

9 20

Notes and Action Items - SSC meeting - 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

Dear SSC Members, Please find below notes and action items from the call today, Monday 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC. While not all members of the SSC were present on the call, those that did attend have proposed a way forward for the full group to consider. The suggested solution: Recommend to the GNSO Council that the top four candidates should have seats on the RDS-RT. Provide instructions for the Council to advocate for this recommendation with the SOs and ACs, noting that only the top three candidates are guaranteed slots in the RDS-RT, and that any additional appointments are at the discretion of the SOs and ACs. Staff will shortly circulate details about this proposal to the SSC list for further consideration and will revise the Council motion to reflect this proposal. The SSC may have an additional call on Wednesday if further discussion is needed to reach consensus on the proposal. Kind regards, Emily ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Monday, 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes Notes: - Recap on status: We received an email from Frederic that on further consultations, we felt that he could not support the ranking of candidates. - He proposes an alternate ranking to increase the diversity of stakeholder groups represented in the top three candidates, recognizing that the top three candidates will automatically be included in the RDS-RT. - Some other members expressed concern about this proposal. - Staff displayed the following text in the AC room for the SSC to reference: From the SSC Charter: The SSC shall strive as far as possible to achieve balance, representativeness, diversity and sufficient expertise appropriate for the applicable selection process. In order to achieve balance and diversity on the Review Teams, the SSC is strongly encouraged to employ a system of rotation to Review Team selections. Any Stakeholder Group which nominated candidates(s) for a Review Team but did not have a candidate selected for that Review Team shall be preferred as a qualified applicant from their Stakeholder Group for one of the three guaranteed slots for the next GNSO Review Team appointment processes. Even though the SSC was not responsible for the selection of the candidates for the SSR2-RT, you may want to factor this into your continued deliberations to achieve full consensus on the candidates to be proposed for the RDS RT? The following community members, including their respective affiliation were selected for the SSR2-RT following GNSO endorsement: James Gannon (NCSG), Denise Michel (CSG – BC), Emily Taylor (RrSG). As a reminder, based on the initial survey and deliberations, the SSC ranked the proposed candidates for the RDS RT as follows: 1-3: Susan Kawaguchi (CSG – BC), Erika Mann (non-affiliated – non-voting Nominating Committee member to the GNSO Council), Stephanie Perrin (NCSG), 4) Volker Greimann (RrSG), 5) Marc Anderson (RySG), Stefania Milan (NCSG) and Timothy Chen (CSG – BC). It may also be worth noting that for this specific review, no requests for endorsement were received from the ASO, RSSAC and SSAC which means that at least in theory there will be additional seats available. It will however be up to the SO/AC chairs to decide whether or not to fill these additional seats. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: Marika, please add to the note, that the note of Frederic was supported by me. Maxim Alzoba: and that Both Frederic and me referenced to " sufficient expertise " in technolgy - Question - can we take an additional consenus call? - Response - if we no longer have full consensus, then the Council is not expected to consider the recommendation from the SSC. If SSC does not reach full consenus prior to Thursday, the motion will need to withdrawn or deferred. - Reminder - It is only the top three that will automatically be included in the RDS-RT. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I believe Poncelet disagrees with the change regardless of there being 3 or 4 Julf Helsingius: That's how I understood it too Julf Helsingius: So no consensus eiher way - Only one review team has so far been filled using this process, no additional members from the GNSO were included. For the RDS-RT, there may be additional slots beyond the three, although this is not guaranteed. - Could we bring the outcome of the discussion as it currently stands to the Council? - The charter envisions that the SSC only puts forward consensus recommendations to the GNSO Council, although it could be possible to give the Council a set of options based on the SSC's delberations. It is also possible for the SSC to request more time from the Council. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I would like to know if these additional seats will be available, because that would help us in consensus. Julf Helsingius: Yes, knowing about additional seats would help - The assignment of any "free" seats will be dependent of the SO/AC discussion. The SSC can recommend guaranteeing the top four, and the Council can make this case to the SOs and ACs but the outcome will depend on the deliberations of the SO/ACs. From the chat: Julf Helsingius: I think we would have pretty good argumets to James to argue for a 4th position Renata Aquino Ribeiro: And perhaps we can send that communication to SO/ACs to ask them for support Options for next steps: 1. Agree to a change in the top 3 candidates. 2. Go back to the GNSO Council and ask for additional time (and possibly request additional information to inform deliberations). 3. Go back to the GNSO Council and say that no consensus is anticipated. 4. Go back to the Council recommending top four candidates with instructions to the Council to defend the allocation with the SOs and ACs. - General support for option 4. Staff will revise the motion, circulate this idea on the mailing list for consideration by those not currently on the call, and leave open the option of having an additional call on Wednesday. ACTION ITEM: Staff will revise the motion and circulate on the mailing list a proposal to go back to the Council recommending top four candidates with instructions to the Council to defend the allocation with the SOs and ACs.

1 0