January 2018 - Gnso-ssc - lists.icann.org

Doodle poll to schedule next SSC meeting - 7-9 February
by Emily Barabas Jan. 31, 2018

Jan. 31, 2018

Dear SSC members, Please take a moment to complete this poll to help staff schedule an SSC meeting for next week: https://doodle.com/poll/azbfwyrzwfn6d5q4. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Poll open - SSR2-RT skills matrix evaluation - deadline Tuesday 6 February at 15:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Jan. 30, 2018

Jan. 30, 2018

Dear SSC members, The poll to evaluate SSR2-RT candidates is now open for voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5 . As a reminder, you can find the application materials for Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick here: https://community.icann.org/x/qA0hB . The deadline for completing this poll is Tuesday 6 February at 15:00 UTC. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
by Renata Aquino Ribeiro Jan. 29, 2018

Jan. 29, 2018

Yes, that will be good. Thanks Em 29 de jan de 2018 2:29 PM, "Emily Barabas" <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> escreveu: Hi Renata, Thanks for your question. For the moment, the poll is only open to test, so that you can provide feedback on the format. The deadline to suggest changes to the format is tomorrow (Tuesday 30 January) at 11:00 UTC. After that deadline, I will send another email letting everyone know that the poll is open for voting. Typically, we give a deadline of one week from the opening of the poll, so the deadline would be Tuesday 6 February. Will that allow you enough time following the NCPH Intersessional? Kind regards, Emily *From: *Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino(a)gmail.com> *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:24 *To: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> *Cc: *Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com>, " gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hi So the open poll is already the final poll and we can vote on it? What is the deadline please? And possible to postpone it for 1 week after NCPH intersessional? Thanks On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> wrote: Hi Frederic, Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT[community.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> ? I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC conducted in Summer 2017. In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT. Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time. Kind regards, Emily *From: *Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com> *Organization: *SafeBrands *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09 *To: *"gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hello All, Sorry, i might have read something wrong. But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ? Otherwise, this is very accurate. Best regards Fredric Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit : +1 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com>> escribió: Hi,He I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me. Best, Rafik On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy(a)gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com> <susankpolicy(a)gmail.com>> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members, It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode. To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r…>. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers. Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_c…> . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. >From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. >From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 <+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976> <+31%206%2084507976> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc -- [image: photo] [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_l…] [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png] [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre…> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png] [twitter.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands&…> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png… : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png… : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.png… : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.png… [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.png…: mailclub1 [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.pn… [safebrands.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw…> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.p… Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://maps.google.com/?q=37+rue+Guibal+%E2%80%A2+13003+Marseille+%E2%80%A…> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/apps/linkedin_connect.png] [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr…> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

2 1

Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
by Emily Barabas Jan. 29, 2018

Jan. 29, 2018

Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4… . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

7 11

Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
by Emily Barabas Jan. 25, 2018

Jan. 25, 2018

Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Recordings, attendance & AC Chat from GNSO Standing Selection Committee call on Thursday, 25 January 2018
by Michelle DeSmyter Jan. 25, 2018

Jan. 25, 2018

Dear all, Please find below the mp3, attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chatfor the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 25 January 2018 at 14:30 UTC. Mp3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-25jan18-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p1zyhni16x7/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Agenda Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B Attendees: Maxim Alzoba Renata Aquino Ribeiro Poncelet Illelji Susan Kawaguchi Osvaldo Novoa Rafik Dammak Apologies: Frederic Guilemaut Erika Mann Lori Schulman ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Terri Agnew Michelle DeSmyter ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 25 January 2018 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection Committee meeting onThursday, 25 January 2018 at 14:30 UTC for 60 minutes. Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Osvaldo Novoa:Hello, Osvaldo Novoa:I don't have the option to connect my audio, it offers only the possibility to dial in. Osvaldo Novoa:I will disconnect and try again. Terri Agnew:Hello, mics are now active. This meeting will begin in 27 minutes Osvaldo Novoa:Ok, I'm back again. Hello Terri and Rafik rafik:hi rafik:nobody speaking? Terri Agnew:This meeting begins in 24 minutes Osvaldo Novoa:Oh, I didn't register the time change. rafik:invite says 23:00 for me Susan Kawaguchi:Good morning/evening Poncelet Ileleji:Good Afternoon Osvaldo Novoa:Hello Maxim Alzoba:Hello All Osvaldo Novoa:Is everybody silent? I hear nothing. Terri Agnew:Hi Osvaldo, we have begun Maxim Alzoba:I hear Susan Maxim Alzoba:via adobe Emily Barabas:yes Terri Agnew:Please log out and back in to see if that helps, as always we can dial out on the telephone Osvaldo Novoa:Ok, I will disconnect and connect again, I seem to be having problems with my audio. Terri Agnew:Check your plug ins: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_icannactest… Emily Barabas:We are on slide 5 Terri Agnew:any better Osvaldo? Osvaldo Novoa:No, I will phone in. Poncelet Ileleji:Yes I have done Poncelet Ileleji:I think the review on the Skills Matrix suits all criteria we shall wish to look into it Maxim Alzoba:I will need formal guidance from RySG Terri Agnew:Welcome Renata Aquino Ribeiro Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hello all, thank you Terri Osvaldo Novoa:I on the phone now Renata Aquino Ribeiro:(just connected my mic) Renata Aquino Ribeiro:oops screen disappeared? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:back now Terri Agnew:I will be dropping off and leaving the call to Emily and Michelle Emily Barabas:Thanks Terri Michelle DeSmyter:Thank you Terri! Renata Aquino Ribeiro:we have to choose 1 of the 2 right? between rao naveed and scott mcormick? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro:+1 Susan Maxim Alzoba:so we have a draft poll questions as usual Maxim Alzoba:and then when all members agree - we make the actual poll Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I also think a poll could be a good idea Poncelet Ileleji:supported +1 on poll Maxim Alzoba:we can use the fields from the call for volunteers and might add additional fileds from the matrix (this one) Renata Aquino Ribeiro:can't we have both? the matrix and the poll only for choice? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:so a matrix and each SSC member gives a short assessment of each candidate (like a 1 paragraph for each) Maxim Alzoba:and please add Other text field so members would be able to express additional thoughts Renata Aquino Ribeiro:sounds good Poncelet Ileleji:supported too Emily Barabas:sure Maxim Alzoba:good idea to have a draft poll Emily Barabas:Yes, we will do that Maxim Alzoba:This week has overlap with NamesCon - lots of SG members are partially available Maxim Alzoba:vegas party? Emily Barabas:Got it, thanks Emily Barabas:perfect Emily Barabas:I don't believe so Maxim Alzoba:I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba:I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba:it was about minority views Emily Barabas:thanks for the clarifcation, Maxim. That is clear. Maxim Alzoba:Also we will need opinion of Erica and Freéderic Emily Barabas:We can also recirculate after the call Emily Barabas:Transparency on page 4 Maxim Alzoba:yes, for example case where SSC recommended 4 seats instead of 3 - and it was for GNSO Council to approve /deny rafik:sorry I need to leave the call earlier. bye all Emily Barabas:Noting the time, perhaps we should continue the discussion on the mailing list? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I think this sounds incredibly complicated and prone to errors Renata Aquino Ribeiro:+1 Emily rafik:sorry I have to leave the call earlier. bye all Maxim Alzoba:I think this mecanics needs to be designed, checked for applicability to the current IT systems and then checked with SSC and GNSO Councel Renata Aquino Ribeiro:bye rafik tks Emily Barabas:Perhaps making more clear on the SSC wiki the role of the SSC would also help? Emily Barabas:So that people reviewing the materials understand the context? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba:@Renata, I am not sure we can do it Maxim Alzoba:having a separate ssc-voting@ list , which is published with a delay might be better idea Emily Barabas:emails could also be sent directly to individuals in the group Emily Barabas:For polling Emily Barabas:These emails would not be archived Renata Aquino Ribeiro:but then we need the record emily Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes Renata Aquino Ribeiro:well that can be optional Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba:if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro:i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba:after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro:(which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas:Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba:when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages Renata Aquino Ribeiro:2nd week of feb would be best Renata Aquino Ribeiro:(after intersessional) Renata Aquino Ribeiro:thanks for the call Renata Aquino Ribeiro:bye Maxim Alzoba:bye all, see you in FEb 2018 :) Osvaldo Novoa:Thank you, Bye Poncelet Ileleji:bye

1 0

Proposed Agenda - SSC meeting - Thursday, 25 January 2018 at 14:30 UTC
by Emily Barabas Jan. 24, 2018

Jan. 24, 2018

Dear SSC members, Below please find the proposed agenda for our meeting tomorrow, Thursday, 25 January 2018 at 14:30 UTC. 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members (see attached and see also materials on the SSC wiki from the previous SSR2 selection process: https://community.icann.org/x/qA0hB) 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter (if time permits, see attached draft document and comments at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c0NllDbjSFap0KR9s61a8uXJoH78FqLtBTOgahL…<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c0NllDbjSFap0KR9s61a8uXJoH78FqLtBTOgahL…>) 4. AOB Background information on agenda item 2: James Gannon has stepped down from the Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS (SSR2) Review Team. The GNSO Council has tasked the SSC with doing a preliminary analysis to see if remaining candidates from the original call for volunteers might be a good fit for the Team. The SSR2-RT has conducted an analysis of the skillsets of current members of the RT (see attached). The SSC will review information about the remaining candidates, Scott McCormick and Rao Naveed Bin Rais (materials here: https://community.icann.org/x/qA0hB) to see if they may fill any skills gaps in the group. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Doodle Poll: SSC meeting next week
by Emily Barabas Jan. 18, 2018

Jan. 18, 2018

Dear SSC members, I hope your 2018 is going well so far. The SSC leadership team would like to schedule an SSC meeting for next week. Please take a moment to fill out this Doodle poll and assist us in finding a slot: https://doodle.com/poll/47u72fg2fkkbgdex Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Reconfirmation of Standing Selection Committee (SSC) leadership
by Emily Barabas Jan. 10, 2018

Jan. 10, 2018

Dear all, According the charter (https://community.icann.org/x/zb-Raw) of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee (SSC), “The membership is expected to be confirmed by each Stakeholder Group and Constituency and the nominating committee appointees within 3 weeks after the end of the ICANN AGM.” This process has been completed. You can find the current list of SSC members here: https://community.icann.org/x/1b-RAw. The Standing Selection Committee has reconfirmed Susan Kawaguchi to continue serving as Chair and Maxim Alzoba to continue serving as Vice-Chair. Please do not hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC leadership re-confirmation
by Emily Barabas Jan. 2, 2018

Jan. 2, 2018

Dear SSC members, Happy New Year! I hope you 2018 is off to a good start. With a number of members expressing affirmative support and no objections raised on the list, we have consensus for re-confirming Susan and SSC Chair and Maxim as Vice-Chair. Congratulations, Susan and Maxim, and thanks for your ongoing service. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday 21 December 2017 at 09:35 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: SSC leadership re-confirmation Dear SSC members, Thanks Osvaldo, Erika, Poncelet, Lori, and Frederic for your responses. As a reminder to those who have not yet replied – the deadline for raising objections to re-confirming Susan and Maxim to the SSC leadership team is end of day tomorrow, Friday 21 December. Kind regards, Emily From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa(a)Antel.com.uy> Date: Monday 18 December 2017 at 13:35 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>, "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: SSC leadership re-confirmation I support re-confirming the actual leadership. Best regards, Osvaldo Novoa De: Gnso-ssc [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Emily Barabas Enviado el: lunes, 18 de diciembre de 2017 06:00 a.m. Para: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org Asunto: [Gnso-ssc] SSC leadership re-confirmation Dear SSC members, Now that the membership of the SSC has been re-confirmed following the Annual General Meeting, it is time to re-confirm the leadership of the SSC. Susan (current Chair) and Maxim (current Vice-Chair) are remaining on the SSC for the current year. Julf, who was serving as an additional Vice-Chair, is no longer a NomCom representative on the GNSO Council, and is therefore no longer on the SSC. Erika Mann has is now the NomCom representative on the SSC. SSC members can choose to keep Susan as Chair and Maxim as Vice-Chair for the coming year or change the leadership team. During our call on Friday, members were supportive of keeping Susan and Maxim in their current leadership positions. If you have objections to this proposal, please raise them on list by end of day Friday 22 December. If there are no objections, the SSC will go ahead and reconfirm the current leadership. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

1 0