January 2021 - Gnso-ssc - lists.icann.org

Notes and Action Items - SSC meeting - 14 January 2021
by Julie Hedlund Jan. 14, 2021

Jan. 14, 2021

Dear SSC members, Please find below notes and action items from today’s call on Thursday, 14 January 2021 at 13:00 UTC. These also are posted to the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/2021-01-14+GNSO+Standing+Selection…. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items: 1. Discussion of poll results and candidate EOI – Community Representatives Group (CRG) to select Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel ACTION ITEM: Staff to put to the list the proposal for Heather as the candidate to put forward to the GNSO Council with a request for SSC members to respond by 23:59 UTC on Monday, 18 January. 2. Content of Report to S/Cs on the CRG Rep selection process ACTION ITEM: Staff to collate the suggestions from this meeting and send them to Leadership, who will review and then send to the SSC members. 3. Discussion – Should the SSC comment on whether to open a new EOI process for CRG candidates? ACTION ITEM: Sophie Hey to draft a letter and send it to the SSC list for review and SSC members can decide whether to sign on in their individual capacities. Notes: 1. SOI Updates: None provided. 2. Discussion of poll results and candidate EOI – Community Representatives Group (CRG) to select Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel (additional information here<https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/CRG+-+IRP+Standing+Panel> and here<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=GSSCMO&title=CRG…>, poll results will be sent once the poll is closed) Summary of Poll Results: -- 7 responses to the poll. -- Overwhelming support for Heather as a qualified candidate. -- Additional response from Peter outside the poll supported Heather. -- Scores on the questions were high all around (8s, 9s, and 10s). -- Addition comments were all very positive. Discussion: -- In future evaluations the EOI needs to be much more specific so that respondents can speak specifically to those items. -- Question: Is it necessary to ask Heather for more information? Answer: This is focused on going forward. Heather is well known. -- Heather was the only candidate, but based on the poll we are supporting putting Heather forward as the candidate. ACTION ITEM: Staff to put to the list the proposal for Heather as the candidate to put forward to the GNSO Council with a request for SSC members to respond by 23:59 UTC on Monday, 18 January. 3. Content of Report to S/Cs on the CRG Rep selection process (see attached slide and below): Questions for the SSC to discuss: • Should additional materials be requested from candidates as part of future EOI processes (for example, an EOI form with specific questions about candidate qualifications)? • Are the SSC’s standard process and practice (e.g. reliance on written materials only) scalable and sufficient for this type of appointment? Should additional mechanisms be considered in the future (interviews, reference, etc.)? If additional mechanisms are recommended, is the SSC in a position to conduct such activities? • Is any additional guidance needed from SG/Cs to support future selection processes? Discussion/Content: -- If bullet number 1 is done more thoroughly then an additional mechanism may not be necessary. -- Need a thorough EOI. If the EOI mirrors the areas of expertise in the Terms of Reference then we probably don’t need additional questions. -- There is the case where a call goes out and there is only one or no candidates – can we make suggestions to improve the process to encourage volunteers? That could be helpful include. -- High perks or benefits and also make qualification criteria clearer. -- Suggest that EOI reflects something around case scenarios as regards role for consideration, likely standard / general questions, and then specifically curated questions that are for purpose on specific roles. -- Pandemic has really eliminated one of the elements of attraction for volunteer positions, which is where there would have been travel support. -- Keep the issue of incentivizing volunteers separate from this particular task (report on this selection process). Might be a separate communication to the Council. Travel support is just one incentive. -- Summary of suggestions: 1) have a more detailed EOI form with a breakdown of questions related to the Terms of Reference as well as some standard/general questions; 2) more detailed called for volunteers – expectations (such as travel support), expected time commitment, qualification criteria; 3) what to do if there aren’t sufficient candidates. -- On bullet number 2: Is the SSC’s process sufficient? What kind of scenarios would help inform the SSC’s decision? Ask for examples to demonstrate qualifications for selection criteria. Like a case study assignment. -- On bullet number 3: Need for additional guidance? With respect to these roles it may not be needed, but with others more role-directed questions would be helpful. -- Could be helpful to include information on the timing of the SSC’s work – something that says that it is necessary for the SSC to have sufficient time to review the candidates and complete its process; more time would be required if interviews are included, for example. ACTION ITEM: Staff to collate the suggestions from this meeting and send them to Leadership, who will review and then send to the SSC members. 4. Discussion – Should the SSC comment on whether to open a new EOI process for CRG candidates? -- Should the content of the SSC’s report apply to reopening the EOI process? -- How many applications were received across the SO/ACs – good to know where we are. Staff answer: 2 for ALAC, 2 GAC and 1 each ccNSO and GNSO meaning 2 nominations; in prior discussions the community leaders agreed that number and representativeness is less important than actually getting qualified reps in the group; timeline is unclear as to whether there could be an impact on the work of the CRG. -- Seems that there is support for the SSC to provide comments on whether to open a new EOI process. Seems to be support for a second EOI among some, but not all, SSC members. At least one member does not think a second EOI is needed. -- There were a lot of questions about this in the Registrar SG – questions about what the CRG is; confused about what the CRG will do; think that there should be better representation from the GNSO. -- GNSO has the option of selecting another member of the CRG but not sure that this additional process would impact any of the GNSO’s other work. If there is no impact then that argues for going with a second call. -- SG/C leadership is the group to decide on whether to initiate another EOI. ACTION ITEM: Sophie Hey to draft a letter and send it to the SSC list for review and SSC members can decide whether to sign on in their individual capacities.

1 0

Consensus call - Deadline Monday, 18 January at 23:59 UTC - GNSO Rep to the Community Representative Group
by Emily Barabas Jan. 14, 2021

Jan. 14, 2021

Dear SSC members, As a follow-up to today’s call, the SSC has reached preliminary agreement to recommend Heather Forrest as a GNSO Representative to the Community Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. If you object to this recommendation, please respond on the mailing list no later than Monday, 18 January at 23:59 UTC. If no objections are received, the SSC will consider this to be a full consensus recommendation and submit it to the GNSO Council. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

1 0

Poll results - SSC meeting - Thursday 14 January at 13:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Jan. 14, 2021

Jan. 14, 2021

Dear all, Please find attached the poll results to support discussion on agenda item 2. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 14:04 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Proposed agenda - SSC meeting - Thursday 14 January at 13:00 UTC Dear all, Please find below the draft agenda for the SSC meeting scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday 14 January at 13:00 UTC: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates 2. Discussion of poll results and candidate EOI – Community Representatives Group (CRG) to select Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel (additional information here<https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/CRG+-+IRP+Standing+Panel> and here<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=GSSCMO&title=CRG…>, poll results will be sent once the poll is closed) 1. Content of Report to S/Cs on the CRG Rep selection process 1. Discussion – Should the SSC comment on whether to open a new EOI process for CRG candidates? 2. AOB Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

2 1

Proposed agenda - SSC meeting - Thursday 14 January at 13:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Jan. 13, 2021

Jan. 13, 2021

Dear all, Please find below the draft agenda for the SSC meeting scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday 14 January at 13:00 UTC: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates 2. Discussion of poll results and candidate EOI – Community Representatives Group (CRG) to select Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel (additional information here<https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/CRG+-+IRP+Standing+Panel> and here<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=GSSCMO&title=CRG…>, poll results will be sent once the poll is closed) 1. Content of Report to S/Cs on the CRG Rep selection process 1. Discussion – Should the SSC comment on whether to open a new EOI process for CRG candidates? 2. AOB Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

1 0

Poll reminder with extended deadline: Please complete by 23:59 UTC TODAY (Wednesday 13 January)
by Emily Barabas Jan. 13, 2021

Jan. 13, 2021

Dear all, Only three members have responded to the IRP CRG poll so far, so the deadline has been extended to 23:59 UTC today, Wednesday 13 January. Please take a few minutes to complete this poll: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PBXJ2QR. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, 11 January 2021 at 08:53 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Poll Open - Deadline Wednesday 13 January at 13:00 UTC - IRP CRG Dear all, Thanks to everyone who provided input on the poll format. Staff has updated the format following this feedback. The poll is now open and available here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PBXJ2QR. The deadline to complete the poll is Wednesday 13 January at 13:00 UTC (24 hours before the next SSC meeting). Kind regards, Emily From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> Date: Sunday, 10 January 2021 at 19:56 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Cc: Sophie Hey <sophie.hey(a)comlaude.com>, "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] RE: Draft SSC Poll - GNSO Representative to the CRP that will nominate the IRP Standing Panel I agree breaking out these - overall and then specific requirements - in the poll questions may offer greater clarity for participants as well as concentrate the mind on the actual SG/C criteria. All good. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:54 PM Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Hi Sophie, We can certainly make this adjustment if others agree that it would be helpful. We will hold on making edits for the moment until others have had a chance to weigh in. Kind regards, Emily From: Sophie Hey <sophie.hey(a)comlaude.com<mailto:sophie.hey@comlaude.com>> Date: Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 19:45 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>>, "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] RE: Draft SSC Poll - GNSO Representative to the CRP that will nominate the IRP Standing Panel Hi Emily, Thanks for sending this through. I wonder whether we want to break out the criteria the SG/C Leaders have identified as particularly important for GNSO appointees? So the existing question evaluating the overall suitability of the candidate(s) for the role remains, but the specific criteria that have been identified as critical to the GNSO are also assessed separately. #3 (“understanding of the IRP and its role as an ICANN accountability mechanism”); and #4 (“relevant organizational and process experience, i.e. ability to understand and evaluate the standing panelist criteria and responses, which includes legal and arbitration experience”) I’m not saying we have to do this, but just floating the idea. Thanks, Sophie Sophie Hey Policy Advisor Com Laude | Valideus D: +44 7535530404 E: sophie.hey(a)comlaude.com<mailto:sophie.hey@comlaude.com> From: Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Emily Barabas Sent: 07 January 2021 14:38 To: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Draft SSC Poll - GNSO Representative to the CRP that will nominate the IRP Standing Panel Dear all, Please find below a draft poll to support your individual evaluations of the candidate to serve as the GNSO Representative to the Community Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. The draft poll is available here in “preview” mode: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=pzivfiRKbvQU1QYS4Q2UtbUETYBdsHJR… [surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=pzivf…>. If you have any feedback about the poll format, please share it on the mailing list no later than tomorrow, Friday 8 December at 23:59 UTC. The poll will be opened on Monday. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.icann.org/__;!!PtGJab4!r5PXviGljff-ej…> ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that the Com Laude Group does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176, having its registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland;Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, headquartered at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan having its registered office at Suite 319,1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan. For further information see www.comlaude.com [comlaude.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/comlaude.com__;!!PtGJab4!r5PXviGljff-ejV…> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4…>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!t2…>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] [council] Motions from Standing Selection Committee for January 2021 GNSO Council Meeting
by Carlton Samuels Jan. 12, 2021

Jan. 12, 2021

Hi Olga: The poll results reported Farrel Folly as the favoured candidate by majority. However, at least one member remarked all candidates were unsuitable for the role. That member was not on the call. All SSC members on the call agreed Farrel was indeed selected by the majority. However it was agreed that a "last call" for consensus be extended via email and the member given an opportunity - until 23.59 UTC today - to clarify his position. In the meanwhile we would submit a placeholder motion to meet motion deadline. I can now safely say having myself not seen any new comments, Farrel's name will be read into the record as the selectee. The recordings and the email with the notes and action items from the SSC call will give the details. Best Carlton On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, 8:25 pm Olga Cavalli, <olgacavalli(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Carlton , > > Many thanks for the information. > > I have a question about the motion "2. Nomination of a Mentor for the > ICANN Fellowship Program;". > > Reviewing the text of the motion, there is no name specified in it. > > Question: is this name for this role already defined or it is open for > volunteers? > > Your comments are welcome, best regards > Olga > > El lun, 11 ene 2021 a las 20:15, Carlton Samuels (< > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>) escribió: > >> Dear Councilors: >> I am submitting three motions to be considered in the 21 January 2021 >> meeting: >> >> 1. Appointment of a GNSO Non-Registry Liaison to the Customer Standing >> Committee; 2. Nomination of a Mentor for the ICANN Fellowship Program; >> 3. Appointment of a GNSO Representative to the Community >> Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review >> Process (IRP) Standing Panel. >> >> Kind regards, >> Carlton Samuels >> >> ============================== >> *Carlton A Samuels* >> >> *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & >> Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> council mailing list >> council(a)gnso.icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and >> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You >> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > >

2 1

Consensus call closed - GNSO-Nominated Mentor to the ICANN Fellowship Program
by Emily Barabas Jan. 12, 2021

Jan. 12, 2021

Dear all, The consensus call is now closed. Seeing no objections to putting forward Farell Folly’s name for the Mentor role, this will be considered a recommendation by full consensus for the Council’s consideration during its 21 January meeting. Attached you will find the three motions that Carlton submitted to Council yesterday for the upcoming meeting. Farell’s name will be filled in on the relevant motion. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 15:02 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Consensus call - Deadline Monday, 11 January at 23:59 UTC - GNSO-Nominated Mentor to the ICANN Fellowship Program Dear SSC members, As a follow-up to today’s call, the SSC has reached preliminary agreement to recommend Farell Folly as the GNSO-Nominated Mentor to the ICANN Fellowship Program. If you object to this recommendation, please respond on the mailing list no later than Monday, 11 January at 23:59 UTC. If no objections are received, the SSC will consider this to be a full consensus recommendation and submit it to the GNSO Council. In today’s SSC discussion, members noted the following comment included in the poll to evaluate candidates: “Overall, none of the candidate appears to have a matching skills that is required for the fellowship mentoring program.” None of the SSC members present on the call appear to have submitted the comment. If possible, SSC members request that the individual making this comment provide additional explanation. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

1 0

Motions from Standing Selection Committee for January 2021 GNSO Council Meeting
by Carlton Samuels Jan. 11, 2021

Jan. 11, 2021

Dear Councilors: I am submitting three motions to be considered in the 21 January 2021 meeting: 1. Appointment of a GNSO Non-Registry Liaison to the Customer Standing Committee; 2. Nomination of a Mentor for the ICANN Fellowship Program; 3. Appointment of a GNSO Representative to the Community Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. Kind regards, Carlton Samuels ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

2 1

Poll open - deadline 6 December at 14:00 UTC - GNSO Nominated Mentor for the ICANN Fellowship Program
by Emily Barabas Jan. 11, 2021

Jan. 11, 2021

Dear all, The Expression of Interest application window is now closed for the GNSO Nominated Mentor for the ICANN Fellowship Program role. Four applications were submitted. Please review the applications on the wiki (available here: https://community.icann.org/x/8oEmCQ) and fill out this poll to organize your thoughts on the candidates: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/8KW6VGS. The poll will close on Wednesday 6 January at 14:00 UTC, 24 hours before our next call. Please note that you will receive an invite today for the next SSC call, which will take place on Thursday 7 January at 14:00 UTC. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

6 12

Poll Open - Deadline Wednesday 13 January at 13:00 UTC - IRP CRG
by Emily Barabas Jan. 11, 2021

Jan. 11, 2021

Dear all, Thanks to everyone who provided input on the poll format. Staff has updated the format following this feedback. The poll is now open and available here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PBXJ2QR. The deadline to complete the poll is Wednesday 13 January at 13:00 UTC (24 hours before the next SSC meeting). Kind regards, Emily From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> Date: Sunday, 10 January 2021 at 19:56 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Cc: Sophie Hey <sophie.hey(a)comlaude.com>, "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] RE: Draft SSC Poll - GNSO Representative to the CRP that will nominate the IRP Standing Panel I agree breaking out these - overall and then specific requirements - in the poll questions may offer greater clarity for participants as well as concentrate the mind on the actual SG/C criteria. All good. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:54 PM Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Hi Sophie, We can certainly make this adjustment if others agree that it would be helpful. We will hold on making edits for the moment until others have had a chance to weigh in. Kind regards, Emily From: Sophie Hey <sophie.hey(a)comlaude.com<mailto:sophie.hey@comlaude.com>> Date: Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 19:45 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>>, "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] RE: Draft SSC Poll - GNSO Representative to the CRP that will nominate the IRP Standing Panel Hi Emily, Thanks for sending this through. I wonder whether we want to break out the criteria the SG/C Leaders have identified as particularly important for GNSO appointees? So the existing question evaluating the overall suitability of the candidate(s) for the role remains, but the specific criteria that have been identified as critical to the GNSO are also assessed separately. #3 (“understanding of the IRP and its role as an ICANN accountability mechanism”); and #4 (“relevant organizational and process experience, i.e. ability to understand and evaluate the standing panelist criteria and responses, which includes legal and arbitration experience”) I’m not saying we have to do this, but just floating the idea. Thanks, Sophie Sophie Hey Policy Advisor Com Laude | Valideus D: +44 7535530404 E: sophie.hey(a)comlaude.com<mailto:sophie.hey@comlaude.com> From: Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Emily Barabas Sent: 07 January 2021 14:38 To: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Draft SSC Poll - GNSO Representative to the CRP that will nominate the IRP Standing Panel Dear all, Please find below a draft poll to support your individual evaluations of the candidate to serve as the GNSO Representative to the Community Representatives Group that will nominate the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. The draft poll is available here in “preview” mode: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=pzivfiRKbvQU1QYS4Q2UtbUETYBdsHJR… [surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=pzivf…>. If you have any feedback about the poll format, please share it on the mailing list no later than tomorrow, Friday 8 December at 23:59 UTC. The poll will be opened on Monday. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.icann.org/__;!!PtGJab4!r5PXviGljff-ej…> ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that the Com Laude Group does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176, having its registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland;Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, headquartered at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan having its registered office at Suite 319,1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan. For further information see www.comlaude.com [comlaude.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/comlaude.com__;!!PtGJab4!r5PXviGljff-ejV…> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4…>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!t2…>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0