- Gnso-ssc - lists.icann.org

Recordings, attendance & AC Chat from GNSO Standing Selection Committee call on Wednesday 7 February 2018
by Nathalie Peregrine Feb. 7, 2018

Feb. 7, 2018

Dear all, Please find below the mp3, attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chat for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC. Mp3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-07feb18-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p74zp62fk12/<https://participate.icann.org/p74zp62fk12/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=390c3f629a9e8e92…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Agenda Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/hQ68B Attendees: Maxim Alzoba Renata Aquino Ribeiro Susan Kawaguchi Osvaldo Novoa Frederic Guillemaut Lori Schulman Apologies: Erika Mann Poncelet Illelji ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 7 February 2018 Nathalie Peregrine:Welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection Committee meeting on Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes. Nathalie Peregrine:Wiki agenda page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hello all Osvaldo Novoa:Hello all Guillemaut Frederic:Hello All Nathalie Peregrine:Welcome all! Osvaldo Novoa:Today I will have to leave some minutes before the hour, I have to get to another meeting. Susan Kawaguchi:thanks for letting us know Osvaldo Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes Guillemaut Frederic:Thanks Maxim Alzoba:I will have to drop 10 minutes to the top of the hour (in 45 min) Maxim Alzoba:@Emily, please grant us scrolling ability Emily Barabas:you can now scroll Lori Schulman:Hi, just letting folks know that I finally solved my Confluence issue. Maxim Alzoba:thnks Emily Barabas:@Lori, great! Maxim Alzoba:Good news Lori Lori Schulman:My browser had been reverting to an old screen and password without my realizing it. Emily Barabas:Oh, that's frustrating. I'm glad it's resolved Lori Schulman:I missed the poll but I read the materials Lori Schulman:yes, the old screen was popping up in every new link Marika Konings:Nothing to add :-) Emily Barabas:I extrapolated to large extent the skills with what was indicated as experience in resumes but that doesn't mean they are accurate assumptions. we may need more details from applicants with regard to requested skills.This is a long list of criteria. Some of them are wide and it is difficult to juge with yes or no. I hope we reach a consensus.There are concerns in RySG that diversity should be taken into account from geo and constituency points of view (from perspective of leaving SSR2 member). The candidate with the scientific background might bring scientific point of view, which would allow SSR2 more wholistic approach to the reviews. Guillemaut Frederic:i have lost sound. Emily Barabas:I extrapolated to large extent the skills with what was indicated as experience in resumes but that doesn't mean they are accurate assumptions. we may need more details from applicants with regard to requested skills. Emily Barabas:This is a long list of criteria. Some of them are wide and it is difficult to juge with yes or no. I hope we reach a consensus. Marika Konings:@Frederic - you may need to restart your AC? Nathalie Peregrine:I still have AC audio, would you like me to dial out to you to join the phone bridge? Emily Barabas:There are concerns in RySG that diversity should be taken into account from geo and constituency points of view (from perspective of leaving SSR2 member). The candidate with the scientific background might bring scientific point of view, which would allow SSR2 more wholistic approach to the reviews. Maxim Alzoba:PTI = new IANA Lori Schulman:post transition iana Lori Schulman:I guess I am old Emily Barabas:https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pti.icann.org_… Emily Barabas:Public Technical Identifiers, formerly Post Transition ICANN Guillemaut Frederic:i am bakc Guillemaut Frederic:i'll connect to the phone bridge Marika Konings:NCSG Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Some of the 1s Naveed had are probably mine as I've assessed also his fellowship experience and a lot of skills asked is covered by presentations and experiences of fellowship program. All fellows go through these presentations and follow up to learn more according to their interest. Guillemaut Frederic:Jamzs Bladel ? Marika Konings:James = NCSG if I am not mistaken Marika Konings:James Gannon Guillemaut Frederic:Registrar Lori Schulman:and regional diversity most likely Marika Konings:Norm Ritchie, no? Maxim Alzoba:I think we need to add it to the matrix of the whole membership of SSR2 - so we see the picture about SO/ACs Lori Schulman:However, Scott's Resume is all about security Maxim Alzoba:Norm is not from GNSO at all , if I am not mistaken Emily Barabas:Norm Ritchie unaffiated Emily Barabas:unaffiliated Emily Barabas:James Gannon was NCUC Marika Konings:Correct, Eric was nominated by RSSAC Emily Barabas:Denise is BC Emily Barabas:and that's it for the GNSO: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di… Renata Aquino Ribeiro:what's the url for candidates material again? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I think Naveed has both NCUC and SSAC affiliaton Marika Konings:you may want to look at teh overall composition of the review team, not just the GNSO appointed candidates? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:(need to recall) Lori Schulman:I think that Rao's security experience is more about doing ICANN trainings; Scott's is about real world world experience Marika Konings:There are currently 4 from the AP region vs. 4 from NA region Lori Schulman:I don't know either personally...does anyone? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Rao Naveed is an academic, a teacher. Scott is indeed an industry professional. Emily Barabas:Candidate materials: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Renata Aquino Ribeiro:tks Emily Lori Schulman: If the review team is tasked with reading a contract, then I presume they will read it Lori Schulman:industry professionals do read contracts because they live with them in the business world Maxim Alzoba:!Lori, they usually do not read non relevant contracts Lori Schulman:Agree with Maxim's suggestion to have a review of all compliance agreements Maxim Alzoba:and for SSR2 it is more about backend services company contracts with registry or registrar Lori Schulman:I am not sure that an Engineering professional is more apt to read legal docs. no one likes reading legal docs except lawyers Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I've just re-checked Naveed has NCUC, ALAC and RSSAC affiliations Maxim Alzoba:me is a beurocrate and psecial projects , so I read it :) Renata Aquino Ribeiro:but he submitted as NCUC Lori Schulman:Agree with Marika, I would prefer to match skills to complement Guillemaut Frederic:hello i am back on the audio bridge. Lori Schulman:Scott and Rao's scores are fairly equal with Scott exceeding in some and Rao exceeding in others...they are almost equally balancec Lori Schulman:at least according to the chart Lori Schulman:Rao's soft skills seem to be ranked higher Lori Schulman:Scott's hard skills seem to be ranked higher Lori Schulman:Based on a quick read of this chart Lori Schulman: I lean toward Scott because of the nature of the review Nathalie Peregrine:Erika Mann has just sent her apology for today's call. Lori Schulman:it's a hard core assessment of a business operation Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I think Rao Naveed has more experience than he was ranked, but I would interpret that comes from his resumé, which focus on academic side, even though he did have professional experience Osvaldo Novoa:I support Scott also, due to his profile and the actual group profile. Emily Barabas:These are the poll results from last year Lori Schulman:2017 you mean? Maxim Alzoba:RySG is more lean to support Naveed from SO/AC balance point of view and an ability to bring scientific point of view Lori Schulman:I don't remember voting in the poll but I would vote for Scott now Guillemaut Frederic:RRSG : we would also think Rao would bring a less business like point of view. Guillemaut Frederic:And therefore would prefer Rao Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Naveed is also now the lead of all fellowship coaches so training will be what he does Lori Schulman:Renata, do you know Rao? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I do not know him personally Renata Aquino Ribeiro:But I can speak to the wg he leads Lori Schulman:If Susan knows Scott and Renata knows Rao maybe they could speak to each candidate? Maxim Alzoba:also Naveed has schientific experiene in networking technology Marika Konings:would it be worth asking Norm and Denise what types of skills / type of person would be most valuable to the SSR as they have first hand experience of what is needed / required? Lori Schulman:does "active in ICANN" carry more weight? sometimes, I wonder if we need more objective, less subjective reviewers...I am not sure. ICANN knowledge can certainly give someone a leg up in this multifaceted environment Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes, just to sum up, I think Rao Naveed has been a part of ICANN community for a long time and his extensive knowledge of SO/ACs as fellow and coach could be interesting for SSR2 resuming work. Lori Schulman:no objections Renata Aquino Ribeiro:no Renata Aquino Ribeiro:these are 2 very different profiles, imo. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:And both with considerable knowledge Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I guess SSR2 leads can help w/ their perspective but would be non binding for our assessment right? Osvaldo Novoa:fine with me Renata Aquino Ribeiro:For instance, ICANN contractual compliance this is something currently hammered in ICANN fellows head and not assessable by Naveed's resumé Marika Konings:@Renate - yes, I believe that is the idea Marika Konings:Denise has been involved in the RT from the start (Norm only joined later) Marika Konings:and maybe you also want to reach out to James G.? Marika Konings:as he did work with the RT as well from the start Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I think reaching out to currently leads would be best wouldn't it? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:there are 2 co-chairs in SSR2? Maxim Alzoba:most probably co-chirs would be a good idea Guillemaut Frederic:ok to talk to the co chiars, but we should define what we want to ask ? Osvaldo Novoa:yes Renata Aquino Ribeiro:what type of profile, if they would take advantage of knowledge from ICANN or from industry Emily Barabas:Yes, we can draft something. It sounds like we are asking for a general recommendation about the skills or profile type that is most helpful, correct? Marika Konings:and after feedback has been received, you can run the poll so it can help inform your ranking? Maxim Alzoba:bye all, need to drop the call - will wait e-mail with from Emily Renata Aquino Ribeiro:ok thanks Nathalie Peregrine:Thank you Maxim. Marika Konings:You can submit a placeholder motion and fill in the name once decided Lori Schulman:so maybe the chairs can respond in 2 business days or is that too fast? Emily Barabas:Document deadline is Feb 12 Emily Barabas:Council meeting is Feb 22 Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I think we should get back to list Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I mean send the following steps Lori Schulman:We can go to list with questions, answers and new polls Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I will have to leave call unf. sorry but will catch up soon Marika Konings:correct Emily Marika Konings:you could have it for discussion at the upcoming meeting, if feasible, but for formal consideration, it would need to be submitted with a motion Marika Konings:by the deadline for the following meeting Guillemaut Frederic:nothins special Emily Barabas:Thanks all Guillemaut Frederic:thank you, Guillemaut Frederic:bye, Guillemaut Frederic:bye Lori Schulman:thanks Susan Osvaldo Novoa:thank you, bye

1 0

Poll Results - SSC meeting - Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Feb. 7, 2018

Feb. 7, 2018

Dear SSC members, The poll to evaluate SSR2-RT candidates is now closed. Please find attached poll results and the SSR2-RT skill matrix updated with information from the poll. We will review these results on our call shortly. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday 6 February 2018 at 18:12 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Proposed Agenda - SSC meeting - Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC - NOTE ALSO POLL DEADLINE EXTENSION Dear SSC members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the SSC meeting tomorrow Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes: 1. Welcome/Agenda review/SOI updates 2. Review of poll results – SSR2-RT candidates/skills matrix 3. Proposed revisions to SSC Charter (time permitting) 4. AOB The leadership team has decided to extend the poll to ensure as many people participate as possible. The new deadline is Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 12:00 UTC. The poll is available at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5 . Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

3 2

Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] RE: Proposed Agenda - SSC meeting - Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC - NOTE ALSO POLL DEADLINE EXTENSION
by Emily Barabas Feb. 6, 2018

Feb. 6, 2018

Dear Lori, I am very sorry for the issues you are experiencing. I will send you a separate email following up on the wiki issue you describe. The files are attached for reference. Kind regards, Emily From: Lori Schulman <lschulman(a)inta.org> Date: Tuesday 6 February 2018 at 18:36 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>, "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>, Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: Proposed Agenda - SSC meeting - Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC - NOTE ALSO POLL DEADLINE EXTENSION Dear Emily, I am continuing to have problems with confluence and I am not allowed into the wiki. I had this problem with our last poll, we deleted my SOI, reloaded it and it worked for a while. Last week I tried to access the wiki for this working group and 2 others and was blocked again. I alert Chantelle Doerksen to this issue. If you recall, last time, I spend many hours trying to find a solution. I do not have that kind of time and I am at a loss for why this is happening. I have changed nothing on my end. Will you kindly send me the application in .pdf format? I will not attempt confluence again today. Lori Lori S. Schulman Senior Director, Internet Policy International Trademark Association (INTA) +1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman From: Gnso-ssc [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Barabas Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 12:13 PM To: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Proposed Agenda - SSC meeting - Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC - NOTE ALSO POLL DEADLINE EXTENSION Dear SSC members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the SSC meeting tomorrow Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes: 1. Welcome/Agenda review/SOI updates 2. Review of poll results – SSR2-RT candidates/skills matrix 3. Proposed revisions to SSC Charter (time permitting) 4. AOB The leadership team has decided to extend the poll to ensure as many people participate as possible. The new deadline is Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 12:00 UTC. The poll is available at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r…> . Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Proposed Agenda - SSC meeting - Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC - NOTE ALSO POLL DEADLINE EXTENSION
by Emily Barabas Feb. 6, 2018

Feb. 6, 2018

Dear SSC members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the SSC meeting tomorrow Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes: 1. Welcome/Agenda review/SOI updates 2. Review of poll results – SSR2-RT candidates/skills matrix 3. Proposed revisions to SSC Charter (time permitting) 4. AOB The leadership team has decided to extend the poll to ensure as many people participate as possible. The new deadline is Wednesday 7 February 2018 at 12:00 UTC. The poll is available at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5 . Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

3 2

Deadline tomorrow at 15:00 UTC - SSR2 poll
by Emily Barabas Feb. 5, 2018

Feb. 5, 2018

Dear SSC members, The deadline for completing the poll to evaluate SSR2-RT candidates is TOMORROW Tuesday 6 February at 15:00 UTC. The poll is available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. So far, there has only been one response. Please make sure complete the poll, the results of which will be discussed during the SSC meeting on Wednesday. Please do not hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

2 1

Reminders - SSR2 poll and next meeting
by Emily Barabas Feb. 2, 2018

Feb. 2, 2018

Dear SSC members, Two reminders -- Please take a moment to complete this doodle poll to help staff schedule the next SSC meeting: https://doodle.com/poll/azbfwyrzwfn6d5q4. Please complete the poll to evaluate SSR2-RT candidates by Tuesday 6 February at 15:00 UTC. The poll is available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Doodle poll to schedule next SSC meeting - 7-9 February
by Emily Barabas Jan. 31, 2018

Jan. 31, 2018

Dear SSC members, Please take a moment to complete this poll to help staff schedule an SSC meeting for next week: https://doodle.com/poll/azbfwyrzwfn6d5q4. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Poll open - SSR2-RT skills matrix evaluation - deadline Tuesday 6 February at 15:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Jan. 30, 2018

Jan. 30, 2018

Dear SSC members, The poll to evaluate SSR2-RT candidates is now open for voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5 . As a reminder, you can find the application materials for Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick here: https://community.icann.org/x/qA0hB . The deadline for completing this poll is Tuesday 6 February at 15:00 UTC. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
by Renata Aquino Ribeiro Jan. 29, 2018

Jan. 29, 2018

Yes, that will be good. Thanks Em 29 de jan de 2018 2:29 PM, "Emily Barabas" <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> escreveu: Hi Renata, Thanks for your question. For the moment, the poll is only open to test, so that you can provide feedback on the format. The deadline to suggest changes to the format is tomorrow (Tuesday 30 January) at 11:00 UTC. After that deadline, I will send another email letting everyone know that the poll is open for voting. Typically, we give a deadline of one week from the opening of the poll, so the deadline would be Tuesday 6 February. Will that allow you enough time following the NCPH Intersessional? Kind regards, Emily *From: *Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino(a)gmail.com> *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:24 *To: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> *Cc: *Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com>, " gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hi So the open poll is already the final poll and we can vote on it? What is the deadline please? And possible to postpone it for 1 week after NCPH intersessional? Thanks On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> wrote: Hi Frederic, Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT[community.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> ? I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC conducted in Summer 2017. In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT. Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time. Kind regards, Emily *From: *Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com> *Organization: *SafeBrands *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09 *To: *"gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hello All, Sorry, i might have read something wrong. But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ? Otherwise, this is very accurate. Best regards Fredric Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit : +1 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com>> escribió: Hi,He I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me. Best, Rafik On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy(a)gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com> <susankpolicy(a)gmail.com>> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members, It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode. To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r…>. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers. Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_c…> . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org>> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. >From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. >From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 <+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976> <+31%206%2084507976> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc -- [image: photo] [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_l…] [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png] [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre…> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png] [twitter.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands&…> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png… : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png… : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.png… : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.png… [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.png…: mailclub1 [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.pn… [safebrands.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw…> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.p… Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://maps.google.com/?q=37+rue+Guibal+%E2%80%A2+13003+Marseille+%E2%80%A…> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/apps/linkedin_connect.png] [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr…> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

2 1

Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
by Emily Barabas Jan. 29, 2018

Jan. 29, 2018

Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4… . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

7 11