- Gnso-ssc - lists.icann.org

REMINDER: Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 13, 2017

April 13, 2017

Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

1 0

Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 12, 2017

April 12, 2017

Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com> Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

1 0

For your review - draft motion and communication to the GNSO Council
by Marika Konings April 10, 2017

April 10, 2017

Dear All, As discussed, please find attached for your review a draft motion concerning the GNSO nominations for the RDS Review team in line with the SSC recommendations. Note that the motion follows a similar approach as was used for the selection of SSR2-RT candidates (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201701) Below you find a draft note that could be used to communicate the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council. Please share any comments or edits you may have with the mailing list as soon as possible, but no later than Sunday 9 April at 23.00 UTC. As Julf is the only Council member in this group, apart from Susan who has recused herself, I would like to ask him whether he would be willing to submit the motion as well as recommendations, following your review and input, to the GNSO Council in time for document and motion deadline of Monday 10 April at 23.59 UTC. In order to determine whether Monday’s call is needed – whether to further discuss the SSC agreements and/or the motion, please let staff know by Friday 7 April at 22.00 UTC if you think the call should go ahead. Best regards, Marika ============= Dear All, On behalf of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee, I am pleased to communicate the full consensus recommendations to the GNSO Council in relation to the nominations for the GNSO Review Team: 1. Agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen Despite the relatively short time frame available, the SSC followed the instructions provided in the SSC Charter and conducted a thorough analysis of the candidates that requested GNSO endorsement, with the help of a survey which resulted in the above recommendations. For further details on the information reviewed as well as the survey results, please see https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw. Attached you will find an accompanying motion for your consideration. Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

4 11

FW: [Ext] Re: Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements
by Marika Konings April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

For your information see below. I believe this means that everyone has expressed its support for the proposed agreements which means you have achieved full consensus as required by the SSC Charter. I hope to circulate a draft motion for your review later today. Some of you indicated that you did want to consult with your respective groups which might result in further input, so we will leave the call on Monday in place for now. Best regards, Marika On 4/5/17, 21:01, "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa(a)Antel.com.uy> wrote: Hi Marika, Sorry for my delay, I was waiting for an answer from my constituency. I support the proposal. Best regards, Osvaldo El 5 abr. 2017, a las 18:26, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> escribió: Hi Osvaldo, I believe you are the only one that has not weighed in yet. Is it possible for you to respond to the list with your feedback? Thanks, Marika Begin forwarded message: From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: April 5, 2017 at 09:18:27 CST To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements Dear All, Following the SSC call today I would hereby like to share the tentative agreements that those on the call reached based on the review of the survey results (see also the notes and survey results which were circulated earlier today): 1. Proposed agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Proposed agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen You are now all requested, and especially those that were not able to attend, to indicate your support or lack thereof for these proposed agreements. As a reminder, the top three ranked candidates will automatically get a seat on the RDS Review Team while the candidates ranked 4-7 may be considered by the SO/AC Chairs for addition to the review team should seats remain available and there is a need to add additional members to ensure diversity. Please respond to this message as soon as possible. Your feedback will determine whether or not a call is needed tomorrow. To facilitate a determination on whether a call is needed, please fill out the following doodle poll: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icannorg.doodle.com_po… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icannorg.doodle.com_po…>. We will keep the slot that is currently scheduled for Monday 10 April at 13.00 UTC to allow for further discussion, if needed, regardless of whether the call tomorrow goes ahead or not. In parallel, staff will start work on a draft motion that would capture the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council which can be submitted once the SSC reaches agreement on its recommendations. Thank you, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements
by Marika Konings April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

All, based on the feedback received to date, I would like to propose that we cancel our meeting of tomorrow (Thursday 6 April 2017). We’ll still keep the meeting on Monday as a back-up as several of you indicated that you want to consult with your respective groups. Of course, you are encouraged to share any further feedback and/or comments with the mailing list as soon as possible. Ideally we are able to confirm by the end of Friday whether Monday’s meeting is necessary or not. Best regards, Marika From: <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 09:18 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements Dear All, Following the SSC call today I would hereby like to share the tentative agreements that those on the call reached based on the review of the survey results (see also the notes and survey results which were circulated earlier today): 1. Proposed agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Proposed agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen You are now all requested, and especially those that were not able to attend, to indicate your support or lack thereof for these proposed agreements. As a reminder, the top three ranked candidates will automatically get a seat on the RDS Review Team while the candidates ranked 4-7 may be considered by the SO/AC Chairs for addition to the review team should seats remain available and there is a need to add additional members to ensure diversity. Please respond to this message as soon as possible. Your feedback will determine whether or not a call is needed tomorrow. To facilitate a determination on whether a call is needed, please fill out the following doodle poll: https://icannorg.doodle.com/poll/crcyit68qkbvgmwp[icannorg.doodle.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icannorg.doodle.com_po…>. We will keep the slot that is currently scheduled for Monday 10 April at 13.00 UTC to allow for further discussion, if needed, regardless of whether the call tomorrow goes ahead or not. In parallel, staff will start work on a draft motion that would capture the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council which can be submitted once the SSC reaches agreement on its recommendations. Thank you, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

1 0

Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Following the SSC call today I would hereby like to share the tentative agreements that those on the call reached based on the review of the survey results (see also the notes and survey results which were circulated earlier today): 1. Proposed agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Proposed agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen You are now all requested, and especially those that were not able to attend, to indicate your support or lack thereof for these proposed agreements. As a reminder, the top three ranked candidates will automatically get a seat on the RDS Review Team while the candidates ranked 4-7 may be considered by the SO/AC Chairs for addition to the review team should seats remain available and there is a need to add additional members to ensure diversity. Please respond to this message as soon as possible. Your feedback will determine whether or not a call is needed tomorrow. To facilitate a determination on whether a call is needed, please fill out the following doodle poll: https://icannorg.doodle.com/poll/crcyit68qkbvgmwp. We will keep the slot that is currently scheduled for Monday 10 April at 13.00 UTC to allow for further discussion, if needed, regardless of whether the call tomorrow goes ahead or not. In parallel, staff will start work on a draft motion that would capture the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council which can be submitted once the SSC reaches agreement on its recommendations. Thank you, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

8 7

Mp3, AC Recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Standing Selection Committee 5 April 2017
by Nathalie Peregrine April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear all, Please find the mp3 for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 5 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC Mp3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-05apr17-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p1fr3q3t4m8/<https://participate.icann.org/p1fr3q3t4m8/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=adafe81581d64faa…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/aL-RAw Attendees: Poncelet Illelji, Frederic Guilemaut, Maxim Alzoba, Julf Helsingius, Osvaldo Novoa, Hibah Kamal-Grayson (temporary alternate for Susan Kawaguchi) Apologies: Renate Ribeira Aquino Lori Schulman ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 5 April 2017 Nathalie Peregrine: (4/5/2017 14:37) Dear all, welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection committee call on April 5th 2017 Nathalie Peregrine: (14:54) Agenda page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Maxim Alzoba: (14:56) Hello All Maxim Alzoba: (14:56) please grant me mic rights in Adobe Frédéric Guillemaut: (14:56) Hello All, Nathalie Peregrine: (14:56) Done Maxim! Welcome all! Frédéric Guillemaut: (14:57) ok, i just saw that i got the rights. Maxim Alzoba: (14:57) I will mostly write Frédéric Guillemaut: (14:57) i have no hardware probleme today, this is too simple. I will try to break something Maxim Alzoba: (14:58) in the chat ... the background noise will be on my phone too Maxim Alzoba: (14:58) Ok, will be back in 4 minutes. need to change the location Julf Helsingius: (15:00) Well, with this turnout it might be an efficient meeting... Osvaldo Novoa: (15:01) Hello all Maxim Alzoba: (15:03) back online Maxim Alzoba: (15:03) one second Julf Helsingius: (15:03) yes,but quite a lot of background noise Maxim Alzoba: (15:05) reconnected mic. should be less noise Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:05) Hibal Kamal-Grayson's SOI: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Julf Helsingius: (15:08) I think we have more than enough candidates to consider as it is Osvaldo Novoa: (15:08) Looking at the other candidates would let us see if the gender and geographinc diversity are as required or if we should make any adjustment Julf Helsingius: (15:09) Should we first see if we have a diversity issue? Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:09) Poncelet Illeleji has joined the AC room Maxim Alzoba: (15:11) Ok about support confirmations to be later. Osvaldo Novoa: (15:12) I don´t think we have a diversity issue, on the contrary, I think we have a good group of candidates, but that might change in the whole Review Team once we see who the other SO/AC choose. Julf Helsingius: (15:12) That is why we'll have candidates 4-7 Julf Helsingius: (15:13) Sure! Poncelet Ileleji: (15:13) Very true @Julf Maxim Alzoba: (15:13) 7 is good number for 3 +4 alternatives Maxim Alzoba: (15:14) Mathematical question, why two 1 top places? Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:14) dealying whois works for one month is not a big issue, as hte whole thing has been lasting for a long time ;-) Marika Konings: (15:14) @Maxim - identical score :-) Osvaldo Novoa: (15:14) I support Julf sugestion Maxim Alzoba: (15:15) it is choice of places, then some additional qualification should be brought to select the only top one Julf Helsingius: (15:15) I don't think the order of the top 3 matters Maxim Alzoba: (15:15) on the other hand 1-1-2 is ok for 3top ones Maxim Alzoba: (15:16) or do we mean 1-1-3 Maxim Alzoba: (15:16) My concern is ... about the technical expertise of those top3 Poncelet Ileleji: (15:16) 4 to 7 Julf Helsingius: (15:17) we seem to be OK with the top 3 from all aspects Poncelet Ileleji: (15:17) What technical EXpertise Maxim Maxim Alzoba: (15:17) experience from the Engineering point of view with DNS system Maxim Alzoba: (15:18) not just legal and operational Poncelet Ileleji: (15:18) Yes Julf I say Top 3, 4 to 7 going on Ranking Osvaldo Novoa: (15:18) I think so, the top three are unanimously choosed. We should study the ranking of the next four Poncelet Ileleji: (15:18) Yes Marika based on Q5 Maxim Alzoba: (15:19) I suggest that we see the voting as a draft attempt ... due to incorrect pick of the 3 candidates, not relevant to GNSO Poncelet Ileleji: (15:20) Why will you say incorrect pick Maxim, I think folks voted based on data they had Maxim Alzoba: (15:20) those persons do not belong to the title f the Maxim Alzoba: (15:20) voting Julf Helsingius: (15:20) and those 3 are in the bottom 4 anyway Maxim Alzoba: (15:21) we do not know the composition - so they influenced the score Julf Helsingius: (15:21) I support going by Q5 Osvaldo Novoa: (15:21) +1 Poncelet Ileleji: (15:21) Thanks Julf Q5 +1 Julf Helsingius: (15:23) If we drop them it won't change the result Osvaldo Novoa: (15:23) There is no difference in the result if we go by Q5 or Q3 and Q4, we have the same 7 candidates. ¿Am I wrong? Osvaldo Novoa: (15:23) Sorry, there is a difference in position 7 Julf Helsingius: (15:24) Yes, Remmy vs. Timothy Poncelet Ileleji: (15:24) This Q5 will apply for 4 to 7 not top 3 which qualify Just to stating my earlier take Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:24) yes, number 7 is differetn, and to me timothy cvhen was in the top 3. i would push its application to be at least in the 7 Osvaldo Novoa: (15:25) I think Timothy is a better candidate than Remmy. Maxim Alzoba: (15:25) the voting was clearly called GNSO Candidates Julf Helsingius: (15:26) I wonder if some people supported Remmy for geographical diversity Maxim Alzoba: (15:26) Geo divercity is important from legal perspective Poncelet Ileleji: (15:26) Maxim I felt we had the schedule prior to the survey you could have raised this then thats my opinion Maxim Alzoba: (15:27) I did it Maxim Alzoba: (15:27) the incorrect voting has already raised concerns Julf Helsingius: (15:27) Yes, Maxim did, but I don't see how it would change the result Osvaldo Novoa: (15:28) I agree with Marika. It is up to the GNSO to decide who to support. We are not sure who they are right now Poncelet Ileleji: (15:28) I its not going to change anything Marika, we stand by the result Maxim Alzoba: (15:28) I have a question on GEO diversity Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:29) i saw that first vote as a draft, it is true. to be used to finalise our choice afterwards. So i guess we will have to re vote anyway. Julf Helsingius: (15:29) I was hoping teh next vote would be "is this list OK or not"? Osvaldo Novoa: (15:30) LAC will not be represented but unluckily his qualifications don't justify selecting him. Poncelet Ileleji: (15:30) If we use that criteria Maxim, then I as well talk of Remmy from Africa, but I think this should not be used as a yardstick to me Osvaldo Novoa: (15:31) +1 Maxim Alzoba: (15:31) someone might be required from other reasons, at least at alternative places... to be able to summon those ... but it is secondary ... so if we think that it is not that important now - I will drop it Maxim Alzoba: (15:32) I suggest we have additional questions to top 11 about texhnical experience Poncelet Ileleji: (15:32) I want to propose Q5 for 4 to 7 I need this be seconded Please Julf Helsingius: (15:32) I think we should provide the ranking as non-binding guidance Julf Helsingius: (15:32) seconding Osvaldo Novoa: (15:32) Any way the agreements of this call should be ratify or not by the rest of the group. We can propose a confirmation to the whole of the group and see if we reach a consensus, it would be like a re-vote. Maxim Alzoba: (15:33) no gender diversity in top 3 though ... but it is balanced by 4-7 places Poncelet Ileleji: (15:33) Yes Maxim its balanced by 4 to 7 Osvaldo Novoa: (15:35) We were asked to priorize the candidates Maxim Alzoba: (15:35) I support sending the list of 7 Julf Helsingius: (15:35) I support sending the 7 Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:36) yes Osvaldo Novoa: (15:37) I think that the only difference is in number 7 position Julf Helsingius: (15:37) Can we agree on 1-6v to start with? Hibah Kamal-Grayson: (15:37) I'm fine with having four additional names without ranking them, but I defer to others if people feel strongly about ranking 4-7 Marika Konings: (15:39) The current ranking of #4 - 7 = 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen Maxim Alzoba: (15:39) Q5 is more important, given that support comes not from our opinion but from Chairs Osvaldo Novoa: (15:39) i am ok with this ranking Hibah Kamal-Grayson: (15:39) I am ok with it as well Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:39) i am ok with tese four people Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:39) timothy marc volker stefania Poncelet Ileleji: (15:39) Am okay with the ranking Marika Julf Helsingius: (15:42) I was hoping we could avoid the call tomorrow Julf Helsingius: (15:42) (as it is really inconvenient for me) Marika Konings: (15:43) if you can all agree on the list, there is no need for a call (but no pressure :-) Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:43) this is a good list i guess. Julf Helsingius: (15:43) I am fine with the list Julf Helsingius: (15:43) Then there is no point in the call tomorrow Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:43) i ll send it today, will wait for the return, Poncelet Ileleji: (15:43) Its Feasible to me Marika Julf Helsingius: (15:43) if people can't commit Maxim Alzoba: (15:44) question about mp3 record/chat/transcript Julf Helsingius: (15:44) I guess we are in trouble if someone comes back with a "no way" on Monday Maxim Alzoba: (15:45) I do not think that hurry is more important then proper review Maxim Alzoba: (15:46) it would be great to have it as soon as possible Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:46) Recordings and notes will be circulated under a couple of hours after the end of the meeitng. Transcript will be available in the next 8 - 10 hours. Julf Helsingius: (15:46) Is the transcript for general circulation? Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:46) The transcription is posted on the GNSO master calendar: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou… Julf Helsingius: (15:47) Thanks! Julf Helsingius: (15:47) Just good to keep in mind if we discuss individual people Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:47) And also on the meeting wiki page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Maxim Alzoba: (15:48) what is the dtae /UTC time of when we need to say - yes we need tomorrow call/no we do not need it Maxim Alzoba: (15:48) ? Maxim Alzoba: (15:49) doodle poll finishing by that time? Maxim Alzoba: (15:49) with yes/not/comment? Maxim Alzoba: (15:51) or to send replacement if they can not attend Julf Helsingius: (15:51) One possible answer might be "can't get answer in time" Maxim Alzoba: (15:51) it is no/no/no :) Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:51) thank you all, Osvaldo Novoa: (15:51) Thank you very much, I really productive meeting. Bye Julf Helsingius: (15:51) Thanks, Marika! Maxim Alzoba: (15:51) Bye all Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:52) bye Poncelet Ileleji: (15:52) Thank You Marika, and Bye all

1 0

Notes and Action Items - GNSO Standing Selection Committee Meeting - 5 April 2017
by Emily Barabas April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting. Marika will shortly send out an email detailing next steps and a Doodle poll about the meeting tentatively scheduled for tomorrow. Kind regards, Emily --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes: 1. Welcome - As a reminder, the SSC operates by full consensus. As the full group is not in attendance on today's call, any outcomes of this call must be confirmed with the full group. - For this nomination, staff has requested that this group considers those candidates who have requested GNSO endorsement. Therefore, only those seeking GNSO endorsement are listed in the survey. The SSC may choose to consider those candidates who requested endorsement from other SOs and ACs. - The GNSO Council has asked SSC to provide recommendations in time for the 20 April meeting. The document deadline for the Council Meeting is 10 April. Once the GNSO Council receives list of endorsed candidates, they must consider the nominations and can choose to adopt them. The adopted list of candidates then goes to the SOs and ACs for consideration. The 25 April deadline is for candidates to be nominated from the different SOs and ACs. - If it is not possible to make these deadlines, the group may want to provide a rationale for requesting additional time. - The top three candidates automatically get a seat on the Review Team. The group may want to provide a ranking for candidates 4 through 7. - While the top three candidates are guaranteed slots, the others may also be considered, weighing for diversity and other considerations. 2. Review Survey Results - Survey results are based on scores to the following questions: -- Question 3: Based on the candidate's materials or your own personal experience, does the candidate appear to qualify as a GNSO endorsed candidate? -- Question 4: Does the candidate's application clearly demonstrate that the candidate has the necessary expertise and competence to do the work? -- Question 5: Based on your assessment of the responsibilities, skills, expertise and desired attributes as outlined in the call for volunteers, please rank these candidates in order of preference (1 being most preferred candidate, 14 being the least preferred candidate) 3. Confirm Next Steps & next meeting (if needed) - Suggestion: Put aside the top 3, as these are the clear top choices. Continue the conversation on ranking candidates 4 through 7 on this call, share on the mailing list to continue the conversation. If no consensus on the mailing list is reached, leverage the next scheduled meeting to work towards consensus. - Candidates 1-3: Susan Kawaguchi, Erika Mann, Stephanie Perrin - Candidates 4-7: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen - Staff will send out notes, recordings, and summary email about the outcome of this call. - A call is tentatively scheduled for tomorrow. We will go ahead with this call unless there is clear agreement that there is no need to go ahead with this call. Staff will circulate a Doodle poll and will make a determination about whether to have a call by 13:00 UTC tomorrow. An additional call is scheduled for Monday in case further discussion is needed. - Staff will work on a draft motion in parallel.

1 0

Please participate - Evaluation Survey GNSO Candidates for RDS Review Team
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, The Evaluation Survey for GNSO Candidates for the RDS Review Team is now live: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GNSORDSRT. Please complete the survey as soon as possible, but at the latest COB Tuesday 4 April so that the results can be aggregated for Wednesday’s SSC meeting. Prior to completing the survey, please make sure to review the candidate applications as well as the call for volunteers which outlines the responsibilities, skills & experience and desired attributes – see https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw. As there were no objections, the results, both aggregated as well as well as individual responses, will be shared public. Do take into account the potential sensitivity of individual comments as you fill out the survey. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

3 5

For your review - survey results
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Thank you all for participating in the survey on such short notice. I am happy to report that all SSC members appointed to date provided their input (note, we are still waiting the appointment of one NCSG rep). Here you can find the aggregated results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-L2VBBBLB/. As some of you expressed concerns about sharing the individual scoring publicly, I have not made that information available at this stage. You may first want to come to agreement on how to handle that information (for example, if there is concern about sharing it publicly, maybe it could be shared on an individual basis between SSC members with the commitment that the information is not shared outside of the group?). To facilitate your review and discussion, I’ve also created the attached excel sheet in which I’ve aggregated the scores for Q3 and Q4 and ranked based on the survey results and also listed the ranking based on Q5. You will note that the top 6 on that basis is identical for Q3&4 and Q5, but there are some differences following that which you may need to discuss. I hope this is helpful. Talk to you all soon. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

5 5