- NA-Discuss - lists.icann.org

At-Large community involvement in policy development
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 16, 2007

May 16, 2007

Dear Community: In order to broaden the opportunities for At-Large throughout the world to get involved in the development of policy throughout ICANN, the existing liaisons which ALAC has appointed to the various standing bodies of ICANN is asking for volunteers! Mailing lists have been established to help the existing liaisons get some help - these are big jobs for one person to handle as they sometimes involve participating in several different committees or working groups. The new mailing lists can be found below. In addition, on the ALAC wiki is a new section to keep you up-to-date on what is going on. Visit https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi? at_large_policy_working_groups and you will find an evolving and growing set of pages telling you what At-Large is involved in - and how you can get involved in too! GNSO Moderator & Liaison– Alan Greenberg Email - gnso-liaison(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org URL to public page: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ gnso-liaison_atlarge-lists.icann.org ALAC Wiki Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?gnso_liaison ICANN Board Liaison Moderator & Liaison– Vittorio Bertola Email - board-liaison(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org URL to public page: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ board-liaison_atlarge-lists.icann.org ALAC Wiki Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?icann_board_liaison ccNSO Moderator & Liaison – Siavash Shahshahani Email - ccnso-liaison(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org URL to public page: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ ccnso-liaison_atlarge-lists.icann.org ALAC Wiki Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?ccnso_liaison IDN Policy Development Moderator & Liaison – Hong Xue Email - idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org URL to public page: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ idn-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.org ALAC Wiki Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?idn_policy_formation WHOIS Policy Moderator & Liaison – Wendy Seltzer Email - whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org URL to public page: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ whois-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.org ALAC Wiki Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?whois_policy -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [NA-Discuss] Formation Schedule - are we on track ?
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

There is no recognised voting system in the international world which I am aware of which counts abstentions as votes. This is also true in the corporate world. As background, I can make these statements not only based upon 20 years of working with international organisations and participating in treaty making conferences, but also because I have recently read the authoritative work on rules of procedure of international conferences and standing committees of international organisations, and gone through the UNGA rules, the UN Model Rules, and the ECOSOC rules in order to come up with draft rules of procedure for At-Large meetings. It would be unwise to go against all established precendents and count abstentions as votes. If you were to do that, it would be very easy to argue that the vote counting method was not valid. This is also logical - if you think about it, counting abstentions as votes means that you are basically counting an abstention as a 'no' vote. If people meant to say 'No', they would have voted that way. Indeed, a number of voters in this election have specifically said that they were abstaining because they didn't have time to properly analyse the situation and didn't feel comfortable voting either way. This sensible approach should not be used to turn their vote into a 'no' vote. On 15/05/07, Wendy Seltzer <wendy(a)seltzer.com> wrote: > Mr. Robert Guerra wrote: > > Wendy: > > > > I believe Luc posted a message with the results of the OP vote. let > > me find it.. > > > > > >> From: "Luc Faubert" <LFaubert(a)conceptum.ca> > >> Date: May 2, 2007 2:49:49 AM EDT (CA) > >> To: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett(a)internet.law.pro>, "All Accredited At > >> Large Structures ((ALS)) in the North AmericanRegion" <na- > >> als(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> Cc: NA Discuss <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [NA-ALS] Voting Procedural Correction > >> > >> Here's a sheet with the current results for the vote on the OP. > >> > >> SUMMARY > >> Yes: 14 > >> No: 5 > >> Abstentions: 3 > >> Didn't vote: 2 > > > > Not sure how to treat the abstentons & non voters. So, i'll assume i > > can just add the yea's and nea's..Total # of votes -19 (14+5). Doing > > the math - Votes in favor = 73 %, opposed 26%. > > I'd count abstentions in the total, we didn't reach 70% of the total, > and thus fail. > > If we can't get 70% for the OP, they shouldn't be Operative. > > --Wendy > > > > > Our criteria for approving by rough consensus was set at 70%. as such > > we - seem to have adopted the OP by rough consensus. > > > > > > regards, > > > > Robert > > --- > > Robert Guerra <rguerra(a)privaterra.org> > > Managing Director, Privaterra > > Tel +1 416 893 0377 > > > > > > > > On 15-May-07, at 9:10 AM, Wendy Seltzer wrote: > > > >> Robert Guerra wrote: > >>> I thought it would be a good idea to post a copy of the Formation > >>> Schedule found on our page on icannwiki. > >>> > >>> are we on track, on schedule? Two key questions - was the MoU > >>> adopted by rough consensus, and if so has it been received by icann > >>> legal for review? > >> As far as I know, no. I never even saw the results of the vote on the > >> Operating Principles. Were those adopted? > >> > >> But I don't think that deliberate speed is a problem. > >> > >> --Wendy > >> > >>> regards > >>> > >>> Robert > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.icannwiki.org/The_North_American_Regional_At- > >>> Large_Organization > >>> > >>> [snipped] > >>> > >>> Formation Schedule > >>> > >>> 2007.04.20: Certified ALSes and individual users name their 2 voting > >>> representatives forming the General Assembly (must be entered at > >>> NARALO Contacts) > >>> 2007.04.27: Members approve final version of NARALO Operating > >>> Principles (Draft) > >>> 2007.05.04: Members vote for Chair and Secretariat of NARALO > >>> 2007.05.11: Members approve final version of Memorandum of > >>> Understanding between NARALO and ICANN (Draft) > >>> 2007.05.14: MOU is sent to ICANN legal for approval > >>> 2007.05.14: The Chair opens the 30-day period for submission of > >>> Statements of Interest for the election of our 2 ALAC representatives > >>> 2007.05.25: ICANN legal approves MOU > >>> 2007.05.28: ICANN opens 21-day public comment period for NARALO MOU > >>> 2007.06.14: The Chair closes the 30-day period for submission of > >>> Statements of Interest for the election of our 2 ALAC representatives > >>> 2007.06.18: ICANN closes 21-day public comment period for NARALO MOU > >>> 2007.06.21: Members select 2 NARALO ALAC representatives > >>> 2007.06.25: ICANN and ALSes sign the MOU and seating of ALAC > >>> representatives in San Juan, Puerto Rico ICANN meeting > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> NA-Discuss mailing list > >>> NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge- > >>> lists.icann.org > >>> --- > >>> Draft MoU with ICANN: > >>> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU > >>> > >>> Draft Operating Principles: > >>> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP > >>> > >>> Draft Code of Conduct: > >>> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org > >> phone: +1.617.418.3456 / +44 (0)1865 287203 // cell: 07785 550361 > >> Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute > >> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society > >> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html > >> http://www.chillingeffects.org/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NA-Discuss mailing list > > NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… > > --- > > Draft MoU with ICANN: > > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU > > > > Draft Operating Principles: > > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP > > > > Draft Code of Conduct: > > http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct > > > > > > > -- > Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org > phone: +1.617.418.3456 / +44 (0)1865 287203 // cell: 07785 550361 > Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute > Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html > http://www.chillingeffects.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > NA-Discuss mailing list > NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… > --- > Draft MoU with ICANN: > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU > > Draft Operating Principles: > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP > > Draft Code of Conduct: > http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

4 3

Re: [NA-Discuss] Formation Schedule - are we on track ?
by Thompson, Darlene May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

Ah, too true on the rude. Sorry about that its just rather hard when there are those trying to be constructive and then just keep getting pulled down and pulled down. Point well taken, though. Unfortunately, those that you are describing are in the minority. The rest of us (on both sides of the border) are trying to keep things moving and are trying to encourage more and more to participate in order to broaden the number of ALSs - even to the point of trying to be more inclusive (eg the org-of-orgs thing). It is really a shame that more outreach wasn't done years ago when there was more time. D Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-6531 Fax: (867) 979-8870 dthompson(a)gov.nu.ca -----Original Message----- From: John L [mailto:johnl@iecc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:37 PM To: Thompson, Darlene Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Formation Schedule - are we on track ? > I am just against certain ones trying to slow the process down for no > apparent reason. If there were those that wanted a pause so as to > discuss the bi-cameral thing, they had plenty of time to discuss it if > they WERE actually interested in it (and not in just slowing things > down). Hi. I could swear I have mail here somewhere from a person with a name very similar to yours bewailing the rude tone in this forum. Believe it or not, we're not opposed for the sake of being opposed, we're opposed because we think that a RALO that is dominated by a handful of tiny organizations and that excludes the individuals that the ALAC is supposed to represent is worse than no RALO at all. R's, John

2 1

Re: [NA-Discuss] Public Comment Period opens on Telnic proposal to amend registry agreement for .TEL gTLD
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-11may07.htm. ICANN Opens Comment Period on Telnic Proposal 11 May 2007 On 27 April 2007, ICANN posted for public information a proposal from Telnic Ltd., the sponsor of the .TEL top-level domain, to amend the .TEL Registry Agreement. Specifically, Telnic is seeking to alter the public display of Whois for TEL customers pursuant to Appendix S, Section VII of the .TEL Registry Agreement (http://www.icann.org/tlds/ agreements/tel/appendix-s-07apr06.htm#Part7). (Telnic intends to launch registry operations in late 2007/early 2008.) Telnic’s request states that they have been in communication with the UK Information Commissioner’s Office concerning Telnic’s current contractual obligations on Whois. However, there is no pending enforcement action against Telnic, therefore this is not a situation that would trigger the Draft ICANN Procedure for Handling Whois Conflicts with Privacy Law (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois- privacy/whois_national_laws_procedure.htm). In addition, this change is being proposed while discussion continues within the GNSO Policy Development Process on Whois. Telnic (and all gTLD registries) will be required to comply with new Whois consensus policy when approved by the Board. As provided for by existing consensus policy (http://www.icann.org/ registries/rsep/rsep.html), ICANN has undertaken a preliminary determination period to determine whether the proposed service might raise significant security or stability, or competition issues. ICANN's determination is that the proposed amendment does not raise such issues. The next step in evaluation is that (because implementation of the proposal would require a change to the .TEL Registry Agreement) ICANN will post the proposed amendment, solicit public comment and refer the proposal to the ICANN Board for consideration. A copy of the proposed amendment is available at http://www.icann.org/ tlds/agreements/tel/tel-amendment-30may07.pdf [PDF, 25K] and provides for changes to Appendix 1, Appendix 5 and Appendix S, Part VI of the .TEL Registry Agreement. The comments on the proposal may be submitted to registryservice(a)icann.orguntil 11 June 2007 23:59 UTC and may be viewed at http://forum.icannorg/lists/registryservice/. The process for considering new registry services is posted athttp:// www.icann.org/registries/rsep/rsep.html. All documentation regarding this proposed service and corresponding comment forum has been previously posted as part of the procedure at http://www.icann.org/ registries/rsep/#2007004. -- Patrick Patrick L. Jones Registry Liaison Manager Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Tel: +1 310 301 3861 Fax: +1 310 823 8649 patrick.jones(a)icann.org

1 0

Vote on ALS Applications
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

Dear All: Since queries have come in, be advised that the voting on the following applications has been held over for a few extra days to allow a few members of the ALAC who have been busy to cast their vote. We expect to be able to announce the results of the voting officially very shortly and on behalf of the ALAC, let me extend apologies to the applications who are waiting for the results: Alberta Community Network Association (ACNA) Association for Community Networking (AFCN) Slovenian Consumers Association (ZPS) Telecommunities Canada Consumers Protection Centre (KEPKA) EFN National Consumers' League Consumer Reports Webwatch Internauta Brasil ISOC Burundi -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

Dear Community: I believe the materials below will be of interest. Begin forwarded message: > From: Denise Michel <denise.michel(a)icann.org> > Date: 15 May 2007 14:26:38 BDT > To: Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton(a)spamcop.net> > Subject: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy > > Attached are documents relating to Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy > under consideration by the GNSO Council, which is discussing status > and next steps: > > 1) is the draft advisory, unchanged from last message in January. > <Draft-Transfer-Advisory-24jan07.doc> > > 2) is some notes on possible tighter wording/clarifications to the > existing policy. This consists of 4 points taken out of the previous > "policy issues" > list--all of these had to do with the reasons for denial section. > <DenialClarifications-28mar07.doc> > > 3) is a revised list of policy issues with the above-mentioned items > taken out. > <Draft-TransfersPolicyList-28mar07> > > > Please let me know if At-Large requires further information. > > Regards, > > Denise > > Denise Michel > Vice President, Policy Development > ICANN www.icann.org > denise.michel@icann.org

1 0

Formation Schedule - are we on track ?
by Robert Guerra May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

I thought it would be a good idea to post a copy of the Formation Schedule found on our page on icannwiki. are we on track, on schedule? Two key questions - was the MoU adopted by rough consensus, and if so has it been received by icann legal for review? regards Robert -- http://www.icannwiki.org/The_North_American_Regional_At- Large_Organization [snipped] Formation Schedule 2007.04.20: Certified ALSes and individual users name their 2 voting representatives forming the General Assembly (must be entered at NARALO Contacts) 2007.04.27: Members approve final version of NARALO Operating Principles (Draft) 2007.05.04: Members vote for Chair and Secretariat of NARALO 2007.05.11: Members approve final version of Memorandum of Understanding between NARALO and ICANN (Draft) 2007.05.14: MOU is sent to ICANN legal for approval 2007.05.14: The Chair opens the 30-day period for submission of Statements of Interest for the election of our 2 ALAC representatives 2007.05.25: ICANN legal approves MOU 2007.05.28: ICANN opens 21-day public comment period for NARALO MOU 2007.06.14: The Chair closes the 30-day period for submission of Statements of Interest for the election of our 2 ALAC representatives 2007.06.18: ICANN closes 21-day public comment period for NARALO MOU 2007.06.21: Members select 2 NARALO ALAC representatives 2007.06.25: ICANN and ALSes sign the MOU and seating of ALAC representatives in San Juan, Puerto Rico ICANN meeting

5 7

ICANN San Juan: Invitation for North American ALS community
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 13, 2007

May 13, 2007

(French version to follow in due course) Dear North American ALS Representatives: ICANN is pleased to invite one representative from each accredited and applicant ALS to attend the San Juan ICANN Meeting in June. The San Juan ICANN Meeting will be held from 25th to 29th June – further details may be found at http://www.icann.org/meetings/sanjuan - and will feature tutorials, workshops, and stakeholder meetings on a variety of issues of interest to end-users (such as internationalized domain names and the introduction of new top level domain names), as well as public forums and a public meeting of ICANN's Board of Directors. There is expected to be a total of one to two sessions of the North American ALS community as part of the San Juan meeting. The first is scheduled for Sunday, 24th June, from approximately 09:00 to 17:00, with a break for lunch and coffee breaks in the morning and afternoon. If another meeting is required, it will be scheduled so that it allows all of you to attend the other ICANN events with as few conflicts as possible. Should your MoU with ICANN be completed on or at the San Juan meetings, and subject to agreement by the Office of the General Counsel on the willingness of ICANN to sign the text you agree on, a signing ceremony will be arranged in which those ALSes who wish to participate will be able to do so. Like those of all the other regions, this will be done as a part of the main public meeting on Thursday morning and will be witnessed by the Board of Directors, with signing by Paul Twomey, the Chief Executive of ICANN on behalf of ICANN. We will work with you in the interim to determine a draft agenda for your meetings. Of course, some of the agenda items are dependent upon your pre-conference work on your Operating Principles, Code of Conduct, and draft Memorandum of Understanding to form your Regional At-Large Organisation with ICANN, as this will determine how much of the discussions, if any, will be about these documents and how much will be focused on other matters, including elections for regional officers if those are not concluded in the remaining weeks from now until the June meeting. Conference documents, draft proposals, and agendas will be published online on the NARALO website and linked to the NARALO pages on ICANNWiki. MEETING VENUE: ICANN will make all the technical arrangements for the meeting. REMOTE PARTICIPATION: Remote participation via voice will be available for those who are unable to attend in person. Further details about this will be provided on the wiki pages devoted to the meeting. MAIN ICANN MEETING ACCESS: You may register for the main ICANN meeting from the Lisbon meeting page as above, or you may choose to register upon arrival. There is no fee for registration in either case. TRAVEL SUPPORT: ICANN is able to provide travel support and hotel accommodation for one representative of each At Large Structure, and candidates for ALS status, who have identified themselves as requiring travel assistance, as follows: Airfare, to and from San Jan, by economy class; Hotel accommodation at a hotel TBD – for the the period from the 23rd to 28th June inclusive; Airport transfers to and from the hotel; A new travel policy is in the final stages of being put into place. This will feature one of the following possible methods to handle costs of meals and other incidental costs (ground transportation if necessary to and from your home airport and the like): 1) A reimbursement-based system where you keep your receipts and submit a claim for them after the fact. 2) A lump sum payment made to you in advance of the meeting to cover these costs, in which case you do not need to submit expenses or ask for reclaiming of expenses, or; 3) A per-diem payment made in advance to you to cover these costs. The attached travel policy details all that you need to know about the travel and subsistence assistance provided by ICANN. Please read it carefully. Once a final determination on the above matters is made, you will be informed of it in detail. VISAS: Please see the attached policy for more information. Invitation letters, if you require them, are not issued directly by ICANN, but by the host for the meeting. You may find more information about this from http://icannsanjuan.pr/visa.php. If you find your local US embassy requires additional documentation than what is available from the host, send an email to travel-staff@atlarge- lists.icann.org and we’ll work to help you. IMPORTANT NOTE ON VISAS: The USA can often take 90 days to process visa applications for many countries. If you require a visa and have not applied allowing for a normal processing period as that has been defined by the US government in respect of applications from your country, ensure you contact your nearest embassy from the URL above to ensure that it is possible for you to get a visa in good time to attend the San Juan meeting. Note that in some, but not all, countries US embassies do have an expedited handling process available for events such as conferences like the ICANN meeting. These can, if available, cut the amount of time for an application to be processed. READY TO RSVP? As per the attached travel policy document, please provide us with the information immediately below. This should be sent by email as described in the attached travel policy, to travel-staff@atlarge- lists.icann.org. DEADLINE FOR RSPVs: In order to keep costs of travel down, we need to receive your RSVPs in good time to take advantage of advance ticket purchase windows. THE DEADLINE FOR RSPVing FOR TRAVEL SUPPORT IS MONDAY, 21st MAY 2007 AT NOON UTC. AFTER THAT TIME, YOU ARE FREE TO ATTEND IN PERSON AT YOUR OWN EXPENSE, BUT TRAVEL SUPPORT FROM ICANN WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE. 1) Full name of the delegate (as shown on the delegate’s passport: 2) Your Nationality (if more than one, the nationality you will travel under): 3) The departure city: 4) Your departure date (in good time to arrive NLT the evening of 23rd June): 5) Your return date: 6) The city you are returning to: 7) If you require a visa to attend the meeting, when did you apply, and has it been issued? I acknowledge receipt of the travel policy for At-Large which has been provided to me, and I agree to abide by it and any subsequent amendments which are sent to me. Name: _______________________________ Date: ________________________________ Signature: ___________________________ We look forward to welcoming you to ICANN San Juan! All the best, ICANN At-Large Staff

1 0

ICANN's recent request for Public Comments - CIRA's response..
by Mr. Robert Guerra May 12, 2007

May 12, 2007

in case some of you haven't seen it yet, below is the the URL of CIRA response to ICANN's recent request for Public Comments http://cira.ca/news-releases/201.html (english) http://cira.ca/news-releases-french/188.html (french) regards, Robert

1 0

At-Large Request for an Issues Report on Domain Tasting
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

Dear Community: I am pleased to forward you the email below. At-Large has now become the first advisory committee ever to request an Issues Report of the GNSO Council on an issue of policy. The report is to be delivered to the GNSO Council by 24th May 2007. The At-Large request was supported by other ICANN constituencies, thanks in large part to the hard work of ALAC GNSO Liaison Alan Greenberg. Having multiple constituencies supporting a request like this is very important to the next steps in the Policy Development Process. The supporting constituencies are: Registry Constituency Commercial and Business Constituency Intellectual Property Constituency For those of you who are not familiar with the process which the request for an Issues Report is part of, please review the Description of the GNSO and Policy Development Process documents available in 4 languages at: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi? lisbon_documents Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> > From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> > Date: 9 May 2007 05:11:08 BDT > Resent-To: Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton(a)spamcop.net> > To: alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: [At-Large] Fwd: Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting > > >> To: GNSO Council <council(a)gnso.icann.org> >> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >> Subject: Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting >> >> Dear Council members, >> >> The At-Large Advisory Committee is requesting that ICANN staff >> prepare an Issues Report on Domain Tasting. The formal request is >> attached. >> >> According to ICANN Bylaws, no action is required from Council at >> this time. Once the Issues Report is delivered to the GNSO, >> Council must then decide whether or not to initiate a PDP. >> >> Alan_______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge- > lists.icann.org > > www.alac.icann.org > www.icannalac.org

1 0