- Ccwg-auctionproceeds - lists.icann.org

No meeting then?
by Sylvia Cadena Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Hi everyone, A bit over 15 minutes after the meeting was supposed to start and I can only see Julie and myself on Adobe. [image1.png] Guess there is no meeting, so off to to sleep then as it is almost 1:00 am here. Hope you all have a happy Christmas and best wishes for 2019. Regards, Sylvia ———— Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia(a)apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> | http://www.apnic.foundation<http://www.apnic.foundation/> ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 | http://www.isif.asia<http://www.isif.asia/> | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia | 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia<x-apple-data-detectors://5> | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100<tel:+61%207%203858%203100> | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199<tel:3858%203199> * Love trees. Print only if necessary.

1 0

Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting - 19 December at 14:30 UTC
by Emily Barabas Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday 19 December at 14:30 UTC for 90 minutes. Attached you will find the public comment review tool, which we will discuss in agenda item 3. Kind regards, Emily Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting - 19 December at 14:30 UTC 1. Roll call 2. Welcome & DOI/SOI updates 3. High-level overview of public comment review tool 4. Next steps for reviewing public comments 5. CCWG meeting schedule 6. Next steps for work plan towards Final Report 7. Reconfirmation of membership 8. AOB Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 1

Reminder CSP deadline
by Nathalie Peregrine Dec. 18, 2018

Dec. 18, 2018

Dear all, We would like to remind you about the upcoming Chairing Skills Program (CSP). If you would like to take part in the training and benefit from individual feedback on your chairing skills, or if you are willing to share your experience and act as a coach we kindly ask that you register here [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_forms_…> by next Friday, 21 December, 2018. You will find some general information about the program in the flyer enclosed and in more detail here: https://community.icann.org/x/8xK4Aw. The CSP will be held during ICANN64 in Kobe, Japan with a preparatory call beforehand. Participation includes a reasonable time commitment between 3-7 hours, but offers great opportunities for effective participation at ICANN meetings. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Sandra Hoferichter, Chair of the ICANN Academy Working Group at info(a)hoferichter.eu<mailto:info@hoferichter.eu> or the PRS Team at prs(a)icann.org<mailto:prs@icann.org>. Thank you, PRS Team Carlos Reyes Strategic Policy Planning Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Mobile: +1 202 802 8019 Skype: carlos.reyes.icann www.icann.org

1 0

Multistakeholder Ethos Award 2019 - Nominations Open
by Nathalie Peregrine Dec. 17, 2018

Dec. 17, 2018

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-12-17-en Nomination Period Opens For ICANN Multistakeholder Ethos Award | Award Targeted for ICANN65 | Nominations Close 22 March 2019 Submit Nominations Via the Ethos Award Nomination Form<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10p6ycAj9Cve9J5YcbT8eG_1aKMLPNkJtKQPga0_8PE…> ICANN is pleased to announce the opening of the nomination period for ICANN's Multistakeholder Ethos Award. Launched in 2014 at ICANN50 in London, the Multistakeholder Ethos Award recognizes ICANNparticipants who have deeply invested in consensus-based solutions, acknowledging the importance of ICANN's multistakeholder model of Internet governance, and contributed in a substantive way to the higher interests of ICANN's organization and its community. The ideal recipient(s) will have served in roles in multiple ICANN working groups or committees and collaborated with more than one Supporting Organization and/or Advisory Committee in a significant capacity. Candidates for the award will demonstrate at least five years of participation in the ICANN Community. Candidates will be evaluated by a panel of community members appointed by the Chairs of each Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees using a merit-based point system evaluated against three criteria: 1. Demonstrated ability to work across community lines with both familiar and unfamiliar ICANNStakeholders with the aim of consensus building and collaboration that substantiate ICANN's multistakeholder model; 2. Facilitator of dialogue and open discussion in a fair and collegial manner, through the spirit of collaboration as shown through empathy and demonstrating a sincere desire to engage with people from other backgrounds, cultures, and interests; and 3. Demonstrated additional devotional factors exhibited by time spent supporting ICANN's multistakeholder model and its overall effectiveness through volunteer service via working groups or committees. Please submit your nominations via this Nomination Form<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10p6ycAj9Cve9J5YcbT8eG_1aKMLPNkJtKQPga0_8PE…> including detailed information outlining why the nominee meets the award criteria. Any additional information in support of nominations and/or questions about the award process may be submitted via email ethosaward2019(a)icann.org<mailto:ethosaward2019@icann.org>. Award recipient(s) will be announced in June 2019 at ICANN65 Marrakech. For more insights on the award program, please consult the ICANN Community Wiki.<https://community.icann.org/x/YyOAAw> Submit Nominations Via the Ethos Award Nomination Form<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10p6ycAj9Cve9J5YcbT8eG_1aKMLPNkJtKQPga0_8PE…>

1 0

2nd REMINDER to complete doodle / Extension of Public Comment Deadline andNext CCWG Meeting
by Terri Agnew Dec. 4, 2018

Dec. 4, 2018

2nd reminder to complete doodle below Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://doodle.com/poll/8tbdw863wer7cq8n Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

ICANN calendar feature
by Nathalie Peregrine Dec. 3, 2018

Dec. 3, 2018

Dear all, You will shortly be able to find all SO/AC public conference calls and webinar events listed on the ICANN calendar which you can find here: https://features.icann.org/calendar Where meetings are members-only, information will be provided as to where recordings and transcriptions will be posted. This global calendar does not in any way replace respective SO, AC, SG and C calendars but allows an overall view of events which ICANN community members could be interested in and will also contribute to avoiding scheduling conflicts. We hope you find this useful. Kind regards, Nathalie Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org%20> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://EB3A6F47-9760-400D-A39B-A7EFFC56B467/learn.icann.org/courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>

1 0

REMINDER to complete doodle / Extension of Public Comment Deadline andNext CCWG Meeting
by Terri Agnew Dec. 3, 2018

Dec. 3, 2018

**REMINDER TO COMPLETE DOODLE BELOW Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://doodle.com/poll/8tbdw863wer7cq8n Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting
by Emily Barabas Nov. 27, 2018

Nov. 27, 2018

Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://doodle.com/poll/8tbdw863wer7cq8n Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

4 6

to whom Thanksgiving is relevant.....
by Vanda Scartezini Nov. 19, 2018

Nov. 19, 2018

Dear all, My best wishes for a joyful and peaceful celebration with all you love! Kisses Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Xavier Calvez <xavier.calvez(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 07:45 To: Erika Mann <erika(a)erikamann.com>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org> Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl(a)iecc.com>, "ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Request for input from ICANN Board - CCWG-AP Not that I can replace Sam, but I will be attending most of the meeting and will help if I can. Thank you. Best, Xavier Xavier Calvez ICANN – SVP & CFO 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Phone: 310-301-5838 Mobile: 805-312-0052 Fax: 310-957-2348 From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika(a)erikamann.com> Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 12:44 PM To: Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org> Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl(a)iecc.com>, "ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Request for input from ICANN Board - CCWG-AP Received and noted. Thank you Sam, we will miss you. Erika Erika Mann Co-Chair CCWG AP erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>> wrote: With apologies that I am not able to attend today's meeting, regarding the discussion of entity status, I wanted to remind the CCWG of the constraints that we identified in the Legal & Fiduciary Constraints memo developed early in this process, which specifies some objective legal requirements to support grant making. The relevant sections are copied below: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58730906/May%202016%20-%20… a. Considerations for grants to organizations When providing grants to another 501(c)(3) organization that operates as a public charitable organization, once alignment is confirmed to ICANN’s mission, the level of administrative needs to confirm the entity is minimal. This is in contrast to a for-profit organization, or another form of organization that is not recognized as equivalent to a 501(c)(3). If ICANN were directed to make grants to a for-profit entity, for example, or an IGO, NGO, or a foreign non-profit, the administrative burden on ICANN to assure compliance with its obligations rise. However, reliance on 501(c)(3) status alone as a demonstration of eligibility would serve to exclude almost any foreign entity from being eligible to receive a portion of the auction proceeds. Requiring a specific U.S.-based tax status is not a desirable or acceptable eligibility requirement. This is not necessary. To the extent that the auction proceeds are requested to financially support an organization that does not have 501(c)(3) status, due diligence to ensure that only incidental private benefits will result (such as payment of reasonable employment salaries) will be required prior to providing that support. That due diligence could include, for example, seeking a clear description of the public benefits that will be generated by the activity, and the circumstances and means through which those benefits are expected to be achieved. It could include seeking of financial data or other information that is appropriate in the circumstance. There are other ways to establish eligibility as well. foreign non-profits or NGOs are eligible to obtain affidavits or opinions of counsel that they operate as an equivalent of a 501(c)(3) public charity. With the proper documentation, ICANN may rely on that affidavit or opinion to demonstrate the public benefit and lack of private benefit, therefore not needing to engage in detailed due diligence. The DT could consider whether the Charter should include any guidance to the CCWG on issues of prioritizing potential recipients based on the resources that would be needed to evaluate their eligibility based on the private benefit restriction. The CCWG could still consider this item even if not specified in its Charter. b. Recommended Prohibition on Grants to Individuals The prohibition on private benefit typically results in an exclusion of grants/payment of funds directly to individuals, because there is little possibility of performing the proper review over the use of those funds to make sure that they went towards service of ICANN’s charitable purpose, as opposed to enriching the individual. This does not mean that the funds cannot be provided to an organization that provides direct services to individuals, but for the purposes of developing eligibility criteria, we recommend that a restriction be included that prohibits ICANN from providing individual grants. ____ Samantha Eisner Deputy General Counsel, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90094 USA Direct Dial: +1 310 578 8631 ________________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Vanda Scartezini <vanda(a)scartezini.org<mailto:vanda@scartezini.org>> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 1:35 PM To: Alan Greenberg; John R. Levine; Marilyn Cade Cc: ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Request for input from ICANN Board - CCWG-AP I also believe nothing will be impede AC/SOs to apply if compliant with the requisites. They are not departments/ divisions of ICANN. What will refrain the applicant is the involvement of any of us working in the Auction proceeds as per our conflict of interest statement. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 10/7/18, 16:26, "Ccwg-auctionproceeds on behalf of Alan Greenberg" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> wrote: At 07/10/2018 11:00 AM, John R. Levine wrote: >>BUT, For later discussion : am not sure what Bd thinks it is saying >>re whether or what funding an SO/AC community can apply. NONE of >>the SO/AC/constituencies are legally affiliated w ICANN. > >I believe the question is whether the SO or AC itself could ask for >money, e.g., the SSAC asks for money to study some security issue or the GNSO >asks for money for some study about perceptions of new TLDs. > >I don't think anyone considers the members of an SO or AC to be >inherently conflicted. > >R's, >John Correct. An AC, SO or SO Council is a creature of the ICANN Bylaws and if it were to apply, it is really ICANN applying. But and ALS for the ALAC or member of the GNSO (through one of its constituent parts), or a ccTLD, could apply. Alan _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

1 0

Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] IMPORTANT: INFORMATION CONCERNING THE RESERVE FUND
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 26, 2018

Oct. 26, 2018

Sorry for the delay in sending this, but the last days of the ICANN meeting were rather hectic. To be clear, the ALAC position (supported by 11 members with 1 objection and three members not voting) was to support use of the Auction Proceeds to replenish the reserve. The ALAC did qualify that with a caveate to use no more than 25% of available auction funds in this way. So if the .web funds are excluded, the Board action was in excess of the that specified by the ALAC statement, and if .web is factored in, it was well below. Alan At 24/10/2018 05:34 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote: Let me provide a different voice here. First, as disclosure, the BC, where I am a member, supported the possibility of using some of the Auction Funds for replenishing the Reserve Fund. And, I was a co drafter and proponent of that BC position. That information is public as I am shown as a co drafter of the BC positions. We were not alone in supporting that possibility, so it is not fair to say that none of the community supported that use of some of the auction funds. BUT only approx. /roughly just under 50% will come from the Auction Funds, and the rest [close to the same amount] from ICANN org budget... Secondly, I am not sure why anyone would propose using funds that are related to a lawsuit. Any attorney worth his/her degree and any business executive would fall over laughing about the legal issues... However, I think the reference was to the funds reserved for other litigation about new gTLDs, Judith, not the .web funds. But Daniel can offer his own clarification. Ultimately, all of us care most about the stability of the organization and while we may have small differences in some areas,. ,and larger differences in others, first and foremost, the world is dependent not on how many grants we make, but on the stability of the organization. For now, that means a reserve fund which is about the entire organization. I prefer to go back to work and quickly advance the public comments about the "models" and then try to advance toward an implementation process/develoment. I don't mean this to sound as negative as it may sound -- but if we get diverted away from our own work, we will deny the benefit of the $100M which can do a lot of good, once we get a mechanism and then an implementation program in place. I suspect that a lot of good can be done with $100M, and we haven't even shown that we know how to manage that level of available funds. And if the .web funds become available that is another $130M+. This is only my view. And I hope you will not think that I am looking for a debate. I am not. I will listen, but my purpose in posting was merely to note that if all of us read all the submissions on replenishment of the Reserve Fund and follow the Budget comments, there has been support for tapping some of the Auction Funds, as well as some who objected. I personally respect that the Board is taking this step and at this time. Marilyn Cade ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Judith Hellerstein <judith(a)jhellerstein.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 4:22 PM To: ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] IMPORTANT: INFORMATION CONCERNING THE RESERVE FUND HI Erika, Yes. Like Daniel and Elliott, I do not understand why they cannot use some of the money that was set aside from the .web auction to refill the coffers. If the line was that we are just replenishing what was lost during the IANA Transition than why not take if from the .web money that was set aside. If for some reason they may find that they need all that money than possibly that could be revisited. I also am interested in learning an answer to Daniel's question Best, Judith Hellerstein _________________________________________________________________________ Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO Hellerstein & Associates 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517 E-mail: Judith(a)jhellerstein.com<mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com> Website: www.jhellerstein.com<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jhelle…> Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked…> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide On 10/24/2018 3:52 PM, Elliot Noss wrote: I find myself terribly angry about this. It makes no sense both because of Daniel’s comment below and because there are other ways towards this. I don’t know that that matters. EN On Oct 24, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Daniel Dardailler <danield(a)w3.org<mailto:danield@w3.org>> wrote: If the board decides to take funding off the Auction benefits pot, that's their right (and maybe obligation I gather) but I think they should at least explain why the ~100M set aside for potential legal costs wrt new gTLD was not used instead. >From the beginning the Auction benefits were labelled as "not for ICANN budget" and replenishing a reserve is clearly a budgetary action, so I'm interested in understanding which constraints on the 100M legal provision mentioned above has been evaluated as stronger that something as clear as the "not for ICANN budget" attached to the Auctions. I'm not trying to revert this ICANN's board decision, I just want to be able to explain the decision made to outsiders. Thanks. On 2018-10-24 13:20, Erika Mann wrote: *Dear CCWG AP colleagues - * *Cherine Chalaby asked for a meeting this morning, October 24, to inform me as CCWG AP Co-Chair about a resolution the Board will pass tomorrow morning, October 25, concerning the replenishment of the Reserve Fund. Maarten Botterman attended the meeting and Chris Disspain was present for a short period at the beginning of the meeting.* *To replenish the Reserve Fund, the Board resolution will request a contribution from ICANN ORG on an annual basis (8 years), total $32 Million, and an immediate contribution from Auction Proceed, total $36 Million. These two amounts seen together would replenish the Reserve Fund (in 8 years) to the agreed height. * *Cherine was interested in informing us ahead of the decision and I mentioned, that we were expecting such a move and, as far as this is concerned, we're not surprised to see the Board passing this resolution tomorrow and that we do appreciate his approach in informing us ahead of passing the resolution. * Reminder:* The* '*Document for Public comment – Replenishment Strategy for the ICANN Reserve Fund' (open date, March 6th, 2018/closed April 25th, 2018) mentioned the following about the replenishment of the fund in relation to the topics mentioned above: * * https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-reserve-fund-replenish…<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann…> < https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-reserve-fund-replenish… >* *§ Contribution from ICANN Org: Future adopted budgets could be made to provide a contribution to the Reserve Fund on an annual basis. This would require ICANN Org to plan each fiscal year for expenses to be lower than funding by an amount explicitly designated for the purpose of replenishing the Reserve Fund. Given ICANN’s funding constraints, contributions from ICANN org to the Reserve Fund replenishment result from a reduced allocation of ICANN’s resources to its on-going activities, in order to produce a surplus that is allocated to the Reserve Fund. Such allocation is and needs to continue being the subject of community engagement and input. * *§ Auction Proceeds: ICANN currently has US$ 104 million collected from auctions that were held as the mechanism of last resort to resolve string contention in the new gTLD program (including investment returns). This amount excludes US$ 132 million relating to the auction of the .WEB string net of auction fees * *Kind regards, * *Erika * *Barcelona, October 24, 2018* _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

1 0