- Gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg - lists.icann.org

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
by Dillon, Chris June 22, 2015

June 22, 2015

Dear colleagues, Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, Please confirm you are happy with Lars' correction below, if you have not already done so. Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>> Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term 'verified' in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of "verification". Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term 'validate' not 'verifiy' and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council's vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday's Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars

4 5

FW: [council] Final Report Translation and Transliteration Correction
by Lars Hoffmann June 21, 2015

June 21, 2015

Dear all, Please find below the note that has gone out to the Council as well as a thank you from Michele Neylon that I would very much like to echo! Very best. Lars From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele(a)blacknight.com> Date: Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:47 To: Lars HOFFMANN <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org>, Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Final Report Translation and Transliteration Correction Lars Thanks for the update and please thank the WG for their quick turnaround on this. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Lars Hoffmann Date: Sunday 21 June 2015 14:32 To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Final Report Translation and Transliteration Correction Dear Councillors, Please find below an important note from the co-Chair of the Translation and Translation of Contact Information PDP WG conerning a correction of their Final Report that is currently under Council consideration. Many thanks Lars From: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon(a)ucl.ac.uk> Date: Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:21 To: Lars HOFFMANN <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org> Cc: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick(a)isoc.be> Subject: FW: Final Report Correction Dear Councillors, During the presentation of the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group to the GNSO on Saturday, 20 June 2015, it emerged that the Group had made a clerical error in its Recommendation #4 (both in the Executive Summary (page 4) and the body of the Report (page 20). This error has been corrected and the correction has been consented to by the WG members (see WG Mailing List Archive <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/> ). The corrected Final Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gtlds/translation-transliteration-contact-f inal-12jun15-en.pdf> has been posted on the WG Wiki Page <https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/Translation+and+Transliteratio n+of+Contact+Information+PDP+Home> and on the WG Project Page <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/transliteration-contact> and is also attached to this email. The Group apologises for this clerical error and hopes the Council will consider the corrected version during its Wednesday public meeting. Many thanks. Chris Dillon and Rudi Vansnick. Co-Chairs of the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

1 0

URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
by Dillon, Chris June 21, 2015

June 21, 2015

Dear colleagues, Many thanks for your work on this urgent issue at such a busy time. As Co-Chair, I would like to determine that we have reached full consensus on the correction to Recommednation #4 on pages 4 (Executive Summary) and 20 (full text recommendations). Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term 'verified' in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of "verification". Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term 'validate' not 'verifiy' and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council's vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday's Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars

1 0

URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
by Lars Hoffmann June 21, 2015

June 21, 2015

Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term verified¹ in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ³verification². Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term validate¹ not verifiy¹ and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council¹s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday¹s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars

8 7

Fwd: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
by Lars Hoffmann June 21, 2015

June 21, 2015

Dear all, Please find Jennifer's consent below. Best. Lars Begin forwarded message: From: "Jennifer Chung" <jen(a)registry.asia<mailto:jen@registry.asia>> Date: 20 Jun 2015 20:10:00 GMT-3 To: "'Lars Hoffmann'" <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>>, <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear Lars, Since I still haven't received the email from the mailing list - might be a subscription problem? I would like to record my consent to the change suggested in your email below (pasted in its entirety). Also in the case that this does not make it to the mailing list (subscription problem?) please forward my response to the list. Thank you! Best Regards, [dotasia-signature] Jennifer Chung, Policy & Organisational Relations DotAsia Organisation<http://www.dot.asia/>, From.Asia / For.Asia E-mail: jen(a)dot.asia<mailto:jen@dot.asia> Skype: jennifer.r.chung ---------- Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term OEverified^1 in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ^3verification^2. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term OEvalidate^1 not OEverifiy^1 and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council^1s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday^1s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars

2 1

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
by Sara Bockey June 20, 2015

June 20, 2015

I consent to this change. Thank you, Lars. Sara From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 4:10 PM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ‘verified’ in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of “verification”. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ‘validate’ not ‘verifiy’ and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council’s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday’s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars

3 2

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!
by Wanawit Ahkuputra June 20, 2015

June 20, 2015

Dear Lars, I consent the change on Recommendation #4. Regards, Wanawit Ahkuputra Deputy Executive Director ETDA Electronic Transactions Development Agency (Public Organization) Mob.: +668 9301 8818 Email: wanawit(a)etda.or.th From: <owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org> on behalf of Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term verified¹ in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ³verification². Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term validate¹ not verifiy¹ and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council¹s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday¹s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars

1 0

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report
by Julie Hedlund June 16, 2015

June 16, 2015

Dear all, As staff support I would like to echo the comments from Lars below. It really has been both a pleasure and privilege to work with all of you, and especially Chris and Rudi! Kind regards, Julie From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 6:05 AM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report > Dear all, > > Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication > that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP > Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the > co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for > the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding > job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership > role within the GNSO community. > > Attached you find the Final Report please note that there were some very > minor edits made to Petter¹s text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with > Petter. I have asked ICANN¹s web-admin team to post the report online and as > soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. > > Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in > Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. > Very best wishes > Lars > >

2 1

Final Report
by Lars Hoffmann June 12, 2015

June 12, 2015

Dear all, Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership role within the GNSO community. Attached you find the Final Report please note that there were some very minor edits made to Petter¹s text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with Petter. I have asked ICANN¹s web-admin team to post the report online and as soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. Very best wishes Lars

4 3

T&T: Today's meeting
by Dillon, Chris June 11, 2015

June 11, 2015

Dear colleagues, Another thought. Following the passing of the consensus deadline at 23:59 UTC last night, it looks very much like we have full consensus. As Amr helpfully pointed out, however, the deadline, might have been somewhat tight for some among you. May I, therefore, encourage anyone who feels they cannot provide their consensus to indicate this on the list before 12:00 UTC today, so that we may deal with this effectively during the call and decide on the next steps. If all consent, it may be a relatively quick call with only minor edits and a reminder of the next steps. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

2 2