April 2017 - Gnso-ssc - lists.icann.org

SSC / Team review for RDS
by Johan Helsingius April 21, 2017

April 21, 2017

I am happy to report that the motion was passed unanimously by the GNSO council. Many thanks to everybody! Julf

4 7

Mp3, AC Recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Standing Selection Committee 19 April 2017
by Nathalie Peregrine April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Dear all, Please find below the mp3, attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chat for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC Mp3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-19apr17-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p891o5tzgib/<https://participate.icann.org/p891o5tzgib/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=adafe81581d64faa…> <%0bhttps:/participate.icann.org/p73kn3lhxcu/> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/aL-RAw Attendees: Frederic Guilemaut Maxim Alzoba Julf Helsingius Hibah Kamal-Grayson (temporary alternate for Susan Kawaguchi) Poncelet Illelji Lori Schulman Osvaldo Novoa Apologies: Renate Ribeira Aquino ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 19 April 2017 Nathalie Peregrine:Dear all, welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC Nathalie Peregrine:Meeting page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Poncelet Ileleji:Good day all Osvaldo Novoa:Hello all Julf Helsingius:Evening! Nathalie Peregrine:Welcome Poncelet, Osvaldo and Julf! Poncelet Ileleji:Thanks Nathalie Frederic Guillemaut 2:Hello Everyone Maxim Alzoba:Marika, could you request call out to +7 916 6761580? Maxim Alzoba:ok Maxim Alzoba:I will mute phone mic for now. Maxim Alzoba:Marika, could you send us the latest edits to our mail list? (which we see now on Adobe dashboard) Julf Helsingius:Exactly Maxim Alzoba:thanks Lori Schulman:Hi, i am fine with the approach. Maxim Alzoba:at least it is the way forward Lori Schulman:It seems fair Julf Helsingius:I don't mind a short call. Maxim Alzoba:short call will help us to live more of a life :) Julf Helsingius:Marika, can you (just to be sure) re-send the redline version to me? Julf Helsingius:Thanks! Maxim Alzoba:Thanks everyone ! Julf Helsingius:late Nathalie Peregrine:21:00 UTC Julf Helsingius:yes, 21:00 UTC Lori Schulman:I will let IPC know. Maxim Alzoba:bye All Julf Helsingius:Thanks, Marika (and everybody)! Lori Schulman:Appreciate it and the written summary. It made it easier. Frederic Guillemaut 2:thank you Frederic Guillemaut 2:very efficeint ;-) Poncelet Ileleji:Thanks Marika Poncelet Ileleji:Thanks Marika Poncelet Ileleji: Bye all

1 0

Fwd: Amended motion - Nomination of GNSO candidates for the RDS RT
by Johan Helsingius April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

FYI... -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Amended motion - Nomination of GNSO candidates for the RDS RT Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:39:33 +0200 From: Johan Helsingius <julf(a)julf.com> To: GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org> CC: gnso-secs(a)icann.org <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Dear council members, With regards to my motion for item 7 on the agenda for our meeting on 20 April 2017 - "Approval of GNSO Nominees for the Registration Directory Services Review Team", I hereby submit a revised motion based on the consensus of the SSC. The SSC was tasked to select the top three candidates, with up to four additional candidates for positions to be filled if other SO/ACs didn't take up their full number. Unfortunately selecting the top three candidates would result in a lack of balance in representation of constituencies. Recognizing this, the group would like to recommend that the GNSO Council consider the top four recommended candidates as primary with guaranteed seats. This is based on our understanding that some other SO/ACs are not taking up their full number on the RDS RT, and we believe the GNSO has a strong case in asking to be able to fill one of the places that are available due to this. Julf

1 0

Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Dear All, Please find below notes and actions items from our (very brief!) call today. Note that Marika will shortly re-circulate the red-lined motion for your reference. Kind regards, Emily ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 17:00 UTC for 60 minutes Notes: Support received to date on the proposal: Poncelet, Renata, Julf, Maxim, Frederic, Osvaldo, Hibah, Lori - The only person unable to attend the call is Renata. She provided approval for the plan over email. - Current status: A call was held on Monday (17 April) to discuss options going forward. There was a desire to have more balance in the representation of candidates, recognizing the SSC is expected to select a top three candidates with up to four additional candidates. - There was general agreement that group would like to recommend that the GNSO Council consider the top four recommended candidates as primary with guaranteed seats. - Julf will put forward the proposal to the GNSO Council. If the Council does not does not support this approach, Julf will withdraw the motion and request additional time for the SSC to deliberate on selection of the top 3 candidates. - All are in agreement to go forward with this approach. - ACTION ITEM: Marika will send final red-lined version of the motion after this call. - The GNSO Council meeting is on Thursday at 21:00 UTC. Following the meeting, staff will report back with the outcome. If the GNSO Council accepts the SSC proposal, the SSC can move forward with its next assignment, the GNSO representative to the Empowered Community. If it does not, the SSC will resume deliberations on the RDS-RT candidates. From the SSC Charter: The SSC shall strive as far as possible to achieve balance, representativeness, diversity and sufficient expertise appropriate for the applicable selection process. In order to achieve balance and diversity on the Review Teams, the SSC is strongly encouraged to employ a system of rotation to Review Team selections. Any Stakeholder Group which nominated candidates(s) for a Review Team but did not have a candidate selected for that Review Team shall be preferred as a qualified applicant from their Stakeholder Group for one of the three guaranteed slots for the next GNSO Review Team appointment processes. F

1 0

For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT
by Marika Konings April 19, 2017

April 19, 2017

Dear All, As discussed during today’s meeting, please find attached the proposed modifications to the motion to reflect the proposed path forward to recommend that candidates 1-4 are considered primary candidates with a guaranteed seat. As the SSC is expected to operate with full consensus, you are all requested to share your views on the mailing list. A next call will be scheduled for Wednesday 19 April (please remember to add your availability to the doodle poll: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh#table) You can also provide your comments / edits to the revised motion via google docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JXXdW7gKqlrl_w_wom5TeDae5ahR4KqI9UhVoDx…. Thank you for your feedback. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

8 14

LAST REMINDER: **UPDATED Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS for call on Wednesday, 19 April 2017
by Terri Agnew April 18, 2017

April 18, 2017

As discussed on Mondays call we may still hold the call on Wednesday. If you have already completed the doodle, please go back in and edit your name slot to select times that will work on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. To edit, hover over your name and a pencil icon appears, select this icon. If having trouble ok to enter a new name slot. Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Tuesday, 18 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

1 0

REMINDER: **UPDATED Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

As discussed on todays call we may still hold the call on Wednesday. If you have already completed the doodle, please go back in and edit your name slot to select times that will work on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. To edit, hoover over your name and a pencil icon appears, select this icon. If having trouble ok to enter a new name slot. Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

2 1

Mp3, AC Recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Standing Selection Committee 17 April 2017
by Terri Agnew April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

Dear all, Please find below the mp3, attendance, Adobe Connect recording and chat for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC Mp3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-17apr17-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p73kn3lhxcu/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/aL-RAw Attendees: Frederic Guilemaut Maxim Alzoba Julf Helsingius Hibah Kamal-Grayson (temporary alternate for Susan Kawaguchi) Renate Ribeira Aquino Apologies: Poncelet Illelji Lori Schulman Osvaldo Novoa ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 17 April 2017 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Monday, 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes Terri Agnew:agenda wik page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> &d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=6Y-ib9I5_ub3eYQSe4f4wfzYorB94qLInYJi-bbmnjk&s=I5nQ_aIzl3XubA_rynkzAaXaOsrxE60ZkEwAys2euDc&e= Maxim Alzoba:Hello Terri, could I test adobe audio - just in case it works for me Maxim Alzoba:Ok, great Maxim Alzoba:Hello Frederic Frederic Guillemaut:Hello Maxim, Hello Emily and Terri Maxim Alzoba:I am thinking about moto helmet with bluetooth mic :) so outside audio does not affect Maxim Alzoba:Hello Julf Julf Helsingius:Maxim: I have one of those. It is still noisy in a helmet. :) Maxim Alzoba:also - I wonder what people think when they see you in a caffee in a helmet ? Maxim Alzoba::) Julf Helsingius:a throat mike might work better Julf Helsingius:I suggest waiting Maxim Alzoba:I think two-3 minutes waiting is ok Julf Helsingius:Got the reminder, let's start Maxim Alzoba:Marika, please add to the note, that the note of Frederic was supported by me. Maxim Alzoba:and that Both Frederic and me referenced to " sufficient expertise " in technolgy Terri Agnew:Welcome Renata Aquino Ribeiro Maxim Alzoba:Hello Renata Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hello and thank you Julf Helsingius:Right, so seems we know we don't have consensus support for a change of the motion, and there is not consensus support for going ahead with the motion Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I believe Poncelet disagrees with the change regardless of there being 3 or 4 Julf Helsingius:That's how I understood it too Julf Helsingius:So no consensus eiher way Maxim Alzoba:We have not reached it yet, and it does not mean we should not try Julf Helsingius:We can't reach it on this call Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Yes I agree there is no consensus Renata Aquino Ribeiro:and we already have an opposer Renata Aquino Ribeiro:by email that is Maxim Alzoba:yes, Poncelet Ileleji could not attend Maxim Alzoba:and we can not reach it without him, but we could try to refine ideas we have now Maxim Alzoba:NOTE: I do not belive that SSAC is going to leave RDS-RT without attendance, their presence might be necessary for balanced view. Maxim Alzoba:I suggest additional questions to top 7 candidates to understand how their technicl expertise is applicable Julf Helsingius:I agree the timescale was challenging Maxim Alzoba:the deadline was artificial, and with proper justification we could request timeline extension. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I would like to know if these additional seats will be available, because that would help us in consensus. Julf Helsingius:Yes, knowing about additional seats would help Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Isn't there any way to get this response soon? Renata Aquino Ribeiro:there is already someone from Rr on 4th seat isn't there? Marc? Marika Konings 2:Volker is currently ranked 4th, with Marc on 5th Julf Helsingius:Volker from Rr as 4, Marc from Ry as 5 Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Right, either way, I guess it makes us reach consensus if the 4th is accepted Julf Helsingius:Yes, probably Julf Helsingius:I think we would have pretty good argumets to James to argue for a 4th position Renata Aquino Ribeiro:And perhaps we can send that communication to SO/ACs to ask them for support Julf Helsingius:I don't think the issue is about skills - I think we haev a pretty good picture of that. The skills needed are not technical. Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes, the skills were already judged by the survey Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I'd also try making a case in council for 4 Maxim Alzoba:my suggestion is to to some more in-depth due diligence Maxim Alzoba:and we might ask GNSO Council to review possiblity of extension of 3 granted seats to 4 Maxim Alzoba:with description of current disagreement (diversity vs technological expertise) Frederic Guillemaut:i agree with the extension to 4 seats Maxim Alzoba:I agree with extension to 4 Julf Helsingius:I support 4 as well Renata Aquino Ribeiro:+1 extension Julf Helsingius:Seems that would be full consensus of all of us on the call Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes Julf Helsingius:Yes, that sounds like a good formulation, Marika Renata Aquino Ribeiro:+1 Maxim Alzoba:My suggestion: 1. we ask for extension of the timeline (we describe the current deadlock and situation we face with "divercity v.s. tech expertise". 2. We suggest 4 seats as a resolution or 3. we need the extension for more id-depth due diligence Julf Helsingius:Yes, so extension only becomes an option if 4 people are not accepted Terri Agnew:Doodle: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__doodle.com_poll_ymw59t3… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__doodle.com_poll_ymw59t3…> &d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=6Y-ib9I5_ub3eYQSe4f4wfzYorB94qLInYJi-bbmnjk&s=8ogstzbBZ78GgK905onXFXP4u6_zr3aWhMDLswbPT-w&e= Maxim Alzoba:Could we have Google docs& offline word copy of the draft, so we can comment on it Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I also believe an extension of time is not what we are asking now, an extension of seats only Maxim Alzoba:I can not edit my checkboxes in the poll for the time Maxim Alzoba:found it Maxim Alzoba:thanks Renata Aquino Ribeiro:i think next steps are good Renata Aquino Ribeiro:drafting a new motion and asking for gnso to analyse Julf Helsingius:Marika: should I flag the possilble developments to the council? Maxim Alzoba:Thanks Everyone Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes julf Julf Helsingius:Sure. Will do that tomorrow morning Frederic Guillemaut:thank you all, Maxim Alzoba:bye all Frederic Guillemaut:enjoy chocolate Renata Aquino Ribeiro:thanks have a great week Julf Helsingius:thanks and bye

1 0

SSC / Team review for RDS
by Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- photo <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> <http://twitter.com/safebrands> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> Skype: mailclub1 <#> www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com> Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.

9 20

Notes and Action Items - SSC meeting - 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas April 17, 2017

April 17, 2017

Dear SSC Members, Please find below notes and action items from the call today, Monday 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC. While not all members of the SSC were present on the call, those that did attend have proposed a way forward for the full group to consider. The suggested solution: Recommend to the GNSO Council that the top four candidates should have seats on the RDS-RT. Provide instructions for the Council to advocate for this recommendation with the SOs and ACs, noting that only the top three candidates are guaranteed slots in the RDS-RT, and that any additional appointments are at the discretion of the SOs and ACs. Staff will shortly circulate details about this proposal to the SSC list for further consideration and will revise the Council motion to reflect this proposal. The SSC may have an additional call on Wednesday if further discussion is needed to reach consensus on the proposal. Kind regards, Emily ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GNSO Standing Selection Committee teleconference on Monday, 17 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes Notes: - Recap on status: We received an email from Frederic that on further consultations, we felt that he could not support the ranking of candidates. - He proposes an alternate ranking to increase the diversity of stakeholder groups represented in the top three candidates, recognizing that the top three candidates will automatically be included in the RDS-RT. - Some other members expressed concern about this proposal. - Staff displayed the following text in the AC room for the SSC to reference: From the SSC Charter: The SSC shall strive as far as possible to achieve balance, representativeness, diversity and sufficient expertise appropriate for the applicable selection process. In order to achieve balance and diversity on the Review Teams, the SSC is strongly encouraged to employ a system of rotation to Review Team selections. Any Stakeholder Group which nominated candidates(s) for a Review Team but did not have a candidate selected for that Review Team shall be preferred as a qualified applicant from their Stakeholder Group for one of the three guaranteed slots for the next GNSO Review Team appointment processes. Even though the SSC was not responsible for the selection of the candidates for the SSR2-RT, you may want to factor this into your continued deliberations to achieve full consensus on the candidates to be proposed for the RDS RT? The following community members, including their respective affiliation were selected for the SSR2-RT following GNSO endorsement: James Gannon (NCSG), Denise Michel (CSG – BC), Emily Taylor (RrSG). As a reminder, based on the initial survey and deliberations, the SSC ranked the proposed candidates for the RDS RT as follows: 1-3: Susan Kawaguchi (CSG – BC), Erika Mann (non-affiliated – non-voting Nominating Committee member to the GNSO Council), Stephanie Perrin (NCSG), 4) Volker Greimann (RrSG), 5) Marc Anderson (RySG), Stefania Milan (NCSG) and Timothy Chen (CSG – BC). It may also be worth noting that for this specific review, no requests for endorsement were received from the ASO, RSSAC and SSAC which means that at least in theory there will be additional seats available. It will however be up to the SO/AC chairs to decide whether or not to fill these additional seats. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: Marika, please add to the note, that the note of Frederic was supported by me. Maxim Alzoba: and that Both Frederic and me referenced to " sufficient expertise " in technolgy - Question - can we take an additional consenus call? - Response - if we no longer have full consensus, then the Council is not expected to consider the recommendation from the SSC. If SSC does not reach full consenus prior to Thursday, the motion will need to withdrawn or deferred. - Reminder - It is only the top three that will automatically be included in the RDS-RT. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I believe Poncelet disagrees with the change regardless of there being 3 or 4 Julf Helsingius: That's how I understood it too Julf Helsingius: So no consensus eiher way - Only one review team has so far been filled using this process, no additional members from the GNSO were included. For the RDS-RT, there may be additional slots beyond the three, although this is not guaranteed. - Could we bring the outcome of the discussion as it currently stands to the Council? - The charter envisions that the SSC only puts forward consensus recommendations to the GNSO Council, although it could be possible to give the Council a set of options based on the SSC's delberations. It is also possible for the SSC to request more time from the Council. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I would like to know if these additional seats will be available, because that would help us in consensus. Julf Helsingius: Yes, knowing about additional seats would help - The assignment of any "free" seats will be dependent of the SO/AC discussion. The SSC can recommend guaranteeing the top four, and the Council can make this case to the SOs and ACs but the outcome will depend on the deliberations of the SO/ACs. From the chat: Julf Helsingius: I think we would have pretty good argumets to James to argue for a 4th position Renata Aquino Ribeiro: And perhaps we can send that communication to SO/ACs to ask them for support Options for next steps: 1. Agree to a change in the top 3 candidates. 2. Go back to the GNSO Council and ask for additional time (and possibly request additional information to inform deliberations). 3. Go back to the GNSO Council and say that no consensus is anticipated. 4. Go back to the Council recommending top four candidates with instructions to the Council to defend the allocation with the SOs and ACs. - General support for option 4. Staff will revise the motion, circulate this idea on the mailing list for consideration by those not currently on the call, and leave open the option of having an additional call on Wednesday. ACTION ITEM: Staff will revise the motion and circulate on the mailing list a proposal to go back to the Council recommending top four candidates with instructions to the Council to defend the allocation with the SOs and ACs.

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS
by Renata Aquino Ribeiro April 14, 2017

April 14, 2017

Hi all I agree w/ Julf. Changing the composition would affect the stakeholder group balance. Best, Renata

1 0

**UPDATED Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 14, 2017

April 14, 2017

**We have added Wednesday, 19 April time slots to see if we can find a time that works for everyone. If you have already completed the doodle, please go back in and edit your name slot to select times that will work on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

2 2

REMINDER: Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 13, 2017

April 13, 2017

Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

1 0

Doodle / SSC - Team review for RDS
by Terri Agnew April 12, 2017

April 12, 2017

Dear all, Please complete the doodle below to schedule the next SSC / Team review for RDS call. Doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/ymw59t3n8utit7wh I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. This doodle will close Friday, 14 April 2017. Kind regards, Terri From: gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:31 AM To: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com> Cc: gnso-ssc(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS All, please share your feedback on Frederic's proposal on the mailing list. In order to allow for some time for further discussion, staff will go ahead and circulate a doodle poll to schedule a meeting of the SSC coming Monday or Tuesday. Best regards, Marika On Apr 12, 2017, at 09:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg(a)safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> > wrote: Dear All I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the team on Monday. As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more validation step, as it was scheduled. In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not send a right message of commitment to the community : To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or 5) to include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push their ideas to other components of Icann. This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it would be easier, to make this change within the team, to reach a consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso. That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after publication, and to me it is for the better, Please take that in consideration, Best regards -- <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre dericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_ PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpn o-txmZRCfpQ&s=ck_O40JPgUv_2WSMqbEFHOsx2ewz-U3Xjkuaq41a__I&e=> [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands& d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWi TDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=zTh uwbQxhTF2njLbUl0_z51HB9GVZB1EdLSizRHtr8I&e=> [twitter.com] Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> fg(a)safebrands.com Skype: mailclub1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=Dw MDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDD o5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIpno-txmZRCfpQ&s=qoUCAzA MiFSlG94KqiFXyPxgVJwXxTYHhtyWe2P4ZB0&e=> www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai 37 rue Guibal 13003 Marseille France <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fr edericguillemaut_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7 _PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=FhDjsg3JqAMP_JF106qf4s2aRiGotIp no-txmZRCfpQ&s=kulntEuGfgnxd3VD_hiiv5UNuUHCfje5gOylC0FpImM&e=> [linkedin.com] N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

1 0

For your review - draft motion and communication to the GNSO Council
by Marika Konings April 10, 2017

April 10, 2017

Dear All, As discussed, please find attached for your review a draft motion concerning the GNSO nominations for the RDS Review team in line with the SSC recommendations. Note that the motion follows a similar approach as was used for the selection of SSR2-RT candidates (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201701) Below you find a draft note that could be used to communicate the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council. Please share any comments or edits you may have with the mailing list as soon as possible, but no later than Sunday 9 April at 23.00 UTC. As Julf is the only Council member in this group, apart from Susan who has recused herself, I would like to ask him whether he would be willing to submit the motion as well as recommendations, following your review and input, to the GNSO Council in time for document and motion deadline of Monday 10 April at 23.59 UTC. In order to determine whether Monday’s call is needed – whether to further discuss the SSC agreements and/or the motion, please let staff know by Friday 7 April at 22.00 UTC if you think the call should go ahead. Best regards, Marika ============= Dear All, On behalf of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee, I am pleased to communicate the full consensus recommendations to the GNSO Council in relation to the nominations for the GNSO Review Team: 1. Agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen Despite the relatively short time frame available, the SSC followed the instructions provided in the SSC Charter and conducted a thorough analysis of the candidates that requested GNSO endorsement, with the help of a survey which resulted in the above recommendations. For further details on the information reviewed as well as the survey results, please see https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw. Attached you will find an accompanying motion for your consideration. Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

4 11

FW: [Ext] Re: Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements
by Marika Konings April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

For your information see below. I believe this means that everyone has expressed its support for the proposed agreements which means you have achieved full consensus as required by the SSC Charter. I hope to circulate a draft motion for your review later today. Some of you indicated that you did want to consult with your respective groups which might result in further input, so we will leave the call on Monday in place for now. Best regards, Marika On 4/5/17, 21:01, "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa(a)Antel.com.uy> wrote: Hi Marika, Sorry for my delay, I was waiting for an answer from my constituency. I support the proposal. Best regards, Osvaldo El 5 abr. 2017, a las 18:26, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> escribió: Hi Osvaldo, I believe you are the only one that has not weighed in yet. Is it possible for you to respond to the list with your feedback? Thanks, Marika Begin forwarded message: From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: April 5, 2017 at 09:18:27 CST To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements Dear All, Following the SSC call today I would hereby like to share the tentative agreements that those on the call reached based on the review of the survey results (see also the notes and survey results which were circulated earlier today): 1. Proposed agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Proposed agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen You are now all requested, and especially those that were not able to attend, to indicate your support or lack thereof for these proposed agreements. As a reminder, the top three ranked candidates will automatically get a seat on the RDS Review Team while the candidates ranked 4-7 may be considered by the SO/AC Chairs for addition to the review team should seats remain available and there is a need to add additional members to ensure diversity. Please respond to this message as soon as possible. Your feedback will determine whether or not a call is needed tomorrow. To facilitate a determination on whether a call is needed, please fill out the following doodle poll: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icannorg.doodle.com_po… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icannorg.doodle.com_po…>. We will keep the slot that is currently scheduled for Monday 10 April at 13.00 UTC to allow for further discussion, if needed, regardless of whether the call tomorrow goes ahead or not. In parallel, staff will start work on a draft motion that would capture the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council which can be submitted once the SSC reaches agreement on its recommendations. Thank you, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc(a)icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ssc] Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements
by Marika Konings April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

All, based on the feedback received to date, I would like to propose that we cancel our meeting of tomorrow (Thursday 6 April 2017). We’ll still keep the meeting on Monday as a back-up as several of you indicated that you want to consult with your respective groups. Of course, you are encouraged to share any further feedback and/or comments with the mailing list as soon as possible. Ideally we are able to confirm by the end of Friday whether Monday’s meeting is necessary or not. Best regards, Marika From: <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 09:18 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements Dear All, Following the SSC call today I would hereby like to share the tentative agreements that those on the call reached based on the review of the survey results (see also the notes and survey results which were circulated earlier today): 1. Proposed agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Proposed agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen You are now all requested, and especially those that were not able to attend, to indicate your support or lack thereof for these proposed agreements. As a reminder, the top three ranked candidates will automatically get a seat on the RDS Review Team while the candidates ranked 4-7 may be considered by the SO/AC Chairs for addition to the review team should seats remain available and there is a need to add additional members to ensure diversity. Please respond to this message as soon as possible. Your feedback will determine whether or not a call is needed tomorrow. To facilitate a determination on whether a call is needed, please fill out the following doodle poll: https://icannorg.doodle.com/poll/crcyit68qkbvgmwp[icannorg.doodle.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icannorg.doodle.com_po…>. We will keep the slot that is currently scheduled for Monday 10 April at 13.00 UTC to allow for further discussion, if needed, regardless of whether the call tomorrow goes ahead or not. In parallel, staff will start work on a draft motion that would capture the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council which can be submitted once the SSC reaches agreement on its recommendations. Thank you, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

1 0

Your input needed - proposed SSC agreements
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Following the SSC call today I would hereby like to share the tentative agreements that those on the call reached based on the review of the survey results (see also the notes and survey results which were circulated earlier today): 1. Proposed agreement #1: Recommend the following three candidates (in no particular order) for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team with a guaranteed seat: 1) Susan Kawaguchi, 2) Erika Mann and 3) Stephanie Perrin 2. Proposed agreement #2: Recommend the following four candidates, in the following order, for GNSO endorsement for the RDS Review Team for any additional slots that may be available for consideration by the SO/AC Chairs: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen You are now all requested, and especially those that were not able to attend, to indicate your support or lack thereof for these proposed agreements. As a reminder, the top three ranked candidates will automatically get a seat on the RDS Review Team while the candidates ranked 4-7 may be considered by the SO/AC Chairs for addition to the review team should seats remain available and there is a need to add additional members to ensure diversity. Please respond to this message as soon as possible. Your feedback will determine whether or not a call is needed tomorrow. To facilitate a determination on whether a call is needed, please fill out the following doodle poll: https://icannorg.doodle.com/poll/crcyit68qkbvgmwp. We will keep the slot that is currently scheduled for Monday 10 April at 13.00 UTC to allow for further discussion, if needed, regardless of whether the call tomorrow goes ahead or not. In parallel, staff will start work on a draft motion that would capture the SSC recommendations to the GNSO Council which can be submitted once the SSC reaches agreement on its recommendations. Thank you, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

8 7

Mp3, AC Recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Standing Selection Committee 5 April 2017
by Nathalie Peregrine April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear all, Please find the mp3 for the GNSO Standing Selection Committee held on 5 April 2017 at 13:00 UTC Mp3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-ssc-05apr17-en.mp3 AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p1fr3q3t4m8/<https://participate.icann.org/p1fr3q3t4m8/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=adafe81581d64faa…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/aL-RAw Attendees: Poncelet Illelji, Frederic Guilemaut, Maxim Alzoba, Julf Helsingius, Osvaldo Novoa, Hibah Kamal-Grayson (temporary alternate for Susan Kawaguchi) Apologies: Renate Ribeira Aquino Lori Schulman ICANN staff: Marika Konings Emily Barabas Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 5 April 2017 Nathalie Peregrine: (4/5/2017 14:37) Dear all, welcome to the GNSO Standing Selection committee call on April 5th 2017 Nathalie Peregrine: (14:54) Agenda page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Maxim Alzoba: (14:56) Hello All Maxim Alzoba: (14:56) please grant me mic rights in Adobe Frédéric Guillemaut: (14:56) Hello All, Nathalie Peregrine: (14:56) Done Maxim! Welcome all! Frédéric Guillemaut: (14:57) ok, i just saw that i got the rights. Maxim Alzoba: (14:57) I will mostly write Frédéric Guillemaut: (14:57) i have no hardware probleme today, this is too simple. I will try to break something Maxim Alzoba: (14:58) in the chat ... the background noise will be on my phone too Maxim Alzoba: (14:58) Ok, will be back in 4 minutes. need to change the location Julf Helsingius: (15:00) Well, with this turnout it might be an efficient meeting... Osvaldo Novoa: (15:01) Hello all Maxim Alzoba: (15:03) back online Maxim Alzoba: (15:03) one second Julf Helsingius: (15:03) yes,but quite a lot of background noise Maxim Alzoba: (15:05) reconnected mic. should be less noise Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:05) Hibal Kamal-Grayson's SOI: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Julf Helsingius: (15:08) I think we have more than enough candidates to consider as it is Osvaldo Novoa: (15:08) Looking at the other candidates would let us see if the gender and geographinc diversity are as required or if we should make any adjustment Julf Helsingius: (15:09) Should we first see if we have a diversity issue? Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:09) Poncelet Illeleji has joined the AC room Maxim Alzoba: (15:11) Ok about support confirmations to be later. Osvaldo Novoa: (15:12) I don´t think we have a diversity issue, on the contrary, I think we have a good group of candidates, but that might change in the whole Review Team once we see who the other SO/AC choose. Julf Helsingius: (15:12) That is why we'll have candidates 4-7 Julf Helsingius: (15:13) Sure! Poncelet Ileleji: (15:13) Very true @Julf Maxim Alzoba: (15:13) 7 is good number for 3 +4 alternatives Maxim Alzoba: (15:14) Mathematical question, why two 1 top places? Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:14) dealying whois works for one month is not a big issue, as hte whole thing has been lasting for a long time ;-) Marika Konings: (15:14) @Maxim - identical score :-) Osvaldo Novoa: (15:14) I support Julf sugestion Maxim Alzoba: (15:15) it is choice of places, then some additional qualification should be brought to select the only top one Julf Helsingius: (15:15) I don't think the order of the top 3 matters Maxim Alzoba: (15:15) on the other hand 1-1-2 is ok for 3top ones Maxim Alzoba: (15:16) or do we mean 1-1-3 Maxim Alzoba: (15:16) My concern is ... about the technical expertise of those top3 Poncelet Ileleji: (15:16) 4 to 7 Julf Helsingius: (15:17) we seem to be OK with the top 3 from all aspects Poncelet Ileleji: (15:17) What technical EXpertise Maxim Maxim Alzoba: (15:17) experience from the Engineering point of view with DNS system Maxim Alzoba: (15:18) not just legal and operational Poncelet Ileleji: (15:18) Yes Julf I say Top 3, 4 to 7 going on Ranking Osvaldo Novoa: (15:18) I think so, the top three are unanimously choosed. We should study the ranking of the next four Poncelet Ileleji: (15:18) Yes Marika based on Q5 Maxim Alzoba: (15:19) I suggest that we see the voting as a draft attempt ... due to incorrect pick of the 3 candidates, not relevant to GNSO Poncelet Ileleji: (15:20) Why will you say incorrect pick Maxim, I think folks voted based on data they had Maxim Alzoba: (15:20) those persons do not belong to the title f the Maxim Alzoba: (15:20) voting Julf Helsingius: (15:20) and those 3 are in the bottom 4 anyway Maxim Alzoba: (15:21) we do not know the composition - so they influenced the score Julf Helsingius: (15:21) I support going by Q5 Osvaldo Novoa: (15:21) +1 Poncelet Ileleji: (15:21) Thanks Julf Q5 +1 Julf Helsingius: (15:23) If we drop them it won't change the result Osvaldo Novoa: (15:23) There is no difference in the result if we go by Q5 or Q3 and Q4, we have the same 7 candidates. ¿Am I wrong? Osvaldo Novoa: (15:23) Sorry, there is a difference in position 7 Julf Helsingius: (15:24) Yes, Remmy vs. Timothy Poncelet Ileleji: (15:24) This Q5 will apply for 4 to 7 not top 3 which qualify Just to stating my earlier take Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:24) yes, number 7 is differetn, and to me timothy cvhen was in the top 3. i would push its application to be at least in the 7 Osvaldo Novoa: (15:25) I think Timothy is a better candidate than Remmy. Maxim Alzoba: (15:25) the voting was clearly called GNSO Candidates Julf Helsingius: (15:26) I wonder if some people supported Remmy for geographical diversity Maxim Alzoba: (15:26) Geo divercity is important from legal perspective Poncelet Ileleji: (15:26) Maxim I felt we had the schedule prior to the survey you could have raised this then thats my opinion Maxim Alzoba: (15:27) I did it Maxim Alzoba: (15:27) the incorrect voting has already raised concerns Julf Helsingius: (15:27) Yes, Maxim did, but I don't see how it would change the result Osvaldo Novoa: (15:28) I agree with Marika. It is up to the GNSO to decide who to support. We are not sure who they are right now Poncelet Ileleji: (15:28) I its not going to change anything Marika, we stand by the result Maxim Alzoba: (15:28) I have a question on GEO diversity Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:29) i saw that first vote as a draft, it is true. to be used to finalise our choice afterwards. So i guess we will have to re vote anyway. Julf Helsingius: (15:29) I was hoping teh next vote would be "is this list OK or not"? Osvaldo Novoa: (15:30) LAC will not be represented but unluckily his qualifications don't justify selecting him. Poncelet Ileleji: (15:30) If we use that criteria Maxim, then I as well talk of Remmy from Africa, but I think this should not be used as a yardstick to me Osvaldo Novoa: (15:31) +1 Maxim Alzoba: (15:31) someone might be required from other reasons, at least at alternative places... to be able to summon those ... but it is secondary ... so if we think that it is not that important now - I will drop it Maxim Alzoba: (15:32) I suggest we have additional questions to top 11 about texhnical experience Poncelet Ileleji: (15:32) I want to propose Q5 for 4 to 7 I need this be seconded Please Julf Helsingius: (15:32) I think we should provide the ranking as non-binding guidance Julf Helsingius: (15:32) seconding Osvaldo Novoa: (15:32) Any way the agreements of this call should be ratify or not by the rest of the group. We can propose a confirmation to the whole of the group and see if we reach a consensus, it would be like a re-vote. Maxim Alzoba: (15:33) no gender diversity in top 3 though ... but it is balanced by 4-7 places Poncelet Ileleji: (15:33) Yes Maxim its balanced by 4 to 7 Osvaldo Novoa: (15:35) We were asked to priorize the candidates Maxim Alzoba: (15:35) I support sending the list of 7 Julf Helsingius: (15:35) I support sending the 7 Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:36) yes Osvaldo Novoa: (15:37) I think that the only difference is in number 7 position Julf Helsingius: (15:37) Can we agree on 1-6v to start with? Hibah Kamal-Grayson: (15:37) I'm fine with having four additional names without ranking them, but I defer to others if people feel strongly about ranking 4-7 Marika Konings: (15:39) The current ranking of #4 - 7 = 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen Maxim Alzoba: (15:39) Q5 is more important, given that support comes not from our opinion but from Chairs Osvaldo Novoa: (15:39) i am ok with this ranking Hibah Kamal-Grayson: (15:39) I am ok with it as well Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:39) i am ok with tese four people Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:39) timothy marc volker stefania Poncelet Ileleji: (15:39) Am okay with the ranking Marika Julf Helsingius: (15:42) I was hoping we could avoid the call tomorrow Julf Helsingius: (15:42) (as it is really inconvenient for me) Marika Konings: (15:43) if you can all agree on the list, there is no need for a call (but no pressure :-) Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:43) this is a good list i guess. Julf Helsingius: (15:43) I am fine with the list Julf Helsingius: (15:43) Then there is no point in the call tomorrow Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:43) i ll send it today, will wait for the return, Poncelet Ileleji: (15:43) Its Feasible to me Marika Julf Helsingius: (15:43) if people can't commit Maxim Alzoba: (15:44) question about mp3 record/chat/transcript Julf Helsingius: (15:44) I guess we are in trouble if someone comes back with a "no way" on Monday Maxim Alzoba: (15:45) I do not think that hurry is more important then proper review Maxim Alzoba: (15:46) it would be great to have it as soon as possible Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:46) Recordings and notes will be circulated under a couple of hours after the end of the meeitng. Transcript will be available in the next 8 - 10 hours. Julf Helsingius: (15:46) Is the transcript for general circulation? Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:46) The transcription is posted on the GNSO master calendar: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou… Julf Helsingius: (15:47) Thanks! Julf Helsingius: (15:47) Just good to keep in mind if we discuss individual people Nathalie Peregrine 2: (15:47) And also on the meeting wiki page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Maxim Alzoba: (15:48) what is the dtae /UTC time of when we need to say - yes we need tomorrow call/no we do not need it Maxim Alzoba: (15:48) ? Maxim Alzoba: (15:49) doodle poll finishing by that time? Maxim Alzoba: (15:49) with yes/not/comment? Maxim Alzoba: (15:51) or to send replacement if they can not attend Julf Helsingius: (15:51) One possible answer might be "can't get answer in time" Maxim Alzoba: (15:51) it is no/no/no :) Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:51) thank you all, Osvaldo Novoa: (15:51) Thank you very much, I really productive meeting. Bye Julf Helsingius: (15:51) Thanks, Marika! Maxim Alzoba: (15:51) Bye all Frédéric Guillemaut: (15:52) bye Poncelet Ileleji: (15:52) Thank You Marika, and Bye all

1 0

Notes and Action Items - GNSO Standing Selection Committee Meeting - 5 April 2017
by Emily Barabas April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting. Marika will shortly send out an email detailing next steps and a Doodle poll about the meeting tentatively scheduled for tomorrow. Kind regards, Emily --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes: 1. Welcome - As a reminder, the SSC operates by full consensus. As the full group is not in attendance on today's call, any outcomes of this call must be confirmed with the full group. - For this nomination, staff has requested that this group considers those candidates who have requested GNSO endorsement. Therefore, only those seeking GNSO endorsement are listed in the survey. The SSC may choose to consider those candidates who requested endorsement from other SOs and ACs. - The GNSO Council has asked SSC to provide recommendations in time for the 20 April meeting. The document deadline for the Council Meeting is 10 April. Once the GNSO Council receives list of endorsed candidates, they must consider the nominations and can choose to adopt them. The adopted list of candidates then goes to the SOs and ACs for consideration. The 25 April deadline is for candidates to be nominated from the different SOs and ACs. - If it is not possible to make these deadlines, the group may want to provide a rationale for requesting additional time. - The top three candidates automatically get a seat on the Review Team. The group may want to provide a ranking for candidates 4 through 7. - While the top three candidates are guaranteed slots, the others may also be considered, weighing for diversity and other considerations. 2. Review Survey Results - Survey results are based on scores to the following questions: -- Question 3: Based on the candidate's materials or your own personal experience, does the candidate appear to qualify as a GNSO endorsed candidate? -- Question 4: Does the candidate's application clearly demonstrate that the candidate has the necessary expertise and competence to do the work? -- Question 5: Based on your assessment of the responsibilities, skills, expertise and desired attributes as outlined in the call for volunteers, please rank these candidates in order of preference (1 being most preferred candidate, 14 being the least preferred candidate) 3. Confirm Next Steps & next meeting (if needed) - Suggestion: Put aside the top 3, as these are the clear top choices. Continue the conversation on ranking candidates 4 through 7 on this call, share on the mailing list to continue the conversation. If no consensus on the mailing list is reached, leverage the next scheduled meeting to work towards consensus. - Candidates 1-3: Susan Kawaguchi, Erika Mann, Stephanie Perrin - Candidates 4-7: 4) Volker Greimann, 5) Marc Anderson, 6) Stefania Milan, 7) Timothy Chen - Staff will send out notes, recordings, and summary email about the outcome of this call. - A call is tentatively scheduled for tomorrow. We will go ahead with this call unless there is clear agreement that there is no need to go ahead with this call. Staff will circulate a Doodle poll and will make a determination about whether to have a call by 13:00 UTC tomorrow. An additional call is scheduled for Monday in case further discussion is needed. - Staff will work on a draft motion in parallel.

1 0

Please participate - Evaluation Survey GNSO Candidates for RDS Review Team
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, The Evaluation Survey for GNSO Candidates for the RDS Review Team is now live: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GNSORDSRT. Please complete the survey as soon as possible, but at the latest COB Tuesday 4 April so that the results can be aggregated for Wednesday’s SSC meeting. Prior to completing the survey, please make sure to review the candidate applications as well as the call for volunteers which outlines the responsibilities, skills & experience and desired attributes – see https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw. As there were no objections, the results, both aggregated as well as well as individual responses, will be shared public. Do take into account the potential sensitivity of individual comments as you fill out the survey. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

3 5

For your review - survey results
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Thank you all for participating in the survey on such short notice. I am happy to report that all SSC members appointed to date provided their input (note, we are still waiting the appointment of one NCSG rep). Here you can find the aggregated results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-L2VBBBLB/. As some of you expressed concerns about sharing the individual scoring publicly, I have not made that information available at this stage. You may first want to come to agreement on how to handle that information (for example, if there is concern about sharing it publicly, maybe it could be shared on an individual basis between SSC members with the commitment that the information is not shared outside of the group?). To facilitate your review and discussion, I’ve also created the attached excel sheet in which I’ve aggregated the scores for Q3 and Q4 and ranked based on the survey results and also listed the ranking based on Q5. You will note that the top 6 on that basis is identical for Q3&4 and Q5, but there are some differences following that which you may need to discuss. I hope this is helpful. Talk to you all soon. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

5 5

FW: RDS/WHOIS2 Review Applicantions
by Marika Konings April 5, 2017

April 5, 2017

Dear All, Please find below the information requested concerning the scale used for the staff assessment of the applicants as well as those candidates for which the GNSO affiliation was not clear. Best regards, Marika From: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 17:45 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Cc: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: RDS/WHOIS2 Review Applicantions Marika, Here are the answers to the questions that the GNSO asked regarding the RDS/WHOIS2 candidates. 1. The scale we used to rate the applicant’s expertise was used to compared the expertise listed in the Call for Volunteers to what each applicant listed in their application. We looked at whether they had enough experience or were actively participating in RDS related working groups, before assessing the expertise they listed. Here is the scale that we used: · Meets All: 6/6 of the expertise criteria listed · Meets Most: 4-5/6 of the expertise criteria listed · Meets some: 1-3/6 of the expertise criteria listed 2. As these applicants reside in Asia we were not sure we could gather a response in sufficient time for the GNSO so we reviewed the applications posted on the wiki for any mention of their affiliation with the GNSO. Here is what we gathered: · Vignesh Pamu: he claims he participated in GNSO - Next Generation RDS PDP WG Face to Face Meeting (attended as Guest) and Thick WHOIS Implementation Review but does not appear as member or observer on both. · Pitinan Kooamornpatana mentioned participation within the GAC but none in GNSO, he is a member of Thai Generation Panel for the Label Generation Rootzone (LGR) for Thai Script, but I believe this is not part of GNSO. · Subham Charan clearly mentioned he has no ICANN experience. Conclusion: We determined that none of the applications appears to show any direct affiliation with the GNSO. I hope this meets the request from the GNSO. Sincerely, Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN

1 0

Reminder Re: Please participate - Evaluation Survey GNSO Candidates for RDS Review Team
by Marika Konings April 4, 2017

April 4, 2017

Reminder – please fill out the survey if you have not done so yet. Thank you to those that have already completed the survey. Best regards, Marika From: <gnso-ssc-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, April 3, 2017 at 17:56 To: "gnso-ssc(a)icann.org" <gnso-ssc(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Please participate - Evaluation Survey GNSO Candidates for RDS Review Team Dear All, The Evaluation Survey for GNSO Candidates for the RDS Review Team is now live: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GNSORDSRT[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r…>. Please complete the survey as soon as possible, but at the latest COB Tuesday 4 April so that the results can be aggregated for Wednesday’s SSC meeting. Prior to completing the survey, please make sure to review the candidate applications as well as the call for volunteers which outlines the responsibilities, skills & experience and desired attributes – see https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>. As there were no objections, the results, both aggregated as well as well as individual responses, will be shared public. Do take into account the potential sensitivity of individual comments as you fill out the survey. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

1 0

FW: RDS/WHOIS2 Review Applicantions
by Marika Konings April 4, 2017

April 4, 2017

Forwarding on behalf of James Bladel. Best regards, Marika From: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, March 24, 2017 at 12:26 To: SO/AC Leadership List <SOAC-leaders(a)icann.org> Cc: "rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org" <rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart(a)icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Subject: RDS/WHOIS2 Review Applicantions Dear SO/AC Leaders, This is to provide you with an update on the Registration Directory Services Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2-RT) Call for Volunteers that closed on 20 March 2017. We are pleased to inform you that a total of 38 of applications were submitted for appointment to the RDS-WHOIS2 Review Team. Please note that: * 6 candidates seek ALAC’s endorsement, 7 the ccNSO’s, 4 the GAC’s and 14 the GNSO’s; * No candidate has indicated they are seeking a review team nomination from the ASO, RSSAC or SSAC; * 7 candidates have not indicated any SO/AC affiliation We invite you to review the RDS-WHOIS2-RT wiki page where all applications that have been submitted are documented - https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=63145857 With the objective of kicking off Review Team activities in May, we would like to suggest the following work plan for your consideration: * As soon as possible but we would like to receive your list of nominations for the Review Team, if possible they should be provided by no later than 25 April &#8211 Please send your list of nominated candidates to rds-whois2-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-staff@icann.org>. * As the list of nominated candidates is being received from each SO and AC, the RDS Review Team wiki page will be updated to indicate those applicants who have been nominated. * We would like to arrange a call with the SO/AC leadership on either 25-26-27 April so that you can review the list of nominated applicants and confirm the selection of the RDS Review Team members. &#8211 To arrange this call we would like to invite you to confirm your availability via https://tinyurl.com/n4fkc9s by 31 March – 23:59 UTC so arrangements can be completed and everyone notified; * On or about 28 April – we would like to arrange for ICANN to issue an announcement on the confirmation of the RDS Review Team members and begin notifying those who were not selected of the option to participate in the work of the Review Team as an Observer. Should you have any comments on the above work plan, please advise at your earliest convenience so it may be adjusted accordingly. Attached to this email you will find a table of the applications received along with a scorecard based on the list of expertise noted in the Call for Volunteers and uses the information provided in each of the applications that were submitted for your use in considering each of the applicants. As always, please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions or concerns. Thank you, Karen Mulberry Director, Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN 12025 Waterfront Dr., Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Phone: +1 424 353 9745

1 0