March 2013 - ALAC-Announce - lists.icann.org

Reminder - ALAC Teleconference - Tuesday 25 September 2012 at 1400 UTC.
by At-Large Staff Aug. 26, 2013

Aug. 26, 2013

Please advise on whether you require a dial-out (with number) or whether you will join via the Adobe Connect Dear All, The next ALAC Teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 25 September 2012 at 1400 UTC. For other times: http://tinyurl.com/bqbkvoa The agenda and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/h4soAg Adobe Connect Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alac If you are unable to attend the call please send an email indicating your absence and we will note this information on the agenda. If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine ICANN At-Large Staff E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

2 8

FW: ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Board-Stakeholder Action List
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 31, 2013

March 31, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-29mar13-en.htm ________________________________ ICANN Board-Stakeholder Action List Items from ICANN Meeting 45 - Toronto 29 March 2013 Updated 26 March 2013 The attached ICANN Board-Stakeholder Action List sets out what the board heard in Toronto where board action was required, what the proposed action was, and what we've done since the ICANN 45 Meeting. In the future, it is intended that an Action List like this one will continue to be published no later than 1 month after each meeting. Just prior to the following meeting an updated version of the Action List will be published setting out what the board has done with respect to each item. Topic What we heard where action is needed Proposed Action What We've Done 1 WCIT Suggestion to establish an ICANN mailing list for those in the ICANN community who will be at WCIT (possibly widen list to I*). Direct the staff to set up mailing list. Completed. 2 Strategic Planning Do not proceed with 2013-2016 Strategic Plan. A new procedure is coming and it needs to ensure there are mechanisms for hearing input so the Community feels heard. The Board has been discussing this since its September board workshop in Los Angeles and plans to continue to work on it and report back as soon as possible. The Board recognizes that any strategic planning framework will need to include the results of the African Strategic Working Group. The upcoming May 2013 Board Retreat to focus on strategic planning. 3 GAC Advice The Board heard several matters from the GAC, which it expects will be addressed in the GAC Communiqué, but specifically notes that the timing of the Board's response to the GAC Communiqué was sub-optimal. The Board acknowledges the problem and will endeavor to put in place a mechanism to ensure timely arrival of its response. The Board has worked to minimize the amount of time taken to respond to GAC Communiqués by establishing a more thorough timeline. 4 WHOIS Review Report There is no consensus on the actions that should follow the WHOIS Review. The Board will discuss the WHOIS Review during its Board meeting this afternoon. Completed. The Board took action on the Report on 8 Nov. 2012, directing renewed and new efforts be undertaken to enforce current WHOIS policy and contractual conditions, and seeking a new approach to gTLD directory services challenges. We have created a second track to take a strategic look at registration data. The Expert Working Group (EWG) is the first step in this process. 5 Patents in Policy Processes Various parts of the GNSO have indicated that a future policy in this area may be needed and that we should address it before it becomes a concern. Board to request "expert advice" on this topic and then put out the recommended approach for public comment to be adopted by the Board. ICANN staff is in the process of scoping and organizing the collection of expert advice on this issue to meet the Board's request. During the Beijing meeting, staff will provide an initial memo on the patent topic, which will include additional follow-up steps, including further expert consultation. 6 Article 29 Working Party Letter Many concerns were expressed. The letter will be taken into account in finalizing the negotiations on the RAA. Concerns were taken into account in the RAA negotiations, as were further communications from data protection authorities in the EU on this same topic. 7 JAS Applications JAS applications need to be given priority in this round and improved in the next round. Treatment during this round is in the hands of the CEO and the New gTLD Program Committee. Treatment in future rounds will be taken up when the next round is formulated. No action needed at this point. To be addressed in next round of applications for new gTLDs. 8 New gTLDs - General implementation issues: * URS * IDN Variants * BC and IPC requirements * IANA Functions Dept. readiness * Registry services readiness * Contractual Compliance team readiness Numerous comments. Concern expressed that ICANN is not ready in some areas and will not be ready in time. The Board is instructing the CEO to focus his full attention and energy on all implementation actions necessary to keep the program on track. Work ongoing. Please refer to the links below for the most up-to-date information on the New gTLD Program. http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/webinars http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/latest 9 New gTLD Funds Document the total amount borrowed from the reserve fund to finance the pre-revenue period of the new gTLD program, and document the intended repayment schedule. We will do so. Detailed documentation of the costs since defined beginning of the program is in the process of being gathered and formalized into a centralized document. The repayment schedule has been determined in the revenue and expense recognition position paper, and corresponds to a monthly repayment throughout the evaluation process. 10 Prioritization Draw Generally positive feedback that IDN's should have priority; a number of suggestions were made to give preference to various subgroups in association with the Prioritization Draw. The NGPC will consider all feedback from this meeting feedback from this meeting and the comment period. All suggestions are being considered by and will be decided by the CEO & NGPC. Prioritization draw held on 17 December 2012. 11 Rights Protection in New gTLDs A handful of concerns were raised regarding the rights protection mechanism(s). The IPC and Business Constituency have reached consensus on further mechanisms for rights protections in new gTLDs. They agreed to socialize these to the rest of the GNSO. All of these are in the hands of the CEO and the New gTLD Program Committee. The Board looks forward to receiving input on these suggestions from the GNSO. The CEO convened a series of stakeholder meetings to review the rights protection mechanisms in light of the IPC/BC list of recs. These resulted in the "Strawman solution" which was posted for public comment as well provided to the GNSO with a request for guidance. The GNSO provided its input and the public comment summary and a review of the analysis are posted. 12 Trademark Clearinghouse There are a significant number of issues with regard to the Trademark Clearinghouse both from an implementation and cost point of view. Interest in whether the final draft agreement and the signed agreement for the trademark clearinghouse will be made public. The rights to the trademark clearinghouse database must remain with ICANN. The Board supports the CEO's decision to make solving these issues his top priority. Yes, it will be made public. The rights will remain with ICANN. Changes have been made to the technical implementation in response to stakeholder feedback. The Trademark Clearinghouse agreement has been split across the functions into several agreements, and these will be posted. The agreements reflect that the rights to the database remain with ICANN. 13 Submission of Public Forum Topics Public Forum questions submitted in advance should include hinting sentences so everyone can be prepared. Forwarded to staff and the Public Participation Committee (PPC) for implementation. Ongoing discussion by Board on format of public forum moving forward. New ideas will be tried in Beijing. This message was sent to matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=90…>

1 0

FW: ICANN News Alert -- New gTLD Program Posts Next Set of Initial Evaluation Results
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 31, 2013

March 31, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-29mar13-en.htm ________________________________ New gTLD Program Posts Next Set of Initial Evaluation Results 29 March 2013 Building upon last week's release of results for the first 30 applications, today ICANN released Initial Evaluation (IE) results for the next set of applications with priority numbers 31-60. There are 25 applications in this second set that received a passing score. This takes the total number of IDN applications receiving a passing score to 52. ICANN will continue to post IE results weekly, ramping up to 100 results per week by June. Click here to view all Initial Evaluation results<https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus>. This message was sent to matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=90…>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 31, 2013

March 31, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)<https://community.icann.org/x/pJlwAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP) Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/pJlwAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 9-April-2013 23:59 UTC. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed 2013 RAA Posted for Comment
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 28, 2013

March 28, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Proposed 2013 RAA Posted for Comment<https://community.icann.org/x/xZRwAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Proposed 2013 RAA Posted for Comment Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/xZRwAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 9-April-2013 23:59 UTC. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: 2013 Revised ALAC Rules of Procedure
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by the ALAC on the proposed "2013 Revised ALAC Rules of Procedure<https://community.icann.org/x/BqFwAg>." ***** * MOTION: ALAN GREENBERG * SECONDED: RINALIA ABDUL RAHIM Whereas the current ALAC Rules of Procedure dates back to 2007, at the very start of the formation of the current RALO-based At-Large Community; Whereas experiences of the ensuing six years had shown that an overall review was required; Whereas a project to review and re-write the Rules of Procedure has been underway since April 2012, and that this project has involved extensive study, discussion and drafting by ALAC members and others from all ICANN regions; Whereas the ALAC/At-Large Improvements Implementation Project Plan recommended a number of required changes in the ALAC Rules of Procedure; Resolved that the Draft ALAC Rules of Procedure dated 27 March 2013 (https://community.icann.org/x/BqFwAg) be adopted to replace the current ALAC Rules of Procedure (Document number AL/2007/1/1.Rev 11). The new Rules will take effect as soon as Adjunct Documents RoP-Adjunct-01, RoP-Adjunct-03 and RoP-Adjunct-04 referenced by the proposed Rules of Procedure have been approved by the ALAC. Do you support the ratification of the 2013 revision of the ALAC Rules of Procedure? ***** Additional information on this topic can be found on the 2013 Revised ALAC Rules of Procedure Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/BqFwAg>. Please note that the poll will be open from 27-March-2013 23:59 UTC to 05-April-2012 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

FW: ICANN Policy Update -- March/April 2013 Double Issue
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> Policy Update Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update Volume 13, Issue 3 – March/April 2013 Double Issue ________________________________ Contents Across ICANN 1. Issues Currently Open for Public Comment<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#1> ccNSO 1. Macedonia Joins ccNSO<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#2> 2. Demi Getschko of .br Selected as ccNSO Councilor<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#3> 3. Beijing Meeting Agenda for ccNSO Finalized<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#4> 4. IDN ccPDP in Final Stage<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#5> 5. ccNSO Council on Draft IANA Customer Service Complaint Resolution Process<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#6> GNSO 1. Public Forum Opened for Preliminary Issue Report on gTLD Registration Data Services<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#7> 2. Preliminary Issue Report on Uniformity of Reporting Now Available for Comment<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#8> 3. Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings – 11 Recommendations Published for Community Input<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#9> 4. GNSO Council Considers Initiation of PDP on Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#10> ASO 1. ASO to Meet in April, Finalize Board Member Selection<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#11> At-Large 1. At-Large Community Prepares for Beijing, Welcomes APRALO At-Large Structure Participants<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#12> 2. ALAC Submits Four Policy Advice Statements in February, March<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#13> 3. ALAC Submits Three New gTLD Objections <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#14> 4. ALAC Whois Briefing Session Highlights Diverse Perspectives<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#15> GAC 1. GAC Expects to Deliver Advice on New gTLDs in Beijing <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#16> RSSAC 1. RSSAC Restructure Underway<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#17> SSAC 1. SSAC Recommends Ways to Minimize Risks in Certificate Authority Practices<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#18> 2. SSAC Report on Domain Name Registration Validation Classifications<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-mar13-en.htm#19> This message was sent to matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=90…>

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Joint Statement on the Consultation on ccTLD Delegation and Redelegation Performance Standards and the Consultation on gTLD
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

Dear All, With 12 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the "ALAC Joint Statement on the Consultation on ccTLD Delegation and Redelegation Performance Standards and the Consultation on gTLD<https://community.icann.org/x/EgFlAg> " we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Joint Statement on the Consultation on ccTLD Delegation and Redelegation Performance Standards and the Consultation on gTLD<https://community.icann.org/x/EgFlAg> " for communication to the relevant parties? ALAC Joint Statement on the Consultation on ccTLD Delegation and Redelegation Performance Standards and the Consultation on gTLD Delegation and Redelegation Performance Standards Number of voters: 11 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 73.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % Voters 1 Yes 11 100.00 Holly Raiche, Eduardo Diaz, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Natalia Enciso, Sandra Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Alan Greenberg, Yaovi Atohoun, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Titi Akinsanmi 2 No 0 0.00 2 Abstain 0 0.00 We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this vote: Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Carlton Samuels, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro, Dev Anand Teelucksingh We can confirm that the following members abstained in this vote. For those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation of why you abstained? n/a You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2983WavVANCZnpLZST69ABAj Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Statement on the Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest Commitments Specification
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

Dear All, With 10 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the "ALAC Statement on the Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest Commitments Specification<https://community.icann.org/x/d4RwAg>" we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest Commitments Specification<https://community.icann.org/x/d4RwAg>" for communication to the relevant parties? ALAC Statement on the Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest Commitments Specification As at Poll close: Monday 25 March 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 10 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 66.67 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % Voters 1 Yes 10 100.00 Holly Raiche, Eduardo Diaz, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Natalia Enciso, Sandra Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Alan Greenberg, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Titi Akinsanmi 2 No 0 0.00 2 Abstain 0 0.00 We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this vote: Yaovi Atohoun, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Carlton Samuels, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro, Dev Anand Teelucksingh We can confirm that the following members abstained in this vote. For those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation of why you abstained? n/a You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2982kmKHzundDM7NVgsgNHez Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>a

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on ICANN's FY 14 Security, Stability and Resiliency Framework
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on ICANN's FY 14 Security, Stability and Resiliency Framework<https://community.icann.org/x/1JNwAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large ICANN's FY 14 Security, Stability and Resiliency Framework Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/1JNwAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 9-April-2013 23:59 UTC. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0