March 2009 - ALAC-Announce - lists.icann.org

Summary Minutes ALAC meeting 13 January
by At-Large Staff May 6, 2009

May 6, 2009

Dear all, The summary minutes, action items and audio recordings of the last ALAC meeting can now be found under the following URL: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?13_january_2009 The meeting minutes and action items are also attached below. Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Marie-Hélène Bouchoms, Heidi Ullrich ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Summary Minutes 13 January ALAC meeting Participants ALAC: C Langdon-Orr, A Greenberg, S Bachollet, V Scartezini, A Peake, , P Vande Walle , B Brendler, F Seye Sylla, C Aguirre, J Ovidio Salgueiro (joined at 1400 UTC) Apologies: H Diakite, W Ludwig Absent: V Vivekandan, R Guerra, TH Nguyen (technical reasons), M El Bashir Liaisons: W Seltzer, A Piazza Guests: Liz Gasster Staff: H Ullrich, M Langenegger, MH Bouchoms 1. Roll Call The quorum was reached at 12:50 (UTC) (see above for participants) 2. Adoption of the Agenda The agenda was adopted. The chair decided to slightly alter the order to start with the business items and the actions to take. The present summary minutes follow the actual progression of the meeting. 3. Proposal to move the ALAC monthly meeting time A new Doodle will be started which contains the times from the previous slot and adds the last Saturday and Sunday of the Month as additional options to the 4th Tuesday of the month. ALAC monthly meetings should occur before the monthly RALO¹s gatherings. Staff will add the Saturday/Sunday option on the Doodle vote and the ALAC members will have up to 14 days to vote. A reminder will be sent by staff. 4. Review of current status of ALS applications 7 current applicants: CETIC AJB, Internauta Venezuela, AUI Peru: currently waiting for Due Diligence Bokk Jang Bokk Jef, CAPDA, FMAI: Regional advise not received yet ALAC vote on the NAROLO regional advice for Knujon. Approved: A Greenberg, C Langdon-Orr, V Scartezini, C Aguirre, P Vande Walle, A Peake, S Bachollet, F Seye Sylla, H Diakite no abstentions Knujon is accepted as certified ALS 5. Proposal of the GNSO/ALAC chair for a joint NCSG WG In favour: (H Diakite, F Seye Sylla, A Greenberg, S Bachollet, C Langdon-Orr, V Scartezini, P Vande Walle, A Peake, C Aguirre) C Aguirre, A Greenberg, C Langdon-Orr, S Bachollet volunteered to be part of this working group. F Seye Sylla will send an email for African volunteers, A Greenberg will ask D Younger and B Brendler from NARALO to volunteer. CLO insisted on the heavy work commitment: a minimum of one teleconference per week is required. CLO will work with A Doria to settle a Doodle meeting times voting poll 6. AOB 1. Agenda and ALS google.doc A Peake complained about the fact that there are no date stamps with any last-minute agenda modification which renders the follow-up difficult. It was suggested to resort to the revision tag for previous views of it. A Peake also complained about the current layout of the Google.doc for the ALS applications and does not permit an effective web-based tracking. 2. Reported cases of non-compliance issues with the RAA B Brendler called the attention of the ALAC to a number of comments received concerning specific compliance issues (onlineNick, GoDaddy) and referred to D Younger¹s comment requesting the ALAC to advise the ICANN Board to revoke the accreditation of failing registrars. C Langdon-Orr said these cases could be used to serve in the RRA WG. At ALAC level they can only be discussions in terms of principles of registrar/registry relations since ALAC does not have the resource to do due diligence. V Scartezini said there should be a fast-track between ALAC and the Council for these individual cases to be addressed to the Council staff who would do a formal due diligence. A Greenberg said there needed to be a liaison to which these issues could be brought, a streamline procedure. The ICANN Board would not intervene for such operational issues at the level of isolate cases. ALAC members will discuss online about the proper conduit. H Ullrich will create a Wiki page with the current registry/registrar relations that will serve as a discussion point at the Mexico meeting. ALAC will arrange a teleconference call with services staff and any other party before the next ALAC meeting. C Landon-Orr and A Greenberg will contact NARALO to clarify ALAC role on this matter. H Ullrich will place the discussion about the role of each structure: RALO¹s, ALAC and ALSes on the Mexico Agenda 3. ALAC/GNSO discussion about NCSG AI: C Langdon-Orr will tell A Doria that ALAC wishes to be involved in the commercial stakeholder group formation to represent the individuals. A Greenberg reminded that there would also be a public comment period when the commercial stakeholder group publishes their charter 4. Registration abuse Policy L Gasster commented that there is an Issue Report about the domain registrations abuse and a drafting team is currently preparing a recommendation on what the GNSO should do. The team is due to report back to the GNSO in 4 weeks. There is still possibility to join the team. The IR has been translated into five languages: EN, FR, SP, RU, and AR She added that there will be an e-crime workshop in Mexico. The next drafting team meeting will be on 16 January 1500 UTC and B Brendler will attend it. 7. Topics to discuss at the joint SO/AC meeting in Mexico. There was confusion about what the percentages of the 2nd survey outcome report meant and how they should be read. The layout will be redrafted and then the survey outcome will be sent to the ALAC members. They will chose a topic or add topics in view of the SO/AC summit meeting at Mexico as the survey serves two ends: summit WG and SO/AC Mexico meeting on day 1. Staff will work with ALAC ExCom to rework the layout of the results and have it distributed to the ALAC members and will set up a doodle vote for the topics. 8. Revision of 9 December 2008 action items PSC: the recording of the PSC meeting extract is missing. It is needed to prepare the statement for the PSC and staff will remedy to that shortly. GNSO single purpose call on new gTLD¹s occurred on 18 December. A resource page for ALAC statements on gTLD¹s was set up (linked to the agenda). It includes two postings from B Brendler, one with an overview of general statements to consider and the other with specific comments on each module of the new GTLD guidebook. B Brendler will refine the documents, incorporate into it the comments received and produce a first draft statement to send to each RALO to comment within 2 weeks. The individual comment of the RALO¹s as well as the individual comment of the ALSes would be appended to it and sent to the ICANN Board after an ALAC vote on it. A Greenberg commented that there would be a teleconference meeting of the GNSO on 15 January 1600 UTC, open to all interested during the week, the purpose of which being to discuss the changes ICANN staff made on the initial GNSO recommendation that was approved by the ICANN Board. C Langdon-Orr said she would attend it and keep AlAC posted. 9. GNSO Whois Study (Liz Gasster participation) Liz Gasster, GNSO Policy officer, explained the historical background of the demand for possible WHOIS studies. She commented that back in 2007, the GNSO had decided that comprehensive studies of WHOIS would be needed to inform the policy debate. In February 2008, the GNSO solicited proposals for these studies from the public and the GAC. The GAC submitted 15 proposals, the community 25. These proposals had been categorized in function of logical groupings and divided into theoretical subject areas. Now, they solicit the viewpoints from the constituencies and the ALAC and the GAC to assess the level of importance of feasibility of each study proposal. She then explained the two documents given: the report of 26 August 2008 with a link to the proposals and an Excel spreadsheet with the actual priority ratings given by the constituencies. (See recordings 1:55). Originally the Council wishes the comments before 16 January but there could be a request for extension of the time. NCUC and the RC don¹t want any study. The Council also wishes to receive commonly understood definitions on 8 terms and ALAC members are asked to read the proposed definitions and comment on them. The proposed terms are based on past discussions and articles. Individual comments are expected any time within the two next weeks at policy-staff(a)icann.org. L Gasster clarified that for the feasibility rating, o¹ meant that one did not know and -1¹ one did not think that was feasible, 1¹ meaning it is feasible. B Brendler said he and D Younger had participated very early in the process. He recommended to read the GAC¹s proposals first as they were consumer-focused. It was agreed to set up a doodle poll for a one single topic call prior to the deadline of the ranking poll a week before the end of the month. The voting will be instantaneous and B Brendler would arrange the final document for the GNSO Staff will work with L Gasster to set up a doodle vote for the topic call on WHOIS ranking studies. The call will be held a week before the end of the month Staff will see if a meeting between L Gasster and the RALO¹s meetings still to run this month can be arranged to discuss WHOIS documents 10. Update on Mexico summit C Langdon-Orr said she has received no feedback from the ALAC letter to the Board concerning the past Cairo Summit problems but that this would be handled by the new PP WG There were great concerns about the flying plans and the programmed return flight on the Thursday afternoon. ALAC and the RALO Senior officers should attend the ICANN Board meeting on the Friday. S Bachollet commented that all the At-Large participants should be entitled to stay until Friday so that they could see the whole process from beginning to end. It was commented that since ICANN announced that the per diem of the GNSO participants would be adjusted in case they had internet included in the room, it implied that there would be funds for ALAC participants for internet. ACTION ITEMS: 1. ALAC monthly meeting schedule Staff will add the Saturday/Sunday option on the Doodle vote. The Saturday/Sunday need to be after the monthly APRALO meeting. ALAC Members will answer the doodle poll within the next 7. Staff will send reminders to ensure that everyone votes 2. Proposal of the GNSO/ALAC chair for a joint NCSG WG A Greenberg to contact D younger and B Brendler to ask for his participation to GNSO/ALAC WG H Diakite, F Seye Sylla to email within 2 days AFRALO for volunteers to GNSO/ALAC WG CLO and A Doria to settle a Doodle voting poll for the GNSO/ALAC WG meeting times 3. Reported cases of non-compliance issues with the RAA ALAC members will discuss online about the proper conduit to report isolate cases of registrar failing compliances. H Ullrich will create a Wiki page with the current registry/registrar relations ALAC to arrange teleconference call towards the end of this month before the next ALAC meeting with services staff and any other party interested, i.e. D Younger, to discuss about the right process to address the registrar failing compliance issues A Greenberg will draft a short ALAC statement for the services staff and NARALO outlining ALAC¹s role with regards to RAA compliance issues. AI: H Ullrich to place the discussion about the role of each structure: RALO¹s, ALAC and ALSes on the Mexico Agenda (actions they can take on comments reporting non-compliance of registrars reports, etc.) 4. Registration abuse Policy RALO¹s are to disseminate the IR on Registration abuse policy among their members 5. PSC Committee staff to proceed to the PSC recording extraction and posting 6. New gTLD guidebook RALO¹s will have two weeks to comment on a draft statement on gTLD guidebook that will be sent to them 7. GNSO Whois Studies Staff to see if a meeting between L Gasster and the RALO¹s meetings still to run this month can be arranged to discuss WHOIS documents Staff to work with L Gasster to set up a doodle vote on meeting times for the topic call on WHOIS ranking studies. The meeting should occur before the week of 26 January. ALAC participants to look at the commonly agreed definitions on WHOIS studies terms and comment on them through the comment list policy-staff(a)icann.org within two weeks.

1 1

ALAC vote on Report on User Involvement in the GNSO now open
by At-Large Staff March 30, 2009

March 30, 2009

Dear all, As per Alan Greenberg¹s request, we have set up an online vote on the Report on User Involvement in the GNSO, which was published by the GNSO ALAC/At-Large New NC Constituency Communities Working Group on February 20th and revised on March 4th. You can find the complete Statement under: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?report_on_user_involvement_in_the_g nso A vote will be held on the following motion: Whereas: - The ICANN Board requested a report on user involvement in the GNSO; - A Work Group was convened which included members of ALAC and At-Large; - The group submitted its report with the full support of all but one of ALAC/At-large participants Motion: The ALAC supports the statement of the Work Group on User Involvement in the GNSO as submitted on 20 February 2009 and revised on 04 March 2009. With possible answers: -Support -Do not Support -Abstain A separate, private email with voting credentials will shortly be sent to the ALAC members. Please inform the Staff if you have not received them or have difficulties with the BigPulse voting interface. The vote will remain open until April 6th at 1200 UTC. Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Summit Follow-Up - New Permanent Working Group Mailing List details
by At-Large Staff March 27, 2009

March 27, 2009

Dear Community members: In accordance with the previously-announced roadmap¹ for At-Large Summit follow-up, we are pleased to provide the following details of the permanent mailing lists for the now-permanent working groups originally created for the Summit. Please note that we have ensured that all subscribers to the Summit-WG lists have been added to the new lists: * The Summit-WG1 list is now Engagement-WG signup available at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-wg_atlarge-lists. icann.org * The Summit-WG2 list is now ICANN-Future-WG signup at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-future-wg_atlarge-list s.icann.org * The Summit-WG3 subscribers have been added to the gTLD-WG list signup at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg_atlarge-lists.icann. org * The Summit-WG4 list is now Trans-Account-WG signup at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/trans-account-wg_atlarge-lis ts.icann.org * The Summit-WG5 list is now DNS-Security-WG signup at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-security-wg_atlarge-list s.icann.org We will now set the Summit-WG lists to read only, in order to preserve the archives of those lists as a part of the permanent record of the Summit. Details of the new wiki homes for the above working groups will be published shortly. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

ALAC Resolves Upon At-Large Summit Follow-up Roadmap
by At-Large Staff March 27, 2009

March 27, 2009

The ALAC, in its meeting on 24th March <https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?24_march_2009> , resolved upon a plan <https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?alac_resolution_on_working_group_statem ents> for taking forward the Summit working groups and outcomes to keep the momentum in the community which the Summit has generated. Firstly, it was agreed that the five Summit working groups <https://st.icann.org/summit-wg/index.cgi?working_groups> should continue to follow the issues within their remit, and all At-Large community members are asked to engage with one, or more, of the working groups. Regular meetings of each working group will be held, commencing shortly, and dedicated wiki work environments are being created to support their work. Secondly, a process was agreed <https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?alac_resolution_on_working_group_statem ents> which will ensure each of the five working group statements becomes not just a Summit conclusion, but also an Advisory of the ALAC to the Board of ICANN. In order to ensure each statement garners the widest possible community support, each statement will be put out for comment by the whole At-Large community in French, Spanish, and English editions. After review and amendment, if required, by each working group¹s leadership team, the statements will be voted on by the ALAC before presentation to the Board. Where an ICANN-wide public comment period is underway on a matter addressed by a statement, it will also be submitted in the relevant comment box. The ALAC asked the Staff to ensure the community were aware of these changes, and of the URLs for mailing lists and workspaces for those who wish to participate. These details will be forthcoming soon if you wish to follow events in the At-Large community, it is recommended that you subscribe to the At-Large announcement list <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce_atlarge-lists .icann.org> . -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

At-Large Response to the IRT (Trademark Issues in gTLDs) Process Forming - Join the Effort!
by At-Large Staff March 18, 2009

March 18, 2009

Dear Community Members: Many of you have expressed an interest in being involved in the At-Large New gTLD working group as it focuses on the work of the Implementation Recommendation Team ("IRT") which is to draft a report for the Board by 24th April. WHAT IS THE IRT? As provided by the Board resolution of 6 March 2009: ³... based on the public comment submissions received regarding the New gTLD Draft Applicant Guidebook, ICANN Staff has determined that the implementation issues involving trademark protection need additional community input and analysis. These issues exist today within the existing gTLDs. Whereas, members of the community with knowledge and expertise in this area have proposed a way to synthesize the comments received in this area, and, with input from the broader community, including WIPO, propose solutions to the Staff on these issues in a timely manner. Whereas, the board recognizes that resolution of these issues would be beneficial to the introduction of new gTLDs, it is Therefore resolved (2009.03.06.06), that the Board requests the GNSO's Intellectual Property Constituency in consultation with staff to convene an Implementation Recommendation Team comprised of an internationally diverse group of persons with knowledge, expertise, and experience in the fields of trademark, consumer protection, or competition law, and the interplay of trademarks and the domain name system to develop and propose solutions to the overarching issue of trademark protection in connection with the introduction of new gTLDs. ³ Further information (English only) may be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-6-06mar09-en.htm. Anyone who wishes to participate in the At-Large new gTLD Working Group on the IRT Process is welcome to do so - please subscribe to the New GTLD Mailing list at this link: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg_atlarge-lists.icann. org. NOTE: If you have previously sent an email to the staff, or in community mailing lists, you should still join the mailing list directly as all At-Large lists are self-service, you have not been subscribed by a third-party. A microsite for the At-Large working group on the IRT is being established at https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?at_large_irt_process_working_gro up. Check back often as content will be added often. The IRT process itself is likely to be conducted in english-only. The At-Large community members participating in discussing the work of the IRT can be supported in English and Spanish, with respect to telephonic meeting interpretation, and to the extent possible document translation, so don't let language stand in your way of participating in this key policy development process. The Staff do not guarantee that all documents will be translated. For those of you who have asked how to directly participate in the work of the IRT, please note that the list of participants is now closed. There are volunteers from At-Large who responded before the deadline; the At-Large working group on the IRT will be closely connected to those individuals and they will be helping to ensure that At-Large¹s views are represented in the IRT¹s work. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Heidi Ullrich, Marie-Hélène Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Mexico City Briefing Note Published
by At-Large Staff March 18, 2009

March 18, 2009

Mexico City Briefing Note Published 9 March 2009 A briefing note <http://mex.icann.org/briefing-note> on the Mexico City meeting of 1-6 March 2009 has been published. ICANN's 34th international public meeting was hosted by ICANN, the Mexican Internet Association (AMIPCI), the Network Information Center (NIC) Mexico, and the Internet Society (ISOC) Mexico. Representatives of over 90 entities from ICANN's global individual Internet user community also gathered at the At-Large Summit which was an integral part of the meeting. The briefing note summarizes key developments at the meeting and outlines next steps and sources of further information for each. The topics included are: * New generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs) * Internationalized Domain Names and the IDN Fast Track * At Large Summit * Amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) * The Improving Institutional Confidence (IIC) consultation * GNSO Improvements * Independent Reviews * A summary of Board resolutions The briefing note is an informal summary. The authoritative records of meetings are be available in published and adopted minutes. Further information about the meeting, including presentations and transcripts, is available at http://mex.icann.org/. The At-Large Summit microsite is accessible at http://www.atlarge.icann.org/summit. Information about the next meeting which will be from 21-26 June 2008 in Sydney, Australia can be found at its dedicated website at http://syd.icann.org. Related links: Mexico City briefing note: http://mex.icann.org/briefing-note Mexico City meeting website: http://mex.icann.org/ Sydney meeting website: http://syd.icann.org -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Heidi Ullrich, Marie-Hélène Bouchoms, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Staff Availability Week of 9-13 March (EN/ES/FR)
by At-Large Staff March 9, 2009

March 9, 2009

Dear Community: The At-Large support staff are largely on leave for the week of 9-13 March, returning Monday 16th March. Any requests made during 9-13 March which are not of an obviously urgent nature will be replied to the following week. Chers Membres, Par la présente, nous vous informons de ce que la plupart des membres de notre personnel At-Large sera en congé du 9 au 13 mars et que le travail reprendra son rythme normal dès le 16 mars. Nous répondrons avec plaisir aux demandes non urgentes dès le lundi 16 mars. Estimados Miembros, Les informamos de que la mayor parte de nuestro personal de At-Large estará de vacaciones del 9 de marzo hasta el 13 de marzo. Nuestro personal al completo estará de vuelta a partir del lunes 16 de marzo. Atenderemos a sus solicitudes no urgentes con mucho gusto a partir del lunes 16 de marzo. -- Regards / Cordialement / Atentamente, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Heidi Ullrich, Marie-Hélène Bouchoms, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Public E-Crime Workshop
by At-Large Staff March 6, 2009

March 6, 2009

Dear All, The slideshows from yesterday¹s public E-Crime workshop and the scribe transcript can now be found under: http://mex.icann.org/node/2653 Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

FW: Advise Requested regarding Constituency Day
by At-Large Staff March 4, 2009

March 4, 2009

Message forwarded from Diane Schroeder, Director of Board Support ******************************** To the Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees: The Board is interested in your views on the best ways for the Board and Supporting Organizations & Advisory Committees to interact at the ICANN international meetings. As the community grows and the issues become more complex, it has become a greater challenge to find a way to effectively and efficiently organise this interaction. In particular, the Board would like to come to a shared understanding of what Constituency Day should be, with a view to trying out different ways of interaction during the Constituency Day at next ICANN international meeting in Sydney.. At present the Constituency Day is organised as follows: the Board is divided up and a number of members are assigned to various constituencies for different amounts of time depending on the constituency. The idea behind this approach was to give the Board members an opportunity to listen to some of the constituency business, not just rely on the question and answer time with the Board. To prepare for the visit by the Board members, each constituency is asked to provide a list of topics that they would like to discuss with the Board. Some constituencies are better at providing this than others. Board Members are assigned to constituencies other than the one with which they are most familiar. In addition, the CEO and the Chair visit all constituencies. At the end of the day, after all the visits, the Board comes together and exchanges the views they have heard from the various groups. To assist in the discussion about the future of Constituency Day, the Board would like your thoughts on the following specific questions, by the end of April. 1. What is the goal of having the Board meet with a Supporting Organization, Constituency, or Advisory Committee during the ICANN meeting? 2. What is the best communication method between the Board and a Supporting Organization, Constituency or Advisory Committee during the ICANN meeting? 3. How much time is needed for effective communication with the Board? 4. Who of the Board should come to such meetings the CEO & the Chair? A representative group of board members? All Board members? Thank you for your help in this process. Diane Schroeder Director of Board Support ICANN 4676 Admiralty Way, Ste. 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 +1-310-301-5827 (direct office) +1-310-823-9358 (main phone) +1-310-823-8649 (fax) +1-562-644-2524 (mobile)

1 0

Vote Results WHOIS Tally/ALS Applications February 2009
by Matthias Langenegger March 3, 2009

March 3, 2009

Dear all, 12 out of 15 ALAC Members have voted in the recent vote on the WHOIS Vote Tally and the current ALS applications. We can therefore confirm that the result is quorate. 1. Would you like to endorse the WHOIS Vote Tally (see link below), ranked in order of importance as proposed by the ALAC WHOIS working group, as the official ALAC view on WHOIS studies? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% Yes 58.33% ( Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Mohamed El Bashir, Beau Brendler, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr, Gareth Shearman) No 25.00% ( Adam Peake, Patrick Vande Walle, Thu Hue Nguyen) Abstain 16.67 (Hawa Diakite, Sébastien Bachollet) 2. Should the regional advice from AFRALO for applicant (117) Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations be rejected? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% ACCEPT the regional advice and accredit this ALS 83.33% ( Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet, Beau Brendler, Thu Hue Nguyen, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr) REJECT regional advice and do not accredit this ALS 8.33% (Adam Peake) Abstain 8.33 % (Gareth Shearman) 3. Should the regional advice from LACRALO for applicant (118) Internauta Venezuela be rejected? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% ACCEPT the regional advice and accredit this ALS 83.33% (Alan Greenberg, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet, Beau Brendler, Thu Hue Nguyen, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr, Gareth Shearman) Abstain 16.67% (Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Adam Peake) REJECT regional advice and do not accredit this ALS 0.00% 4. Should the regional advice from LACRALO for applicant (119) CETIC AJB be rejected? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% ACCEPT the regional advice and accredit this ALS 100.00% (Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Adam Peake, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet, Beau Brendler, Thu Hue Nguyen, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr, Gareth Shearman) REJECT regional advice and do not accredit this ALS 0.00 % Abstain 0.00 % 5. Should the regional advice from LACRALO for applicant (120) AUI Peru be rejected? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% ACCEPT the regional advice and accredit this ALS 100.00% (Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Adam Peake, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet, Beau Brendler, Thu Hue Nguyen, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr, Gareth Shearman) REJECT regional advice and do not accredit this ALS 0.00% Abstain 0.00% 6. Should the regional advice from AFRALO for applicant (121) Bokk Jang Bokk Jef be rejected? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% ACCEPT the regional advice and accredit this ALS 100.00% (Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Adam Peake, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet, Beau Brendler, Thu Hue Nguyen, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr, Gareth Shearman) REJECT regional advice and do not accredit this ALS 0.00% Abstain 0.00% 7. Should the regional advice from AFRALO for applicant (123) CAPDA be rejected? Number of voters: 12 Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 80.00% ACCEPT the regional advice and accredit this ALS 100.00% (Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Adam Peake, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet, Beau Brendler, Thu Hue Nguyen, Vanda Scartezini, Cheryl Landon-Orr, Gareth Shearman) REJECT regional advice and do not accredit this ALS 0.00% Abstain 0.00% You may verify the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=7Gz7SUSzZHUvFd8DitSF When announcing the results of voting, we have been requested by the Chair to provide a listing of those who have not voted. Accordingly, we can confirm that the following ALAC member did not participate in the balloting: Carlos Aguirre Fatimata Seye Sylla Vivek Annand Regards, -- Matthias Langenegger At-Large Coordination Officer Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: matthias.langenegger(a)icann.org Main Tel: +41 (79) 644 65 35 Fax: +41 (22) 594 85 44 Skype ID: matthiaslangenegger

1 0