- ALAC-Announce - lists.icann.org

Contractual Compliance Monthly Update -- October 2013
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 14, 2013

Nov. 14, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> October 2013 Contractual Compliance Monthly Update Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers http://www.icann.org/en/resources/compliance/ October 2013 ________________________________ Table of Contents 1 * General Update * Audit Program Update * Complaints Handling and Enforcement Summary http://www.icann.org/en/resources/compliance/update/update-oct13-en.htm ________________________________ 1 This update is provided for information purposes only. Please do not rely on the information contained within this update to make conclusions or business decisions.

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Thick Whois Policy Development Process (PDP) Recommendations for Board Consideration
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 14, 2013

Nov. 14, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Thick Whois Policy Development Process (PDP) Recommendations for Board Consideration<https://community.icann.org/x/6B2fAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft can be found on the At-Large Thick Whois Policy Development Process (PDP) Recommendations for Board Consideration Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/6B2fAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by the Buenos Aires Meeting. A vote is to commence after comments have been collected. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Policy & Implementation Working Group
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 14, 2013

Nov. 14, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Policy & Implementation Working Group<https://community.icann.org/x/-hSMAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft can be found on the At-Large Policy & Implementation Working Group Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/-hSMAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by the Buenos Aires Meeting. A vote is to commence after comments have been collected. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 13, 2013

Nov. 13, 2013

Dear All, With 13 out of 14 ALAC Members having voted on the "ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)<https://community.icann.org/x/oxuMAg>" we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)<https://community.icann.org/x/oxuMAg>" for communication to the relevant parties? ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP) As at Poll close: Tuesday 12 November 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 13 · Group size: 14 · Percentage voted: 92.86 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % Voters 1 Yes 12 92.31 Holly Raiche, Carlton Samuels, Eduardo Diaz, Natalia Enciso, Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Sandra Hofericher, Evan Leibovitch, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Alan Greenberg, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro, Tijani Ben Jemaa 2 Abstain 1 7.69 Jean-Jacques Subrenat 3 No 0 0.00 ***** We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this vote: Titi Akinsanmi We can confirm that the following members abstained in this vote. For those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation of why you abstained? Jean-Jacques Subrenat We can confirm that the following members voted no in this vote. For those that have voted no, would you like to provide an explanation of why you voted no? n/a You may review the results independently under: http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=35484Y93Nnvq2UhaNJza7G8I Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>a

1 0

News Alert -- ICANN Selects Lead for Development of Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 12, 2013

Nov. 12, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-11nov13-en.htm ________________________________ ICANN Selects Lead for Development of Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework 11 November 2013 ICANN signed an agreement with JAS Global Advisors LLC to lead the development of the Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework, in cooperation with the community. The statement of work for the development of the Framework can be found here<http://www.icann.org/en/about/staff/security/ssr/name-collision-sow-11nov13…> [PDF, 89 KB]. ICANN intends to present a development timeline and initial questions for discussion at ICANN 48 Buenos Aires (17-21 November 2013). Interested parties (e.g., current and prospective Registry Operators, security practitioners, community members) are encouraged to attend the SSR Session<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-security-stability> on Monday, 18 November 2013 and provide input. The Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework was adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors, New gTLD Program Committee on 7 October 2013, (the "Framework") and is intended to manage name collisions<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1…> [PDF, 841 KB] in new gTLDs. More specifically, the Framework should: * Identify appropriate parameters and processes to assess the probability and severity of impact resulting from name collision occurrences. * Specify a set of Name Collision Occurrence Assessments and corresponding mitigation measures that ICANN or Top-Level Domains (TLD) applicants may need to implement. These assessments are to be based on Second-Level Domain data generated by DNS-OARC's<https://www.dns-oarc.net/> "Day in the Life of the Internet" initiative. Additional data sets, such as information from Certificate Authorities regarding the issuance of internal name certificates may be used as well. * Be made available for public comment. In accordance with its guidelines for procuring vendors, ICANN sent a Request for Proposal (RFP) to four qualified candidates. Three of the parties submitted proposals, and from those received ICANN selected JAS Global Advisors LLC. About JAS Global Advisors LLC: Founded in 2003, JAS Global Advisors LLC<https://www.jasadvisors.com> is a unique professional services firm delivering risk management, technology, and governance solutions to a wide range of commercial and government clients. Read more about Name Collision: * A Study on the Name Collisions in the DNS<http://www.icann.org/en/about/staff/security/ssr/name-collision-02aug13-en.…> [PDF, 3.34 MB] * NGPC Resolution for Addressing the Consequences of Name Collisions<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-08oct13-en.htm> * Implementing the New gTLD Collision Occurrence Management Plan<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/announcement-16oct13-en>

1 0

ICANN News Alert -- Status Update from the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 12, 2013

Nov. 12, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11nov13-en.htm ________________________________ Status Update from the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services 11 November 2013 ICANN has embarked on a journey to reinvent today's WHOIS system. Help the EWG envision a better system by joining the discussion at ICANN's Buenos Aires meeting and online. The Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) has been working to envision a clean-slate approach to better meet global Internet community needs for domain name registration data with greater privacy, accuracy, and accountability. In its Initial Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] published in June, the EWG recommended a series of principles and proposed a model for the next-generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace today's WHOIS system. In advance of the ICANN-48 Meeting in Buenos Aires, the EWG has published a Status Update Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] that provides further insight into the EWG's analysis and highlights its current thoughts on key issues, after more extensive exploration of open areas and careful consideration of all Community comments received on its Initial Report. As the EWG's deliberations are on-going, it is hoped that this report will provide insight into the team's recommendations, answer questions, and stimulate lively Community dialogue in Buenos Aires and online input. Key issues highlighted in this Status Update Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] include: * Identifying the data elements to be freely available on an anonymous basis, and those that might require authenticated, gated access through accreditation for permissible purposes * Details on the principles for better privacy or proxy services and a proposal for secured protected credentials for use by at-risk individuals * Suggestions to improve data quality through standardization validation, periodic checks, and prevalidated contacts * Consideration of jurisdictional and applicable law issues, notably data protection law * Suggestions for ensuring harmonized approaches to data protection and security measures, and a framework for binding corporate rules to meet data protection obligations. * Exploration of how existing technical protocols could be utilized by the EWG's recommended implementation model (such as EPP or the RDAP protocol under development by the IETF) * Comparison of the current WHOIS system (as improved in the 2013 RAA) to the EWG's recommended next-generation registration data directory service * Description of various implementation models examined by the EWG, including a detailed comparison of pro and cons. The ideas presented in this Status Update Report are works-in progress, not consensus recommendations, and may be further updated by the EWGin Buenos Aires. The EWG hopes to use Community input and research into specific areas to reach fact-based recommendations to be delivered in its Final Report. Join the discussion There are several ways to participate in this journey to envision a better system: * Learn more and ask questions during the EWG's presentation "Exploring Replacements for WHOIS – The Next Generation Directory Services<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-rds>" on Wednesday, 20 November 2013, 8:30-10:00 ART, in Buenos Aires. A recording of the session will be made available shortly after. * Exchange ideas during an interactive open EWG Workshop<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-ewg-wrap-up> on Wednesday, 20 November 2013, 16:30-17:30 ART, in Buenos Aires. The dialogue will inform the EWG's deliberations as it refines its recommendations for the next generation registration data directory services. * Submit your ideas to the EWG's Public Mailbox: input-to-ewg(a)icann.org<mailto:input-to-ewg@icann.org> Input is publicly archived. To read input received to date, please refer to: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/share-24jun13-… What's Next? Due to the complexity of the task at hand and the importance of basing any next-generation RDS on a solid understanding of the benefits and impacts that would likely result, the EWG has not yet completed its recommendations, but intends to do so in early 2014, informed by Community feedback and in-depth analysis of selected areas. The EWG expects to reconvene in March 2014 to derive fact-based recommendations, delivering its final report to the ICANN Board before June 2014. Background In December, ICANN announced the creation of an Expert Working Group (EWG) on next-generation gTLD Registration Directory Services, as a first step in fulfilling the ICANN Board's directive to help redefine the purpose and provision of gTLD registration data. The EWG's findings are expected to serve as a foundation to help the GNSO create a new global policy for the provision of gTLD registration data. A significant milestone was reached on 24 June 2013<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> with the publication <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> of the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services> (EWG)'s Initial Report and FAQs, opening a consultation period with the ICANN community. The initial report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] enumerated the users, purposes, data elements, recommended principles and features, and proposed model to guide the development of a next generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS. The initial report was accompanied by a questionnaire soliciting community input on complex areas needing further analysis to draft consensus recommendations. While comments were received on the entire initial report, two topics received the most feedback: the EWG's recommendation to replace fully anonymous WHOIS with a gated access paradigm, and the suggested Aggregated RDS (ARDS) implementation model. The EWG's Status Update Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] aims to highlight the EWG's current thinking on these and many other key issues, after careful consideration of all comments and feedback received to date. It also provides a great deal more detail on the analysis that lay behind the Initial Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB], as requested by the community. More Information The EWG work stems from the Board's directive<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-08nov12-en.htm> to redefine the purpose and provision of gTLD registration data, while balancing data accuracy and access issues with safeguards for protecting data. The EWG considered the important community work done over the last decade by the GNSO, the SSAC, the WHOIS Review Team, the GAC and others. The EWG's Initial Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] reflects the EWG's consensus view of design principles and features needed in a new RDS, along with a proposed Model illustrating how these could be fulfilled in the ICANN domain ecosystem. For more information, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/faqs> prepared by the EWG after its Initial Report. Initial Report Executive Summary * العربية<http://www.icann.org/ar/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 166 KB] * Español<http://www.icann.org/es/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 249 KB] * English<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 232 KB] * Français<http://www.icann.org/fr/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 235 KB] * Русский<http://www.icann.org/ru/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 296 KB] * 简体中文<http://www.icann.org/zh/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 338 KB] Initial Report * العربية<http://www.icann.org/ar/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 572 KB] * Español<http://www.icann.org/es/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.13 MB] * English<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] * Français<http://www.icann.org/fr/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.18 MB] * Русский<http://www.icann.org/ru/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 963 KB] * 简体中文<http://www.icann.org/zh/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 877 KB] Consultation Archives * A webinar on Monday, 8 July at 15:00-16:30 UTC – webinar archives<http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/gtld-directory-services-24j…> * A consultation in Durban on Monday, 15 July – session archives<http://durban47.icann.org/node/39627>. To view the Expert Working Group's activities, please refer to the EWG wiki<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189>.

1 0

NOW OPEN: 2013 ALAC ALT and Liaison Nominations
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 11, 2013

Nov. 11, 2013

Dear All, On behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, the 2013 call for nomination of ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) members and ALAC Liaisons is now open. ALT: The available positions are for the following ALT Members: · Vice-President (2 positions) · Rapporteur (1 position) · Regional Representative (1 position) Proposed ALT Schedule: · Call for Nominees: 11 November - 18 November · Nominees acceptance period: 18 November - 20 November · ALAC votes by consensus: 21 November All terms run from the end of the 2013 AGM to the end of the 2014 AGM. Please see the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> for important information on the ALT requirements and responsibility Nominations, including self-nominations may be made directly on the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> or by sending a note to At-Large staff<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Only members of the ALAC after the close of the 2013 AGM are eligible for these positions. Only sitting ALAC Members are eligible and entitled to vote. Terms run from the end of the 2013 AGM to the end of the 2014 AGM. Please see the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> for important information on the ALT requirements and responsibilities. Nominations, including self-nominations may be made directly on the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> or by sending a note to At-Large staff<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Liaisons: The available positions are for the following liaisons: * ALAC Liaison to the GNSO * ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO * ALAC Liaison to .MOBI * ALAC Liaison to the SSAC Proposed Liaison Schedule: Call for Nominees: 11 November - 18 November ALAC votes by consensus: 21 November All terms run from the end of the 2013 AGM to the end of the 2014 AGM. Please see the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> for important information on the ALAC Liaisons requirements and responsibilities. Nominations, including self-nominations may be made directly on the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> or by sending a note to At-Large staff<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>>

1 0

Revocation webinar/ Tuesday 12 November 2013 at 1100 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 11, 2013

Nov. 11, 2013

Dear all, On behalf Cheryl Langdon-Orr, please find below the information about the "Revocation" webinar to ensure interested members of At-Large are aware of the opportunity. ********* The ccNSO Framework of Interpretation Working Group (FoI WG) has published its initial interpretations of current policy and guidelines related to "Revocation", which is defined as redelgations undertaken without the consent of the ccTLD manager. "Revocation" refers to the process by which the IANAOperator rescinds responsibility for management of a ccTLD from a manager. To give a better idea of the progress made to date and an opportunity to answer questions from community members, there will be a webinar on this topic on: Tuesday 12 November at 11:00 UTC Please see dial in details below and let me know as soon as possible if you need dial out assistance. Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Adobe Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnso2013/ There will be a two-way audio connection in the Adobe Room. The meeting will be recorded and posted online for those who will not be able to join. *********** Thank you, Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Fwd: Submission Final Report DSSA WG and letter of co-chairs
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Nov. 11, 2013

Nov. 11, 2013

Dear all, please be so kind to find the Final Report of the DNS Security and Stability Analysis working group (DSSA) linked to below and the DSSA co-chair's cover letter attached. The DSSA recommends adoption of it final report. However there is also an option for a Phase 2 to be considered. Please note the prerequisites for any Phase 2 in terms of renewing the membership of the DSSA. Kindest regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission Final Report DSSA WG and letter of co-chairs Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:32:04 -0800 From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> To: Byron Holland <byron.holland(a)cira.ca>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson(a)ipracon.com>, John Curran <jcurran(a)arin.net> CC: KnobenW(a)telekom.de Knoben <KnobenW(a)telekom.de>, "Fältström, Patrik" <patrik(a)frobbit.se>, Mason Cole <masonc(a)snapnames.com>, Mark Kosters <markk(a)arin.net>, James M. Galvin <jgalvin(a)afilias.info>, Mike O'Connor <mike(a)haven2.com>, Jörg Schweiger <schweiger(a)denic.de> Dear Olivier, Byron, Jonathan and John, As you may recall, the ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO and NRO, acting as ASO in this particular case, have all endorsed the charter of the joint DNS Security and Stability and Analysis working group (DSSA) according to each own rules and procedures, in December 2010 and as a result are the participating SO's and AC's in the DSSA. On behalf of the co-chairs of the DSSA, I am writing you in your capacity as chairs of each supporting organizations/advisory committee's, to submit the Final Report of the DSSA and the related cover letter from the co-chairs DSSA to you. As the Final Report contains a lot of graphical elements therefore I have included a link to the report: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/dssa-final-08nov13-en.pdf. The letter to you from the co-chairs is included. Kind regards, Bart Boswinkel

1 0

GNSO and At-Large week calls - Week of 11 November
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 8, 2013

Nov. 8, 2013

Dear all, Please find hereafter the At-Large and GNSO calls for the week of 11 November. ******** ICANN 48 Buenos Aires GNSO and At-Large Schedule: http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule-full At-Large Buenos Aires meetings Workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/nFl-Ag ******** Monday 11 November 13:00 UTC: PI Definition Sub team - https://community.icann.org/x/XheMAg Tuesday 12 November 2300 - 0000 UTC / 2000 – 2100 ART : Leadership Training Meet and Greet Reception – https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Wednesday 13 November 1200 – 2100 UTC / 0900–1800 ART : Facilitation Skills Training – Day 1: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg 20:00 UTC: Policy and Implementation WG - https://community.icann.org/x/y1V-Ag Thursday 14 November 1200-2100 UTC / 0900 - 1800 ART : Facilitation Skills Training – Day 2: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Friday, 15 November 1200 – 2100 UTC / 0900 – 1800 ART : AC/SO Leadership Training – Day 1: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Saturday, 16 November 1200 – 2100 UTC / 0900 – 1800 ART : AC/SO Leadership Training - Day 2: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Thank you, Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0