- ALAC-Announce - lists.icann.org

ICANN News Alert -- Status Update from the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 12, 2013

Nov. 12, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11nov13-en.htm ________________________________ Status Update from the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services 11 November 2013 ICANN has embarked on a journey to reinvent today's WHOIS system. Help the EWG envision a better system by joining the discussion at ICANN's Buenos Aires meeting and online. The Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) has been working to envision a clean-slate approach to better meet global Internet community needs for domain name registration data with greater privacy, accuracy, and accountability. In its Initial Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] published in June, the EWG recommended a series of principles and proposed a model for the next-generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace today's WHOIS system. In advance of the ICANN-48 Meeting in Buenos Aires, the EWG has published a Status Update Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] that provides further insight into the EWG's analysis and highlights its current thoughts on key issues, after more extensive exploration of open areas and careful consideration of all Community comments received on its Initial Report. As the EWG's deliberations are on-going, it is hoped that this report will provide insight into the team's recommendations, answer questions, and stimulate lively Community dialogue in Buenos Aires and online input. Key issues highlighted in this Status Update Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] include: * Identifying the data elements to be freely available on an anonymous basis, and those that might require authenticated, gated access through accreditation for permissible purposes * Details on the principles for better privacy or proxy services and a proposal for secured protected credentials for use by at-risk individuals * Suggestions to improve data quality through standardization validation, periodic checks, and prevalidated contacts * Consideration of jurisdictional and applicable law issues, notably data protection law * Suggestions for ensuring harmonized approaches to data protection and security measures, and a framework for binding corporate rules to meet data protection obligations. * Exploration of how existing technical protocols could be utilized by the EWG's recommended implementation model (such as EPP or the RDAP protocol under development by the IETF) * Comparison of the current WHOIS system (as improved in the 2013 RAA) to the EWG's recommended next-generation registration data directory service * Description of various implementation models examined by the EWG, including a detailed comparison of pro and cons. The ideas presented in this Status Update Report are works-in progress, not consensus recommendations, and may be further updated by the EWGin Buenos Aires. The EWG hopes to use Community input and research into specific areas to reach fact-based recommendations to be delivered in its Final Report. Join the discussion There are several ways to participate in this journey to envision a better system: * Learn more and ask questions during the EWG's presentation "Exploring Replacements for WHOIS – The Next Generation Directory Services<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-rds>" on Wednesday, 20 November 2013, 8:30-10:00 ART, in Buenos Aires. A recording of the session will be made available shortly after. * Exchange ideas during an interactive open EWG Workshop<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-ewg-wrap-up> on Wednesday, 20 November 2013, 16:30-17:30 ART, in Buenos Aires. The dialogue will inform the EWG's deliberations as it refines its recommendations for the next generation registration data directory services. * Submit your ideas to the EWG's Public Mailbox: input-to-ewg(a)icann.org<mailto:input-to-ewg@icann.org> Input is publicly archived. To read input received to date, please refer to: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/share-24jun13-… What's Next? Due to the complexity of the task at hand and the importance of basing any next-generation RDS on a solid understanding of the benefits and impacts that would likely result, the EWG has not yet completed its recommendations, but intends to do so in early 2014, informed by Community feedback and in-depth analysis of selected areas. The EWG expects to reconvene in March 2014 to derive fact-based recommendations, delivering its final report to the ICANN Board before June 2014. Background In December, ICANN announced the creation of an Expert Working Group (EWG) on next-generation gTLD Registration Directory Services, as a first step in fulfilling the ICANN Board's directive to help redefine the purpose and provision of gTLD registration data. The EWG's findings are expected to serve as a foundation to help the GNSO create a new global policy for the provision of gTLD registration data. A significant milestone was reached on 24 June 2013<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> with the publication <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> of the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services> (EWG)'s Initial Report and FAQs, opening a consultation period with the ICANN community. The initial report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] enumerated the users, purposes, data elements, recommended principles and features, and proposed model to guide the development of a next generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS. The initial report was accompanied by a questionnaire soliciting community input on complex areas needing further analysis to draft consensus recommendations. While comments were received on the entire initial report, two topics received the most feedback: the EWG's recommendation to replace fully anonymous WHOIS with a gated access paradigm, and the suggested Aggregated RDS (ARDS) implementation model. The EWG's Status Update Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] aims to highlight the EWG's current thinking on these and many other key issues, after careful consideration of all comments and feedback received to date. It also provides a great deal more detail on the analysis that lay behind the Initial Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB], as requested by the community. More Information The EWG work stems from the Board's directive<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-08nov12-en.htm> to redefine the purpose and provision of gTLD registration data, while balancing data accuracy and access issues with safeguards for protecting data. The EWG considered the important community work done over the last decade by the GNSO, the SSAC, the WHOIS Review Team, the GAC and others. The EWG's Initial Report<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] reflects the EWG's consensus view of design principles and features needed in a new RDS, along with a proposed Model illustrating how these could be fulfilled in the ICANN domain ecosystem. For more information, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/faqs> prepared by the EWG after its Initial Report. Initial Report Executive Summary * العربية<http://www.icann.org/ar/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 166 KB] * Español<http://www.icann.org/es/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 249 KB] * English<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 232 KB] * Français<http://www.icann.org/fr/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 235 KB] * Русский<http://www.icann.org/ru/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 296 KB] * 简体中文<http://www.icann.org/zh/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 338 KB] Initial Report * العربية<http://www.icann.org/ar/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 572 KB] * Español<http://www.icann.org/es/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.13 MB] * English<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] * Français<http://www.icann.org/fr/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.18 MB] * Русский<http://www.icann.org/ru/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 963 KB] * 简体中文<http://www.icann.org/zh/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 877 KB] Consultation Archives * A webinar on Monday, 8 July at 15:00-16:30 UTC – webinar archives<http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/gtld-directory-services-24j…> * A consultation in Durban on Monday, 15 July – session archives<http://durban47.icann.org/node/39627>. To view the Expert Working Group's activities, please refer to the EWG wiki<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189>.

1 0

NOW OPEN: 2013 ALAC ALT and Liaison Nominations
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 11, 2013

Nov. 11, 2013

Dear All, On behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, the 2013 call for nomination of ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) members and ALAC Liaisons is now open. ALT: The available positions are for the following ALT Members: · Vice-President (2 positions) · Rapporteur (1 position) · Regional Representative (1 position) Proposed ALT Schedule: · Call for Nominees: 11 November - 18 November · Nominees acceptance period: 18 November - 20 November · ALAC votes by consensus: 21 November All terms run from the end of the 2013 AGM to the end of the 2014 AGM. Please see the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> for important information on the ALT requirements and responsibility Nominations, including self-nominations may be made directly on the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> or by sending a note to At-Large staff<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Only members of the ALAC after the close of the 2013 AGM are eligible for these positions. Only sitting ALAC Members are eligible and entitled to vote. Terms run from the end of the 2013 AGM to the end of the 2014 AGM. Please see the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> for important information on the ALT requirements and responsibilities. Nominations, including self-nominations may be made directly on the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> or by sending a note to At-Large staff<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Liaisons: The available positions are for the following liaisons: * ALAC Liaison to the GNSO * ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO * ALAC Liaison to .MOBI * ALAC Liaison to the SSAC Proposed Liaison Schedule: Call for Nominees: 11 November - 18 November ALAC votes by consensus: 21 November All terms run from the end of the 2013 AGM to the end of the 2014 AGM. Please see the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> for important information on the ALAC Liaisons requirements and responsibilities. Nominations, including self-nominations may be made directly on the 2013 ALAC Leadership Team and Liaison Selection Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/2013+ALAC+Leadership+Team+and+L…> or by sending a note to At-Large staff<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>>

1 0

Revocation webinar/ Tuesday 12 November 2013 at 1100 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 11, 2013

Nov. 11, 2013

Dear all, On behalf Cheryl Langdon-Orr, please find below the information about the "Revocation" webinar to ensure interested members of At-Large are aware of the opportunity. ********* The ccNSO Framework of Interpretation Working Group (FoI WG) has published its initial interpretations of current policy and guidelines related to "Revocation", which is defined as redelgations undertaken without the consent of the ccTLD manager. "Revocation" refers to the process by which the IANAOperator rescinds responsibility for management of a ccTLD from a manager. To give a better idea of the progress made to date and an opportunity to answer questions from community members, there will be a webinar on this topic on: Tuesday 12 November at 11:00 UTC Please see dial in details below and let me know as soon as possible if you need dial out assistance. Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Adobe Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnso2013/ There will be a two-way audio connection in the Adobe Room. The meeting will be recorded and posted online for those who will not be able to join. *********** Thank you, Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Fwd: Submission Final Report DSSA WG and letter of co-chairs
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Nov. 11, 2013

Nov. 11, 2013

Dear all, please be so kind to find the Final Report of the DNS Security and Stability Analysis working group (DSSA) linked to below and the DSSA co-chair's cover letter attached. The DSSA recommends adoption of it final report. However there is also an option for a Phase 2 to be considered. Please note the prerequisites for any Phase 2 in terms of renewing the membership of the DSSA. Kindest regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission Final Report DSSA WG and letter of co-chairs Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:32:04 -0800 From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> To: Byron Holland <byron.holland(a)cira.ca>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson(a)ipracon.com>, John Curran <jcurran(a)arin.net> CC: KnobenW(a)telekom.de Knoben <KnobenW(a)telekom.de>, "Fältström, Patrik" <patrik(a)frobbit.se>, Mason Cole <masonc(a)snapnames.com>, Mark Kosters <markk(a)arin.net>, James M. Galvin <jgalvin(a)afilias.info>, Mike O'Connor <mike(a)haven2.com>, Jörg Schweiger <schweiger(a)denic.de> Dear Olivier, Byron, Jonathan and John, As you may recall, the ALAC, ccNSO, GNSO and NRO, acting as ASO in this particular case, have all endorsed the charter of the joint DNS Security and Stability and Analysis working group (DSSA) according to each own rules and procedures, in December 2010 and as a result are the participating SO's and AC's in the DSSA. On behalf of the co-chairs of the DSSA, I am writing you in your capacity as chairs of each supporting organizations/advisory committee's, to submit the Final Report of the DSSA and the related cover letter from the co-chairs DSSA to you. As the Final Report contains a lot of graphical elements therefore I have included a link to the report: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/dssa-final-08nov13-en.pdf. The letter to you from the co-chairs is included. Kind regards, Bart Boswinkel

1 0

GNSO and At-Large week calls - Week of 11 November
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 8, 2013

Nov. 8, 2013

Dear all, Please find hereafter the At-Large and GNSO calls for the week of 11 November. ******** ICANN 48 Buenos Aires GNSO and At-Large Schedule: http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule-full At-Large Buenos Aires meetings Workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/nFl-Ag ******** Monday 11 November 13:00 UTC: PI Definition Sub team - https://community.icann.org/x/XheMAg Tuesday 12 November 2300 - 0000 UTC / 2000 – 2100 ART : Leadership Training Meet and Greet Reception – https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Wednesday 13 November 1200 – 2100 UTC / 0900–1800 ART : Facilitation Skills Training – Day 1: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg 20:00 UTC: Policy and Implementation WG - https://community.icann.org/x/y1V-Ag Thursday 14 November 1200-2100 UTC / 0900 - 1800 ART : Facilitation Skills Training – Day 2: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Friday, 15 November 1200 – 2100 UTC / 0900 – 1800 ART : AC/SO Leadership Training – Day 1: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Saturday, 16 November 1200 – 2100 UTC / 0900 – 1800 ART : AC/SO Leadership Training - Day 2: https://community.icann.org/x/rQufAg Thank you, Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the ccNSO FoI WG's Interim Report on "Revocation"
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 8, 2013

Nov. 8, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the ccNSO FoI WG's Interim Report on "Revocation"<https://community.icann.org/x/rBefAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft can be found on the At-Large ccNSO FoI WG's Interim Report on "Revocation" Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/rBefAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 10-December-2013 23:59 UTC. A five day vote is to commence after comments have been collected. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

ICANN News Alert -- Bulk Transfer of Domain Names from Cheapies.com Inc. to Tucows Domains Inc.
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 8, 2013

Nov. 8, 2013

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-07nov13-en.htm ________________________________ Bulk Transfer of Domain Names from Cheapies.com Inc. to Tucows Domains Inc. 7 November 2013 ICANN has authorized the bulk transfer of gTLD domain names from Cheapies.com Inc. to Tucows Domains Inc. due to compliance actions taken by ICANN that resulted in the de-accreditation of Cheapies.com Inc. The affected gTLD registries have processed the bulk transfers. Former registrant-customers of Cheapies.com Inc. should receive notices from Tucows advising of the transfer. Customer questions about the transfer should be directed to Tucows (for contact details see http://www.internic.net/registrars/registrar-69.html or visit the website directly at http://www.tucows.com/) Additional information about these bulk transfers is provided below. FAQs Q. Why were these transfers authorized by ICANN? A. The Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) of Cheapies.com Inc. was terminated for failure by the registrar to comply with its RAA. Cheapies.com Inc.'s RAA terminated on 26 October 2013 and the termination notice is posted here: ICANN Sends Notice of Termination<http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/serad-to-jeske-11oct13-en.pdf> [PDF, 151 KB]. As a result, Cheapies.com Inc. is no longer permitted to register or manage gTLD registrations. ICANN authorized bulk transfers pursuant to the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy to ensure that the registrant-customers of this registrar would not be harmed by their registrar's discontinued ability to manage the registrations. Q. How was the gaining registrar selected? A. ICANN followed its De-Accredited Registrar Transition Procedure (see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/drt/dartp-11jul13-en.pdf [PDF, 129 KB]) to identify a gaining registrar for the gTLD names formerly managed by the de-accredited registrar. Through this process, Tucows was identified. Q. Will Tucows attempt to contact the affected registrants? What should customers of this de-accredited registrar do now? A. Former customers of this registrar should receive a notice of the transfer and instructions for continued management of their names from Tucows. Affected customers who do not receive notices from Tucows should contact Tucows by using the contact information provided at http://www.internic.net/registrars/registrar-69.html. Q. Do registrants have to pay a fee for the bulk transfer? A. No, there is no cost to registrants for the bulk transfer. Unlike a normal inter-registrar transfer, the registration terms will not be extended by a year. Accordingly, it is important to contact Tucows if your registration will expire soon in order to maintain your registration. Q. What if affected registrants want to select a different registrar? A. Registrants will continue to be able to transfer their registrations to other registrars under the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (see http://www.icann.org/en/transfers/) Note that Tucows may deny transfers for the first 60 days following the bulk transfer, at its discretion. This 60-day period is permissible under the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy and is intended to help protect registrants. The registrant may need to renew names that will expire during the first 60 days following the transfer to Tucows by using the details provided above. Q. How will Cheapies customers know if a message purportedly from Tucows is legitimate? A. The message from Tucows should direct you to its website or refer you to other contact information provided above. For general advice about avoiding phishing email messages, you may also wish to refer to the materials prepared by the Anti-Phishing Working Group (see http://www.antiphishing.org/resources/overview/avoid-phishing-scams)

1 0

VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 8, 2013

Nov. 8, 2013

Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by the ALAC on the proposed ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)<https://community.icann.org/x/oxuMAg>." ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)<https://community.icann.org/x/oxuMAg>" for communication to the relevant parties? ***** Additional information on this Statement can be found on the At-Large Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP) Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/oxuMAg>. Please note that the poll will be open from 7-November-2013 23:59 UTC to 12-November-2013 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Call for volunteers:Working Group to develop policy recommendations on issues relating to the accreditation of privacy and proxy service providers for domain name registrations.
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 7, 2013

Nov. 7, 2013

In Brief The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers to serve on a Working Group to develop policy recommendations on issues relating to the accreditation of privacy and proxy service providers for domain name registrations. What This Team Will Do The Working Group (WG) is tasked to provide the GNSO Council with a set of recommendations regarding issues identified during the recently-concluded negotiations for the new 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), including recommendations made by law enforcement and GNSO working groups, that were not addressed during the negotiations and otherwise suited for a Policy Development Process (PDP); specifically, issues relating to the accreditation of privacy & proxy services. Specific issues to be discussed by the WG are detailed in the WG’s charter: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/raa-pp-charter-22oct13-en.pdf How This Team Will Work ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this WG will be recorded, and the recordings will be available to the public. The mailing list for the WG will be archived publicly. WG members are expected to submit Statements of Interest (SOI<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs>). The group will collaborate using a public workspace. The WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines<http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf>. How to Join The GNSO Council invites interested parties to join the WG, which will be open to anyone interested to join. Community members who wish to be invited to join the group should contact the GNSO secretariat<mailto:gnso.secretariat@icann.org?subject=Application%20to%20Join%20Uniformity%20of%20Reporting%20Drafting%20Team> (gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@icann.org>). Background In October 2011, the ICANN Board initiated negotiations with the Registrars Stakeholder Group for a new form of RAA, and simultaneously requested an Issue Report from the GNSO on issues not covered by the negotiations and otherwise suited for a PDP. The Final Issue Report was published in March 2012, and recommended that the GNSO commence its PDP as soon as possible after receiving a report that the negotiations were concluded. In June 2013, the ICANN Board formally approved the new 2013 RAA. In September 2013, ICANN staff published a paper for the GNSO reporting on the conclusion of the RAA negotiations and highlighting that of all the high and medium priority topics for the negotiations previously identified by the GNSO and the law enforcement community, only two were not fully addressed in the negotiations, viz. clarification of certain registrar responsibilities in relation to proceedings under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), and issues relating to privacy and proxy services, including their accreditation and Relay/Reveal procedures. The UDRP questions have, however, been dealt with in a separate PDP that concluded with the publication of a Final Report in June 2013 and its adoption by the GNSO Council in August 2013. Following a number of discussions on the topic, the GNSO Council formally approved the charter for this RAA Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues WG at its meeting on 31 October 2013. As ICANN has already committed itself to establishing an accreditation program for privacy and proxy service providers, the recommendations from this WG are expected to inform the development of such a program. In addition, there continues to be ongoing work on various aspects of the Whois gTLD registration data directory service, including the creation of an Expert Working Group (EWG) in December 2012 that is expected to assist ICANN in redefining the purpose and provision of gTLD registration data directory services. The EWG published its Initial Report in June 2013 and is currently working on its Final Report. In addition, the GNSO had previously commissioned a study on Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse. The results of the study, performed by the National Physical Laboratory in the United Kingdom, were published for public comment in September 2013. It is expected that the study will be relevant to the deliberations of this WG. This WG is an opportunity for the GNSO and other interested community members to help develop specific recommendations that will assist ICANN in developing a privacy and proxy accreditation program in relation to gTLD registration data directory services. Thank you, Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Internet Governance Webinar Conversation Opportunity With ICANN Senior Executives
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 7, 2013

Nov. 7, 2013

The call details are as follows: Adigo Call Numbers : http://adigo.com/icann Adigo Conference Bridge No. Conference ID: 45151321 Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/icann-soac ------------------------ Internet Governance Webinar Conversation Opportunity With ICANN Senior Executives Dear SOAC Leaders; Based on recent discussions within the broader community and your feedback over the past couple of weeks regarding the Montevideo statement, we think it would be most useful to have a community call before everyone departed for the ICANN Public Meeting in Buenos Aires to discuss recent Internet governance developments – specifically the Montevideo statement - and plans for a broader Internet stakeholder meeting in Brazil next year. Fadi has had or is planning a few individual conversations with community groups, but we thought some broader community engagement opportunities with ICANN senior executives would also be helpful so that Fadi, Tarek and Theresa could: § Provide background and context of the recent I-Star discussions leading to the Montevideo statement; § Explain the Board/Staff partnership in this effort; § Explain what has been done to date and share perceptions of the recent IGF-Bali meeting; and § Highlight next steps/prep plans for Brazil next April. As a result, we have arranged for two community webinars scheduled for next Friday, 8 November at 1200 UTC and 1900 UTC so that the team can share its thoughts and field community questions and comments. We are scheduling two separate sessions to cover the global geographic spread of the community and hope that you will be able to share information about the opportunity with your communities. Each session will be an hour long and any questions or comments that the team can’t get to on the calls will be saved for further discussion in Buenos Aires. The call details are as follows: Adigo Call Numbers : http://adigo.com/icann Adigo Conference Bridge No. Conference ID: 45151321; Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/icann-soac To help the team prepare for the sessions, please feel free to share any pre-session questions that you have with me. I will pass them on to the ICANN Strategy Team in preparation for the sessions. Best regards, David -- David A. Olive Vice President, Policy Development Support General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters –Istanbul Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Hakki Yeten Cad. Selenium Plaza No:10/C K:5 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey Tel: +90.212.381.8727 - Fax: +90.212.381.8731 - Mobile: +1. 202.341.3611

1 0