July 2009 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Implementation Plan for IDN Fast Track Process
by Vanda Scartezini July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

Hi Hong I believe, besides your personal comment, would be good to add your ideas to this discussion Siva compiled to aggregate your ideas into our paper. kisses Vanda Scartezini POLO Consultores Associados & IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8 01418-903 Sao Paulo,SP. Fone + 55 11 3266.6253 Mob + 5511 8181.1464 -----Original Message----- From: idn-wg-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:idn-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Hong Xue Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:50 AM To: Nick Ashton-Hart Cc: ICANN AtLarge Staff; idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC Working List Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Implementation Plan for IDN Fast Track Process Hi, Nick, my last email was actually based on my reading of that draft on the wiki. Basically I feel it is difficult to understand it. But if it is the outcome of a long discussion within ALAC, I guess I'd better be quiet and send in my comment as an individual. Hong On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org > wrote: > Dear Hong: > > FYI, as you will see on the At-Large Policy Advice Development calendar at > http://www.atlarge.icann.org/policycalendar, the draft statement composed > by Siva is now available for At-Large comment at > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?comment_on_draft_implementation_pla n_for_idn_cctld_fast_track_process_revision_3. > This was announced last week in case anyone missed it. > > Comments on the draft will continue to be taken until 7th July. May I > encourage you to visit the above URL and leave any further comments as well > as the one below? I'm sure that your comments will be very valuable, > especially considering your long tenure as the previous IDN Liaison for > ALAC. > > Hong Xue wrote: > >> >> Since the deadline has passed, I'm not making any new suggestion but do >> concern what has been deleted from the original DIP, such as contracts and >> financial contribution. I wonder whether these parts will be subject to >> separate documents or "gentleman's agreement". >> >> Also, I hope the whole discussions could be on the public list. It is >> difficult for the community to follow the sporadic announcements from time >> to time. >> >> Hong >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Nick Ashton-Hart < >> nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>> wrote: >> >> Dear All: >> >> To add to the schedule below one final point, a draft ALAC >> Statement on the v3 Fast Track proposal is due on the 26th >> (today), so that it can be posted for At-Large community comment. >> >> Separately, in addition to the PDF clean text which Siva has >> referenced, there is a redline text available at >> >> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cctl d-redline-29may09-en.pdf >> . >> This shows the differences between v2, which the ALAC commented >> on, and the present text; for those familiar with the previous >> version, looking at the redline text should make it much easier to >> decide what At-Large should say about v3, since only parts of the >> text have changed. >> >> There are versions in the six UN languages: >> >> Espanol: >> >> http://www.icann.org/es/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cctl d-redline-29may09-es.pdf >> Francais: >> >> http://www.icann.org/fr/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cctl d-redline-29may09-fr.pdf >> >> The others may all be found from >> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm >> >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> The third revision of the Draft Implementation Plan is at page >> >> http://icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cctld-cl ean-29may09-en.pdfwhich >> is also attached as a PDF here. As per schedule ICANN public >> consultation closes on 15th July. ALAC consultation on this >> topic would open >> on 30th June and closes on 7th July, based on which a final >> draft is to be >> preapred and posted for voting on 9th. Voting would close on >> 14th on the >> ALAC submission. >> >> Please go through the attached PDF with specific consideration >> to the >> following: >> >> 1. Page 25 - 29 Process Overview and the detailed flowcharts- >> are there any >> comments about the process as outlined? >> >> 2. 3.4 Technical String Criteria : Should Alac recommend >> relaxation on the >> number of characters required? Is this a technical issue or a >> socio-political issue? What would be alac's position on this? >> >> 3. 5.5 contentin issues >> >> 4. 5.6 Processing of a Fast Track issue >> >> 5. 6.3 US Government Authorization: is this within the purview >> of alac to >> comment in the context of IDNs. >> >> 6. Are there specific IDN points from the various constituency >> sessions of >> other constituencies that alac is in agreement with, that may >> be featured as >> points agreed, in the alac draft comment? >> >> I also wish to submit to alac and the IDN Working Group to >> consider the fact >> that the fast track process has taken a long time, during >> which there have >> been positive developmens on the technical and process >> readiness on the part >> of ICANN to implement IDN's, so is there a need to imply a delayed >> implementation of the gTLD process? Would alac like to >> consider being >> equally concerned about ccTLDs and gTLDs? >> >> And is there anything that requires caution on the path >> towards implentation >> of IDNs? There was some opinion that DNS stability takes >> precedence over the >> fast track process. Is there any such contrary opinion and are >> these >> opinions have any validity? >> >> To truly fast track the IDN process, I wish to propose to alac >> to propose to >> ICANN that an "IDN Day" be organized, either for one full day >> preceeding the >> ICANN meeting to bring together the constituencies concerned >> to focussed >> sessions on security, legal and commericial issues, all >> related to IDN's. If >> an additional day is not possible, a relatively light day such >> as a Thrusday >> could be dedicated for discussions on IDNs for ICANN to come >> to a conclusive >> position on IDNs and truly fast track the implementation process. >> >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com >> >> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh >> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6 >> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC-Internal mailing list >> ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> <mailto:ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> >> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists. icann.org >> >> ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac >> At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org >> >> >> -- >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Nick Ashton-Hart >> >> Director for At-Large >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 >> >> USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637 >> >> Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 >> >> Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 >> >> email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> >> >> Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com> / >> AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com> / >> Skype: nashtonhart >> >> Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IDN-WG mailing list >> IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> >> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.o rg >> >> IDN WG Wiki: >> https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hong Xue, Ph.D. >> Professor of Law >> Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law >> Beijing Normal University >> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street >> Beijing 100875 China >> > > -- > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Nick Ashton-Hart > > Director for At-Large > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Tel: +33 (450) 42 81 83 > > USA Tel: +1 (310) 301-8637 > > Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44 > > Mobile: (Switzerland): +41 79 595 5468 > > > email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org > > Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: > nashtonhart > > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > -- Hong Xue, Ph.D. Professor of Law Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law Beijing Normal University 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ IDN-WG mailing list IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.o rg IDN WG Wiki: https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Implementation Plan for IDN Fast Track Process
by Nick Ashton-Hart July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

Apologies for misunderstanding! Of course if you wish to remain quiet, you cannot be stopped :) However, this is a draft which Siva was requested to write in his capacity as liaison, so that the working group members and community would have something more than a blank sheet of paper to start from on this subject (just as you so ably did during your tenure). Hong Xue wrote: > > Hi, Nick, my last email was actually based on my reading of that draft > on the wiki. Basically I feel it is difficult to understand it. But if > it is the outcome of a long discussion within ALAC, I guess I'd better > be quiet and send in my comment as an individual. > > Hong > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart > <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>> wrote: > > Dear Hong: > > FYI, as you will see on the At-Large Policy Advice Development > calendar at http://www.atlarge.icann.org/policycalendar, the > draft statement composed by Siva is now available for At-Large > comment at > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?comment_on_draft_implementation_pl…. > This was announced last week in case anyone missed it. > > Comments on the draft will continue to be taken until 7th July. > May I encourage you to visit the above URL and leave any further > comments as well as the one below? I'm sure that your comments > will be very valuable, especially considering your long tenure as > the previous IDN Liaison for ALAC. > > Hong Xue wrote: > > > Since the deadline has passed, I'm not making any new > suggestion but do concern what has been deleted from the > original DIP, such as contracts and financial contribution. I > wonder whether these parts will be subject to separate > documents or "gentleman's agreement". > > Also, I hope the whole discussions could be on the public > list. It is difficult for the community to follow the sporadic > announcements from time to time. > > Hong > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Nick Ashton-Hart > <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org > <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> > <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org > <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>>> wrote: > > Dear All: > > To add to the schedule below one final point, a draft ALAC > Statement on the v3 Fast Track proposal is due on the 26th > (today), so that it can be posted for At-Large community > comment. > > Separately, in addition to the PDF clean text which Siva has > referenced, there is a redline text available at > > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cct…. > This shows the differences between v2, which the ALAC commented > on, and the present text; for those familiar with the previous > version, looking at the redline text should make it much > easier to > decide what At-Large should say about v3, since only parts > of the > text have changed. > > There are versions in the six UN languages: > > Espanol: > > http://www.icann.org/es/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cct… > Francais: > > http://www.icann.org/fr/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cct… > > The others may all be found from > > http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote: > > Hello > > The third revision of the Draft Implementation Plan is > at page > > http://icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cctld-c… > is also attached as a PDF here. As per schedule ICANN > public > consultation closes on 15th July. ALAC consultation on this > topic would open > on 30th June and closes on 7th July, based on which a final > draft is to be > preapred and posted for voting on 9th. Voting would > close on > 14th on the > ALAC submission. > > Please go through the attached PDF with specific > consideration > to the > following: > > 1. Page 25 - 29 Process Overview and the detailed > flowcharts- > are there any > comments about the process as outlined? > > 2. 3.4 Technical String Criteria : Should Alac recommend > relaxation on the > number of characters required? Is this a technical > issue or a > socio-political issue? What would be alac's position on > this? > > 3. 5.5 contentin issues > > 4. 5.6 Processing of a Fast Track issue > > 5. 6.3 US Government Authorization: is this within the > purview > of alac to > comment in the context of IDNs. > > 6. Are there specific IDN points from the various > constituency > sessions of > other constituencies that alac is in agreement with, > that may > be featured as > points agreed, in the alac draft comment? > > I also wish to submit to alac and the IDN Working Group to > consider the fact > that the fast track process has taken a long time, during > which there have > been positive developmens on the technical and process > readiness on the part > of ICANN to implement IDN's, so is there a need to > imply a delayed > implementation of the gTLD process? Would alac like to > consider being > equally concerned about ccTLDs and gTLDs? > > And is there anything that requires caution on the path > towards implentation > of IDNs? There was some opinion that DNS stability takes > precedence over the > fast track process. Is there any such contrary opinion > and are > these > opinions have any validity? > > To truly fast track the IDN process, I wish to propose > to alac > to propose to > ICANN that an "IDN Day" be organized, either for one > full day > preceeding the > ICANN meeting to bring together the constituencies > concerned > to focussed > sessions on security, legal and commericial issues, all > related to IDN's. If > an additional day is not possible, a relatively light > day such > as a Thrusday > could be dedicated for discussions on IDNs for ICANN to > come > to a conclusive > position on IDNs and truly fast track the > implementation process. > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com > > facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh > LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6 > Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Internal mailing list > ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > <mailto:ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > <mailto:ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org > <mailto:ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists… > > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > -- > -- > > Regards, > > > Nick Ashton-Hart > > Director for At-Large > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 > > USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637 > > Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 > > Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 > > email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org > <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> > <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org > <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>> > > Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com > <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com> <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com > <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com>> / > AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com > <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com> <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com > <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com>> / > > Skype: nashtonhart > > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > _______________________________________________ > IDN-WG mailing list > IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > <mailto:IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > <mailto:IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org > <mailto:IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.… > > IDN WG Wiki: > https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy > > > > > -- > Hong Xue, Ph.D. > Professor of Law > Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law > Beijing Normal University > 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street > Beijing 100875 China > > > -- > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Nick Ashton-Hart > > Director for At-Large > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Tel: +33 (450) 42 81 83 > > USA Tel: +1 (310) 301-8637 > > > Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44 > > Mobile: (Switzerland): +41 79 595 5468 > > > email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> > > Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com> / > AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com> / > Skype: nashtonhart > > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > > > > -- > Hong Xue, Ph.D. > Professor of Law > Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law > Beijing Normal University > 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street > Beijing 100875 China -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Tel: +33 (450) 42 81 83 USA Tel: +1 (310) 301-8637 Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: (Switzerland): +41 79 595 5468 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

2 3

Re: [ALAC] [ALAC-Announce] Call for Volunteers: Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group
by Sivasubramanian Muthusamy July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

Hello I wish to be a part of this working group. I am part of ICANN At Large as the representative from ISOC India Chennai ALS, and also the ALAC IDN liaison. Please include me as part of this working group. Thank you. Sivasubramanian Muthusamy Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6 Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:36 PM, At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>wrote: > Dear All, > > The GNSO Council at its meeting on 24 June 2009 passed a resolution on > Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery - PDP Working Group Charter > > http://gnso.icann.org/issues/post-expiration-recovery/pednr-wg-charter-24ju… > > Each constituency, and the liaisons, are invited to provide names of > expected participants who can then be added to the WG mailing list. Other > stakeholders and experts may be invited to join the WG by the GNSO Council. > Community members who wish to be invited to join the group should contact > the GNSO secretariat <gnso.secretariat[at]icann.org> and the invitations > will be reviewed by the GNSO council. > > The GNSO Council RESOLVES > > To form a Working Group composed of Constituency representatives as well as > interested stakeholders in order to develop potential policy and/or best > practices to address the issues covered, while seeking additional > information as appropriate to inform the work. The WG will also be open to > invited experts and to members or representatives of the ICANN Advisory > Committees, whether acting in their own right or as representatives of their > AC. > > The policy development process that this working group is a part of began > when the ALAC asked for an Issues Report on the subject. > The Working Group initially shall: > > 1. Pursue the availability of further information from ICANN compliance > staff to understand how current RAA provisions and consensus policies > regarding deletion, auto-renewal, and recovery of domain names following > expiration are enforced; > > 2. Review and understand the current domain name life cycle; > > 3. Review current registrar practices regarding domain name expiration, > renewal, and post-expiration recovery. > > The Working Group shall then consider the following questions: > > 1. Whether adequate opportunity exists for registrants to redeem their > expired domain names; > > 2. Whether expiration-related provisions in typical registration agreements > are clear and conspicuous enough; > > 3. Whether adequate notice exists to alert registrants of upcoming > expirations; > > 4. Whether additional measures need to be implemented to indicate that once > a domain name enters the Auto-Renew Grace Period, it has expired (e.g., hold > status, a notice on the site with a link to information on how to renew, or > other options to be determined); > > 5. Whether to allow the transfer of a domain name during the RGP. > > The Working Group is expected to organize an issue update / workshop at the > Seoul meeting, in addition to an update to the GNSO Council. > > The Working Group should consider recommendations for best practices as > well as or instead of recommendations for Consensus Policy. > > Working Group processes: > > All WG meetings will be recorded and all recordings will be available to > the public. > A PEDNR WG mailing list has been created (gnso-pednr-dt(a)icann.org) with > public archives at:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-pednr-dt/. > A SocialText wiki has been provided for WG usage and can be found at > https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/index.cgi?post_expirati… > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce_atlarge-lists… > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >

1 0

Make sure your bulge is significant
by alac＠icann.org July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

 Trouble viewing this e-mail? Click here. Subscribe | Manage My Account Always dream to be large? DrMaxMan. Click and enjoy ¿ 2009 Ejxoxobjnyo Inc.All Rights reserved. Use, duplication, or sale of this service, or data contained herein, is strictly prohibited. You are currently subscribed as: alac(a)icann.org.Send this eNewsletter to a friend: Click hereUnsubscribe from this mailing list: Click hereUpdate your Profile: Click here

1 0

Root Server System Scaling: Public Comment Period
by At-Large Staff July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

Dear Patrick and Lutz, cc At-Large DNS Security Working Group members: A public comment period is now opened on an issue related to the remit of your working group and the ALAC Executive Committee has asked that the working group should take the lead in creating a response to the question. They have proposed the following schedule for action on this issue: Date Draft Statement Due: 10th July At-large community wide consultation on draft from 10th - 20th July Final Draft Statement Due: 24th July ALAC Voting Period: 25-30 July This would allow the final statement to be ratified the day before the close of the Public Comment period. Background: As you may know, the ICANN Board has requested the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) and the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) have commissioned a study of the potential impact on the operation of the root server system of adding IPv6 address records, IDN top level names, other new TLDs, and new records to support DNS security to the root zone. The Terms of Reference (http://www.icann.org/en/committees/dns-root/root-scaling-study-tor-05may09-…) for the study cover all aspects of root zone operation, including data production, compilation, and publication to the root servers (including anycast instances) and serving data from the root servers. A study team of experts led by Lyman Chapin and including Patrik Fältström, Glenn Kowack, Jaap Akkerhuis, Bill Manning, and Lars-Johan Liman expects to complete its work by the end of August 2009. Their goal is to construct a model of the root server system (including all of its provisioning and query components) that shows how the different parts are related, and how changing something in one part affects each of the other parts. The model will demonstrate the effect of changing the value of one or more variables (e.g., the rate at which new TLDs are added to the root, or the expected frequency of emergency key rollover events in a signed root) on each of the components of the root server system. The study team intends to gather information from as many sources as possible in order to construct a complete and accurate model of the root server system. The public comment period will last from 28 May 2009 to 31 July 2009. You may review comments made at http://forum.icann.org/lists/scaling/.

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [IDN-WG] [ALAC-Internal] Draft Implementation Plan for IDN Fast Track Process
by Nick Ashton-Hart July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

Dear Hong: FYI, as you will see on the At-Large Policy Advice Development calendar at http://www.atlarge.icann.org/policycalendar, the draft statement composed by Siva is now available for At-Large comment at https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?comment_on_draft_implementation_pl…. This was announced last week in case anyone missed it. Comments on the draft will continue to be taken until 7th July. May I encourage you to visit the above URL and leave any further comments as well as the one below? I'm sure that your comments will be very valuable, especially considering your long tenure as the previous IDN Liaison for ALAC. Hong Xue wrote: > > Since the deadline has passed, I'm not making any new suggestion but > do concern what has been deleted from the original DIP, such as > contracts and financial contribution. I wonder whether these parts > will be subject to separate documents or "gentleman's agreement". > > Also, I hope the whole discussions could be on the public list. It is > difficult for the community to follow the sporadic announcements from > time to time. > > Hong > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Nick Ashton-Hart > <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>> wrote: > > Dear All: > > To add to the schedule below one final point, a draft ALAC > Statement on the v3 Fast Track proposal is due on the 26th > (today), so that it can be posted for At-Large community comment. > > Separately, in addition to the PDF clean text which Siva has > referenced, there is a redline text available at > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cct…. > This shows the differences between v2, which the ALAC commented > on, and the present text; for those familiar with the previous > version, looking at the redline text should make it much easier to > decide what At-Large should say about v3, since only parts of the > text have changed. > > There are versions in the six UN languages: > > Espanol: > http://www.icann.org/es/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cct… > Francais: > http://www.icann.org/fr/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cct… > > The others may all be found from > http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31may09-en.htm > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote: > > Hello > > The third revision of the Draft Implementation Plan is at page > http://icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/draft-implementation-plan-cctld-c… > is also attached as a PDF here. As per schedule ICANN public > consultation closes on 15th July. ALAC consultation on this > topic would open > on 30th June and closes on 7th July, based on which a final > draft is to be > preapred and posted for voting on 9th. Voting would close on > 14th on the > ALAC submission. > > Please go through the attached PDF with specific consideration > to the > following: > > 1. Page 25 - 29 Process Overview and the detailed flowcharts- > are there any > comments about the process as outlined? > > 2. 3.4 Technical String Criteria : Should Alac recommend > relaxation on the > number of characters required? Is this a technical issue or a > socio-political issue? What would be alac's position on this? > > 3. 5.5 contentin issues > > 4. 5.6 Processing of a Fast Track issue > > 5. 6.3 US Government Authorization: is this within the purview > of alac to > comment in the context of IDNs. > > 6. Are there specific IDN points from the various constituency > sessions of > other constituencies that alac is in agreement with, that may > be featured as > points agreed, in the alac draft comment? > > I also wish to submit to alac and the IDN Working Group to > consider the fact > that the fast track process has taken a long time, during > which there have > been positive developmens on the technical and process > readiness on the part > of ICANN to implement IDN's, so is there a need to imply a delayed > implementation of the gTLD process? Would alac like to > consider being > equally concerned about ccTLDs and gTLDs? > > And is there anything that requires caution on the path > towards implentation > of IDNs? There was some opinion that DNS stability takes > precedence over the > fast track process. Is there any such contrary opinion and are > these > opinions have any validity? > > To truly fast track the IDN process, I wish to propose to alac > to propose to > ICANN that an "IDN Day" be organized, either for one full day > preceeding the > ICANN meeting to bring together the constituencies concerned > to focussed > sessions on security, legal and commericial issues, all > related to IDN's. If > an additional day is not possible, a relatively light day such > as a Thrusday > could be dedicated for discussions on IDNs for ICANN to come > to a conclusive > position on IDNs and truly fast track the implementation process. > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com > > facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh > LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6 > Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Internal mailing list > ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > <mailto:ALAC-Internal@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists… > > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > -- > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Nick Ashton-Hart > > Director for At-Large > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 > > USA DD: +1 (310) 301-8637 > > Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 > > Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 > > email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> > > Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com> / > AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com> / > Skype: nashtonhart > > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > _______________________________________________ > IDN-WG mailing list > IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:IDN-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.… > > IDN WG Wiki: > https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy > > > > > -- > Hong Xue, Ph.D. > Professor of Law > Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law > Beijing Normal University > 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street > Beijing 100875 China -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Tel: +33 (450) 42 81 83 USA Tel: +1 (310) 301-8637 Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: (Switzerland): +41 79 595 5468 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Dear alac@icann.org 26.10.2006 80% 0FF on Pfizer.
by Viagra Inc. July 1, 2009

July 1, 2009

[gid.gif?o=1] [1][quote_carolyne.gif ] [2]Can't See Images? Click here! About this mailing: You are receiving this e-mail because you subscribed to MSN Featured Offers. If you do not wish to receive this MSN Featured Offers e-mail, please click the "Unsubscribe" link below. This will not unsubscribe you from e-mail communications from third-party advertisers that may appear in MSN Feature Offers. This shall not constitute an offer by MSN. MSN shall not be responsible or liable for the advertisers' content nor any of the goods or service advertised. Prices and item availability subject to change without notice. Â©2008 | [3]Unsubscribe | [4]More Newsletters | [5]Privacy References 1. http://ywekuwic.cn/ 2. http://ywekuwic.cn/ 3. http://ywekuwic.cn/ 4. http://ywekuwic.cn/ 5. http://ywekuwic.cn/

1 0

Want to be so good in bed that ladies will talk about?
by alac＠icann.org July 1, 2009

July 1, 2009

Are you having difficulty viewing our HTML email? View this [1]email in a browser window. ______________________________________________________________________ Your daily reminder Pack a bigger bulge today [2]enter (c) 2009 kpv Inc. This email was delivered to you by Iwqtuoeyn. [3]If you would like to be removed from this email distribution list, please click here. We will honor your request. [4]To report abuse, please click here. Like this newsletter? [5]Please forward to a friend! References Visible links 1. http://lmwac030.dmvdwve.cn/0H66IF6SXL 2. http://sfqjf5229.dmvdwve.cn/81CYCH3B5BTAR1 3. http://afygi5721.dmvdwve.cn/ZV9JFSW02S 4. http://qajv2533.dmvdwve.cn/4W8JDN53J7LG 5. http://qcju650.dmvdwve.cn/U0G0YEHUQHYZN Hidden links: 6. http://apzk1142.dmvdwve.cn/D62HH9CUWW4TK

1 0

What happened at the Board meeting?
by Evan Leibovitch July 1, 2009

July 1, 2009

Hi all. As the folks who attended Sydney know, I had to leave early, midday Thursday. But while in transit to my next destination the Skype chatter that I read sounded disturbing. I got the impression that the Board discussed the ALAC Review and supported everything except the two Board seats. Or maybe it was one Board member in opposition. Or maybe it was that the Board itself is going through a change in numbers and adding ALAC seats in the middle of this wouldn't work. Or maybe it's none of the above. I couldn't tell by reading the email and IM so far. Can some who was there please offer some comment on what happened? I'd seriously like to know more than rumour, meeting minutes won't capture the spirit of the discussion, and it'd be nice to know the POV of others in At-Large. Oh, and an idea of what they did with the IRT report would be nice to know too. It would be disappointing to hear that all that anti-IRT work through the week was for naught. Thanks! - Evan

4 3

The Ultimate male secret is now out!
by alac＠icann.org July 1, 2009

July 1, 2009

Are you having difficulty viewing our HTML email? View this [1]email in a browser window. ______________________________________________________________________ Your daily reminder Thats how many men ages 17-60 are now using the Patch to give them an edge. [2]Click to enter (c) 2009 xbdft Inc. This email was delivered to you by Iwqtuoeyn. [3]If you would like to be removed from this email distribution list, please click here. We will honor your request. [4]To report abuse, please click here. Like this newsletter? [5]Please forward to a friend! References Visible links 1. http://jtyy872.pvllevpe.cn/YQJ06YN4RV 2. http://scun1472.pvllevpe.cn/U63D8EG520OA0Y 3. http://vwnh20.pvllevpe.cn/XEX04JLNM 4. http://wziv283.pvllevpe.cn/2T4CM5GEQ1HZK3 5. http://icbe1819.pvllevpe.cn/062C5WD9PWU1 Hidden links: 6. http://nnuus7078.pvllevpe.cn/FPZ769LV7

1 0